Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Trump's Cabinet Pick: Doug Collins

Trump's Cabinet Pick: Doug Collins

House Judiciary Committee ranking member Rep. Doug Collins, R-Ga., speaks during a news conference on Capitol Hill on Tuesday Dec. 3, 2019.

(Photo by Caroline Brehman/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Today, we bring you the next in our series on current and former members of Congress nominated to a cabinet post by President-elect Trump, originally published by Govtrack.us

The Senate will vote on Trump’s nominees once they are formally nominated after he takes office, but senators have already begun meeting with the expected nominees. They may also hold hearings ahead of Trump’s inauguration to expedite the confirmation process.


How did Trump’s Veterans Affairs Secretary nominee, Doug Collins, vote in Congress?

Former Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA9) is President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to replace Denis McDonough as Secretary of Veterans Affairs. The position requires confirmation by the Senate.

Collins served in the House from 2013 to 2020, However, as a Military.com article noted, Collins “did not play a prominent role on veterans issues during that time [in Congress] and never served on the House Veterans Affairs Committee.”

Instead, he appears to have been nominated largely due to his military biography. Collins served as a Navy Reserve chaplain in the 1980s, left to earn divinity and law degrees, then rejoined the military as an Air Force chaplain after the September 11, 2001 attacks, including a 2008 deployment to Iraq.

He declined to run for reelection in 2020 to run for Georgia’s Senate seat, but finished third in the open primary, failing to advance to the runoff with the top two candidates. (The seat was open due to a resignation. Trump publicly advocated that Georgia’s governor appoint Collins to temporarily fill the seat, though the governor selected someone else.)

Since leaving office, Collins has served as Georgia’s state chair for the Trump-affiliated America First Policy Institute.

Bills about veterans

Collins was the lead sponsor of 117 bills in Congress, several related to veterans issues:

Newborn Care Improvement Act

This bill would have doubled the maximum length of healthcare provided for a baby born to a veteran at a VA hospital or facility, from seven days to 14. Collins introduced the bill with bipartisan cosponsorship in 2014, 2015, and 2017, but it never received a House vote.

Current law remains seven days.

Expanding Veterans’ Access to Choice Act

In 2014, a series of scandals emerged about VA hospital and medical facility backlogs and wait times, particularly focusing on one Phoenix facility. Ultimately, up to 40 veterans died while waiting for medical care in Phoenix alone. Overall, at least 42 VA institutions were placed under investigation. President Obama’s VA Secretary, Eric Shinseki, resigned.

In response, Congress enacted a new law that same year with a number of reforms. Yet even after the enactment, Collins thought something was still missing. So, he added a short addendum for clarification:

Any veteran who lived within 40 miles of a VA hospital but couldn’t be assigned a VA doctor or receive their needed medical care within that 40-mile distance still remained eligible for the government’s Veterans Choice medical program.

The bill attracted bipartisan cosponsorship but never received a standalone vote. As far as GovTrack can determine, it does not appear the measure was ever enacted.

Major votes about the VA

Collins voted for perhaps the three biggest veterans-related laws during his congressional tenure – although that’s not too revealing about his priorities, since the vast majority of Congress voted for all three as well.

However, the subsequent history of those laws reveals how congressional intent doesn’t always work as intended in practice.

First was the aforementioned Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014, a set of reforms after the VA health scandals. The House vote was almost unanimous at 420-5, with all five dissents from Republicans. Collins voted for it.

However, the Obama-era VA stopped implementing aspects of the law in 2016 related to firing and disciplining employees, claiming the provisions were unconstitutional.

Next was the VA Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act of 2017, which GovTrack covered at the time. That bill enhanced immunities for in-house whistleblowers and made it easier for the VA Secretary to fire employees, particularly after the revelation that some employees had watched pornography on work computers yet weren’t fired. The House vote was 368-55. Collins voted for it.

At that time, 54 of the 55 dissents were Democrats, concerned that avenues for employee appeals were too restricted. Indeed, an appeals court and federal labor boards subsequently curtailed the law. L.

In response, Republicans in the current Congress introduced the Restore VA Accountability Act, which would create another mechanism making it easier for VA employees to be disciplined or fired in a way that might fare better in the courts. The GOP-controlled House Veterans’ Affairs Committee passed it in March, but it may not get a vote in the full chamber or the Senate.

