Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Censorship in Prime Time: Is The Authoritarian Playbook in Motion?

Opinion

Censorship in Prime Time: Is The Authoritarian Playbook in Motion?
Fayl:Jimmy Kimmel June 2022.jpg - Vikipediya

ABC’s decision to pull Jimmy Kimmel Live! indefinitely has sent shockwaves through both the media and political worlds, with critics denouncing the move as censorship. “This isn’t right,” wrote actor Ben Stiller. California Governor Gavin Newsom went further, accusing the Republican Party of “censoring you in real time,” warning that “buying and controlling media platforms, firing commentators, canceling shows… it’s coordinated. And it’s dangerous.”

This isn’t just about one late-night host. It’s about a pattern—a six-step playbook used by authoritarian regimes to dismantle democratic institutions. And under President Donald Trump’s second term, critics say that playbook is being executed with alarming precision.


On an episode of HBO’s Real Time, political satirist Bill Maher issued a stark warning about what he calls a “slow-moving coup” orchestrated by Trump.

Maher laid out a chilling checklist of tactics he believes are being used to consolidate power and undermine democratic norms.

“Let me just describe some of the steps—and you tell me if I’m being paranoid,” Maher said. He pointed to the normalization of masked federal police, the deployment of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., and the increasing militarization of urban spaces. “Get people used to looking at that. Normalize snatching people off the street. Normalize seeing the National Guard and the military on the street,” he warned.

Maher’s concerns stem from Trump’s recent moves in the capital, including the federalization of local police and the deployment of troops following a high-profile carjacking incident. Trump has since suggested similar actions may be taken in Chicago and New York City, citing public pleas for intervention and rising crime rates.

Critics argue these actions amount to political theater and dangerous overreach.

McKenzie Carrier and Thomas Carothers of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace warn, Trump is moving “more aggressively and creatively than many autocrats abroad,” bypassing legislative pathways in favor of executive orders, emergency powers, and rhetorical domination.

1. Expand Executive Power
Trump has repeatedly tested the limits of presidential authority, from deploying federal agents to threatening military action against cities. Political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt warned early on: “No other major presidential candidate in modern U.S. history… has demonstrated such a weak public commitment to constitutional rights and democratic norms” (How Democracies Die, 2018).

2. Suppress Dissent
The Kimmel incident is not isolated. It follows a broader trend of silencing critics—whether through legal threats, media pressure, or direct intervention.

The cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert earlier this year sparked a firestorm of speculation, especially given the timing: it came just three days after Colbert publicly criticized CBS’s parent company, Paramount, for settling a defamation lawsuit with Donald Trump for $16 million.

At the time, Trump celebrated the cancellation on Truth Social, writing, “I absolutely love that Colbert got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings”. He also took shots at other late-night hosts, suggesting Jimmy Kimmel could be next.

3. Control Information
From discrediting journalists to amplifying propaganda, Trump’s media strategy has created a climate where truth is negotiable. The FCC’s involvement in the Kimmel case—threatening action against ABC before the show was pulled—raises serious concerns about state interference in editorial decisions.

4. Cripple the Opposition
Trump’s rhetoric routinely paints political opponents as enemies of the state. Legal harassment, smear campaigns, and delegitimizing electoral outcomes are all tools in the autocrat’s arsenal. The Authoritarian Playbook for 2025 warns that Trump’s allies are “laying the groundwork to consolidate power and undermine checks and balances.”

5. Exploit Populism and Nationalism

Political psychologist Karen Stenner explains that authoritarianism is triggered not by fear, but by threats to “oneness and sameness”—a dynamic Trump exploits with precision (The Authoritarian Dynamic, 2005). The MAGA movement thrives on exclusion and grievance, reinforcing a worldview that demands conformity and punishes difference.

6. Secure Elite Support
Despite his populist image, Trump has rewarded loyalists with impunity and power. The Kimmel controversy reveals how media conglomerates and regulators may be aligning with executive interests, prioritizing political loyalty over public service.

Reclaiming the Three Branches

To protect our constitutional system, we must:

  • Reinforce Judicial Independence: Congress must pass legislation to insulate courts from executive influence.
  • Protect Press Freedom: Journalists must name authoritarianism when they see it. Delay is complicity.
  • Mobilize Civic Education: Teach the principles of checks and balances and democratic resilience.
  • Support Local Democracy: State and municipal governments must assert their rights against federal overreach.
  • Build Coalitions Across Difference: Authoritarianism thrives on division. Solidarity is our strongest defense.

