We are building a citizen army across America fighting for a U.S. Constitutional Amendment that will end the rampant corruption of our federal government and ensure Free and Fair Elections. The massive amounts of money spent in our elections from outside special interests, often with little to no transparency, is drowning out the voices of average citizens and distorting the most fundamental principle of America - a country dependent upon the people alone. By working together, we can solve this problem and ensure true representative government in America for ourselves and future generations with an amendment to the Constitution. Wolf-PAC is using a proven strategy of going through our state governments to achieve an amendment. Learn more about our plan and how to become an active citizen by visiting our website.
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Top Stories
Latest news
Read More
Chicago South Siders impacted by air pollution can help shape future environmental policy
Jan 08, 2025
Communities in the southwest and southeast sides of Chicago impacted by the adverse effects of air pollution from truck traffic, warehouses, and factory operations have the opportunity to change their future. But what exactly are they experiencing, and how can they change it?
For the greater part of the last year, officials, including State Sen. Javier Cervantes (D-1) and 12th Ward Ald, Julia Ramirez and others from organizations such as the Environmental Defense Fund have been drafting Senate Bill 838. The bill aims to curb environmental injustices, such as air pollution caused by heavy truck traffic and industrial practices, that overburden Chicago’s Southwest and Southeast communities.
According to data distributed by the Illinois Environmental Council and the Environmental Defense Fund, exposure to pollution released from diesel trucks and buses can be deadly. While diesel vehicles only constitute 7% of the road traffic in Illinois, they are responsible for 67% of nitrogen oxide (NOx) and 59% of particulate matter 2.5 emissions in the air. High levels of NOx can produce foul smells, irritate skin and eyes, and damage respiratory airways. PM2.5 are microscopic solids or liquids that can enter your lungs and bloodstream. Both diesel pollution and PM2.5 have been linked to severe health conditions such as asthma, heart disease, and strokes.
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
Air Quality and Health Index, Chicago 2020. January 2020. Credit: City of Chicago Air Quality and Health Report.
Community organizer and Executive Director of Neighbors for Environmental Justice, Alfredo Romo, says that maps, such as the ones above, illuminate the disparity of environmental impact:
“Once you put them side to side, you will see what environmental racism looks like, and you will see how much of the Southwest Side and the Southeast Side are becoming the black lungs of the city’s infrastructure. And that's what we're saying. You know, how can we pump the brakes on any more heavy industry coming in overburdened communities?” Romo said.
The passage of Senate Bill 838 is one way. While it would aim to monitor and control pollution caused by truck traffic and industrial practices, SB838 would also focus on increasing the transparency of trucking and warehouse practices in adversely affected communities by developing environmental policy that prioritizes them. As the language stands, much of the responsibility for action falls to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (referenced 41 times throughout SB838).
A screenshot from the Chicago Truck Data Portal, a study that counted truck density in adversely affected Chicago neighborhoods. May 17, 2023. (Credit: Center for Neighborhood Technology)
“The bill is crucial for addressing uncertainty about proper air pollution sources, improving the well-being of citizens disproportionately impacted by harmful pollution, and achieving our climate goals,” Cervantes said during the most recent town hall about SB838, held this fall.
With hope for SB838’s passage by early next year, those involved emphasize that this cannot be done without relying on the voices of residents of Southwest and Southeast Chicago. This sentiment is reflected in the current language of SB838.
In addition to its main goals of increased transparency and regulation, SB838 aims to amplify community voices by establishing a council where community members can directly contribute to policy solutions.
“Pollution is distributed unevenly, impacts overburdened communities disproportionately, and varies on a block-by-block basis;,” reads the first clause of Section 9.20. of SB838.
The council established under the SB838 amendment would be called the Health and Equity Advisory Council. The council’s main aims would be to,
“Make findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding environmental justice in the State and uses of federal funds provided to the State for environmental justice,” states the current language in SB838.
The makeup of the Council’s members is what makes this development unique and pressing for community members uniquely impacted by environmental injustices in Chicago. At least two voting members (of which there are currently nine proposed spots) are to be reserved for “representatives of communities with heavy truck traffic.” There are also six proposed non-voting member seats on the Council, which, according to SB838, would be filled by representatives of community organizations,
“(A) one representative of a labor organization; (B) one representative of a statewide organization representing manufacturers; (C) 2 representatives of faith-based organizations; and (D) 2 representatives of health organizations.”
Members of the Council would share the responsibility of translating the lived experiences of Chicago Southsiders to guide future policy recommendations. While amplifying Southside voices is essential to the further development of SB838, those involved with the legislation emphasize that it has been a continuous challenge to get community members involved.
