Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

15 Years After Citizens United, Seattle Can Show the Way Forward

15 Years After Citizens United, Seattle Can Show the Way Forward

Rolled up American bills against a yellow background.

Getty Images, Mensent Photography

January 21, 2025 marked the 15th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling, a decision that opened the floodgates for unlimited corporate spending in elections. Since that ruling, super PACs and outside spending have skyrocketed and the voices of everyday voters have been drowned out by wealthy donors and corporate interests. The impact of Citizens United is clear: the political system is increasingly controlled by the rich, while ordinary voters are left behind.

According to recent data from OpenSecrets, the numbers are striking. In 2008, outside spending in U.S. elections totaled $574 million. By 2012, that number had more than doubled to nearly $1.3 billion, and by 2024, outside spending exceeded $4.5 billion, much of it spent by super PACs and outside groups. In 2008, the top 100 individual donors contributed just $80.9 million, a small fraction (1.5%) of the overall $5.3 billion spent on federal elections. By 2024, that share had ballooned, with the top 10 donors alone contributing at least $42.3 million each—led by Elon Musk’s record-breaking $280 million.


While the rest of the country struggles to rein in the influence of big money, Seattle has charted a different course. In response to Citizens United, we introduced the Democracy Voucher Program (DVP) in 2017—an innovative effort to empower everyday voters and reduce the dominance of big-money donors. The program provides all Seattle residents with four $25 vouchers, which they can donate to the candidates of their choice. It’s a tool designed to give Seattle’s voters a direct role in funding local elections, ensuring that political power remains in the hands of the people, not corporate PACs or the wealthiest individuals.

The results have been encouraging. Before the DVP, only 1.3% of Seattle residents contributed to City Council races. In 2021, that number jumped to 7.6%, with over 48,000 residents participating. The program has been particularly effective in engaging first-time voters, with 88% of participants in 2017 having never donated to a local election before. What’s more, the DVP has democratized the donor pool, making it more reflective of Seattle’s diverse electorate. People of color and low-income residents, who historically have been underrepresented in political donations, are now contributing at much higher rates.

The DVP has also dramatically reduced the influence of out-of-state and corporate donors. Since its introduction, donations to Seattle City Council races from out-of-state sources have decreased by over 80%. This is a powerful reminder that it is possible to reduce the impact of big money in elections while empowering local voters to make their voices heard.

The DVP has also led to greater diversity in Seattle’s candidate pool. Nearly half of first-time candidates in recent years have cited the Democracy Voucher Program as the reason they decided to run. By removing financial barriers, the program has opened up the political arena to candidates who might not have otherwise had the resources to run. Seattle’s elections are now more competitive, with a greater range of perspectives and backgrounds.

However, as we look toward 2025, Seattle faces a critical challenge: the property tax levy that funds the Democracy Voucher Program is set to expire. Without renewal, we risk losing a vital tool in the fight against the influence of big money in local elections.

As the rest of the nation struggles to reverse the damage done by Citizens United, Seattle has the chance to continue leading the way. The Democracy Voucher Program has proven that it is possible to reduce the influence of big donors and create a more inclusive and equitable democracy. But to maintain that momentum, we must renew the levy that funds the program in 2025.

The 15th anniversary of Citizens United serves as a reminder of how far we’ve come in the wrong direction. But it’s also an opportunity for Seattle to show the country that there’s another way—one where ordinary voters, not wealthy special interests, control the political process. Let’s renew the Democracy Voucher Program and continue our leadership in the fight for a more democratic, people-powered future.

Cindy Black is the Executive Director of Fix Democracy First. She is active with several state and national coalitions, addressing voting access, money in elections, alternative voting systems, and increasing civic participation.

Read More

Seattle Votes on Democracy Vouchers Designed To Counteract Wealthy Donors

If approved, the Democracy Voucher program would bring in $4.5 million each year through a property tax.

Road Red Runner/Adobe Stock

Seattle Votes on Democracy Vouchers Designed To Counteract Wealthy Donors

A public funding mechanism for Seattle elections is up for renewal in next week's election.

