Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

How Language and Cultural Barriers in Healthcare Plague Seattle’s Latino Community

News

How Language and Cultural Barriers in Healthcare Plague Seattle’s Latino Community

stethoscope on top of a clipboard

Getty Images

A visit to the hospital can already be a stressful event for many. For those in the Seattle Latino community, language and cultural barriers present in the healthcare system can make the process even more daunting.

According to Leo Morales, a healthcare provider at UW Medicine’s LatinX Diabetes Clinic and co-director of the Latino Center for Health, communication difficulties are one of the most obvious barriers in healthcare for Latinos with limited English proficiency.


“There are few bilingual, bicultural healthcare providers of any kind in [Washington],” he said. “So, for the most part, people who are limited English proficient and Spanish-speaking encounter all sorts of barriers to accessing care, starting with entering into a building or trying to make a phone call to make an appointment.”

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Latinos and Hispanics make up 14.6% of Washington’s population and 8.2% of Seattle’s population. The agency also reported that 9% of Washington’s total population speaks Spanish at home, with 40% of this demographic speaking English less than “very well.”

While the healthcare system often tries to accommodate non-English speakers by using interpreters, Morales said he finds such solutions to be imperfect at best.

“In terms of patient interactions, it’s a much different thing to have an interaction in someone’s native language than it is through an interpreter,” he said. “It’s not uncommon, for example, as a provider, to have somebody interpret, and this interpreter will have an entire conversation with a person and then turn around and give you a yes/no answer. And it’s like, wait a minute, what happened?”

Cultural barriers can also present a challenge in a healthcare setting for Latinos, particularly regarding food and nutrition, according to Morales.

For instance, he said those being treated for diabetes, a disease that disproportionately affects U.S. Latinos according to the Centers for Disease Control, will usually be provided nutrition education focused on foods associated with white American culture. However, some Latinos, particularly those who are first-generation, may lack familiarity with American foods or even access to those foods, depending on where they live, Morales said.

“If you go to South Seattle, for example, if you go to Burien or White Center, you’ll find Mexican markets,” he said. “Walk into a Mexican market after you’ve walked into a QFC, or Whole Foods, or Metropolitan Market, and you will understand what cultural difference is.”

Emely Diaz Barragan, a graduate student in the UW School of Public Health and intern for the Latino Center for Health, said certain cultural nuances can get lost when translating from Spanish to English.

For instance, she said the Spanish saying “la voluntad de Dios,” which roughly translates to “let God’s will be done” in English, often gets misinterpreted by those unfamiliar with the spiritual and religious values of Hispanic Latinos.

“If you say that to, for example, a white-presenting therapist with Americanized, westernized ideals, a lot of times they will take that and be like ‘Oh, they must be suicidal,’” Barragan said. “And it’s like, no. We just always say that to people that we care about.”

These kinds of barriers can lead to frustration, confusion, lower quality care, and negative health outcomes for Latinos. For example, a study found that 29% of Spanish-speaking patients reported that their medical problems were not addressed after a doctor’s appointment, compared to 10% of English-speaking patients.

Ricardo Moreno Garcia, a graduate student in the UW Department of Global Health, recalled his family’s own experiences with healthcare barriers following their move from Mexico to the Tri-Cities area in Washington about nine years ago.

Garcia’s father had an illness in his gallbladder that required surgery. However, he and his family were kicked out of the hospital because they didn’t speak any English. A month later, Garcia’s father collapsed, and he was rushed to the emergency room.

By this point, Garcia, who was 15 years old at the time, had learned some English and was able to act as a translator. Even so, Garcia had a very low-level understanding of English, making it difficult to translate the more complex medical terms.

While his father’s surgery ultimately went well, Garcia said he left the experience feeling many new emotions.

“I was feeling anxious, I was feeling depressed, I was feeling sad, angry, and even, to a point, I was feeling used,” Garcia said. “I was feeling that I was useless because I wasn’t able to help my family. I wasn’t able to help my dad because we didn’t know how to speak English in that moment, and that happened and is still happening right now.”

Morales said that Seattle, as a large urban city, has more resources to reduce these barriers than underserved rural areas, where these issues are more prominent. Even so, he said many Seattle Latinos still fall through the cracks.

While circumstances may differ among each individual Latino, Latino immigrants are generally the ones who encounter language and cultural barriers in healthcare the most, according to Morales. However, recent actions taken by President Donald Trump’s administration may only reinforce such barriers for this already vulnerable demographic.

There are concerns that Trump’s executive order designating English as the official language of the United States could reduce multilingual resources in sectors such as healthcare.

“What’s been a guiding principle for healthcare organizations is they need to provide language access of the language that their patients speak,” Morales said. “That’s always been the expectation. I don’t know how making English officially the language of the country changes that expectation, and that would be my concern there.”

Morales said he is also concerned that pre-existing financial barriers combined with the increased threat of deportation will further discourage Latino immigrants from visiting the doctor’s.

Nevertheless, there are organizations within Seattle working to reduce the language and cultural barriers faced by Latinos in healthcare.