When it comes to lack of community involvement, Neda Deylami, lawyer and Vehicle Electrification Manager for the Environmental Defense Fund, said in November,
“I think that this comes up in every kind of environmental justice policy that I've personally been involved in or that I've witnessed. I think people are used to feeling disempowered.”
Romo of the N4EJ offered a different perspective from his years of experience doing community-based environmental advocacy as a resident of the Southwest Side.
“For one, we’re dealing with low-income communities. You know, Black and Brown and immigrant communities. When you really analyze those demographics, you will see that a lot of our people are working for these [trucking and factory] industries,” said Romo, “It’s very hard for them to push back on these industries because they do depend on them to put food on the table.”
Romo also cites language fluency as a challenge to involving the community in legislative development.
Despite these struggles, Romo and the N4EJ are continuing to canvas the Southwest and Southeast Sides to raise awareness of the environmental justice issues that plague these communities. They are not alone. Organizations such as the Little Village Environmental Justice Organization, Center for Neighborhood Technology, and Fish Transportation Group, Inc. are also working to collect data that validates people’s lived experiences.
Similarly, representatives and officials will continue to act as an open ear, hosting town halls and community events to better understand the unique needs of the Southwest and Southeast communities and inform the legislative development of SB838.
If you have experienced or been impacted by truck/air pollution in your job or neighborhood and would like to share your experience, please contact Neda Deylami at ndeylami@EDF.org. Your feedback and experiences are important to inform SB838 and shape future environmental policies.
Britton Struthers-Lugo is a reporter with the Medill News Service at Northwestern University, a freelance journalist, and a photographer.
Keep ReadingShow less
Recommended
American Democracy Forum: Audra Watson
Jan 08, 2025
"As America approaches its 250th birthday, growing polarization threatens our national unity, democracy, and security. We can’t afford to wait—we must address this divisiveness now," reads The Institute for Citizens & Scholars' mission in charting a peaceful path forward with well-informed citizens, productively engaged and committed to democracy.
The Institute for Citizens & Scholars brings together leaders from all backgrounds to transform college campuses, workplaces, and communities into spaces where young people can bridge divides and solve problems.
Audra Watson is the Chief of Youth Civic Programs with C&S. She leads youth-facing initiatives seeking to activate young people so that they have the skills needed to discuss important topics that divide us and can constructively engage in problem-solving within their communities.
She and I met at the National Conference on Citizenship, hosted in Washington, DC, in December. I had the chance to meet some of the winners of the Youth Civic Solutions Competition, who discussed innovative ideas for civic engagement from a youth perspective. Learn more about the program and the brilliant students by reading The next generation of civic innovators offers hope for democracy by Bradford Fitch.
I had the opportunity to speak with Audra Watson in a recent episode of American Democracy Forum, where she shared with me the work she leads with C&S, her experience as an educator, and who and what inspires her work.
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
Click here to watch the interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hNF6c UOGe70
Previously, Watson held several leadership positions within the New York City Department of Education. In her role as Executive Director, she spearheaded strategies dedicated to supporting and retaining early career teachers within the school district. Serving as the Director of Mentoring & Induction, Audra took the helm in creating a district region-wide induction plans tailored for new educators. She earned her BA in Political Science from Carleton College, MA in Education from Columbia University, and Ph.D. in Urban Education Policy from the City University of New York Graduate Center.
Here are other Change Leaders who I had the opportunity to interview as part of the American Democracy Forum series:
- Sam Daley Harris, founder of Civic Courage
- Sylvia Puente, President & CEO, Latino Policy Forum
- Jaisal Noor, Solutions Journalism Network's Democracy Cohort Manager
I am the Fulcrum's executive editor. As a journalist, I take a collaborative approach to paving the path forward to a more informed and engaged citizenry, fortifying the foundations of democracy.
Keep ReadingShow less
Moderate voices are vanishing. Here’s how to get them back.
Jan 07, 2025
Fifty years ago this month, the US Congress established the Harry S. Truman Scholarship, which brings together service-minded college juniors who span the ideological spectrum – from Neil Gorsuch, now a Supreme Court Justice, to Stacey Abrams, founder of Fair Fight, to Bill Gates, who served as the Chair of Maricopa County Board of Supervisors during the 2020 presidential election. The scholarship is intended to serve as a living memorial to our 33rd President’s commitment to public service by building a diverse community committed to upholding public institutions.
After receiving the scholarship in 1997, I spent two intense summers with my fellow Trumans, soaking in diverse viewpoints, debating policy, wrestling with ethical dilemmas, and dreaming about how we might serve our country. During the Clinton impeachment's seemingly unprecedented partisan tensions, we discussed running on cross-partisan slates – not promising to always agree, but committing to respectful engagement and understanding our differences. Twenty-five years later, watching my 17-year-old son write about losing his faith in politics, I wonder what happened to that vision.
