Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Democracy for All Project

An Annual Survey and Research Initiative

News

The Democracy for All Project

American democracy faces growing polarization and extremism, disinformation is sowing chaos and distrust of election results, and public discourse has become increasingly toxic. According to most rankings, America is no longer considered a full democracy. Many experts now believe American democracy is becoming more autocratic than democratic. What does the American public think of these developments? As Keith Melville and I have noted, existing research has little to say about the deeper causes of these trends and how they are experienced across partisan and cultural divides. The Democracy for All Project, a new partnership of the Kettering Foundation and Gallup Inc., is an annual survey and research initiative designed to address that gap by gaining a comprehensive understanding of how citizens are experiencing democracy and identifying opportunities to achieve a democracy that works for everyone.

A Nuanced Exploration of Democracy and Its Challenges


Beyond surface-level observations, a more nuanced exploration of democracy and its challenges is critical. Democracy has never worked fully for many groups in a nation founded on the enslavement of African Americans, the exclusion of women, and the conquest of Indigenous peoples. People’s dissatisfaction with democracy may have multiple, perhaps even contradictory, sources. Citizens today are worried about access to affordable housing and health care, the quality of education, and escalating prices for food, gas, and basic necessities. Some also believe institutions represent the wealthy and elites. At the same time, many of the most privileged believe that they are being discriminated against because of efforts to address historical inequalities.

As the challenges to American democracy have evolved, survey research must also grow and adapt. The depth of the divisions and discontent go beyond conventional explanations based on previous eras in our nation’s history. Are Americans hopelessly divided, or are there opportunities for common ground? How can institutions be improved to be more worthy of Americans’ trust? Surface-level questions will be insufficient to diagnose and reverse the dissatisfaction that has enabled this democratic backsliding.

Tying in Lived Experience

The starting point for the Democracy for All Project is the overwhelming evidence that many Americans perceive democracy is not working for them. For Americans to regain their faith in democracy, they must experience democracy positively in their communities and everyday lives. The research will introduce a novel approach to measuring democracy and will examine the deeper emotional and cultural drivers behind how people choose to engage with democracy today. How do ordinary Americans engage in 21st century democracy? What are the obstacles? How is democracy, or democratic backsliding, reflected in things they care about?

Values and Civic Identity

At the center of these trends is America’s future as a multiracial, pluralistic democracy. The US is projected to become majority-minority in 2045, and Gen Z is more diverse than preceding generations. Historically, diverse democracies have generally failed. The future of American democracy may depend on whether Americans can find common ground on core questions of national identity. Many of today’s most divisive issues hinge on attitudes toward various forms of diversity, including reckoning with America’s racial past, immigration, gender identity and LGBTQ+ rights, and whether America is or should be a Christian nation. What do Americans mean by “We, the People”? Do they see ethnic, racial, religious, and gender diversity as a national strength or a threat?

Elevating All Voices

To study these questions, today’s democracy demands robust data that reflect its growing diversity. A key goal of The Democracy for All Project is to elevate diverse voices while finding opportunities for common ground. The survey is committed to a best-in-class large sample size—20,000 adults—sufficient to account for the multi-dimensionality of people’s identities. The data will not be the same across groups or even within groups. Emerging research is showing that minority groups are not homogeneous, so differences within groups by gender, generation, nationality, education, and religion need to be fully understood. Within Gen Z, differences by gender are emerging. These trends can be understood only by including hard-to-reach populations with sufficient demographic resolution to study under-researched subpopulations.

A Commitment to the Long Term

Finally, the current crisis of American democracy has evolved over many years, and if democracy continues to decline, it will not fail overnight. To see how American democracy continues to evolve and respond, Kettering and Gallup are committed to annual surveys over an initial five-year period, with the flexibility to supplement core questions with specific items from year to year.

On November 20, Kettering and Gallup will release Is Democracy Working? the first of two reports on this year’s data. With a deeper understanding of what citizens want from their democracy, citizens, change-makers, and leaders can begin working together toward a shared vision in which everyone has a voice and feels valued.