The LatinX Diabetes Clinic, a subdivision of the UW Diabetes Institute Clinic, provides linguistically and culturally accessible care for Spanish-speaking Latino patients with diabetes. Additionally, the Latino Center for Health partners with community-based organizations to bring healthcare to hard-to-reach Latino populations in both rural and urban settings in Washington.

Still, Garcia said the push to address these kinds of healthcare barriers should primarily be coming from the local and state governments.

“People in charge of clinics and hospitals should make this change,” he said. “But who will make them do that change will be the senators, will be people with higher power, like the local government [and] Washington government.”

Morales said the issue of language and cultural barriers in healthcare is complicated, but the solution often gets reduced to simply providing more interpreters. Because of this, he said, a human element to this problem is often overlooked.

“I think you can lose the humanity of people when they’re ill, when any of us are ill,” Morales said. “The inability to access care for fear, or, even when people are accessing care, just not getting the kind of care that they should get because [they’re] running into barriers or not understanding how to navigate the system [means] people die sooner because of it … These are individuals, peoples, families, and they are in the fabric of our society. If you look around anywhere, you will see immigrants doing the work that needs to be done and doing it well.”

Cassie Diamond is a junior at the University of Washington double majoring in Journalism and Public Interest Communication and Political Science. She is passionate about telling stories that spread awareness about pressing issues and is interested in political and environmental topics.

Cassie is a student in Hugo Balta's solutions journalism class at UW. Balta, an accredited solutions journalism trainer with the Solutions Journalism Network, is the Fulcrum's executive editor. The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists.

Read More

Understanding the National Environmental Policy Act Reform Debate
Three blocks labeled "environmental", "social", and "governance" in front of a globe.
Getty Images, Khanchit Khirisutchalual

Understanding the National Environmental Policy Act Reform Debate

History of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

Signed into U.S. law in 1970, NEPA is considered the “Magna Carta” of environmental law. It requires federal agencies to assess the environmental impact of major construction projects such as airports, highways, federal buildings, or projects constructed on federally owned land before construction. To fulfill the NEPA requirements, federal agencies are required to complete a detailed Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for any actions with environmental impact. The completed EIS is an extensive written report from federal agencies that includes a summary of the environmental effects of the proposed project, a purpose statement, potential alternatives, and an overview of the affected environment.

Before a final EIS can be published, agencies must publish a draft EIS for a public review and comment period of 45 days. The final EIS must fully address substantive comments from the review period to be considered complete. Major projects with a low likelihood of pronounced environmental impact can bypass the NEPA process if granted a Categorical Exclusion (CATEX). If the project’s impact on the environment is uncertain, agencies are required to prepare a shorter Environmental Assessment (EA) to determine the need for an EIS.

Keep ReadingShow less
Crowd waving flags
Crowd waving flags
(Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

The Parallel Twin Lives of Democracy

It is a striking paradox of contemporary American life: The country appears to be bitterly divided, yet at the same time it is in deep internal agreement.

Survey after survey show broad consensus on issues that once split the nation: Same-sex marriage, interracial marriage, public smoking bans, marijuana legalization, background checks for gun ownership, even paid parental leave. Many of these were once thought irreconcilable, but today they register supermajority support. Yet at the same time, partisanship has become the most toxic line of fracture in American identity. As political philosopher Robert Talisse has observed, parents who would welcome a child marrying across lines of faith or ethnicity recoil at the prospect of marriage across ideological lines. The left and right increasingly define one another not as fellow citizens who happen to disagree, but as existential threats.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Democratic Party's American Dream Problem — And Opportunity

New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani holds a campaign event with the healthcare worker's union on September 24, 2025 outside of St. Barnabas Hospital in the Bronx borough of New York City.

(Photo by Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)

The Democratic Party's American Dream Problem — And Opportunity

Why have so many rank-and-file Democrats found Zohran Mamdani’s candidacy for New York mayor so captivating – despite all the naysaying from the party’s establishment? Because his message may be the first from a Democrat to counter decades of Republican dominance over a narrative central to our nation: the American Dream.

What the American Dream tells us is that anything is possible in America, that if you work hard, nothing can stop you, and you will succeed. It’s a rags-to-riches story, reminiscent of Horatio Alger and Rocky Balboa, and the classic tale of immigrants arriving with nothing and sacrificing everything to create a better life for themselves and their families.

Keep ReadingShow less
The New Face of US Interventionism: Economic Warfare in Brazil

USA Brazil tariffs

AI generated

The New Face of US Interventionism: Economic Warfare in Brazil

President Donald J. Trump has threatened to impose a new round of tariffs and sanctions against Brazil after Brazil’s Supreme Court sentenced the former far-right president Jair Bolsonaro to 27 years in prison for attempting a coup — an act of political retaliation that should raise alarm bells across the globe.

President Trump’s threat follows the earlier imposition of a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods and Magnitsky sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who presided over Bolsonaro’s trial. These measures are designed to punish Brazil’s judiciary for daring to prosecute Bolsonaro, who plotted to overturn the 2022 elections and assassinate then-president-elect Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

Keep ReadingShow less