Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

How business can help address the American schism without touching political “third rails”

A conversation with author Seth Radwell

How business can help address the American schism without touching political “third rails”
Getty Images

Elizabeth Doty has served as the Director of the Erb Institute’s Corporate Political Responsibility Task Force since its launch in 2021. For 30 years, she has helped leading companies implement their business strategies, improve employee engagement and retain customers by aligning across functions and delivering on their commitments. Her book, “The Compromise Trap,” was published in the aftermath of the 2008 Financial Crisis. Based on that work, she was recognized as a Top Thought Leader in Trust, and has designed and led executive-level programs for Fortune 500 companies, Stanford Graduate School of Business, Presidio Graduate School and the U.S. Department of Defense.

In a recent Expert Dialogue presented by the Corporate Political Responsibility Taskforce at the Erb Institute, award-winning author and former CEO Seth Radwell explored the dilemmas and opportunities that business leaders face amid increasing political polarization and incivility in public discourse. Radwell is author of “American Schism: How the Two Enlightenments Hold the Secret to Healing Our Nation,” winner of the 2022 International Book Award.


Building on his experience as a business executive — as CEO of The Proactiv Company and president of e-Scholastic — Radwell now devotes his time to exploring business’ role in democracy reform and depolarization.

During the dialogue, I asked Seth why he left business to research the causes of American polarization. He said the need for business leaders to step up came into sharp focus over the last decade as he watched the country’s democratic infrastructure weaken and civic debate collapse. “We’re actually moving more and more into an amygdala-driven dialogue about fear and emotions as opposed to facts and problem-solving,” Radwell said.

Yet in the face of this crisis, he watched as most of his peers opted to keep their heads down and avoid getting involved. “They’re afraid of backlash, and concerned that they cannot make a difference,” he said. “I understand this, but I believe business leaders have a unique opportunity to help heal the schism dividing our nation by working to support strong democratic institutions and civic discourse — all in ways that go beyond the polemical issues fueling the current rancor.”

Through the rest of the dialogue, Radwell expounded on why business leaders should be concerned about the health of U.S. democracy and how they can play a pragmatic, constructive role in promoting democratic principles and civic discourse. He gave examples of pro-democratic, nonpartisan issues business leaders can engage with and shared advice for those looking for other ways to take action on issues.

Why should business leaders be concerned about the health of the U.S. democracy?

Radwell said he’s seen civic debate collapsing over the last decade as rational problem-solving, data, and reason have been crowded out by emotionally driven content. The issue will not fix itself due to what he calls the double-incentive problem: both the political system and most media encourage emotionally driven content. Specifically, he argued that politicians know that provoking fear and anger motivates voters to turn out, while the media is also incentivized to stir emotion to promote viewership and engagement.

The result is that though the extreme voices are in the minority, they continue to get more play. He said to fix the problem, the “exhausted, frustrated” majority — or the 70% of people who dislike the country’s political polarization and the state of public discourse — must step up.

Could history provide a model for solutions to today’s polarized environment?

In his book, Radwell looked to five historical periods marked by great division, going back to the Enlightenment and the founding of constitutional democracy in the U.S. He was excited to discover that the U.S. has a successful formula.

Historically, the U.S. has navigated these divisions by letting facts and data lead the conversation and working together constructively to engage multiple perspectives and work toward consensus and compromise.

“History can act as a salve for our wounds if only we’d apply it,” he said. “Over the course of our history, we found what I call a secret sauce, a formula that we’ve used to forge solutions despite being in the face of great division. That’s the reason why I said before the stakes are so high, because where we are today, the trajectory we’re on is moving not with that solution space, that secret sauce, we’re moving away from it.”

He went on to explain that though long-debated questions such as political representation and influence continue to manifest in new forms today, the country increasingly has leaned toward rancor and acrimony while crowding out objective truth and reason.

“It’s about changing a lot of how we talk to each other, how we relate as Americans. And here’s where I think the digital environment has been somewhat destructive in allowing a level of anonymity to fester in the public discourse. We are moving away and not towards the solution, and that’s why it’s so serious.”

To restore the health of U.S. democracy, Radwell calls on the “exhausted majority” to re-engage using that formula.

“The first step,” Radwell explains, “is for the exhausted majority to realize that they are, in fact, the majority.” This realization can help them get over the fear that may hold them back from engaging in today’s bitter debates. “This is about fundamentally rejecting the paradigm of debate today — the demonization, the ad hominem attacks,” he said. “It’s about forcing the debate to consider data and facts and reason. And I think we, as business people, have a huge role to play here.”

How can companies play a pragmatic, constructive role?

Radwell suggests that private sector business leaders are uniquely positioned to help, because so many of them use the U.S. “success formula” — relying on data and debate, and bringing in many perspectives — as a matter of course.

Though some business leaders fear that in today’s environment, speaking out about issues will bring on the wrath of certain groups or get them “canceled.” Still, Radwell said there are productive, nonpartisan avenues to engage on key issues that don’t throw businesses into the middle of controversial debates. “What I try to show business people is, in fact, they can get involved in a completely nonpartisan way that has nothing to do with the hot-button issues of today. By engaging in the process of democracy systems, business leaders can make a huge contribution without touching radioactive issues.”

