Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Censorship in Prime Time: Is The Authoritarian Playbook in Motion?

Censorship in Prime Time: Is The Authoritarian Playbook in Motion?
Fayl:Jimmy Kimmel June 2022.jpg - Vikipediya

ABC’s decision to pull Jimmy Kimmel Live! indefinitely has sent shockwaves through both the media and political worlds, with critics denouncing the move as censorship. “This isn’t right,” wrote actor Ben Stiller. California Governor Gavin Newsom went further, accusing the Republican Party of “censoring you in real time,” warning that “buying and controlling media platforms, firing commentators, canceling shows… it’s coordinated. And it’s dangerous.”

This isn’t just about one late-night host. It’s about a pattern—a six-step playbook used by authoritarian regimes to dismantle democratic institutions. And under President Donald Trump’s second term, critics say that playbook is being executed with alarming precision.


On an episode of HBO’s Real Time, political satirist Bill Maher issued a stark warning about what he calls a “slow-moving coup” orchestrated by Trump.

Maher laid out a chilling checklist of tactics he believes are being used to consolidate power and undermine democratic norms.

“Let me just describe some of the steps—and you tell me if I’m being paranoid,” Maher said. He pointed to the normalization of masked federal police, the deployment of National Guard troops in Washington, D.C., and the increasing militarization of urban spaces. “Get people used to looking at that. Normalize snatching people off the street. Normalize seeing the National Guard and the military on the street,” he warned.

Maher’s concerns stem from Trump’s recent moves in the capital, including the federalization of local police and the deployment of troops following a high-profile carjacking incident. Trump has since suggested similar actions may be taken in Chicago and New York City, citing public pleas for intervention and rising crime rates.

Critics argue these actions amount to political theater and dangerous overreach.

McKenzie Carrier and Thomas Carothers of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace warn, Trump is moving “more aggressively and creatively than many autocrats abroad,” bypassing legislative pathways in favor of executive orders, emergency powers, and rhetorical domination.

1. Expand Executive Power
Trump has repeatedly tested the limits of presidential authority, from deploying federal agents to threatening military action against cities. Political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt warned early on: “No other major presidential candidate in modern U.S. history… has demonstrated such a weak public commitment to constitutional rights and democratic norms” (How Democracies Die, 2018).

2. Suppress Dissent
The Kimmel incident is not isolated. It follows a broader trend of silencing critics—whether through legal threats, media pressure, or direct intervention.

The cancellation of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert earlier this year sparked a firestorm of speculation, especially given the timing: it came just three days after Colbert publicly criticized CBS’s parent company, Paramount, for settling a defamation lawsuit with Donald Trump for $16 million.

At the time, Trump celebrated the cancellation on Truth Social, writing, “I absolutely love that Colbert got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings”. He also took shots at other late-night hosts, suggesting Jimmy Kimmel could be next.

3. Control Information
From discrediting journalists to amplifying propaganda, Trump’s media strategy has created a climate where truth is negotiable. The FCC’s involvement in the Kimmel case—threatening action against ABC before the show was pulled—raises serious concerns about state interference in editorial decisions.

4. Cripple the Opposition
Trump’s rhetoric routinely paints political opponents as enemies of the state. Legal harassment, smear campaigns, and delegitimizing electoral outcomes are all tools in the autocrat’s arsenal. The Authoritarian Playbook for 2025 warns that Trump’s allies are “laying the groundwork to consolidate power and undermine checks and balances.”

5. Exploit Populism and Nationalism

Political psychologist Karen Stenner explains that authoritarianism is triggered not by fear, but by threats to “oneness and sameness”—a dynamic Trump exploits with precision (The Authoritarian Dynamic, 2005). The MAGA movement thrives on exclusion and grievance, reinforcing a worldview that demands conformity and punishes difference.

6. Secure Elite Support
Despite his populist image, Trump has rewarded loyalists with impunity and power. The Kimmel controversy reveals how media conglomerates and regulators may be aligning with executive interests, prioritizing political loyalty over public service.

Reclaiming the Three Branches

To protect our constitutional system, we must:

  • Reinforce Judicial Independence: Congress must pass legislation to insulate courts from executive influence.
  • Protect Press Freedom: Journalists must name authoritarianism when they see it. Delay is complicity.
  • Mobilize Civic Education: Teach the principles of checks and balances and democratic resilience.
  • Support Local Democracy: State and municipal governments must assert their rights against federal overreach.
  • Build Coalitions Across Difference: Authoritarianism thrives on division. Solidarity is our strongest defense.

