Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories
Source: WalletHub

10 states where party planners can host (and avoid) representative primaries

Source: WalletHub
Source: WalletHub

Illinois should host the first presidential primaries if the goal is to pick a state that most closely matches the demographics of the country.

And Vermont, the home state of Democratic front-runner Bernie Sanders, should have minimal influence over the process because its makeup is least similar to the entire United States — meaning the results from that state would be hardly at all predictive of the nation's views.

Those are among the conclusions out Thursday from the personal financial services website Wallet Hub, which has been churning out a series of reports this winter hoping to point political leaders toward helpful data for picking candidates in a more democratically sustainable way.


Once again this year, the Democratic Party has taken heat for its decision to hold its first two contests in a pair of states with abnormally high shares of white voters. But Wallet Hub expects the parties want to look beyond racial makeup if they're in search of places to hold potentially dispositive contests in 2024 and beyond.

And so they compiled and weighted an enormous amount of data about the demographics, economies, education levels, religious affiliations, and partisan and public policy attitudes of all 50 states.

Turns out, Iowa is an 89 percent match with the country — a good if not great No. 17 on the national list, highest among the four early voting states. But only seven states are less of a national mirror than New Hampshire, at 82 percent.

South Carolina, which will vote on Saturday, is near the middle. But as its leaders have advertised for decades, it does have the third highest level of political engagement among African Americans by Wallet Hub's calculus.

Unsurprisingly, seven states that are expected to be contested by both parties in the November presidential election end up among the 10 that are the closest match for the country, according to what the company has labeled its 2020 Electorate Representation Index:

  1. Illinois (95 percent match)
  2. Florida (94 percent)
  3. Michigan (93 percent)
  4. Arizona (92 percent)
  5. Ohio (92 percent)
  6. Pennsylvania (92 percent)
  7. Virginia (92 percent)
  8. Delaware (92 percent)
  9. North Carolina (91 percent)
  10. Indiana (90 percent)

Also unsurprisingly, only two of the 10 states least representative of the entire United States (New Hampshire and Maine) are at all competitive in the general election. Six of the rest can reliably be colored bright red now on the Electoral College map:

  1. Wyoming (83 percent)
  2. Arkansas (83 percent)
  3. New Hampshire (82 percent)
  4. Maine (82 percent)
  5. Alabama (81 percent)
  6. Massachusetts (80 percent)
  7. West Virginia (80 percent)
  8. Utah (78 percent)
  9. Mississippi (78 percent)
  10. Vermont (only a 77 percent match)

www.youtube.com


Source: WalletHub

Read More

President Trump answers questions from reporters.

U.S. President Donald Trump answers questions from reporters before boarding Air Force One on August 21, 2026 in Joint Base Andrews, Maryland.

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Trump’s White House Press Ban Violates 1st Amendment

The principle is simple. Just like politicians are not supposed to pick their voters, government officials don’t get to pick the reporters who cover them.

If they did, the First Amendment would be meaningless. and we would no longer live in anything resembling a constitutional republic. That is why President Trump’s September 18 announcement that he is banning reporters from CNN, MSNow, and Politico from the White House is so dangerous.

Keep ReadingShow less
White marble exterior of the United States Capitol, often called the Capitol Building, is the home of the United States Congress and the seat of the legislative branch of the U.S. federal government

The CLARITY Act crypto bill failed a procedural vote on Sept. 15, but it could return. Here's what it does, who would regulate crypto, and the Trump angle.

Richard Sharrocks / Getty Images

The CLARITY Act

The CLARITY Act

The CLARITY Act, which failed in a procedural vote on Sept. 15, and a new venture by the Trump family’s World Liberty Financial cryptocurrency company made us think it was time to write about the cryptocurrency legislation. Even though it’s not currently active, the bill could come back.

Keep ReadingShow less
When Money Trumps Life

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during the 81st session of the United Nations (U.N.) General Assembly at U.N. Headquarters on September 22, 2026 in New York City.

Alexi J. Rosenfeld/Getty Images

When Money Trumps Life

Last week at the United Nations, Donald Trump showed the world just how little he values human life. In a single speech, he rattled off a laundry list of “hoaxes” to write off: climate change, AI, “Russia hoax,” “Ukraine hoax,” and more. Climate change, AI, and modern warfare all pose existential threats to civilization as we know it, and yet our president seems hellbent on gaslighting our fears while accelerating problems that threaten our survival. What would make a person behave in such a self-sabotaging way? Well, perhaps we should, as they say, follow the money.

Earlier this month, the UN warned that Earth is already 1.4°C hotter than before the industrial age and set to blow past the 1.5°C limit in the next few years. The World Health Organization projects that such warming will cause roughly 250,000 additional deaths a year starting in 2030. Any leader who values human life should recognize this as the existential threat it is and change course. Instead, Trump has pulled the U.S. out of the UN's founding climate treaty, and his EPA scrapped the scientific finding underpinning federal limits on greenhouse gas emissions. Meanwhile, in the first six months since launching his war in Iran, Trump's nine largest oil and gas holdings gained up to $4.4 million.

Keep ReadingShow less
US Supreme Court building in Washington, DC.
a group of people standing in front of a building
Photo by Stephen Talas on Unsplash

Supreme Court Restores Flawed Federal Voter‑Check System

On September 22nd, a Supreme Court majority declined to halt the Trump-Vance administration from reinstating a controversial citizenship-verification program that repeatedly misidentified eligible voters as non-citizens.

The ruling, issued on the Court’s shadow docket, lifts a lower-court order that blocked the Department of Homeland Security from using its SAVE database to flag voters for removal. SAVE checks state-submitted information—such as name, date of birth, and sometimes Social Security number—against federal immigration records to determine whether someone is a U.S. citizen. If the information doesn't match exactly or the records are outdated, eligible voters can be incorrectly flagged as non-citizens.

Keep ReadingShow less