Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Fight for Immigrant Rights in Maryland’s Latino Communities

News

The Fight for Immigrant Rights in Maryland’s Latino Communities

immigration

On a chilly Saturday morning at a Maryland public high school, where one in four students is of Hispanic origin, about twenty-five Latino students and parents gather to hear attorney José Campos explain what to do if U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents show up at their home. “Regardless of your status, you have constitutional rights,” Campos says.

After showing the group what an official judicial warrant looks like, the lawyer urges them to memorize “five magic phrases.” The slide he pulls up reads: “I do not want to talk with you; I do not want you to come inside; Leave; I do not want you to search anything, and I want my lawyer.” And remember, he adds, “Always turn your phone camera on. Record what is happening. Don’t let them intimidate you.”


This is easier said than done as anxiety among Latino communities across Maryland, which represent the third largest ethnic group in the state and make up approximately 11 percent of the population, is growing, and young people are experiencing it first-hand.

“My mom has been very anxious lately,” says “Monica,” a 17-year-old student attending the Saturday meeting with the Fulcrum. Her mother is from Nicaragua and does not have legal status in the U.S. despite being here for twenty years. “She is my protector, and I have never seen her this worried before.” “Monica,” born in the U.S., says that if her mom is deported, she will go live with her dad, a U.S. citizen. “I have many opportunities here, but if I were to leave with my mom, all her efforts would be in vain.” The Fulcrum uses a pseudonym for “Monica,” per her request.

Across the state, schools host “Know your Rights” meetings like the one at a Montgomery County High School, which the Parent Teachers’ Association organized. Information is power, and Monica, as the editor of the Spanish language school newspaper, is leveraging her passion for journalism to launch a podcast in Spanish where immigrants can get answers to their questions from a network of pro bono lawyers. “People must educate themselves, and social media cannot be their only source of information. A podcast is accessible and low-cost.”

Ayuda Facebook Page

Resources like Ayuda are crucial for informing immigrants about their rights as ICE quietly expands its collaboration with local enforcement agencies through the 287 (g) Program, named after Section 287 (g) of the 1996 Immigration and Nationality Act. This allows the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to sign agreements with state or local enforcement authorities that authorize them to act as ICE agents. A fact sheet on the 287 (g) program by the American Immigration Council states that as of December 2024, ICE had agreements with 135 state and local law enforcement agencies across 21 states.

Though only three counties in Maryland have such agreements with ICE—Cecil, Frederick, and Harford counties—immigrant rights organizations are striking back hard to counter President Donald Trump's mass deportation agenda. In early February, CASA Maryland joined forces with other civil society allies and faith institutions to push for three bills to protect immigrants in Maryland. One of them, the Maryland Values Act, is aimed explicitly at terminating 287 (g) agreements in the state.

At a rally held in front of the Maryland State House on February 4th, Ashanti Martinez, Chair of the Maryland Legislative Latino Caucus, said in a press statement by CASA MD, “I know that all of us here understand what’s on our shoulders – the responsibility that we have to make sure that every family, no matter what your status is, feels protected, loved, seen, and valued here in Maryland. We value personhood more than status.”

The Protecting Sensitive Locations Act, the second piece of legislation introduced by CASA Maryland and allies, establishes clear guidelines for limiting ICE access to what are often referred to as “sensitive locations.” These include schools, courthouses, hospitals, places of worship, and other sensitive locations.

A win related to this motion came on February 24 th, when U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang in Maryland ordered ICE not to conduct immigration enforcement actions “in or near places of worship.” The judge responded to a complaint filed by the Quakers and other religious groups about their constituents’ rights. While a setback for President Trump’s mass deportation agenda, the ruling applies only to one sensitive location.

The final piece of legislation is the Maryland Privacy Act, sponsored by state delegate Lorig Charkoudian and state senator Clarence Lam. This bill requires ICE to have a warrant to access Maryland residents' private state and local agency data. Under state law, undocumented immigrants can still obtain a driver’s license or identification card.

- YouTubewww.youtube.com

“This is a privacy bill to ensure the federal government cannot go through a fishing expedition in our state databases,” said Senator Lam at the Maryland State House rally. “This legislation really is about promoting transparency and promoting privacy. Marylanders have a right to know who’s attempting to access their data.”

