Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Video: My Brother’s Shoes

Hugh James Music

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Three weeks ago I wrote a column in The Fulcrum titled “ Shifting the narrative on homelessness in America.“ About homelessness in America, I noted the ease with which once can become numb to statistics and forget about the human suffering each homeless person is experiencing.


As so often is the case in our country, real progress on major social issues first necessitates emotional engagement. This can be done by putting ourselves in someone else’s shoes, looking at the situation through the eyes of others. Doing so inspires people to take action and has so often served as the foundation for social progress in our nation. And oftentimes, pop culture can play a vital role in the process whether through music, film, theater, dance, or even sports.

Robert Craig Films’ No Address, which I spoke of a few weeks ago, reminds us of the human side of those struggling as he shares the story of a group of individuals experiencing the national epidemic of homelessness due to various personal circumstances.

And so with my mind still focused on the emotions I’ve been feeling since the previous writing, a friend introduced me to a song asking, “Has anybody out there seen my brother's shoes?”

Hugh James captures the spirit of brotherly love with the passion that reminds all of us not to judge the lives of others until we’ve walked a few miles in their shoes. The Los Angeles based singer/songwriter was inspired to write "My Brother's Shoes"in the wake of his brother Doug’s passing in 2014, after his sibling had fallen on hard times.

The song is a prompt to consider another’s walk in life before making our own judgements and opinions.

I was deeply moved. Are you?


Read More

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs
person sitting while using laptop computer and green stethoscope near

Healthcare Jobs Surge Mask a Productivity Crisis—and Rising Costs

Healthcare and social assistance professions added 693,000 jobs in 2025. Without those gains, the U.S. economy would have lost roughly 570,000 jobs.

At first glance, these numbers suggest that healthcare is a growth engine in an otherwise slowing labor market. But a closer look reveals something more troubling for patients and healthcare professionals.

Keep ReadingShow less
A large group of people is depicted while invisible systems actively scan and analyze individuals within the crowd

Anthropic’s lawsuit against the Trump administration over a Pentagon “supply-chain risk” label raises major constitutional questions about AI policy, corporate speech, and political retaliation.

Getty Images, Flavio Coelho

Anthropic Sues Trump Over ‘Unlawful’ AI Retaliation

Anthropic’s dispute with the Trump administration is no longer just about AI policy; it has escalated into a constitutional test of whether American companies can uphold their values against political retaliation. After the administration labeled Anthropic a “supply‑chain risk”, a designation historically reserved for foreign adversaries, and ordered federal agencies to cease using its technology, the company did not yield. Instead, Anthropic filed two lawsuits: one in the Northern District of California and another in the D.C. Circuit, each challenging different aspects of the government’s actions and calling them “unprecedented and unlawful.”

The Pentagon has now formally issued the supply‑chain risk designation, triggering immediate cancellations of federal contracts and jeopardizing “hundreds of millions of dollars” in near‑term revenue. Anthropic’s filings describe the losses as “unrecoverable,” with reputational damage compounding the financial harm. Yet even as the government blacklists the company, the Pentagon continues using Claude in classified systems because the model is deeply embedded in wartime workflows. This contradiction underscores the political nature of the designation: a tool deemed too “dangerous” to be used by federal agencies is simultaneously indispensable in active military operations.

Keep ReadingShow less