Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

World AIDS Day and the Fight to Sustain PEPFAR

Opinion

World AIDS Day and the Fight to Sustain PEPFAR
a woman in a white shirt holding a red ribbon
Photo by Bermix Studio on Unsplash

Every year on December 1, World AIDS Day isn't just a time to look back, but it’s a call to action. This year, that call echoes louder than ever. Even as medicine advances and treatments improve, support from political leaders remains shaky. When the Trump administration threatened to roll back the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), it became clear just how vulnerable such critical programs can be. The effort to weaken or even dismantle PEPFAR wasn't just a policy debate; it lifted the curtain on how fragile moral commitments are. Revealing how easily leaders can forget the human stakes when political winds shift.

Despite these challenges, PEPFAR endures. It remains among the world's most effective global health efforts. For over twenty years, it has received bipartisan backing, saved more than 25 million lives, and strengthened public health systems across dozens of countries, notably in Africa and the Caribbean. Its ongoing existence stands as a testament to what is possible when compassion and strategic investment align. Yet the program's continued effectiveness is anything but guaranteed. As attempts to chip away at its foundation recur, PEPFAR's future depends on unflagging advocacy and renewed resolve to keep it robust and responsive.


The threat to PEPFAR revealed something deeper: as HIV became easier to treat and faded from daily headlines in wealthier countries, our collective sense of urgency weakened. Political attacks on such programs expose an even broader societal amnesia—a willingness to let remarkable progress slip away through neglect or partisan infighting.

But for millions, especially Black communities, queer and Indigenous people, and those without reliable access to healthcare—the AIDS epidemic endures, ever-present and often invisible to the privileged. World AIDS Day, especially now, is about more than recommitting to aid spending: it's a test of whether America can recover the moral memory that first sparked global action and avoid letting history repeat itself through complacency or carelessness.

Today's medical reality would have seemed miraculous a generation ago: antiretroviral drugs make HIV manageable, while preventative medications and rapid testing have transformed both outcomes and expectations. But science hasn't reached everyone, nor has it erased the longstanding inequities the epidemic exposed. Disparities persist here in the United States. Black Americans comprise roughly 13 percent of the population, but nearly 42 percent of new HIV cases, while the South continues to suffer the highest rates due to poverty and lack of access to care. The most significant risk now isn't ignorance: it's losing focus, letting attention drift, and leaving the most vulnerable behind.

Moments of instability when PEPFAR faces budget cuts or operational threats cause immediate harm: clinics strain under funding losses, prevention efforts stall, and access to medication wavers. Though PEPFAR still stands, its position is less secure than it appears. Each debate about its future puts lives in the balance and makes it harder to rebuild relationships and infrastructures lost to even brief lapses. So the current landscape brings into sharper focus not just the challenges of policy, but the underlying drift of our public conscience. Attacks on PEPFAR aren't grounded in evidence of its failure, but in politics, ideology, or skepticism toward global engagement itself.

Yet HIV's stubborn presence is a mirror held up to global values. Diseases ignore borders, and so must our compassion. When wealthier nations let programs like PEPFAR atrophy, they accept a world in which birthplace determines fate—abandoning the vision of global solidarity that programs like PEPFAR once embodied. Eroding that foundation risks not just progress, but also hope and trust.

On World AIDS Day, we ought to imagine what comes next. In many faith communities, Advent brings an obligation to carry memory into present action—not just to recall the past, but to act with a sense of duty shaped by difficult lessons. Strengthening PEPFAR and securing its future depends on that same ethic. This neighborliness pushes us to recognize that the well-being of a mother in Tanzania and a young man in Alabama is interconnected. The ongoing fight against stigma remains critical. Even as language has softened, prejudice persists, making care harder to seek and receive, faith organizations and advocates must continue their work to stamp out shame—putting human dignity and compassion first.

Revitalizing public concern will take more than statistics. Amplifying the stories and experiences of people living with HIV, supporting bold education campaigns, and building real coalitions matter more than ever. HIV has not disappeared; it remains preventable and disproportionately targets the marginalized.

Commemorating World AIDS Day is, at its heart, a refusal to forget. It honors not just those lost, but those who survived, resisted, and built communities of support. Accurate remembrance is only the beginning; absolute honor resides in protecting the living and keeping life-saving programs like PEPFAR beyond the reach of short-term political games.

