Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

15 Years After Citizens United, Seattle Can Show the Way Forward

Opinion

15 Years After Citizens United, Seattle Can Show the Way Forward

Rolled up American bills against a yellow background.

Getty Images, Mensent Photography

January 21, 2025 marked the 15th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling, a decision that opened the floodgates for unlimited corporate spending in elections. Since that ruling, super PACs and outside spending have skyrocketed and the voices of everyday voters have been drowned out by wealthy donors and corporate interests. The impact of Citizens United is clear: the political system is increasingly controlled by the rich, while ordinary voters are left behind.

According to recent data from OpenSecrets, the numbers are striking. In 2008, outside spending in U.S. elections totaled $574 million. By 2012, that number had more than doubled to nearly $1.3 billion, and by 2024, outside spending exceeded $4.5 billion, much of it spent by super PACs and outside groups. In 2008, the top 100 individual donors contributed just $80.9 million, a small fraction (1.5%) of the overall $5.3 billion spent on federal elections. By 2024, that share had ballooned, with the top 10 donors alone contributing at least $42.3 million each—led by Elon Musk’s record-breaking $280 million.


While the rest of the country struggles to rein in the influence of big money, Seattle has charted a different course. In response to Citizens United, we introduced the Democracy Voucher Program (DVP) in 2017—an innovative effort to empower everyday voters and reduce the dominance of big-money donors. The program provides all Seattle residents with four $25 vouchers, which they can donate to the candidates of their choice. It’s a tool designed to give Seattle’s voters a direct role in funding local elections, ensuring that political power remains in the hands of the people, not corporate PACs or the wealthiest individuals.

The results have been encouraging. Before the DVP, only 1.3% of Seattle residents contributed to City Council races. In 2021, that number jumped to 7.6%, with over 48,000 residents participating. The program has been particularly effective in engaging first-time voters, with 88% of participants in 2017 having never donated to a local election before. What’s more, the DVP has democratized the donor pool, making it more reflective of Seattle’s diverse electorate. People of color and low-income residents, who historically have been underrepresented in political donations, are now contributing at much higher rates.

The DVP has also dramatically reduced the influence of out-of-state and corporate donors. Since its introduction, donations to Seattle City Council races from out-of-state sources have decreased by over 80%. This is a powerful reminder that it is possible to reduce the impact of big money in elections while empowering local voters to make their voices heard.

The DVP has also led to greater diversity in Seattle’s candidate pool. Nearly half of first-time candidates in recent years have cited the Democracy Voucher Program as the reason they decided to run. By removing financial barriers, the program has opened up the political arena to candidates who might not have otherwise had the resources to run. Seattle’s elections are now more competitive, with a greater range of perspectives and backgrounds.

However, as we look toward 2025, Seattle faces a critical challenge: the property tax levy that funds the Democracy Voucher Program is set to expire. Without renewal, we risk losing a vital tool in the fight against the influence of big money in local elections.

As the rest of the nation struggles to reverse the damage done by Citizens United, Seattle has the chance to continue leading the way. The Democracy Voucher Program has proven that it is possible to reduce the influence of big donors and create a more inclusive and equitable democracy. But to maintain that momentum, we must renew the levy that funds the program in 2025.

The 15th anniversary of Citizens United serves as a reminder of how far we’ve come in the wrong direction. But it’s also an opportunity for Seattle to show the country that there’s another way—one where ordinary voters, not wealthy special interests, control the political process. Let’s renew the Democracy Voucher Program and continue our leadership in the fight for a more democratic, people-powered future.

Cindy Black is the Executive Director of Fix Democracy First. She is active with several state and national coalitions, addressing voting access, money in elections, alternative voting systems, and increasing civic participation.


Read More

Poll: Voters Want Solutions for Government Corruption
Greggory DiSalvo/Getty

Poll: Voters Want Solutions for Government Corruption

A new Brennan Center survey finds that large majorities of Republicans, Democrats, and independents share deep-seated concerns about government corruption, which most voters define broadly and blame for many of the country’s biggest problems going unaddressed. The survey, fielded to 2,000 registered voters across the country between April 28 and May 6, also finds widespread support for key anticorruption reforms, such as new limits on money in elections and stronger protections against self-dealing by high-ranking government officials.

The key findings include:

Keep ReadingShow less
Elon Musk’s new ‘trillionaire’ status is a good thing, actually

SpaceX, Twitter and electric car maker Tesla CEO Elon Musk attends an event during the Vivatech technology startups and innovation fair at the Porte de Versailles exhibition centre in Paris, on June 16, 2023.

(Joel Saget/AFP/Getty Images/TNS)

Elon Musk’s new ‘trillionaire’ status is a good thing, actually

I am not a huge fan of Elon Musk as a political activist or commentator. I think he’s made Twitter — sorry, X — worse. His support for the nationalist right in Europe has been ugly. His tenure leading the Department of Government Efficiency mostly amounted to a missed opportunity and often descended into little more than performative vandalism. His personal life is not exactly consonant with my preference for bourgeois family values. Though, one can hardly accuse him of being a deadbeat dad.

On the other hand, I am a huge fan of his accomplishments in business and engineering. He helped create the foundations of the digital economy with PayPal. At the helm of Tesla, he made the electric car into a viable industry (something climate activists once lionized him for). Starlink, his internet satellite business, has been transformative. And, finally, there’s SpaceX, which went public last week. It’s a testament to human ingenuity, immigrant success and American greatness, on a scale that is hard to describe.

Keep ReadingShow less
America's Political War Is Costing Trillions: An American Union Could Fix It

The skyline of Austin, Texas.

(adamkaz / Getty Images)

America's Political War Is Costing Trillions: An American Union Could Fix It

America’s long-standing political conflicts increasingly carry an economic cost that is rarely discussed. Research on economic policy uncertainty suggests that sustained political instability can readily reduce national economic output by 1–2 percent or more of GDP through reduced investment, hiring delays, and lower productivity.

In an economy the size of the United States, that represents hundreds of billions of dollars every year — roughly the economic output of an entire mid-size U.S. state.

Keep ReadingShow less
Michigan group pushes to get big money out of politics

According to the Federal Election Commission, the 2024 election cycle saw billions spent on campaigns, with PACs alone raising more than $15 billion.

(Pexels)

Michigan group pushes to get big money out of politics

A new push to limit corporate money in Michigan politics appears to be gaining traction.

There is strong bipartisan support for restricting political contributions from regulated monopolies and companies seeking government contracts, according to a survey commissioned by supporters of the proposal. Supporters said the measure would increase transparency and reduce “pay-to-play” politics, where political donations can influence government decisions.

Keep ReadingShow less