Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Video: My Brother’s Shoes

Hugh James Music

Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

Three weeks ago I wrote a column in The Fulcrum titled “ Shifting the narrative on homelessness in America.“ About homelessness in America, I noted the ease with which once can become numb to statistics and forget about the human suffering each homeless person is experiencing.


As so often is the case in our country, real progress on major social issues first necessitates emotional engagement. This can be done by putting ourselves in someone else’s shoes, looking at the situation through the eyes of others. Doing so inspires people to take action and has so often served as the foundation for social progress in our nation. And oftentimes, pop culture can play a vital role in the process whether through music, film, theater, dance, or even sports.

Robert Craig Films’ No Address, which I spoke of a few weeks ago, reminds us of the human side of those struggling as he shares the story of a group of individuals experiencing the national epidemic of homelessness due to various personal circumstances.

And so with my mind still focused on the emotions I’ve been feeling since the previous writing, a friend introduced me to a song asking, “Has anybody out there seen my brother's shoes?”

Hugh James captures the spirit of brotherly love with the passion that reminds all of us not to judge the lives of others until we’ve walked a few miles in their shoes. The Los Angeles based singer/songwriter was inspired to write "My Brother's Shoes"in the wake of his brother Doug’s passing in 2014, after his sibling had fallen on hard times.

The song is a prompt to consider another’s walk in life before making our own judgements and opinions.

I was deeply moved. Are you?


Read More

Person holding "Vote" sign.

Person holding "Vote" sign.

Photo provided

Latino Voters Shift Ahead of Midterm Elections

Two years after providing historic levels of support that helped propel Donald Trump back to the White House, Latino voters are shifting rapidly away from the Republican Party. The realignment is driven by a potent combination of persistent economic anxieties and a sharp backlash against the administration’s aggressive domestic immigration crackdowns. A landmark national poll conducted by NBC News and Telemundo reveals that the President’s approval rating among registered Latino voters has plummeted to just 27%, signaling deep political turbulence for the GOP on the eve of critical midterm elections.

When asked by reporters outside the White House about the plunging numbers, President Trump angrily dismissed the data, labeling the findings as “fake news.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Person placing ballot in voting box

Person placing ballot in voting box

Getty Images

Who Gave the Federal Government the Right to Decide Who Can Vote?

The Trump administration is pressing to remove noncitizens from voter rolls across the country. Yet an important question seems to be missing from the debate: Where, exactly, does the federal government get the authority to impose a citizenship requirement on federal elections? The Constitution does not make citizenship a universal qualification for voting. Instead, Article I, Section 2, Clause 1 states: “The Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.” At the same time, Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 explicitly grants Congress authority over the conduct of federal elections: “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.” In Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. (2013), the U.S. Supreme Court distinguished Congress’s power to regulate how federal elections are conducted from the states’ authority to determine voter qualifications, explaining that Congress may regulate the “Times, Places and Manner” of elections, “but not who may vote in them.” For much of American history, noncitizens voted in elections in at least 22 states and territories, and some historical research suggests the number may have been as high as 40. Today, certain noncitizens are still permitted to vote in local elections in California, Maryland, Vermont and the District of Columbia. If the Constitution leaves voter qualifications to the states, what gives the federal government the authority to demand otherwise?

A Long History of State Decisions

Keep ReadingShow less
USA Presidential voters on electoral college map

USA Presidential voters on electoral college map

Getty Images

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact Federalism at Its Best

Federalism operates at its peak when states collaborate as a unified network rather than acting as isolated silos. While the American system traditionally views states as competitive "laboratories of democracy," pure isolationism limits policy success. When states pool resources, align regulations, and share data, they solve national problems faster without expanding federal bureaucracy.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) represents federalism at its best by using explicit constitutional state powers to modernize the presidential election system without a constitutional amendment.

Keep ReadingShow less