Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The 10 states where patriotism is the most (and least) measurable

Map of USA with flag
David Gn Photography/Getty Images

New Hampshire is the most patriotic place in the country, based on its residents' strong measure of civic engagement and decently high rate of military service. And New Jersey, just four hours by car to the south, is the least flag-waving state.

These results come from the latest rankings of the states from the personal financial services website Wallet Hub, which churns out a steady diet of reports assessing the "best" and "worst" states on all sorts of social, economic and behavioral scales.

The new report was released Monday in plenty of time to be digested before July Fourth, but also in light of the unusual combination of stresses likely limiting patriotic fervor this summer. The coronavirus pandemic, and the nationwide protests against police brutality and systemic racism, are magnifying an incredibly divisive political landscape already getting heightened in an election year.



Source: WalletHub


"Many people may find it hard to celebrate a country in which racist incidents persist," Wallet Hub noted, and the customary array of parades, fireworks displays and cookouts will likely be limited by social distancing requirements in many parts of the county. But it's important to note that there are plenty of ways Americans can express patriotism year-round," the company said, Include thanking our servicemembers, remaining politically active, buying U.S.-made goods, taking time to learn about our history or volunteering to help your fellow Americans."

The study compared the states across 13 key indicators of patriotism, ranging from the number of military enlistees and veterans in each state to the share of adults who voted in the 2016 presidential and primary elections and the number of AmeriCorps and Peace Corps volunteers per capita. Three-quarters of the points were awarded for civic engagement and the rest for commitment to military service.

The top possible score was 100, but New Hampshire came in at No. 1 with a 64 — while New Jersey's 22 was the lowest red-white-and-blue tally.

Delaware, the home of presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, came in 31st. But New York, which President Trump has called home his whole life, came in 49th — for a variety of reasons. It has only 54 veterans for every thousand residents, for example, a small fraction of the 127 per 1,000 veteran population of Alaska, the highest share of any state.

Maine, the 15th most patriotic state, had the highest share of adults who voted in the 2016 presidential election: 73 percent. Hawaii had the lowest turnout, at 47 percent, one reason its patriotism ranking was 38th place.

While stressing the virtues of patriotism even in a highly partisan time, Wallet Hub also concluded that states that vote reliably Republican for president are generally more patriotic than those on which the Democratic nominee can count

And, of the top 10 highest scorers, six can be counted on to be colored red in November while only Maryland will be blue. (New Hampshire, Minnesota and Wisconsin are purple for now.)

1. New Hampshire (64 points)
2. Wyoming (62)
3. Idaho (62)
4. Alaska (61)
5. Maryland (61)
6. Utah (61)
7. North Dakota (60)
8. Wisconsin (60)
9. Minnesota (57)
10. South Carolina (57)

Al the other end of the list is something of a mirror image: Six blue states, solidly red West Virginia and three of the biggest battlegrounds: Florida, Texas and Michigan

41. Illinois (32)
42. Michigan (32)
43. Connecticut (31)
44. New Mexico (31)
45. Florida (30)
46. West Virginia (28)
47. Texas (28)
48. California (24)
49. New York (23)
50. New Jersey (22 points)


Read More

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Close-up of sign reading 'Immigrants Make America Great' at a Baltimore rally.

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Donald Trump’s second administration has fully clarified Latinos’ racial position in America: our ethnic group’s labor, culture, and aspirations are too much for his supporters to stomach. The Latino presence in America triggers too many uneasy questions (are they White?), too many doubts (are they really American?), and too much resentment (why are they doing better than me?).

Trump’s targeted deportations of undocumented Latinos, unwarranted arrests of Latino citizens, and heightened ICE presence in Latino neighborhoods address these worries by lumping Latinos with Black people. Simply put, we have become yet another visible population that America socially stigmatizes, economically exploits, and politically terrorizes because aggrieved White adults want to preserve their rank as our nation’s premier racial group. The cumulative impacts are serious: just yesterday, an international panel of investigators on human rights and racism, backed by the U.N., found that such actions have resulted in “grave human rights violations.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: The SAVE Act and the Future of Voter ID Rules
A close up of a window with a sticker on it
Photo by Zach Wear on Unsplash

Just the Facts: The SAVE Act and the Future of Voter ID Rules

Last week, I wrote a column in the Fulcrum entitled “Just the Facts: Voter ID, States’ Powers, and Federal Limits.” The facts presented in that writing made it clear that the U.S. Constitution does not require voter ID and left almost all election administration—including voter qualifications—to the states. However, over time, constitutional amendments and federal statutes have restricted states’ ability to impose discriminatory voting rules, but they have never mandated voter ID.

The SAVE America Act

The national debate over voter ID has entered a new phase with the introduction of the SAVE America Act, the most sweeping federal voter‑identification and citizenship‑documentation proposal in modern history. For more than two centuries, voter eligibility rules—ID included—have been primarily a matter of state authority, bounded by constitutional protections against discrimination. The SAVE America Act would shift that balance by imposing federal requirements for both photo identification and documentary proof of citizenship in federal elections.

Keep ReadingShow less
Posters are displayed next to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) as he speaks at a news conference to unveil the Take It Down Act to protect victims against non-consensual intimate image abuse, on Capitol Hill on June 18, 2024 in Washington, DC.

A lawsuit against xAI over AI-generated deepfakes targeting teenage girls exposes a growing crisis in schools. As laws struggle to keep up, this story explores AI accountability, teen safety, and what educators and parents must do now.

Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

Deepfakes: The New Face of Cyberbullying and Why Parents, Schools, and Lawmakers Must Act

As a former teacher who worked in a high school when Snapchat was born, I witnessed the birth of sexting and its impact on teens. I recall asking a parent whether he was checking his daughter’s phone for inappropriate messages. His response was, “sometimes you just don’t want to know.” But the federal lawsuit filed last week against Elon Musk's xAI has put a national spotlight on AI-generated deepfakes and the teenage girls they target. Parents and teachers can’t ignore the crisis inside our schools.

AI Companies Built the Tool. The Grok Lawsuit Says They Own the Damage.

Whether the theory of French prosecutors–that Elon Musk deliberately allowed the sexualized image controversy to grow so that it would drive up activity on the platform and boost the company’s valuation–is true or not, when a company makes the decision to build a tool and knows that it can be weaponized but chooses to release it anyway, they are making a risk-based decision believing that they can act without consequence. The Grok lawsuit could make these types of business decisions much more costly.

Keep ReadingShow less