The ongoing struggle against HIV and AIDS tests both domestic priorities and global leadership. Will the U.S. step up as a trusted partner and healer, or keep retreating behind suspicion and isolation? Keeping PEPFAR strong is only the first step. The deeper challenge is to rekindle the public conscience to approach suffering as a call to action, not a distant trouble.

Managing HIV and AIDS with the tools of medicine alone isn't enough. World AIDS Day demands memory and action. It takes courage to insist that the vulnerable are never left to fend for themselves. And it takes imagination to envision an end to the epidemic hand in hand with a broader struggle for dignity, justice, and solidarity.

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.

Read More

A stethoscope, calculator, pills, and cash.

As ACA subsidies expire and Medicaid rolls shrink, millions could face higher premiums or lose coverage, reigniting a national healthcare debate.

Getty Images, athima tongloom

How Expiring Subsidies and Medicaid Cuts Could Reshape U.S. Access to Care

Current Issue

In the coming year, millions of Americans could see their health insurance premiums rise, or lose coverage entirely, as key federal supports for affordable care are set to expire. The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace, which were later extended by the Inflation Reduction Act, are scheduled to expire at the end of 2025. According to one analysis, if these enhanced subsidies expire, premiums on average could increase by 25-100 percent. At the same time, several states are reducing Medicaid rolls following the end of the pandemic-era continuous coverage requirement. Over 25 million people had been disenrolled from Medicaid and CHIP during this process in 2024. Together, these changes could redefine U.S. healthcare access, reigniting debates about public health and fiscal restraint.

Background

The ACA, passed in 2010, aimed to make health insurance more accessible for millions of uninsured Americans by expanding Medicaid eligibility and creating subsidized plans under the premium tax credit. The ARPA of 2021 significantly increased those marketplace subsidies, eliminating the 400% of poverty threshold for eligibility and reducing the percentage of income that enrollees must pay in premiums. As a result, the number of people eligible for marketplace subsidies increased from 18.1 million to 21.8 million from 2020-2021. Meanwhile, pandemic policies prevented states from disenrolling almost all Medicaid and CHIP enrollees for over three years. When this continuous coverage requirement ended in April of 2023, states began to reevaluate the eligibility of tens of millions of people. The expiration of ARPA temporary subsidies combined with the end of continuous Medicaid coverage set the stage for a contentious healthcare market next year.

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Healthcare in 2025: Chaos, Costs, and Controversy Without Real Progress
a person wearing a blue shirt with a white circle on it
Photo by Nappy on Unsplash

U.S. Healthcare in 2025: Chaos, Costs, and Controversy Without Real Progress

The year 2025 has been one of the most turbulent years in modern U.S. healthcare. The headlines were explosive, the rhetoric dramatic, and the controversies nonstop. Yet for all the hoopla and upheaval, the medical care Americans receive now, month in and month out, looks no better than what they experienced on January 1 — but far more expensive.

Here are five areas of healthcare that generated chaos, confusion, and conflict in 2025 without meaningful improvement.

Keep ReadingShow less
University Roundtable Puts Latino Mental Health Front and Center

woman holds "Hablo Espanol" button

Picture Provided

University Roundtable Puts Latino Mental Health Front and Center

“Keep it to yourself. Push it down. Don’t say anything.” That is how Isis Lara Fernandez was taught to live with her status as an undocumented immigrant in the United States.

At 6-years-old, Lara Fernandez fled to the U.S. with her mother and siblings to escape domestic violence in Honduras. From that point forward, Lara Fernandez navigated life with a persistent fear that her secret could be discovered at any point in time.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Health Care Debate & Feldstein’s Fix
black and gray stethoscope

The Health Care Debate & Feldstein’s Fix

Serving in Congress during the implementation of President Barack Obama’s Affordable Care Act, Republicans embraced the position of “repeal and replace.” Repeal the ACA, but replace it with what? The debate is front-and-center again, though the ground has shifted some. There is more support for the ACA. Even some Republicans are looking to temporarily extend COVID-era subsidies for ACA health plans. Other Republicans want Health Savings Accounts, so more money goes to individuals instead of insurance companies. Democratic leadership seeks an approach temporarily extending the expanded premium subsidies, during which the entire approach to health care can be rethought.

The late economist Martin Feldstein had the fix: Martin Feldstein proposed a voucher system in which everyone could purchase a health insurance plan covering health care expenses exceeding 15% of their income. This could be combined with HSAs if they prove popular with the public.

Keep ReadingShow less