Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Long lines, language barriers & misleading info: A Super Tuesday sampler

California primary voters

Voters in Los Angeles County waited in line up to three hours to cast their ballots on Super Tuesday.

Mario Tama/Getty Images

High voter turnout was both a blessing and a curse on Super Tuesday. While more participation in elections gave civic advocates something to cheer about, long lines in two of the biggest states plus a wave of online disinformation left voting rights groups with a to-do list before the next primaries.

During the biggest day of voting in the Democratic presidential contest, hotlines operated in 11 languages by a coalition of progressive groups fielded more than 2,000 calls from voters expressing concern and confusion.

But as the polls started to close Tuesday evening, representatives of the so-called Election Protection coalition, led by the Lawyer's Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, told reporters they believe the primaries in all 14 states generally went off with few if any hitches.


Still, learning from reported problems will be "critical" in making sure the rest of the election season is similarly smooth, said Erica Bernal-Martinez, chief operating officer of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) Action Fund, which ran a hotline in Spanish and English.

Michigan and five other states will vote Tuesday, the next contests in what's effectively become a nominating battle between former Vice President Joe Biden and Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont. Billionaire Michael Bloomberg ended his quest and endorsed Biden on Wednesday, while Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts was contemplating her options after poor showings from coast to coast.

At least 12.6 million ballots were cast Tuesday and, with results still being tabulated in California and Maine, it was clear turnout exceeded the Democratic primary numbers four years ago in at least seven states. (Four states switched from caucuses in 2016, so a full comparison is not possible.)

These were the issues raised by the Election Protection team:

California: This was the first test of several new voting procedures in Los Angeles County, the most populous county in the country. Perhaps the biggest change was a switch from traditional precinct-sized polling stations to vote centers, allowing residents to vote at nearly 1,000 locations regardless of where in the county they live.

Staff at the vote centers also used more modern technology to check in voters and update their registration using ePollbooks, instead of printed voter rolls. New ballot marking devices, with a paper trail, were also introduced. Additionally, in all of California's 58 counties, this election was the first that allowed for early voting and same-day voter registration.

While the changes were intended to make voting easier and more accessible, they also slowed the process considerably — resulting in wait times as long as three hours. Voters were assured they'd be allowed to vote so long as they were in line by closing time, said Kathay Feng, executive director of Common Cause California.

Texas: Thousands of voters were compelled to wait more than two hours after the polls closed before casting their ballots — the result of a turnout surge of as much as 50 percent from the Democratic contest in 2016, when 1.4 million ballots were cast.

Most of the delays were reported in precincts with college campuses and in the state's two biggest cities, Dallas and Houston. Voting in at least one precinct, at Texas Southern University, did not finish until 1:30 a.m. Still, there were no reports of problems connected to the state's decision to shutter dozens of smaller polling places in the last few years.

North Carolina: Two counties reported mishaps but state election officials were quick to respond, said Tomas Lopez, executive director of Democracy North Carolina.

In Winston-Salem, the state's fifth largest city, a precinct ran out of ballots and turned some voters away. And on the eastern side of the state, a precinct in the small town of Windsor had difficulty setting up a printer, which caused delays. As a result, the Board of Elections extended polling hours by at least 30 minutes in the two precincts.

Tennessee: Deadly tornadoes that swept across much of the state a few hours before the polls opened destroyed homes, claimed at least 24 lives and prevented at least 15 polling sites from operating in Nashville, the state's largest city.

The Lawyer's Committee filed a lawsuit in state court Tuesday hoping to force a reopening of the polls through Friday for voters in areas hardest hit by the storm. "There was simply no meaningful way for them to overcome the obstacles that stood between them and the polls," said the group's president, Kristen Clarke.

Disinformation: Instances were reported across all 14 states, mostly on social media.

Common Cause spokesman Jay Riestenberg said his group reached out to address confusion expressed by more than 200 voters on social media. They had been given incorrect information about voting procedures, including being told the wrong primary date and that they could cast ballots on Twitter or with a text message.

