Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Severe weather, virus worries disrupt the gears of democracy on Super Tuesday

Debris from Nashville tornado

Deadly storms swept through Tennessee last night and left residents with worries other than voting.

Brett Carlsen/Getty Images

Deadly storms in at least two Super Tuesday states and coronavirus anxieties nationwide are complicating efforts to boost turnout and ease confidence in the results from the nation's most important day of voting ahead of November.

Efforts to get democracy working more smoothly are almost always focused on human behavior, from making it easier for people to vote to rewarding collaboration among partisan politicians. This time, unpredictably treacherous weather and the unpredictable spread of disease are conspiring to make things much more difficult for Democrats casting ballots to award a third of their presidential delegates.


Voting rights groups were focused on Tennessee, where tornadoes ripped through parts of the state a few hours before the polls were set to open, shattering buildings and killing at least 22 people. Some polling sites in Nashville as well as in Davidson and Wilson counties opened an hour late but were still set to close on time at 8 p.m. EST, Republican Secretary of State Tre Hargett announced. And with 15 voting venues in the state's biggest city out of commission, the people who showed up were told they could cast ballots instead at pair of "supersites" in minimally damaged neighborhoods.

"Of course we want people to exercise caution," GOP Gov. Bill Lee said at a news conference. "We also want folks to exercise their rights to get out there and vote. It's a very important day for that. So, we're going to make it possible for as many folks as we can to vote — and wherever we find a polling station that there's a problem, we're reaching out to correct that."

The Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, a Washington-based nonprofit, said the steps Tennessee was taking were insufficient and the group was headed to court in hopes of getting the primary extended through the end of the week.

Similar efforts were being planned in Alabama, where tornado warnings were issued in at least five counties in the central part of the state and a handful of polling places were reportedly without electricity during a morning marked by drenching thunderstorms.

In both states, poll workers in rural areas were being told to take extra precaution because of potential flash flooding this evening if their responsibilities included taking results by hand from their precincts to a central county office — potentially delaying the results from states with 116 delegates at stake.

The National Weather Service said severe thunderstorms, wind damage and more tornadoes were also possible in parts of two other states voting Tuesday, Virginia and North Carolina, while severe storms that could cause large hail, damaging winds and a tornado are possible in central Texas the final few hours before the polls close in the second-biggest prize of the day. Texas' 228 delegates are exceeded only by the 415 in California, where weather did not seem to be a concern.

Fourteen states have presidential primaries now underway. And this is not the first time severe weather has struck on Super Tuesday. Twelve years ago, when two dozen states had primaries and caucuses on Feb. 5, dozens of tornadoes were reported in 10 of those states, killing 57 people.

Back then, though, there was no COVID-19. In California's Solano County, where the country's first case of the virus' spread within a community was identified, there are new curbside sites where people could drop off their ballots Tuesday without having to leave their cars.

The state also allows people to vote through the mail so long as their ballots are postmarked by election day, and residents were being urged to take advantage of that option as another precaution against the virus — further increasing the likelihood that final results there won't be known for days. Almost 75 percent of the state's voters received absentee ballots.

For those who still want to vote in person in Sacramento County, for example, election officials distributed to all the polling sites hand sanitizer, wipes and latex gloves thin enough for use with touch-screen voting machines.

The elections director in Falls Church, a Virginia suburb of Washington, also laid on big supplies of hand sanitizer and disinfectant wipes and told poll workers to frequently wipe down the booths and pens touched by voters. But the official, Dave Bjerke, said all his poll workers had promised to show up.


Read More

People standing at voting booths.

The proposed SAVE Act and MEGA Act would require proof of citizenship to register to vote, risking the disenfranchisement of millions of eligible Americans.

Getty Images, EvgeniyShkolenko

The SAVE Act is a Solution in Search of A Problem

The federal government seems to be barreling toward a federal election power grab. Trump's State of the Union address called for the Senate to push through the SAVE Act, which has already passed the House, in the name of so-called "election integrity." And the SAVE Act isn’t the only such bill. Like the SAVE Act, the Make Elections Great Again (MEGA) Act—introduced in the House—would require voters to provide a document outlined in the Act that allegedly proves their U.S. citizenship. We’ve been down this road before in Texas, and spoiler alert: it was unworkable.

Both the SAVE and MEGA Acts would disenfranchise millions of eligible U.S. citizens without making our federal elections more secure. They seek to roll out a faulty federal voter registration system, despite the existing separate registration and voting process for state and local elections. And these Acts target a minuscule “problem”—but would unleash mass voter purges and confusion.

Keep ReadingShow less
With the focus on the voting posters, the people in the background of the photo sign up to vote.

Should the U.S. nationalize elections? A constitutional analysis of federalism, the Elections Clause, and the risks of centralized control over voting systems.

Getty Images, SDI Productions

Why Nationalizing Elections Threatens America’s Federalist Design

The Federalism Question: Why Nationalizing Elections Deserves Skepticism

The renewed push to nationalize American elections, presented as a necessary reform to ensure uniformity and fairness, deserves the same skepticism our founders directed toward concentrated federal power. The proposal, though well-intentioned, misunderstands both the constitutional architecture of our republic and the practical wisdom in decentralized governance.

The Constitutional Framework Matters

The Constitution grants states explicit authority over the "Times, Places and Manner" of holding elections, with Congress retaining only the power to "make or alter such Regulations." This was not an oversight by the framers; it was intentional design. The Tenth Amendment reinforces this principle: powers not delegated to the federal government remain with the states and the people. Advocates for nationalization often cite the Elections Clause as justification, but constitutional permission is not constitutional wisdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

A voter registration drive in Corpus Christi, Texas, on Oct. 5, 2024. The deadline to register to vote for Texas' March 3 primary election is Feb. 2, 2026. Changes to USPS policies may affect whether a voter registration application is processed on time if it's not postmarked by the deadline.

Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Postal Service Changes Mean Texas Voters Shouldn’t Wait To Mail Voter Registrations and Ballots

Texans seeking to register to vote or cast a ballot by mail may not want to wait until the last minute, thanks to new guidance from the U.S. Postal Service.

The USPS last month advised that it may not postmark a piece of mail on the same day that it takes possession of it. Postmarks are applied once mail reaches a processing facility, it said, which may not be the same day it’s dropped in a mailbox, for example.

Keep ReadingShow less
Post office trucks parked in a lot.

Changes to USPS postmarking, ranked choice voting fights, costly runoffs, and gerrymandering reveal growing cracks in U.S. election systems.

Photo by Sam LaRussa on Unsplash.

2026 Will See an Increase in Rejected Mail-In Ballots - Here's Why

While the media has kept people’s focus on the Epstein files, Venezuela, or a potential invasion of Greenland, the United States Postal Service adopted a new rule that will have a broad impact on Americans – especially in an election year in which millions of people will vote by mail.

The rule went into effect on Christmas Eve and has largely flown under the radar, with the exception of some local coverage, a report from PBS News, and Independent Voter News. It states that items mailed through USPS will no longer be postmarked on the day it is received.

Keep ReadingShow less