Derek W. M. Barker is senior program officer for research initiatives at the Charles F. Kettering Foundation, a political theorist, and the lead editor of the foundation’s blog series From Many, We.

From Many, We is a Charles F. Kettering Foundation blog series that highlights the insights of thought leaders dedicated to the idea of inclusive democracy. Queries may be directed to fmw@kettering.org.

Read More

The statue of liberty.

David L. Nevins writes how President Trump’s $1 million “Gold Card” immigration plan challenges America’s founding ideals.

Getty Images, Alexander Spatari

Give Me Your Rich: The Gold Card and America’s Betrayal of Liberty

“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

These words, inscribed on the Statue of Liberty, have long served as a moral and cultural statement of America’s openness to immigrants and those seeking freedom. They shape Lady Liberty as more than a monument: a beacon of hope, a sanctuary for the displaced, and a symbol of the nation’s promise.

Keep ReadingShow less
Meet the Faces of Democracy: Karen Brinson Bell

Karen Brinson Bell

Photo provided

Meet the Faces of Democracy: Karen Brinson Bell

Editor’s note: More than 10,000 officials across the country run U.S. elections. This interview is part of a series highlighting the election heroes who are the faces of democracy.

Karen Brinson Bell, a Democrat and native of North Carolina, is the former executive director of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, serving from June 2019 to May 2025. As the state’s chief election official, she was responsible for overseeing election administration for more than 7.5 million registered voters across 100 counties in North Carolina. During her tenure, she guided the state through 20 elections, including the 2024 presidential election held in the aftermath of Hurricane Helene, as well as the 2020 presidential election during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Under her leadership, North Carolina gained national and state recognition, earning four Clearinghouse Awards from the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, two national Election Center awards, and the inaugural Partnership Award from the North Carolina Local Government Information Systems Association.

Keep ReadingShow less
Social media apps on a phone

A Pentagon watchdog confirms senior officials shared sensitive military plans on Signal, risking U.S. troops. A veteran argues accountability is long overdue.

Jonathan Raa/NurPhoto via Getty Images

There’s No Excuse for Signalgate

The Defense Department Inspector General just announced that information shared by Defense Secretary Hegseth in a Signal chat this spring could have indeed put U.S. troops, their mission, and national security in great peril. To recap, in an unforced error, our Defense Secretary, National Security Advisor, and Vice President conducted detailed discussions about an imminent military operation against Houthi targets in Yemen over Signal, a hackable commercial messaging app (that also does not comply with public record laws). These “professionals” accidentally added a journalist to the group chat, which meant the Editor-in-Chief of the Atlantic received real-time intelligence about a pending U.S. military strike, including exactly when bombs would begin falling on Yemeni targets. Had Houthi militants gotten their hands on this information, it would have been enough to help them better defend their positions if not actively shoot down the American pilots. This was a catastrophic breakdown in the most basic protocols governing sensitive information and technology. Nine months later, are we any safer?

As a veteran, I take their cavalier attitude towards national security personally. I got out of the Navy as a Lieutenant Commander after ten years as an aviator, a role that required survival, evasion, resistance, and escape training before ever deploying, in case I should ever get shot down. To think that the Defense Secretary, National Security Advisor, and Vice President could have so carelessly put these pilots in danger betrays the trust troops place in their Chain of Command while putting their lives on the line in the service of this country.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Democrat's Plan for Ending the War in Gaza
An Israeli airstrike hit Deir al-Balah in central Gaza on Jan. 1, 2024.
Majdi Fathi/NurPhoto via Getty Images

A Democrat's Plan for Ending the War in Gaza

Trump's 21-point peace plan for Gaza has not and will not go anywhere, despite its adoption by the UN Security Council. There are two reasons. One is that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his ultra-orthodox nationalist allies will not agree to an eventual Palestinian state in the occupied territories. The other is that Hamas will not stand down and give up its arms; its main interest is the destruction of Israel, not the creation of a home for the Palestinian people.

Democrats should operate as the "loyal opposition" and propose a different path to end the "war" and establish peace. So far, they have merely followed the failed policies of the Biden administration.

Keep ReadingShow less