Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

​​Five-week report card on Trump 2.0

Opinion

Donald Trump

Donald Trump

Jeff Bottari/Zuffa LLC via Getty Images

According to Forbes, New York Magazine, Time, and Inside Higher Education, Donald Trump sent letters to high schools and colleges attended, plus SAT College Board personnel, threatening them with legal action if they released his academic records. One certainly might wonder why a 78-year-old man elected to the highest office in the U.S. would spend time focusing on this issue, which is relatively meaningless compared to one’s strength of character, integrity, honesty, and work ethic.

The grading that really matters is the grades the American public gives Mr. Trump during his first 100 days of office or 180 days -- according to the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 playbook -- as the time designed for Trump to implement their proposals. Trump’s actions will be graded by the world for eternity.


America’s 335 million citizens, especially the ~51 percent of voters who voted for someone else to become USA’s 47th president, deserve a five-week report card on Trump’s 2.0 endeavors. Recall Trump said at the 2024 Republican National Convention he was running for president “for all of America, not half of America because there is no victory in winning half of America.”

Twenty-nine issues have come front and center before the public since Jan. 20. Let’s see what the majority of citizens think of Trump’s 2.0 presidency to date:

  • A Feb. 19 Quinnipiac poll revealed the majority of Americans feel Trump has failed on seven issues: immigration, economy, foreign policy, trade, federal workforce, Russia-Ukraine war, and Israel-Hamas conflict.
  • According to a new Pew Research Center survey, 56 percent of U.S. adults disapprove of Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship (February 21).
  • Since January 20, Trump has signed 64 executive orders and issued 27 proclamations while more than 70 lawsuits have been filed against Trump for his – most constitutional law professors have said- anti-democratic and anti-constitutional actions. Hence, a February 14 Pew Research Center survey found that “65 percent of U.S. adults say it would be `too risky’ to give Trump more power to deal directly with many of the nation’s problems.”
  • According to Data for Progress, a super majority of voters oppose Trump’s proposal to take ownership of Greenland, Canada, Panama Canal, and Gaza.
  • A YouGov poll revealed that the vast majority of Americans oppose Trump ending humanitarian aid to foreign countries (USAID), abolishing the Department of Education, and disbanding OSHA (ibid).
  • Only 24 percent of Americans approve of Donald Trump withholding congressionally appropriated funds (ibid).
  • President Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance said judges should not have the power to review or block executive actions; 3 out of 5 Americans disagree (ibid).
  • Of the 16 federal bodies (e.g., NASA, FBI, CIA, FEMA, USAID, DOGE-Department of Government Efficiency, etc.), the one that is the least favorable by Americans is DOGE, created by Mr. Trump (ibid).
  • In separate Quinnipiac and Pew Research Center polls, 54-55 percent of voters think Elon Musk has too much power in making decisions affecting America (Politico, Feb. 19).
  • Only 12 percent of Americans think Trump should seek out billionaires’ policy advice (AP/NORC poll).
  • Two-thirds of consumers think Trump isn’t focused enough on the prices of products, which he said would be lowered on January 20 (CBS News).
  • A majority to a supermajority of Americans oppose Trump’s plan to impose tariffs on goods imported from Mexico, Canada, and Europe (ibid), identified by the conservative Wall Street Journal editorial board as “the dumbest trade war in history” (February 1-2).
  • Trump shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), whereby farmers purchase $2 billion in agricultural products annually, and research is conducted at institutions like Iowa State University, Virginia Tech, and hundreds of other major universities (KCCI Des Moines).
  • Due to Trump’s actions, the National Federation of Independent Business’s uncertainty index for small businesses recently reached its third highest level, coinciding with Stanford’s index of policy uncertainty for big businesses (Wall Street Journal, Feb. 12).
  • Trump’s program to deport immigrants illegally residing in America receives 59 percent approval (CBS News); Trump hits a home run with this issue.