The pulling of Jimmy Kimmel Live! is more than a programming decision—it’s a stress test for the First Amendment. When political pressure leads to the silencing of satire, we’re not just losing a television show—we’re watching the boundaries of free expression shrink in real time. If we fail to respond, this moment won’t be remembered as an anomaly, but as the inflection point when censorship moved from fringe to mainstream, and constitutional protections began to buckle under partisan weight.

Hugo Balta is the executive editor of the Fulcrum and the publisher of the Latino News Network.

Read More

When Good Intentions Kill Cures: A Warning on AI Regulation

Kevin Frazier warns that one-size-fits-all AI laws risk stifling innovation. Learn the 7 “sins” policymakers must avoid to protect progress.

Getty Images, Aitor Diago

When Good Intentions Kill Cures: A Warning on AI Regulation

Imagine it is 2028. A start-up in St. Louis trains an AI model that can spot pancreatic cancer six months earlier than the best radiologists, buying patients precious time that medicine has never been able to give them. But the model never leaves the lab. Why? Because a well-intentioned, technology-neutral state statute drafted in 2025 forces every “automated decision system” to undergo a one-size-fits-all bias audit, to be repeated annually, and to be performed only by outside experts who—three years in—still do not exist in sufficient numbers. While regulators scramble, the company’s venture funding dries up, the founders decamp to Singapore, and thousands of Americans are deprived of an innovation that would have saved their lives.

That grim vignette is fictional—so far. But it is the predictable destination of the seven “deadly sins” that already haunt our AI policy debates. Reactive politicians are at risk of passing laws that fly in the face of what qualifies as good policy for emerging technologies.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why Journalists Must Stand Firm in the Face of Threats to Democracy
a cup of coffee and a pair of glasses on a newspaper
Photo by Ashni on Unsplash

Why Journalists Must Stand Firm in the Face of Threats to Democracy

The United States is living through a moment of profound democratic vulnerability. I believe the Trump administration has worked in ways that weaken trust in our institutions, including one of democracy’s most essential pillars: a free and independent press. In my view, these are not abstract risks but deliberate attempts to discredit truth-telling. That is why, now more than ever, I think journalists must recommit themselves to their core duty of telling the truth, holding power to account, and giving voice to the people.

As journalists, I believe we do not exist to serve those in office. Our loyalty should be to the public, to the people who trust us with their stories, not to officials who often seek to mold the press to favor their agenda. To me, abandoning that principle would be to betray not just our profession but democracy itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fighting the Liar’s Dividend: A Toolkit for Truth in the Digital Age

In 2023, the RAND Corporation released a study on a phenomenon known as "Truth Decay," where facts become blurred with opinion and spin. But now, people are beginning to doubt everything, including authentic material.

Getty Images, VioletaStoimenova

Fighting the Liar’s Dividend: A Toolkit for Truth in the Digital Age

The Stakes: When Nothing Can Be Trusted

Two weeks before the 2024 election, a fake robocall mimicking President Biden's voice urged voters to skip the New Hampshire primary. According to AP News, it was an instance of AI-enabled election interference. Within hours, thousands had shared it. Each fake like this erodes confidence in the very possibility of knowing what is real.

The RAND Corporation refers to this phenomenon as "Truth Decay," where facts become blurred with opinion and spin. Its 2023 research warns that Truth Decay threatens U.S. national security by weakening military readiness and eroding credibility with allies. But the deeper crisis isn't that people believe every fake—it's that they doubt everything, including authentic material.

Keep ReadingShow less
From TikTok to Telehealth: 3 Ways Medicine Must Evolve to Reach Gen Z
person wearing lavatory gown with green stethoscope on neck using phone while standing

From TikTok to Telehealth: 3 Ways Medicine Must Evolve to Reach Gen Z

Ask people how much they expect to change over the next 10 years, and most will say “not much.” Ask them how much they’ve changed in the past decade, and the answer flips. Regardless of age, the past always feels more transformative than the future.

This blind spot has a name: the end-of-history illusion. The result is a persistent illusion that life, and the values and behaviors that shape it, will remain unchanged.

Keep ReadingShow less