The pulling of Jimmy Kimmel Live! is more than a programming decision—it’s a stress test for the First Amendment. When political pressure leads to the silencing of satire, we’re not just losing a television show—we’re watching the boundaries of free expression shrink in real time. If we fail to respond, this moment won’t be remembered as an anomaly, but as the inflection point when censorship moved from fringe to mainstream, and constitutional protections began to buckle under partisan weight.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network.


Read More

The robot arm is assembling the word AI, Artificial Intelligence. 3D illustration

AI has the potential to transform education, mental health, and accessibility—but only if society actively shapes its use. Explore how community-driven norms, better data, and open experimentation can unlock better AI.

Getty Images, sarawuth702

Build Better AI

Something I think just about all of us agree on: we want better AI. Regardless of your current perspective on AI, it's undeniable that, like any other tool, it can unleash human flourishing. There's progress to be made with AI that we should all applaud and aim to make happen as soon as possible.

There are kids in rural communities who stand to benefit from AI tutors. There are visually impaired individuals who can more easily navigate the world with AI wearables. There are folks struggling with mental health issues who lack access to therapists who are in need of guidance during trying moments. A key barrier to leveraging AI "for good" is our imagination—because in many domains, we've become accustomed to an unacceptable status quo. That's the real comparison. The alternative to AI isn't well-functioning systems that are efficiently and effectively operating for everyone.

Keep ReadingShow less
Government Cyber Security Breach

An urgent look at the risks of unregulated artificial intelligence—from job loss and environmental strain to national security threats—and the growing political battle to regulate AI in the United States.

Getty Images, Douglas Rissing

AI Has Put Humanity on the Ballot

AI may not be the only existential threat out there, but it is coming for us the fastest. When I started law school in 2022, AI could barely handle basic math, but by graduation, it could pass the bar exam. Instead of taking the bar myself, I rolled immediately into a Master of Laws in Global Business Law at Columbia, where I took classes like Regulation of the Digital Economy and Applied AI in Legal Practice. By the end of the program, managing partners were comparing using AI to working with a team of associates; the CEO of Anthropic is now warning that it will be more capable than everyone in less than two years.

AI is dangerous in ways we are just beginning to see. Data centers that power AI require vast amounts of water to keep the servers cool, but two-thirds are in places already facing high water stress, with researchers estimating that water needs could grow from 60 billion liters in 2022 to as high as 275 billion liters by 2028. By then, data centers’ share of U.S. electricity consumption could nearly triple.

Keep ReadingShow less
Posters are displayed next to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) as he speaks at a news conference to unveil the Take It Down Act to protect victims against non-consensual intimate image abuse, on Capitol Hill on June 18, 2024 in Washington, DC.

A lawsuit against xAI over AI-generated deepfakes targeting teenage girls exposes a growing crisis in schools. As laws struggle to keep up, this story explores AI accountability, teen safety, and what educators and parents must do now.

Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

Deepfakes: The New Face of Cyberbullying and Why Parents, Schools, and Lawmakers Must Act

As a former teacher who worked in a high school when Snapchat was born, I witnessed the birth of sexting and its impact on teens. I recall asking a parent whether he was checking his daughter’s phone for inappropriate messages. His response was, “sometimes you just don’t want to know.” But the federal lawsuit filed last week against Elon Musk's xAI has put a national spotlight on AI-generated deepfakes and the teenage girls they target. Parents and teachers can’t ignore the crisis inside our schools.

AI Companies Built the Tool. The Grok Lawsuit Says They Own the Damage.

Whether the theory of French prosecutors–that Elon Musk deliberately allowed the sexualized image controversy to grow so that it would drive up activity on the platform and boost the company’s valuation–is true or not, when a company makes the decision to build a tool and knows that it can be weaponized but chooses to release it anyway, they are making a risk-based decision believing that they can act without consequence. The Grok lawsuit could make these types of business decisions much more costly.

Keep ReadingShow less
Sketch collage image of businessman it specialist coding programming app protection security website web isolated on drawing background.

Amazon’s court loss over Just Walk Out highlights a deeper issue: employers are increasingly collecting workers’ biometric data without meaningful consent. Explore the growing conflict between workplace surveillance, privacy rights, and outdated U.S. laws.

Getty Images, Deagreez

The Quiet Rise of Employee Surveillance

Amazon’s loss in court over its attempt to shield the source code behind its Just Walk Out technology is a small win for shoppers, but the bigger story is how employers are quietly collecting biometric data from their own workers.

From factories to Fortune 500 companies, employers are demanding fingerprints, palmprints, retinal scans, facial scans, or even voice prints. These biometric technologies are eroding the boundary between workplace oversight and employee autonomy, often without consent or meaningful regulation.

Keep ReadingShow less