Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Contentious Senate Hearings Begin

News

Contentious Senate Hearings Begin

U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's nominee for Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth speaks during a Senate Armed Services confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill on January 14, 2025 in Washington, DC.

(Photo by Chen Mengtong/China News Service/VCG via Getty Images)

President-elect Donald Trump’s nomination of Pete Hegseth as defense secretary set the stage for a series of confirmation hearings ahead of the inauguration on January 20.

During Tuesday’s hearing, Democrats raised concerns about Hegseth’s qualifications, particularly regarding his experience in managing nonprofit finances and his personal conduct. They argued that he does not meet the expected standards for a leader at the Pentagon.


Meanwhile, Trump’s allies have been actively working to sway Republican senators, including potential threats to support primary challengers against those who oppose the nomination.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune has expressed optimism about Hegseth’s chances for confirmation. "I think he's got a [confirmation] path," he toldFox News ' Laura Ingraham.

Here’s the schedule:

Wednesday, Jan. 15

9 a.m.

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, picked to lead the Department of Homeland Security, is slated to appear before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee

9:30 a.m.

Pam Bondi, picked for attorney general, is slated to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee

10 a.m.

Sen. Marco Rubio, secretary of state pick, is set to appear before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee

Former Rep. John Ratcliffe, pick for CIA director, is set to appear before the Senate Intelligence Committee

Former Rep. Sean Duffy, pick for transportation secretary, will appear before the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee

Liberty Energy CEO Chris Wright, pick for energy secretary, is scheduled to appear before the Senate Energy & Natural Resources Committee

1 p.m.

Russell Vought, pick to be director of the Office of Management and Budget, is set to appear before the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee

Thursday, Jan. 16

10:00 a.m.

Former governor of North Dakota Doug Burgum, Interior Department pick, appears before members of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee

Former NFL player who ran the White House Opportunity and Revitalization Council in Trump's first term, Scott Turner, Housing and Urban Development Department pick, appears at a hearing before the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee

Former New York congressman Lee Zeldin, Environmental Protection Agency pick, appears before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee

10:15 a.m.

Pam Bondi returns before the Senate Judiciary Committee

10:30 a.m.

Billionaire money manager, Scott Bessent, Treasury Department pick, takes questions from members of the Senate Finance Committee.

What is the Cabinet?

Presidents guide the federal government with the support of a team of close advisers and the leaders of various federal agencies, such as the Department of Justice and the Pentagon.

While certain positions, like the vice president and the White House chief of staff, do not require Senate approval, most cabinet positions do. Some roles, such as the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations or the CIA director, have been considered at the Cabinet level in some administrations but not in others.

Why does the Senate get a say?

Article II is the section of the Constitution that deals with the executive branch. Section II, it makes clear that while the president is the executive, he hires certain positions spelled out in the Constitution and others established by law with the “advice and consent” of senators.

How does the process work?

A president-elect nominates his picks for top officials after winning the election.

Oversight committees in the Senate can conduct confirmation hearings before Inauguration Day on January 20. They can refer nominees to the full Senate or quick votes when the new president takes the oath of office.

Some reporting for this article was curated from the Associated Press, NPR, and NBC.


Read More

White House
A third party candidate has never won the White House, but there are two ways to examine the current political situation, writes Anderson.
DEA/M. BORCHI/Getty Images

250 Years of Presidential Scandals: From Harding’s Oil Bribes to Trump’s Criminal Conviction

During the 250 years of America’s existence, whenever a scandal involving the U.S. President occurred, the public was shocked and dismayed. When presidential scandals erupt, faith and trust in America – by its citizens as well as allies throughout the world – is lost and takes decades to redeem.

Below are several of the more prominent presidential scandals, followed by a suggestion as to how "We the People" can make America truly America again like our founding fathers so eloquently established in the constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Gavin Newsom’s Prop 50 is Reshaping California - For Better or For Worse
Getty Images, Mario Tama

How Gavin Newsom’s Prop 50 is Reshaping California - For Better or For Worse

Prop 50 is redrawing California’s political battlefield, sparking new fears of gerrymandering, backroom mapmaking, and voters losing their voice. We cut through the spin to explain what’s really changing, who benefits, and what it could mean for competitive elections, election reform, and independent voters. Plus, Independent CA-40 candidate Nina Linh joins us to spell out how Prop 50’s map shifts are already reshaping her district - and her race.

Keep ReadingShow less
Texas redistricting map
A map of new Texas Senate districts can be seen on a desk in the Legislature.
Tamir Kalifa/Getty Images

SCOTUS Upholds Texas Map, Escalates Gerrymandering Crisis

In the closing weeks of 2025, a majority of the U.S. Supreme Court moved our democracy in the wrong direction by clearing the way for a gerrymandered congressional map in Texas to be in place for the 2026 midterm elections in its Abbott v. LULAC decision. Aside from the fact that the new Texas map illegally discriminates to weaken the voting power of the state’s Black and Latino voters, the Supreme Court’s ruling is deeply problematic on a number of other levels.

Most disturbingly, the majority in this opinion takes an appalling new turn on the issue of partisan gerrymandering. To illustrate the Court’s backward slide, consider that in 2004 then-Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote as a concurrence to an opinion in a key redistricting case that, if a state declared it would redistrict with the goal of denying a certain group of voters “fair and effective representation” for partisan reasons, then the Court “would surely conclude the Constitution had been violated.”

Keep ReadingShow less