Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Everyone votes with their wallet

wallet with dollar bills, on top of an American flag
hartcreations/Getty Images

Sturner is the author of “Fairness Matters” and managing partner of Entourage Effect Capital.

This is the fifth entry in the “Fairness Matters” series, examining structural problems with the current political systems, critical policies issues that are going unaddressed and the state of the 2024 election.

Let me start by saying that I’m a capitalist whose study of economics was forged in business school in the early 1980s, grounded in Milton Friedman’s view of neoliberalism and an embrace of the free market. But, as any good student of Friedman will tell you, we don’t actually live in a free market economy, because our markets are distorted by the hand of the government.

But that’s just the starting point for this discussion. If you’re like me, and you too vote with your wallet, then it’s important to understand how narratives used by the politics industry distort reality and influence public opinion.


Who’s to blame for inflation?

If you buy into the GOP’s narrative, then you blame the Biden administration for the current inflationary environment. The GOP consistently cites the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 as the main culprit of our current economic climate. While that certainly has been a factor, the perception is increasingly tied to ideology rather than data. So, is the American Rescue Plan truly the main culprit or is that political theater? To answer that question we need to understand that inflation has been a constant under almost every administration over the last 100 years. So, are there other factors in play? The simple answer is: Yes!

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

First and foremost, the printing of money is ground zero when analyzing what creates inflation. Once you acknowledge that inflation is caused by the monetary supply, you quickly realize that it’s how corporations and governments react to the increase that ultimately creates price increases. Make sense?

Beyond the money supply, if you zoom out you see that our current inflationary situation is a result of many factors including supply chain issues resulting from Donald Trump’s handling of the pandemic as well as Joe Biden’s reaction to it upon taking office. More recently, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, surging demand, production costs and swaths of relief funds all have played a role, as does the central banks’ fractional reserve policies. And we can not ignore corporate greed, which is a significant driver of inflation across many sectors, from oil and gas to groceries.

It's hard to overstate the implications of this. Interest rates soared — meaning things like mortgages got more expensive — while prices of consumer goods went up, too. And those price hikes hit middle- and lower-class Americans the hardest. One tool used to resolve inflation (raising interest rates) drives up costs and unemployment. So we're losing out in every direction, all while corporations cash in.

Debunking the economic narrative

For much of the last four decades, the Republican Party has grounded its economic priorities in Reaganesque “trickle down” economics. While it is hard to argue that Ronald Reagan’s policies helped the economy recover in the aftermath of the Jimmy Carter years, does that mean that the GOP’s economic policies are preferable? And if so, to whom?

Joint Economic Committee graphic

A 2016 bipartisan report of the Joint Economic Committee of Congress concluded: “The Republican Party claims to be ‘the party of maximum economic freedom and the prosperity that freedom makes possible.’ However, an analysis of economic performance since World War II under Democratic versus Republican presidents strongly suggests that claims that Republicans are better at managing the economy are simply not true.” The committee’s research asserts that if you look at every administration dating back to the 1970s, you’ll see that each Republican White House — except Reagan’s — has tanked the economy and every time it was the succeeding Democratic administration that helped pull us out.

According to those findings, and others, the U.S. economy has performed better on average under the administration of Democratic presidents than Republicans since World War II.

The reasons for this are debatable but the observation applies to economic variables including job creation, GDP growth, stock market returns, personal income growth and corporate profits. Ten of the 11 U.S. recessions between 1953 and 2020 began under Republican presidents. Red states are actually a drain on the American public, while blue states are economic engines that subsidize the federal government. The unemployment rate has fallen on average under Democratic presidents, while it has risen on average under Republican presidents. Budget deficits relative to the size of the economy were lower on average for Democratic presidents. And then there’s the stock market.

Since 1945, the S&P 500 has averaged an annual gain of 11.2 percent during years when Democrats controlled the White House. That’s well ahead of the 6.9 percent average gain under Republicans. “The market does do better under Democratic presidential control,” said Sam Stovall, chief investment strategist at CFRA Research.

Or maybe it’s just luck. Either way, I believe that adherence to Reaganomics has not served our country. And, as I explored previously in Fairness Matters, the net effect of GOP tax cuts has been the gutting of the middle class and the hollowing out of the American dream. And it’s important to note that economists caution that if Trump is re-elected, his proposed policies could cause a sharp rise in inflation. I firmly believe we must reject the dogma that the GOP’s policies are objectively better for the economy, while opening our minds to the fact that voting for a Democrat will not invariably lead to socialism. Only then can we begin to have a common sense conversation about how to bring fiscal responsibility to the heart of our political discourse. Which we must prioritize before it’s too late.