Common Cause has been in contact with the social media platforms, mainly Twitter, to flag content containing disinformation. The group marked dozens of posts for disinformation and within two hours Twitter had removed the content.

Non-English voting assistance: Hotline administrators reported several states lacked the proper resources to assist voters who are not English speakers. The reports came in to hotlines staffed not only in English but in Spanish, Arabic and eight Asian languages, but many polling sites did not have these language assistance capabilities.

NALEO's Bernal-Martinez said a surge of Latino voters, particularly in California and Texas, was held back a bit. Without enough Spanish-speaking volunteers at polling sites, she said, some voters were mistakenly asked to vote provisionally or simply were not given proper assistance.


Read More

Voters lining up to vote.

Voters line up at the Oak Lawn Branch Library voting center on Primary Election Day in Dallas on March 3, 2026. Republicans' decision to hold a split primary from the Democrats and to eliminate countywide voting forced Dallas County voters to cast ballots at assigned neighborhood precincts, leading to confusion. Republicans have now decided to use countywide polling locations for the May 26 runoff election.

Shelby Tauber for The Texas Tribune

Dallas County GOP Will Agree To Use Countywide Voting Sites for May 26 Runoff Election

Dallas County Republicans will agree to allow voters to cast ballots at countywide voting sites for the May 26 runoff election after a switch to precinct-based voting sites caused chaos, the county party chair said Tuesday.

Dallas County Republican Chairman Allen West supported the use of precinct-based sites earlier this month, but said using precincts again for the runoff would expose the county party to “increased risk and voter confusion” because the county is planning to use countywide sites for upcoming municipal elections and early voting.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person signing a piece of paper with other people around them.

Javon Jackson, center, was able to register to vote following passage of a 2019 Nevada law that restored voting rights to formerly incarcerated individuals.

The Nation Is Missing Millions of Voters Due to Lack of Rights for Former Felons

If you gathered every American with a prison record into one contiguous territory and admitted it to the union, you would create the 12th-largest state. It would be home to at least 7 million to 8 million people and hold a dozen votes in the Electoral College.

In a close presidential race, this hypothetical state of the formerly incarcerated could decide who wins the White House.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

An analysis of Trump’s SAVE Act strategy, the voter ID debate, and how Pew data is being misused—exploring election integrity, voter suppression, and the political fight shaping U.S. democracy.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Stop Fighting Voter ID. Start Defining It.

President Trump doesn't need the SAVE America Act to pass. He only needs the debate to continue. Every minute spent arguing about voter suppression repeats the underlying premise — that noncitizen voting is a real and widespread problem — until it feels like an established fact. The question is whether Democrats will contest Republicans’ definition before the frame hardens.

Trump's claim that 88% of Americans support the bill traces to a Pew Research Center survey — a survey that found 83% support a “government-issued photo ID to vote,” not extreme vetting for proof of citizenship. That support included 95% of Republicans and 71% of Democrats, indicating genuine, broad, bipartisan support for a basic civic principle. That's worth taking seriously.

Keep ReadingShow less
People standing at voting booths.

The proposed SAVE Act and MEGA Act would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, risking the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible Americans.

Getty Images, EvgeniyShkolenko

The SAVE Act is a Solution in Search of A Problem

The federal government seems to be barreling toward a federal election power grab. Trump's State of the Union address called for the Senate to push through the SAVE Act, which has already passed the House, in the name of so-called "election integrity." And the SAVE Act isn’t the only such bill. Like the SAVE Act, the Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act—introduced in the House—would require voters to provide a document outlined in the Act that allegedly proves their U.S. citizenship. We’ve been down this road before in Texas, and spoiler alert: it was unworkable.

Both the SAVE and MEGA Acts would disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens without making our federal elections more secure. They seek to roll out a faulty federal voter registration system, despite the existing separate registration and voting process for state and local elections. And these Acts target a minuscule “problem”—but would unleash mass voter purges and confusion.

Keep ReadingShow less