Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Missouri, Kentucky move forward on tough voter ID laws

Photo ID required for voting
Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Two more solidly red states are moving closer this week to enacting a photo ID requirement for voting starting this fall.

The Republican-majority state House in Missouri gave initial approval to such a bill Wednesday. The GOP state House in Kentucky is expected to clear a measure by Friday, with enough votes to override a potential veto.

Only 18 states now require people to present an identification card with a picture on it at the polls, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, and such rules have become one of the more highly contentious parts of the democracy reform debate in recent years.


Republicans say the requirement is a proper guard against voter fraud. People are often required to show identification when conducting personal business, they argue.

Democrats and voting rights advocates argue that minorities and poor people may not have a driver's license, by far the most common form of photo ID, and that such a requirement is really intended to suppress turnout.

In Missouri last month, the state Supreme Court struck down a newly enacted law that required voters who didn't have an ID to sign a statement in order to cast a ballot. The bill now moving in Jefferson City would restore the photo ID requirement but not the sworn statement provision.

The Missouri bill gives voters only two options: show a photo ID to cast a regular ballot or else cast a provisional ballot. The state Senate, where Republicans hold 24 seats to the Democrats' 10, has until May to act, after which the signature of GOP Gov. Mike Parson could be counted on.

In Kentucky, the Senate has already passed a measure that would clarify that a driver's license photo ID should be used at the polling place. It also sets out what alternate identification cards are allowed.

While Republicans control the capital in Frankfort, Gov. Andy Beshear is a Democrat and has hinted he's opposed to the bill. (He's already become a hero in voting rights circles by acting in his first days as governor in December to restore voting rights to about 140,000 convicted felons.)

Even if Beshear were to veto the legislation, it only takes a simple majority of each house in order to overturn that veto.

The trend is moving in the opposite direction in Virginia. There, where Democrats have simultaneous control of the General Assembly and the governor's mansion for the first time in a quarter century, legislation to eliminate the state's voter ID law is awaiting the signature of Gov. Ralph Northam. He is almost certain to sign the bill — making Virginia the first state to repeal such a requirement — since he was the one who proposed it.


Read More

Gynecologist doing ultrasound of pregnant woman in hospital.

Rural hospital labor and delivery closures are creating maternity care deserts—and costing communities physicians, jobs, families, and economic investment.

Maskot/Getty Images

No Doctor, No Delivery, No Future

Today, less than half of rural hospitals in the U.S. still offer labor and delivery services, and since 2020, 139 of them have stopped delivering babies altogether. That's usually treated as public health statistic. It's also an economic one. Each closure doesn't just push expectant mothers into longer drives to the hospital, it pushes out physicians, jobs, young families, and the investment that follows them. So, what happens to a town after it loses its only labor and delivery unit?

The answer, it turns out, is a lot more than a longer drive to the hospital. More than a third of U.S. counties, 35.1 percent by the most recent national count, are now what researchers call maternity care deserts: places with no hospital or birth center offering obstetric care and no obstetric clinicians at all. Since the end of 2020, 139 rural hospitals have stopped delivering babies, and today less than half of rural hospitals nationwide still offer labor and delivery services.

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Standard for Ethical Immigration Reporting
people holding flag of U.S.A miniature
Photo by Frank Kastle on Unsplash

A New Standard for Ethical Immigration Reporting

Seven months ago, I attended the first day of my Reporting on Race class at USC. Taught by journalist and immigration reporting expert Jean Guerrero, the course offered growth I hadn’t yet imagined, showing me how much I could evolve as a journalist in just one semester.

For the next five months, I researched and reported on an immigration story of my choosing. I wrote about how educators in Los Angeles protect and advocate for students and communities living in fear of ICE deportations. These educators organized community street patrols to keep their neighborhoods safe. Finding sources and producing the final draft took months, but it was one of the most rewarding experiences of my journalism studies so far.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Utah’s H.B. 222 Set the Stage for State-level Climate Liability Shields
A factory with smoke coming out of it
Photo by Anthony Maw on Unsplash

How Utah’s H.B. 222 Set the Stage for State-level Climate Liability Shields

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Background

Keep ReadingShow less