Skip to content
Project 2025
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories
Tracy Chapman and Luke Combs on stage

Luke Combs, politics and healing our nation's divide

J.D. Vance and Matt Gaetz talking to each while walking

Trump’s kakistocracy invites possible catastrophe

Red elephants and blue donkeys

America's two-party system is failing us

The 10 states where the electorate looks the most like the population

people U.S. map
SiberianArt/Getty Images
Our Staff
By Our StaffOct 23, 2020
Our Staff
The Fulcrum staff.
See More Writings by author

There are some notable disparities between the share of Americans considered reliable voters and the actual demographic makeup of the country.

The people most likely to turn up at the polls every election are generally older, richer, whiter and a tiny bit more female than the population on the whole. But a new analysis from the personal financial services website WalletHub reveals that the electorate in some states comes much closer than others to reflecting the gender, racial and age makeups of the places where they live.

Source: WalletHub

WalletHub compared the 2016 presidential electorate in each state to its overall population to generate its Voter Representation Index. A perfect score of 100 would mean the voter demographics and the population demographics were identical. None were. But deep blue Maryland came closest, scoring a 95 — trailed closely by neighboring and almost as reliably Democratic Virginia, followed by predictably Republican Indiana and battleground Pennsylvania.

The report also analyzed how voters nationally compared to the overall population four years ago. The match was 87 percent overall, because the 2016 electorate was 2 percentage points more female (at 54 percent), 4 points more white (at 73 percent), 3 points older (24 percent had passed their 65th birthday), 7 points more married (59 percent) and 5 points more wealthy (37 percent had income above $100 ,000).

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The scores of the 50 states were all bunched pretty close together, to be sure. Solidly red South Dakota has the biggest difference between its people and its voters, but still there was a 79 percent match.The 10 states with the closest correlation:

  1. Maryland (95)
  2. Virginia (94)
  3. Indiana (93)
  4. Pennsylvania (93)
  5. Minnesota (91)
  6. Oregon (91)
  7. Massachusetts (91)
  8. Nevada (91)
  9. Wyoming (91)
  10. New Jersey (90)

The 10 states with the least correlation:

      1. Idaho (85)
      2. Nebraska (85)
      3. Hawaii (85)
      4. Kentucky (85)
      5. Illinois (84)
      6. Washington (84)
      7. Florida (84)
      8. Tennessee (84)
      9. Kansas (82)
      10. South Dakota (79)

      Latest news

      Donald Trump and Joe Biden in the Oval Office
      Election 2024

      Selfish Biden has given us four years of Trump

      Read More

      Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

      Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

      Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

      Listen now

      Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

      Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

      There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

      On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

      Your Take: The Price of Freedom

      Your Take: The Price of Freedom

      Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

      What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

      It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

      One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

      Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

      Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

      Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

      I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

      Keep ReadingShow less
      No, autocracies don't make economies great

      libre de droit/Getty Images

      No, autocracies don't make economies great

      Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

      One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

      In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

      Keep ReadingShow less
      © Copyright 2024