Both parties ignore the most important foundational aspect of Friedman's neoliberalism: austerity.

Consider data from the right-leaning National Review, which found that both Barack Obama and Trump, despite criticizing their predecessors’ spending habits, ran up the national debt. And the Biden administration hasn’t changed course. Our national debt now stands at an historic $34 trillion, threatening all of our futures or is it $65 trillion.

Scott Galloway, on his "The Prof G Pod" podcast, poignantly — and accurately, in my opinion — stated when giving his prediction for 2024:

“The American dream has become a hallucination. Medium home prices continue to vastly accelerate well beyond the pace of median household incomes. The only way you could bring housing back to affordable levels is if you saw a 35 percent correction, a 4 percent decline in interest rates, or 55 percent growth in income. Which basically means, we're in for a long road here in terms of affordability. It's unlikely any of those three things would happen.”

Sadly, I find it hard to imagine, given where our culture is today, that a politician will ever get elected by telling the American public that it’s time for austerity and to start making sacrifices for our children and grandchildren. Instead, we get rhetoric and finger-pointing and no common sense solutions. The only objective conclusion we can draw from the data is that neither party really cares about fiscal responsibility.

This is why the duopoly isn't working for us. As such, we have to find a way to come together and stop blaming one party or the other for the economic reality that the duopoly has wrought.

Read More

Members of Congress standing next to a poster about Project 2025

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Patty Murray look at their Project 2025 poster during a press conference on Sept. 12.

Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

Project 2025 policies are on the Nov. 5 ballot

Corbin is professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.

It’s becoming crystal clear, as we near the Nov. 5 presidential election, that voters need to seriously check out the radical government reformation policies contained within the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025. Here’s why.

The right-wing think tank has written not one, not two, but nine “Mandate for Leadership” documents for Republican presidential candidates, with its first playbook published in 1981. The Heritage Foundation spent $22 million —serious money — in 2023 to create Project 2025 for Donald Trump to implement.

Keep ReadingShow less
screenshot of Steve Kornacki

You don't need to be Steve Kornacki to know which states (and counties) to watch on election night.

YouTube screenshot

How to win a bar bet on election night

Klug served in the House of Representatives from 1991 to 1999. He hosts the political podcast “Lost in the Middle: America’s Political Orphans.”

The odds are you don’t go to sleep at night and dream of precinct maps and tabulation deadlines like NBC’s breathless election guru Steve Kornacki. Watch him on election night and you will be dazzled and exhausted by his machine-gun-like sharing of statistics and crosstabs.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latino man standing at the counter in a bakery

"Trump wants to bring jobs back to America. For us, this means more work here and for our community,” says Joge Sactic, who owns a bakery just outside Washington, D.C.

Beatrice M. Spadacini

Small-business owner prioritizes immigration in this year’s election

Spadacini is an Italian American freelance journalist who writes about social justice and public health.

The Fulcrum presents We the People, a series elevating the voices and visibility of the persons most affected by the decisions of elected officials. In this installment, we explore the motivations of over 36 million eligible Latino voters as they prepare to make their voices heard in November.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump and Kamala Harris debating

Former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris debate on Sept. 10.

Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The state of our nation: Polling Americans’ priorities for election 2024

Originally published by The 19th.

This is the third annual poll from The 19th and SurveyMonkey, designed to shed light on what women, particularly women of color, and LGBTQ+ people think about the issues animating our politics. It comes as Americans face another critical election, one that could make Democrat Kamala Harris the first woman to hold the country’s highest office or give Republican Donald Trump a second term. Here’s what we learned about how Americans view the candidates, as well as opinions on abortion and on reproductive care more broadly, the ability to access gender-affirming care and more.

Keep ReadingShow less
Taylor Swift

Taylor Swift made another call for peopleto register to vote at the Video Music Awards on Thursday.

Christopher Polk/Billboard via Getty Images

What will Taylor Swift's endorsement of Kamala Harris mean?

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

On Sep 11, we reported in The Fulcrum thatTaylor Swift had entered the political fray by endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris for president of the United States. I ended the article by stating that “the full extent of her impact remains to be seen.”

Now only a few days later, some data is already suggesting the impact could be significant. The day after Swift endorsed Harris there was a significant surge of visitors to Vote.gov, the U.S. government website that helps citizens understand how they can register to vote. According to a spokesperson for the Government Services Administration, Swift’s endorsement on Instagram led directly to 337,826 people visiting the site.

Keep ReadingShow less