The Democracy Voucher program was passed 10 years ago. It offers voters four $25 vouchers to use each election cycle for candidates who accept certain fundraising and spending limits. Supporters said it is a model for more inclusive democracy, touting higher turnout, increased participation from more small donors and a more diverse candidate field.

Spencer Olson, spokesperson for the group People Powered Elections Seattle, which supports Proposition 1, said the program helps level the playing field.

"It's really important that people's voices are heard and that candidates can run being supported by their constituents," Olson contended. "Versus just listening to those wealthiest donors, those special interests that have historically been the loudest voices at the table and really dominated what priorities rise to the top."

The voucher is supported by a property tax. Olson and other supporters hope to bring the model statewide. Critics said the program is not big enough to make a difference in elections and has not curbed outside spending. Ballots are due by 8 p.m. Tuesday.

Olson pointed out the vouchers have succeeded in encouraging more diverse participation in local elections.

"The intention of the program was to bring a public financing program to Seattle elections to help empower more candidates -- more diverse candidates, women, renters, people of color -- to have equal access to be able to run, and run competitive elections without having to rely on wealthy donors, special interests," Olson emphasized.

Olson noted because the money comes from a dedicated tax levy, unused vouchers roll over to the next election.

"The goal isn't to create an unlimited pot of money but to be able to provide resources for candidates to run with the community's support," Olson stressed. "But it's not a blank check at the same time."

Eric Tegethoff is a journalist covering the Northwest for Public News Service.

Keep ReadingShow less
Dollar in Decline: Trump’s Economic Policies and a Falling Dollar
1 U.S.A dollar banknotes

Dollar in Decline: Trump’s Economic Policies and a Falling Dollar

“Tariffs are like throwing sand into the gears of the global economy.”
— David Kelly, JP Morgan Asset Management

The dollar has plunged 10.8% in 2025, marking its worst start since 1973—a year defined by oil shocks, soaring inflation, and Watergate-era political turmoil. Behind the headlines, one has to wonder: Could America be headed for a crisis reminiscent of that turbulent era? A volatile mix of President Trump’s trade wars, sweeping tax cuts, and assertive executive actions fuels uncertainty. The dollar’s slide isn’t merely a currency-market blip—it’s a warning that America’s economic stability and global standing are under threat.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why a College Degree No Longer Guarantees a Good Job
woman wearing academic cap and dress selective focus photography
Photo by MD Duran on Unsplash

Why a College Degree No Longer Guarantees a Good Job

A college education used to be considered, along with homeownership, one of the key pillars of the American Dream. Is that still the case? Recent experiences of college graduates seeking employment raise questions about whether a university diploma remains the best pathway to pursuing happiness, as it once was.

Consider the case of recent grad Lohanny Santo, whose TikTok video went viral with over 3.6 million “likes” as she broke down in tears and vented her frustration over her inability to find even a minimum wage job. That was despite her dual degrees from Pace University and her ability to speak three languages. John York, a 24-year-old with a master’s degree in math from New York University, writes that “it feels like I am screaming into the void with each application I am filling out.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Financial planning.  Budgeting. Expense tracking. Profit and loss analysis. Data analysis. Spreadsheet software. Productivity. Efficiency. Financial literacy. Personal finance. Business finance.

Congress and the President push forward the One Big Beautiful Bill – yet polling shows that nearly all of the major spending and tax reforms are not popular.

Getty Images, Natalia Gdovskaia

The Public Says, ‘This Is Not My Beautiful Bill’

Congress and the President continue to push forward their comprehensive spending and tax reform bill – the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB) – yet polling shows that nearly all of the major spending and tax reforms are not popular, including: lowering taxes on high incomes, cutting Medicaid and SNAP, increasing spending on defense and immigration enforcement, and eliminating tax credits for clean energy.

When asked about the OBBB in general, with no or few details about its specific policies, the public has consistently been opposed. Polls by Fox News, Quinnipiac University, KFF, Pew Research Center, and the Washington Post/Ipsos have found net opposition in the double digits. Support did not surpass 38% in any of the polls. The poll that gave the most level of detail about the bill, by the Washington Post, found the lowest level of support at just 23%.

Keep ReadingShow less