Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Temples and Test-Tubes

Opinion

Temples and Test-Tubes

Silhouette of man stand on top of mountain and see in the night sky. Galaxy and space. Meditation and astrology. Esoterica and psychology.

Getty Images/Elements of this image furnished by NASA

Since I was old enough to speak, I have been questioning everything around me. The turquoise color of the ocean, what would happen if I slept on a cloud, the enticing smell of Mom’s “signature” box mac and cheese. Thankfully, these questions eventually evolved into more meaningful ones.

I grew up and continue to be a member of the Baháʼí Faith; therefore, the principles of unity, justice, and service guide the way I live my life. The Baháʼí Faith is a religion that strives to achieve a worldwide unification of all races, religions, and cultures. Founded in the 19th century, the religion teaches the oneness of God, the elimination of prejudice, harmony among religions, and the common origin of all past prophets of God.


Integral to the teachings of the Baháʼí Faith, I have always been committed to conducting my own investigation of truth, independent of what society or my family tells me. Of course, this leads to clashes between what I have been taught and my own beliefs; yet, with the principle of independent investigation of truth, I have learned that questioning is not rejection, but rather growth. Through this deep questioning, I have found that when I combine the truths of science and religion, reality comes to a transparent authenticity.

Essentially, science and religion appear as complete opposites. While science relies on factual evidence and observations, religion leans towards the belief in abstract and spiritual concepts. Though on the surface they appear to collide, I strongly believe that when science and religion are used in harmony with one another, they are paired to serve humanity best.

Belay Goshu and Muhammad Ridwan, professors of physics in Ethiopia and Indonesia, argue that integrating science and religion can effectively promote empathy and understanding among diverse communities, supporting their claim that both are prerequisites for achieving global peace.

Through ongoing exploration of the sciences, the truth of a God becomes suddenly more evident, just as the investigation of a Creator reveals the inevitable fact of scientific study.

C. Reese from the The C.S. Lewis Institute ‘24 explains that, “Physicists have concluded that the universe sprang into existence out of nothing… This means that whatever brought the Big Bang about is beyond space and time, immaterial, personal, and unbelievably powerful. Of course, this is an excellent description of many of God's attributes! Who else but God could have brought a universe into being?”

It is interesting to note that a 2009 Pew Research Center study found that 51 percent of scientists believe in God.

Clearly, science relies on religion just as religion relies on science.

More simply, think about that one friend who keeps everyone intact. A color-coded itinerary, flights booked, dinner reservations made, and packed phone chargers for everyone. (Science!) Now the other friend, the one reminding you to soak it all in, find meaning in the moment, talk to strangers, and embrace the new culture! (Religion!) Without friends of both strengths, what would you do?

It is of extreme importance to grasp that the sole study of science leads down a rabbit hole of materialism and moral decay. In contrast, the confined study of the spiritual dimension can lead to superstition and fanaticism, further dividing the global search for truth.

While science explains the “how,” religion clarifies the “why”. Although both explain the natural world in different ways, it is not true to say that either becomes invalidated. The combining of both wisdoms uplifts and complements one another.

Climate scientists and anyone who cares about the health of our home utilize a balance of science and spirituality. Science warns us that our planet is deteriorating, and religion explains that our home is sacred and why we must care for God’s creation. This study unites billions of people to work not only for themselves, but for the salvation of all life.

We catch sight of the seemingly never-ending corruption when we open the news, our doors, and especially our eyes. Unfortunately, it may be inevitable, yet amid the darkness, one thing is certain to cultivate light for all humankind alike. Regardless of our diverse viewpoints, we can all find common ground on the fact that science, faith, and truth keep us going.

Lyla E. Thurber is a 10th grader from Miami, Florida, who is studying at the School of New York Times.

Read More

Two speech bubbles overlapping each other.

Democrats can reclaim America’s founding principles, rebuild the rural economy, and restore democracy by redefining the political battle Trump began.

Getty Images, Richard Drury

Defining the Democrat v. Republican Battle

Winning elections is, in large part, a question of which Party is able to define the battle and define the actors. Trump has so far defined the battle and effectively defined Democrats for his supporters as the enemy of making America great again.

For Democrats to win the 2026 midterm and 2028 presidential elections, they must take the offensive and show just the opposite–that it is they who are true to core American principles and they who will make America great again, while Trump is the Founders' nightmare come alive.

Keep ReadingShow less
Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Trump and the MAGA movement have twisted the meaning of patriotism. It’s time we collectively reclaim America’s founding ideals and the Pledge’s promise.

Getty Images, LeoPatrizi

Mirror, Mirror On the Wall, Who's the Most Patriotic of All?

Republicans have always claimed to be the patriotic party, the party of "America, right or wrong," the party willing to use force to protect American national interests abroad, the party of a strong military. In response, Democrats have not really contested this perspective since Vietnam, basically ceding the patriotic badge to the Republicans.

But with the advent of Donald Trump, the Republican claim to patriotism has gotten broader and more troubling. Republicans now claim to be the party that is true to our founding principles. And it is not just the politicians; they have support from far-right scholars at the Heritage Foundation, such as Matthew Spalding. The Democratic Party has done nothing to counter these claims.

Keep ReadingShow less
Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

As political violence threatens democracy, defending free speech, limiting government overreach, and embracing pluralism matters is critical right now.

Getty Images, Javier Zayas Photography

The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

The assassinations of conservative leader Charlie Kirk and Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota have triggered endorsements of violence and even calls for literal war on both the far right and far left. Fortunately, an overwhelming majority of Americans reject political violence, but all of us are in a fight to keep our diverse and boisterous brand of democracy alive. Doing so requires a renewed commitment to pluralism and a clear-headed recognition of the limits of government, especially when proposals entail using the criminal justice system to punish speech.

Pluralism has been called the lifeblood of a democracy like ours, in which being an American is not defined by race or religion. It requires learning about and accepting our differences, and embracing the principle that, regardless of them, every person is entitled to be protected by our Constitution and have a voice in how we’re governed. In contrast, many perpetrators of political violence rationalize their acts by denying the basic humanity of those with whom they disagree. They are willing to face the death penalty or life in prison in an attempt to force everyone to conform to their views.

Keep ReadingShow less