Finally, there was the VA MISSION Act of 2018, which provided a series of technical changes to the agency. The House vote was 347-70. All 70 dissenters were Democrats, who opposed the bill’s lack of a sustainable funding source. The acronym MISSION stood for Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks.

What Congress is saying

Collins “knows the trials of the battlefield, having completed a deployment to Iraq… and has a strong understanding of the policies that impact veterans,” Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee top Republican Sen. Jerry Moran (R-KS) said in a press release. “President Trump nominated a candidate who has demonstrated his dedication to public service and a willingness to support veterans and their families.”

Democrats seem amenable to the nomination.

"I worked with Doug Collins when he was in Congress. And I look forward to continuing to work with him as VA Secretary,” House Veterans’ Affairs Committee top Democrat Rep. Mark Takano (D-CA39) said in a press release, implying that his nomination was relatively noncontroversial and Senate confirmation was likely.

“I hope we can work together to… continue to address the deadly legacy of toxic exposure, leave no veteran behind, and ensure that VA remains a strong institution that serves all generations of veterans."

The Senate will vote on Trump’s nominees once they are formally nominated after he takes office, but senators have already begun meeting with the expected nominees. They may also hold hearings ahead of Trump’s inauguration, to expedite the confirmation process.

Jesse Rifkin’s writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.


Read More

The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's annual policy conference at the Washington Convention Center March 6, 2018 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

The Unscrupulousness of AIPAC

After AIPAC failed to defeat El-Sayed in the Michigan Democratic Senate primary—after spending $32 million—it said that it remains committed to defeating El-Sayed and his "radical, anti-Israel" agenda in the general election. Which means it is poised to sink tens of millions of dollars in supporting Republican Mike Rogers. It also said that Haley Stevens, his opponent, had presented "an authentic Democratic agenda." Meaning that El-Sayed did not? And they think that Mike Rogers, a MAGA Trump supporter, does compared with El-Sayed?

How can AIPAC say that El-Sayed does not present an authentic Democratic agenda when his socialist stance is much more in line with the principles stated in the Declaration of Independence than most centrist Democrats'? And making it sound like AIPAC cares about an authentic Democratic agenda is deceitful, when in the same breath they make clear that they will support Mike Rogers, a Trump lackey, in the general election.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research
silhouette of person using microscope

Scientists Warn of Deepening Federal Attacks on Research

Scientists and the federal government have been close partners since World War II. A landmark report by President Truman’s chief science advisor laid out a vision for government research that shaped eight decades of federally funded science. That vision is now at risk. In principle, the Trump administration has supported scientific research with its own vision for a new “golden age of science.” But in practice, the administration has upended the relationship between the government, researchers, and their institutions. The changes have alarmed working scientists and their allies, who have protested in record numbers.

In July, I moderated a webinar on “Rewriting the Rules: What’s happening to public science?” (read the transcript here). The webinar was co-sponsored by NAPA, CODE, and the Bridge Alliance, with Dr. Aaron Carroll of AcademyHealth, Dr. Chris Marcum of the Federation of American Scientists, Dr. Gretchen Goldman of the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Dr. Maryam Zaringhalam of the Center for Open Science. I also interviewed Cole Donovan of the Stand Up for Science Foundation by email.

Keep ReadingShow less
Why hasn’t the Princeton Redistricting Project spoken out?

The exterior of Capitol Hill

Getty Images

Why hasn’t the Princeton Redistricting Project spoken out?

The 2026 congressional map is finally set after ten states adopted new congressional redistricting maps for the November 3 General Election. Observers note that the Princeton Gerrymandering Project (PGP) has not graded any state’s maps since it gave California’s Proposition 50 an “F” on October 30, 2025.

The PGP has officially paused grading its Redistricting Report Card because founder Dr. Sam Wang, who transitioned from the Gerrymandering Project to the Electoral Innovation Lab, has launched a campaign for Congress in New Jersey’s 12th District, requiring him to step back from his academic roles, including his leadership at PGP.

Keep ReadingShow less
Impunity: Democracy and the Toll of Unchecked Harm

Lady Justice

Photo provided

Impunity: Democracy and the Toll of Unchecked Harm

Impunity is not only the failure to punish. It is a public answer to the question of whether harm matters.

Every democracy must repeatedly answer the question of impunity. When public trust is violated, or when law itself is manipulated or attacked, penalties matter. But the deeper question is whether a society can recognize injury and prevent further harm when it has lost the ability to clearly name wrongdoing.

Keep ReadingShow less