Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Dems blame everything but themselves for losing

Woman holding a sign that reads "This is a time to roll up our sleeves."

A protestor holds up a sign with a quote from Vice President Kamala Harris at the Women's March rally outside the Heritage Foundation on Nov. 9.

Shannon Finney/Getty Images

It’s tough sledding for Democrats, as they try to wrap their heads around Donald Trump’s improbable-but-also-foreseeable sweep of all seven swing states and winning the popular vote.

This wasn’t supposed to happen, after all. Democrats genuinely believed — as they did in 2016 — that Trump’s many odious qualities would be enough to keep him far away from the White House again.

And if for some reason that wasn’t enough for most Americans, they had in Vice President Kamala Harris a woman of color who, apparently, by virtue of her identity alone, would help seal the deal among those voting demographics.


And if that wasn’t enough, there was always … Beyoncé.

But it didn’t go that way. Voters overlooked Trump’s crimes and insults. Plenty of women and voters of color didn’t vote for Harris just because she was a woman or a minority, and celebrities didn’t deliver a Dem to the White House. And so the blame games have begun.

In a closed-door meeting for House Democrats last week, one congressional member suggested it’s party consultants who are to blame for reelection failures down-ballot.

But candidates with ears shouldn’t have needed consultants to tell them what voters already were — that they were worried about the economy.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Another member blamed President Biden’s support of Israel in the Gaza war for Dems’ losses. But just 4% of national voters named foreign policy as their top issue at the polls — and among Harris voters, it was just 3%.

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi blames Biden for staying in the race too long. At least some in the Harris camp do, too, with one aide saying, “Joe Biden is the singular reason Kamala Harris and Democrats lost tonight.”

But over in Biden world, some fingers are pointing back at Harris for “benching” the president. Another wondered, “How did you spend $1 billion and not win? What the f***?”

Among some progressive voices, there’s another culprit: White women.

MSNBC host Joy Reid argued, “This will be the second opportunity that white women in this country have to change the way that they interact with the patriarchy,” she said.

Another MSNBC host, Symone Sanders-Townsend, also pointed a finger at white women: “I understand there are white women out there that voted for Kamala Harris, but baby 52% of y’all voted for Donald Trump. And this was not the first time. So you’ve got to come together and address it internally.”

Huh? The voters who didn’t vote for your candidate have to discuss amongst themselves why they let you down — instead of Dems asking what they did to lose that voting bloc?

This all ignores some very obvious, but apparently painful, realities for Democrats: their policies are unpopular.

If we take voters at their word — and we’d be wise to — the economy was by far their No. 1 concern throughout this election.

A majority of voters with a total household income under $50,000 voted for Trump. A majority of voters making more than $100,000 voted for Harris. Among people who said their family’s financial situation is better today than four years ago, 82% voted for Harris. Only 14% voted for Trump. Among people who said inflation caused their family severe hardship, 74% voted for Trump. Of people who said the economy is not so good or poor, 70% voted for Trump.

Don’t these numbers tell you just as much, if not more, about why people voted for Trump?

This was a clear rejection of Biden and Harris’ inflationary economic policy— stimulus checks, tariff hikes, student loan forgiveness, anti-tech and antitrust policy, and regulatory burdens on small businesses.

On immigration, voters also resoundingly rejected Democrats’ asylum policy of open borders and sanctuary cities. Not because voters are racist, but because the policy demonstrably doesn’t work — just ask Democratic mayors and governors.

On crime, voters rejected Dems’ soft-on-crime policies — slashing police budgets, refusing to prosecute entire categories of offenders, and releasing violent criminals back onto the streets.

But for any political party, policy, even if it’s obviously bad, is the hardest thing to part with or even re-examine. It’s why you hear so much more about needing to tweak messaging, improve the ground game, reach new voters, field fresh candidates, and other things that ignore the obvious — that voters don’t think your policies are working.

And there are plenty of policy areas where majorities agree with Democrats — abortion being just one.

But it seems like the left is determined to make this excruciating loss about messaging, identity politics, and the inherent awfulness of voters.

In the words of one Dem consultant, “Kamala Harris wasn’t a flawed candidate. America is a flawed country.” Trust me, that’s no way to win voters back.

Solving their problems through policy is.

Cupp is the host of "S.E. Cupp Unfiltered" on CNN.

©2024 S.E. Cupp. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Read More

Donald Trump and his family on stage

President-elect Donald Trump claimed a mandate on Nov. 6.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Elections don’t tell leaders what voters want. 2024 was no exception.

Interpreting the meaning of any election is no easy task. In a democracy, the results never speak for themselves. That is as true of the 2024 presidential election as it has been for any other.

This year, as is the case every four years, the battle to say what the results mean and what lessons the winning candidate should learn began as soon as the voters were counted. But, alas, elections don’t speak for themselves.

Keep ReadingShow less
Young people cheering

Supporters cheer during a campaign event with Vice President Kamala Harris at Temple University in Philadelphia on Aug. 6.

Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The youth have spoken in favor of Harris, but it was close

For many young voters, the 2024 presidential election was the moment they had been waiting for. Months of protests and demonstrations and two political conventions had all led to this — the opportunity to exercise their democratic rights and have a say in their future.

While Donald Trump won the election, Kamala Harris won among young voters. But even though 18- to 29-year-olds provided the strongest support for Harris, President Joe Biden did better with that cohort four years ago.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand-drawn Pilgrim hat with the words "Happy Thanksgiving"
mushroomstore/Getty Images

This Thanksgiving, it's not only OK but necessary to talk politics

This Thanksgiving, do not follow the old maxim that we should never discuss politics at the dinner table.

Many people's emotions are running high right now. Elections often bring out a wide range of feelings, whether pride and optimism for those who are pleased with the results or disappointment and frustration from those who aren’t. After a long and grueling election season, we need to connect with and not avoid one another.

Keep ReadingShow less
Men in "Dominicans for Trump" shirts

Attendees cheer as former President Donald Trump speaks on stage during a campaign rally in Allentown, Pa.,. in October.

Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post via Getty Images

The great Latino apology: It’s ‘the street,’ stupid

Donald Trump secured a surprising 43 percent of the Latino vote, enough to swing the election in his favor. Now, Democrats are forced to confront the fallout of their failure, which is rooted in decades of disinvestment and disregard for the diverse Latino communities. Articles, conferences and white papers have warned of these consequences for years.

Those familiar with Latino politics know that Latinos voting for Republicans is nothing new. Historically, Cuban Americans and some South American groups have formed a solid Republican voting bloc. What’s new is the recent shift among Mexican Americans, Central Americans and Puerto Ricans. Was it religion? Racism? Machismo? Misogyny? Negative experiences with government in the United States and home countries? A look at Mexico and its first female president (of Jewish descent) this year might challenge some of these assumptions. Whether this shift is permanent remains to be seen.

Keep ReadingShow less