Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Severe weather, virus worries disrupt the gears of democracy on Super Tuesday

Debris from Nashville tornado

Deadly storms swept through Tennessee last night and left residents with worries other than voting.

Brett Carlsen/Getty Images

Deadly storms in at least two Super Tuesday states and coronavirus anxieties nationwide are complicating efforts to boost turnout and ease confidence in the results from the nation's most important day of voting ahead of November.

Efforts to get democracy working more smoothly are almost always focused on human behavior, from making it easier for people to vote to rewarding collaboration among partisan politicians. This time, unpredictably treacherous weather and the unpredictable spread of disease are conspiring to make things much more difficult for Democrats casting ballots to award a third of their presidential delegates.


Voting rights groups were focused on Tennessee, where tornadoes ripped through parts of the state a few hours before the polls were set to open, shattering buildings and killing at least 22 people. Some polling sites in Nashville as well as in Davidson and Wilson counties opened an hour late but were still set to close on time at 8 p.m. EST, Republican Secretary of State Tre Hargett announced. And with 15 voting venues in the state's biggest city out of commission, the people who showed up were told they could cast ballots instead at pair of "supersites" in minimally damaged neighborhoods.

"Of course we want people to exercise caution," GOP Gov. Bill Lee said at a news conference. "We also want folks to exercise their rights to get out there and vote. It's a very important day for that. So, we're going to make it possible for as many folks as we can to vote — and wherever we find a polling station that there's a problem, we're reaching out to correct that."

The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, a Washington-based nonprofit, said the steps Tennessee was taking were insufficient and the group was headed to court in hopes of getting the primary extended through the end of the week.

Similar efforts were being planned in Alabama, where tornado warnings were issued in at least five counties in the central part of the state and a handful of polling places were reportedly without electricity during a morning marked by drenching thunderstorms.

In both states, poll workers in rural areas were being told to take extra precaution because of potential flash flooding this evening if their responsibilities included taking results by hand from their precincts to a central county office — potentially delaying the results from states with 116 delegates at stake.

The National Weather Service said severe thunderstorms, wind damage and more tornadoes were also possible in parts of two other states voting Tuesday, Virginia and North Carolina, while severe storms that could cause large hail, damaging winds and a tornado are possible in central Texas the final few hours before the polls close in the second-biggest prize of the day. Texas' 228 delegates are exceeded only by the 415 in California, where weather did not seem to be a concern.

Fourteen states have presidential primaries now underway. And this is not the first time severe weather has struck on Super Tuesday. Twelve years ago, when two dozen states had primaries and caucuses on Feb. 5, dozens of tornadoes were reported in 10 of those states, killing 57 people.

Back then, though, there was no COVID-19. In California's Solano County, where the country's first case of the virus' spread within a community was identified, there are new curbside sites where people could drop off their ballots Tuesday without having to leave their cars.

The state also allows people to vote through the mail so long as their ballots are postmarked by election day, and residents were being urged to take advantage of that option as another precaution against the virus — further increasing the likelihood that final results there won't be known for days. Almost 75 percent of the state's voters received absentee ballots.

For those who still want to vote in person in Sacramento County, for example, election officials distributed to all the polling sites hand sanitizer, wipes and latex gloves thin enough for use with touch-screen voting machines.

The elections director in Falls Church, a Virginia suburb of Washington, also laid on big supplies of hand sanitizer and disinfectant wipes and told poll workers to frequently wipe down the booths and pens touched by voters. But the official, Dave Bjerke, said all his poll workers had promised to show up.


Read More

A person signing a piece of paper with other people around them.

Javon Jackson, center, was able to register to vote following passage of a 2019 Nevada law that restored voting rights to formerly incarcerated individuals.

The Nation Is Missing Millions of Voters Due to Lack of Rights for Former Felons

If you gathered every American with a prison record into one contiguous territory and admitted it to the union, you would create the 12th-largest state. It would be home to at least 7 million to 8 million people and hold a dozen votes in the Electoral College.

In a close presidential race, this hypothetical state of the formerly incarcerated could decide who wins the White House.

Keep ReadingShow less
People standing at voting booths.

The proposed SAVE Act and MEGA Act would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, risking the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible Americans.

Getty Images, EvgeniyShkolenko

The SAVE Act is a Solution in Search of A Problem

The federal government seems to be barreling toward a federal election power grab. Trump's State of the Union address called for the Senate to push through the SAVE Act, which has already passed the House, in the name of so-called "election integrity." And the SAVE Act isn’t the only such bill. Like the SAVE Act, the Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act—introduced in the House—would require voters to provide a document outlined in the Act that allegedly proves their U.S. citizenship. We’ve been down this road before in Texas, and spoiler alert: it was unworkable.

Both the SAVE and MEGA Acts would disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens without making our federal elections more secure. They seek to roll out a faulty federal voter registration system, despite the existing separate registration and voting process for state and local elections. And these Acts target a minuscule “problem”—but would unleash mass voter purges and confusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
Stickers with the words "I Voted Today."

Virginia is on its way to be the 19th jurisdiction to adopt the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, bringing the U.S. closer to electing presidents by the national popular vote.

Getty Images, EyeWolf

Virginia On The Path to Join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact

NPVIC is an agreement among U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to the presidential ticket that wins the overall popular vote in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. It is considered a pragmatic, voluntary state-based initiative because it aims to ensure the winner of the national popular vote wins the presidency without requiring a constitutional amendment, operating instead within the existing Electoral College framework by utilizing states' constitutional authority to appoint electors. If enough states join the NPVIC to reach a total of 270 electoral votes, the United States will effectively shift from a winner-take-all (WTA) regime to a national popular vote system for electing the President.

With Virginia's adoption, the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact will be adopted by eighteen states and the District of Columbia, collectively holding 222 electoral votes. The compact requires 270 electoral votes (a majority of the 538 total) to take effect. It currently needs forty-eight more electoral votes to become active.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

Should the U.S. nationalize elections? A constitutional analysis of federalism, the Elections Clause, and the risks of centralized control over voting systems.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Why Nationalizing Elections Threatens America’s Federalist Design

The Federalism Question: Why Nationalizing Elections Deserves Skepticism

The renewed push to nationalize American elections, presented as a necessary reform to ensure uniformity and fairness, deserves the same skepticism our founders directed toward concentrated federal power. The proposal, though well-intentioned, misunderstands both the constitutional architecture of our republic and the practical wisdom in decentralized governance.

The Constitutional Framework Matters

The Constitution grants states explicit authority over the "Times, Places and Manner" of holding elections, with Congress retaining only the power to "make or alter such Regulations." This was not an oversight by the framers; it was intentional design. The Tenth Amendment reinforces this principle: powers not delegated to the federal government remain with the states and the people. Advocates for nationalization often cite the Elections Clause as justification, but constitutional permission is not constitutional wisdom.

Keep ReadingShow less