It starts with business leaders getting engaged locally, seeing what issues people in their communities care about, and plugging into existing efforts that make the democratic system more trustworthy and fair — led by citizens. Radwell gave four examples of such pro-democratic reforms: redistricting, open primaries, ranked-choice voting, and money in politics.

Speaking to the issue of open primaries as an example, Radwell said because of safe red or blue districts and closed primaries, 8% of the electorate is responsible for electing 84% of the U.S. Congress. He said there are already groups working on these and other structural reforms so businesses have no need to reinvent the wheel. “And that’s what I encourage business to do: to plug into this structure that’s out there,” he said.

Specific pro-democratic groups noted by Radwell included Business for America, Unite America, American Promise, and RepresentUs. He said the political depolarization group Braver Angels deals directly with mindset rather than structural changes. Business leaders can also help support economic fairness by providing job training or educational programs.

“You don’t have to give up your career to do this,” Radwell said. “You can focus on continuing to run your business, but doing these one or two or three additional things to support what I call the pro-democracy movement.”

The view, thoughts, and opinions expressed in this writing do not represent an endorsement or advocating by the ERB Institute of the work or organizations cited in this writing.


Read More

An illustration of the U.S. flag on the shape of the U.S. with blue and red figures of people across it.

Every state has its own constitution.

How State Constitutions Became the Battleground for American Rights and Liberties – on Both the Left and Right

Beyond picking governors, state legislators, local officials and representatives to serve in Congress, voters in almost every state this year will have the opportunity to amend the language of their state constitution. In one state, they could potentially rewrite the constitution altogether.

Though the U.S. Constitution is rarely amended, voters frequently amend their state constitutions. In every election cycle, voters are asked to ratify constitutional amendments.

Keep ReadingShow less
Protestors holding signs at a rally, one reads, "Trump is not above the law."

Protesters gather at a Nobody Is Above the Law rally protesting President Trump's interference in the Mueller investigation on November 08, 2018 in Washington, DC.

Larry French/Getty Images

The Double Standard Presidency: When We Watch Leaders Act Above the Law

Americans are told that no one is above the law. Yet every day, they watch a president behave in ways that would get any ordinary citizen fired, disciplined, confronted, or held accountable — and they watch some Americans excuse it. What makes this moment even more striking is that critics across the political spectrum, including conservatives, now warn that the presidency is operating on a dangerous double standard. This is not a partisan concern. It is a constitutional one. And it is tearing at the fabric of our democracy.

For generations, the Constitution has provided guardrails — separation of powers, checks and balances, oversight mechanisms, and limits on executive authority — designed to prevent any leader from functioning above the law. The framers feared concentrated power more than anything else. They believed that the presidency must be constrained not only by written law but by norms of restraint, dignity, and respect for institutions. Those norms held for centuries because presidents understood that the office was larger than any individual, and Congress understood that oversight was not optional.

Keep ReadingShow less
Study Reveals Sharp Generational Divide in How Latino Identity Influences Daily Life

Study Reveals Sharp Generational Divide in How Latino Identity Influences Daily Life

Latino immigrants and U.S.-born Latinos differ sharply in how much their identity shapes their daily lives, according to recent findings from the Pew Research Center’s 2025 National Survey of Latinos. The survey shows that Latino immigrants are far more likely than U.S.-born Latinos to say their identity is central to who they are, and that it influences their experiences in the United States. Pew researchers Gabriel Piña, Mark Hugo Lopez, Sahana Mukherjee, Dalia Fahmy, and Alexandra Cahn report that the divide reflects differences in cultural connection, lived experience, and generational distance from immigrant roots.

Pew’s analysis finds that Latino immigrants are significantly more likely to say their origins are central to their identity, while U.S.-born Latinos — especially those in the third generation or higher — are less likely to feel that connection. The report notes that “U.S. Hispanics are divided on whether their identity helps or hurts them in America,” with some respondents describing their Latino identity as a source of pride and connection, and others saying it is tied to discrimination or barriers.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Clerk Matthew Sandbar, 34, demonstrates part of the ballot-sorting process to members of the media attending a walkthrough of the Philadelphia Ballot Processing Center used to process the ballots of the 2022 US midterm elections, in Philadelphia on October 27, 2022.

Photo by Ryan Collerd / AFP via Getty Images

A Democracy Cannot Run on an AI Model

Tallying the results of Washington, DC’s first ranked-choice election in June took about 10 days—longer than many voters are used to. In an age when artificial intelligence can generate an answer in seconds, waiting days for election results can feel old-fashioned, inefficient, even suspicious. And it is about to matter far more widely. This November, 17 states, cities, and counties will use ranked-choice voting, including Maine and Alaska statewide, in races that could help decide control of Congress. More voters than ever will watch results take days to resolve, and more will be asked to trust a count they cannot see.

But that slowness may be one of its most democratic features.

Keep ReadingShow less