Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Texas civil rights group fights for online voter registration

Texas civil rights group fights for online voter registration
nilakkus/Getty Images

A civil rights group on Tuesday renewed a four-year-old courtroom campaign to force the state of Texas to adopt online voter registration.

An attorney with the Texas Civil Rights Project told a federal judge that Texans should be allowed to register to vote when they use online systems to apply for or renew their driver's licenses in accordance with the National Voter Registration Act, a 1993 federal law passed before Microsoft released Internet Explorer.


Thirty-eight states and the District of Columbia have adopted laws that will allow a person to register to vote online before the 2020 presidential election.

Beth Stevens, the attorney for the Texas Civil Rights Project, argued the state had no intention of making it easier for people to vote, asking U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia to force the state to adopt online voter registration, the Austin American-Statesman reported.

State officials countered that Texas complies with the "motor voter law" by allowing a person to register to vote in person at Department of Public Safety offices but nothing in federal or state law requires online registration.

Currently, a person applying for or updating their license through the DPS website only has the option of clicking a link that opens a printable voter registration form that must be signed by hand and mailed to election officials.

The Texas Civil Rights Project first sued the state in 2016 over its lack of an online registration option. Garcia, the judge hearing the current case, ruled in favor of the civil rights group in 2018, but the decision was overturned after an appeals court found the plaintiffs — four Texans — no longer had standing because they had successfully registered to vote while the case was on appeal.

MOVE Texas and the League of Women Voters of Texas have joined the latest lawsuit, claiming the lack of online registration forces the groups to spend more time and money registering people in person.

Read More

Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an ‘F’
Independent Voter News

Princeton Gerrymandering Project Gives California Prop 50 an ‘F’

The special election for California Prop 50 wraps up November 4 and recent polling shows the odds strongly favor its passage. The measure suspends the state’s independent congressional map for a legislative gerrymander that Princeton grades as one of the worst in the nation.

The Princeton Gerrymandering Project developed a “Redistricting Report Card” that takes metrics of partisan and racial performance data in all 50 states and converts it into a grade for partisan fairness, competitiveness, and geographic features.

Keep ReadingShow less
"Vote Here" sign

America’s political system is broken — but ranked choice voting and proportional representation could fix it.

Stephen Maturen/Getty Images

Election Reform Turns Down the Temperature of Our Politics

Politics isn’t working for most Americans. Our government can’t keep the lights on. The cost of living continues to rise. Our nation is reeling from recent acts of political violence.

79% of voters say the U.S. is in a political crisis, and 64% say our political system is too divided to solve the nation’s problems.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. President Barack Obama speaking on the phone in the Oval Office.

U.S. President Barack Obama talks President Barack Obama talks with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan during a phone call from the Oval Office on November 2, 2009 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, The White House

‘Obama, You're 15 Years Too Late!’

The mid-decade redistricting fight continues, while the word “hypocrisy” has become increasingly common in the media.

The origin of mid-decade redistricting dates back to the early history of the United States. However, its resurgence and legal acceptance primarily stem from the Texas redistricting effort in 2003, a controversial move by the Republican Party to redraw the state's congressional districts, and the 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry. This decision, which confirmed that mid-decade redistricting is not prohibited by federal law, was a significant turning point in the acceptance of this practice.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand of a person casting a ballot at a polling station during voting.

Gerrymandering silences communities and distorts elections. Proportional representation offers a proven path to fairer maps and real democracy.

Getty Images, bizoo_n

Gerrymandering Today, Gerrymandering Tomorrow, Gerrymandering Forever

In 1963, Alabama Governor George Wallace declared, "Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever." (Watch the video of his speech.) As a politically aware high school senior, I was shocked by the venom and anger in his voice—the open, defiant embrace of systematic disenfranchisement, so different from the quieter racism I knew growing up outside Boston.

Today, watching politicians openly rig elections, I feel that same disbelief—especially seeing Republican leaders embrace that same systematic approach: gerrymandering now, gerrymandering tomorrow, gerrymandering forever.

Keep ReadingShow less