To date, Trump has failed to serve the majority of Americans on 28 of 29 issues that are of importance. Evidence is replete Trump has not fulfilled his promise of being a president “for all of America.”

There are two additional developments that need to be mentioned. First, support for Trump by farmers, teachers, civil servants, CEOs, adults aged 18-44, and people 65 and over is rapidly declining. Secondly, a February 3-16 Gallup poll revealed Trump has a 45 percent job approval rating, which is 15 percent below the historical average for 10 other presidents elected since 1953.

With five weeks down in Trump 2.0 and 203 weeks to go, as Alexander Pope said in his 1733 poem, “hope springs eternal” ... though it seems unlikely.

Steve Corbin is a professor emeritus of marketing at the University of Northern Iowa.


Read More

US Capitol building
The United States Capitol building with its white dome against a blue sky

Would Congressional Term Limits Make Congress Better—or Worse?

Starting in the 1990’s, the idea of putting term limits on members of Congress became a recurring idea to reform the institution and improve democracy. The idea was born out of the theory that replacing the current crop of legislators with a new batch would produce a better Congress. More than 30 years later we now have quantitative and qualitative data showing the impact of term limits.

Twenty-one state legislatures have enacted some kind of term limit on legislators since 1990. Since then, dozens of academic studies have examined the impact on such factors as: complexity of legislation, influence of lobbyists and staff on legislative outcomes, and interactions with constituent. Here are some key findings.

Keep ReadingShow less
Hand points to the word tax on a screen

Data calculations

Getty Images

Inconvenient Numbers Are a Sign the System Works

Earlier in October, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that consumer prices rose 3.7 percent over the past year, a little higher than the month before, with gasoline accounting for more than half of September's increase. Rising prices are the kind of news no incumbent politician wants weeks before an election. The report was published anyway, on schedule. That is the quiet discipline of a trustworthy statistical system. It tells us what is true even when the number is unwelcome to whoever holds power.

So, do Americans trust government data? We do. But that trust is incomplete, and it has room to grow.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

The Pennsylvania state capitol building.

jimfeng/Getty Images

Pennsylvania’s Bipartisan Exchange Is Rebuilding Trust in Governance

The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics has nearly 40 years of experience working with legislators from different political parties, and it is building on this history by drawing on lessons from the successful American Congressional Exchange model, begun in 2018 at the Bipartisan Policy Center, and from state exchanges now underway in Minnesota and Michigan. The University of Pittsburgh Institute of Politics, in collaboration with the Bridge Alliance, has launched the Pennsylvania Legislative Exchange.

This state-based, systematic approach is designed to foster better relationships and build trust across the political aisle with the following guiding principles:

Keep ReadingShow less
An empty grocery cart in a market.

NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani proposes five city-run grocery stores. See the arguments for and against, from food deserts to bodega concerns and the $70M cost.

Getty Images, Kwangmoozaa

Government-Owned Grocery Stores: Accessible Nutrition or Government Overreach?

Issue Introduction

Over the past few years, affordability has become the most central issue affecting Americans and the quality of life in the United States. The prices of groceries and basic necessities have risen 25-30% since the COVID-19 pandemic and are projected to rise another 3.2% in 2026. At the same time, the exodus of grocery chains from rural and low-income areas has scattered food deserts throughout individual states. Recent mass closures include Grocery Outlet’s shuttering of 36 stores and continued shut-downs of many Albertsons locations. These factors have led politicians to make affordability a major campaign issue.

During his progressive campaign for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani raised the idea of opening grocery stores owned and operated by the city government to provide New Yorkers with affordable groceries. In his April 2026 public address that marked his first 100 days in office, Mayor Mamdani announced plans for the first of five city-run grocery stores. Mamdani’s proposed initiative will use $70 million in capital funding to build five city-owned municipal stores–one in each borough–and place them under control of the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). NYCEDC will then select third-party operating staff in accordance with city standards for affordability and proper labor practices. Public opinion following the announcement continues to be divided between uproar and support.

Keep ReadingShow less