In an interview with the Fulcrum, Stacey Brustin, a professor of law at Catholic University and a member of the advisory council for Ayuda, an immigrant rights organization in the Washington D.C. greater metro area, says that the biggest differences when it comes to immigration policy in the second Trump administration are “the targeting of sensitive locations, the stopping of enforcement priorities so that anyone can be a target and the diminishing access to legal representation while in detention.”

For Monica and other Latinos in Maryland, fighting back means overcoming the escalation of daily

trauma.“Fear creates stress, and stress creates illness,” says Beatriz to the Fulcrum, a woman in her 60s born in Colombia and now a U.S. citizen. “There is an emotional pandemic playing out in our communities, and I believe the consequences will be felt for years.”

Beatrice Spadacini is a freelance journalist for the Fulcrum. Spadacini writes about social justice and public health.


Read More

A TSA employee standing in the airport, with two travelers in the foreground.

A Transportation Security Administration (TSA) worker screens passengers and airport employees at O'Hare International Airport on January 07, 2019 in Chicago, Illinois. TSA employees are currently working under the threat of not receiving their next paychecks, scheduled for January 11, because of the partial government shutdown now in its third week.

Getty Images, Scott Olson

Nope. Nevermind. Some DHS agencies still shut down.

House Republicans reject clean bill to open shut-down DHS agencies (March 28 update)

House Republicans (and three Democrats) rejected the Senate's clean bill to end the shutdown late Friday night. Instead, the House passed a different bill that fully funds every agency in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) but for only 60 days with the knowledge that this short-term continuing resolution will not pass in the Senate.

Both chambers are out until April 13 so the shutdown is expected to last until then at least. Hope that no major weather disasters occur before then because FEMA is one of the DHS agencies out of commission (though some of its employees may be working without pay). It's possible that air travel security lines won't get worse since the President signed an Executive Order authorizing DHS to pay TSA workers. New DHS Secretary Mullin says paychecks will start to go out as early as Monday. How long can this approach continue? Unknown. Leaving aside the questionable legality of repurposing funds in this way, DHS may not be willing to keep paying TSA from these other funds long-term.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors holding signs, including one that says "let the people vote."
Attendees hold signs advocating for voting rights and against the SAVE America Act at a rally to outside the U.S. Capitol on March 18, 2026 in Washington, DC.
Getty Images, Heather Diehl

The Senate Was Meant to Slow Us Down—Not Stop Us Cold

The Senate is once again locked in a familiar pattern: a bill with clear support on one side, firm opposition on the other—and no obvious path forward.

This time it’s the SAVE Act, framed by its supporters as a safeguard for election integrity and by its opponents as a barrier to voting access. The arguments are well-rehearsed. The positions are firm. And yet, beneath the policy debate sits a more revealing truth: in today’s Senate, the outcome of legislation is often shaped long before a final vote is ever cast.

Keep ReadingShow less
Clarity Is Power: The Three Pillars That Keep the People in Charge
man in white robe holding a book statue
Photo by Caleb Fisher on Unsplash

Clarity Is Power: The Three Pillars That Keep the People in Charge

American democracy does not weaken all at once. It falters when citizens lose clarity about how power is being used in their name. Abraham Lincoln warned that “public sentiment is everything… without it, nothing can succeed.” When people understand what their leaders are doing, they can hold them accountable.

But when confusion takes hold, power shifts quietly, and the public’s ability to act begins to erode. Clarity enables citizens to participate fully in democratic life and shape a government that responds to them. Confusion is not harmless; it erodes the safeguards, public awareness, and civic action that make self‑government possible. Clarity strengthens all three pillars at once — it protects our constitutional safeguards, sharpens public awareness, and fuels civic action.

Keep ReadingShow less
CONNECT for Health Act of 2025
person wearing lavatory gown with green stethoscope on neck using phone while standing

CONNECT for Health Act of 2025

How does a bill with no enemies fail to move? That question should trouble anyone who cares about Medicare, about rural health care, and about whether Congress can still do straightforward things.

In plain terms, the CONNECT Act would permanently end the outdated rule that limits Medicare telehealth to patients in rural areas who travel to an approved facility. It would make the patient's home a covered site of care. It would protect audio-only services, critical for seniors without broadband or smartphones, especially for behavioral health. It would ensure that Federally Qualified Health Centers can be reimbursed for telehealth, and it would lock in the pandemic-era flexibilities that Congress has been extending on a temporary basis since 2020. In short, it would turn five years of emergency workarounds into permanent, accountable policy.

Keep ReadingShow less