Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Parents: It’s Time To Get Mad About Online Child Sexual Abuse

Opinion

A person on using a smartphone.

With millions of child abuse images reported annually and AI creating new dangers, advocates are calling for accountability from Big Tech and stronger laws to keep kids safe online.

Getty Images, ljubaphoto

Forty-five years ago this month, Mothers Against Drunk Driving had its first national press conference, and a global movement to stop impaired driving was born. MADD was founded by Candace Lightner after her 13-year-old daughter was struck and killed by a drunk driver while walking to a church carnival in 1980. Terms like “designated driver” and the slogan “Friends don’t let friends drive drunk” came out of MADD’s campaigning, and a variety of state and federal laws, like a lowered blood alcohol limit and legal drinking age, were instituted thanks to their advocacy. Over time, social norms evolved, and driving drunk was no longer seen as a “folk crime,” but a serious, conscious choice with serious consequences.

Movements like this one, started by fed-up, grieving parents working with law enforcement and law makers, worked to lower road fatalities nationwide, inspire similar campaigns in other countries, and saved countless lives.


But today, one of the biggest dangers to children comes with almost no safeguards: the internet. Parents know the risks, yet there is no large-scale “movement” when it comes to keeping our kids safe online.

This is a big missed opportunity. The internet is not going anywhere, but in order to make it safer for children and young people, parents are key - and they need to get mad on a much larger scale.

In 2024, there were 20.5 million reports of child sexual abuse material made to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children’s CyberTipline, and underreporting is a serious problem. These images represent real children who have been abused, their photos and videos of the abuse shared – exponentially – on platforms that we use every day. Add to that the rising number of teens who have died by suicide after being groomed and extorted, and the number of kids who are exposed to pornographic material on sites that are supposedly “safe” for children.

AI is complicating matters further, suggesting extreme dieting to teens and offering advice on how to commit suicide. According to Common Sense Media, 3 out of 4 kids have used an AI chatbot, and many parents have no idea.

Despite widespread acknowledgement of child sexual abuse, imagery, and exploitation on all major platforms, tech companies are still not required to proactively search for, detect, or remove content unless it is reported to them. Online safeguards are, by and large, voluntary, and tech companies are still rarely held accountable for crimes committed on their sites, creating a virtual playground for predators to groom children without consequences.

Much like the lax culture around drunk driving before MADD, the dangers online are often seen as an unfortunate risk that parents are forced to accept in order to let their children and teens exist in the digital world. Instead of anger, there is a sense of overwhelm and apathy at the scale and the ubiquity of online risks. Parents are mostly forced to throw up their hands, put in place whatever precautions they can, and just go along with it. This is unacceptable.

Congress is making some progress towards passing legislation that will help hold tech companies accountable and let law enforcement better prosecute these crimes. Other countries around the world, like Australia, the U.K., and Brazil, are starting to pass online safety legislation, too. But these achievements are largely uncoordinated, and they exist on a national scale, not a global one.

Since most Big Tech companies are based in the U.S., Congress must take the lead in making companies accountable for the risks children face online. We also need a collective, organic movement led by parents and the public that will drive a global movement for sustainable, meaningful change.

It is not up to parents to solve this crisis. But parents can – and should – be angry. And we must use that anger to fuel change. We must educate ourselves about the risks and not be afraid to talk to others about the risks our kids are facing. The tech companies will not bring themselves down, so parents, teachers, and adults who care about children must continue putting pressure on Congress to act. We can end online child sexual abuse and make the internet a much safer place for everyone, but only if we come together first.


Erin Nicholson is the strategic communications adviser for ChildFund International, a global nonprofit dedicated to protecting children online and offline. ChildFund launched the #TakeItDown campaign in 2023 to combat online child sexual abuse material. She is currently a Public Voices Fellow on Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse with The OpEd Project.

Read More

Robot Holding a Resume Doing HR Work Vector Illustration

AI résumé screening can filter out qualified candidates before a human ever looks. Here's why transparency and human oversight in hiring matter.

nicoletaionescu/Getty Images

When AI Screens the Resume, Who Gets a Fair Shot at Work?

A job seeker can spend hours tailoring a résumé, checking qualifications and writing a thoughtful application, believing the next step will be a person deciding whether to schedule an interview.

Increasingly, that assumption may be wrong.

Keep ReadingShow less
President Trump answers questions from reporters.

U.S. President Donald Trump answers questions from reporters before boarding Air Force One on August 21, 2026 in Joint Base Andrews, Maryland.

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Trump’s White House Press Ban Violates 1st Amendment

The principle is simple. Just like politicians are not supposed to pick their voters, government officials don’t get to pick the reporters who cover them.

If they did, the First Amendment would be meaningless. and we would no longer live in anything resembling a constitutional republic. That is why President Trump’s September 18 announcement that he is banning reporters from CNN, MSNow, and Politico from the White House is so dangerous.

Keep ReadingShow less
A person interacts with an AI chatbot on a smartphone. The screen displays a conversation interface with the text "Hi, may I help you?" suggesting the use of an AI assistant app. A laptop is visible in the background, emphasizing a tech-savvy environment.

A 2026 study found AI beat elite debaters, until it was slowed to human speed. Why persuasion throughput matters and how to make chatbot tempo transparent.

Chong Kee Siong/Getty Images

Political Chatbots Should Not Be Allowed To Set the Pace

A political chatbot can answer before a citizen has finished reading its previous message. It can add statistics, historical examples, causal claims, and links at a rate no human campaign volunteer could match. That does not necessarily make its case wiser. It changes the contest by allowing one speaker to control the tempo.

A June 2026 preprint offers unusually direct evidence of this problem. Across four preregistered experiments involving 18,978 conversations from 6,923 people, frontier AI systems were more persuasive than laypeople, tournament winners, professional canvassers and elite competitive debaters. The human experts were not casual opponents: the study included world and continental champions, paid preparation, live practice and substantial performance incentives.

Keep ReadingShow less
Camera pointing at Donald Trump

U.S. President Donald Trump is seen in the electronic viewfinder of a television camera in the Oval Office at the White House on September 18, 2026, in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

How Democracy Dies Alongside a Constricted Press

The Fulcrum is committed to nurturing the next generation of journalists.

We asked Malory Shaw, a Fall Fulcrum Fellow, to share what democracy means to her and how she sees its current health.

Keep ReadingShow less