These weren't just idealistic dreams. When my husband served in the Colorado legislature, we put these principles into practice. We hosted dinners with his colleagues across the aisle and their spouses, to connect as people first, and they often reciprocated. One memorable visit took us to Republican Representative Jim Wilson's home in Salida. Our young sons walked into a house adorned with hunting trophies, wide-eyed at the mounted deer and moose. Over dinner, Jim told us stories about growing up hunting, and we later watched our boys bounce on the trampoline with his granddaughter.
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
While Jim and my husband disagreed on many issues, their ability to see each other as people first led to productive conversations at the Capitol. They found ways to compromise on thorny issues, serving their constituents more effectively because they understood the human complexity behind their political differences. This approach led my husband to pass more bipartisan bills than any other legislator in the building during his eight years of service.
The Boettcher Foundation in Colorado recognized the power of such personal connections. For years, they ran a successful program bringing new legislators together across party lines, away from cameras and social media, focusing on human connection before policy debates. These retreats helped forge relationships that later enabled difficult compromises on contentious issues. Sadly, this program's effectiveness has waned as some new legislators now refuse to attend, viewing engagement with colleagues across the aisle as political weakness.
Last month, my son Sachin wrote in The Denver Postof watching his father endure relentless personal attacks during a recent mayoral debate, and said it was the moment he lost his "pure, unshakeable love for politics." But this isn't just about my family, it's a warning sign of a broader crisis in American democracy: we're making public service increasingly unbearable for the very people we most need in government – thoughtful moderates willing to work across divides to create effective policy solutions.
Across state legislatures and city councils, moderate voices are vanishing. They're either choosing not to run, losing primaries to extreme candidates, or stepping down. The Colorado legislature, once a body known for bipartisan collaboration, has seen an exodus of moderate leaders, replaced by individuals who seem to thrive on the rhetoric of campaigning but have little demonstrated interest in tackling the complex work of balancing competing priorities that policymaking requires.
We must reform primary systems to reduce partisan extremes. One way is to follow the lead of the more than 50 American cities that use a form of ranked choice voting (RCV), in which voters rank candidates on their ballot. If no-one receives a majority, the candidate with the fewest first-choice votes is eliminated and voters who ranked the eliminated candidate first have their votes redistributed to their second choice. This process continues until a candidate receives a majority of votes. According to the National Civic League, exit polls in cities using RCV show strong support for the system. Fair Vote found that both voters and candidates perceive RCV elections to foster more civil campaigns with less negative rhetoric compared to traditional plurality voting systems. Some states are also considering blanket or nonpartisan primaries, which allow voters to select candidates from any party for each office, encouraging all candidates to appeal beyond party bases.
Since research shows that personal connections can transcend political divisions, funders should support opportunities for elected officials to build relationships across party lines. This could be in the form of hosting and strongly incentivizing attendance at new legislator retreats, or programs that bring elected officials representing different parts of a state to visit their colleagues’ districts. While there are not enough efforts in politics to demonstrate how this would work, my experience with interfaith dialogue has shown how coming together as people can transform seemingly intractable conflicts. When campus chaplains bring together students from different faith traditions, they start with sharing personal journeys rather than theological debates. This same approach can work in politics. If anything, such approaches would bring back the type of engagement across lines of difference often experienced in the past through religious, faith-based and cultural organizations, all of which have been on the decline in the US over the last three decades.
Communities can foster these skills through practical civic engagement. School districts should offer credit for campaign work and local government internships, letting students learn democratic processes firsthand. Local organizations should create forums where citizens can practice constructive disagreement while working on shared community challenges. As part of these efforts, participants can be introduced to simple techniques like controlled breathing to help them manage their emotional reactions during difficult conversations. These hands-on experiences build the muscles needed for democratic participation far better than traditional civics classes alone.
All of us as individuals should reward journalism that illuminates complexity rather than inflames division, and contribute to outlets that prioritize substantive policy discussion over political theater. Congress is currently considering competing funding recommendations that will determine whether the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) receives any funding in 2027 – a crucial moment for preserving thoughtful public discourse. Anyone committed to a free and fair press should write to their representatives, urging them to fund CPB.
Most importantly, as voters and citizens, we must change how we engage with public servants. When voters don't understand the complexity of governing, it's easy to jump to unfair conclusions: he worked in the private sector so doesn’t care about poor people; he is white so doesn’t care about people of color; he talked with a lobbyist from the gas industry so must not care about climate change. My children heard all of these charges lobbed against a father who they know cares about all of these issues. As my son suggests, each of us can play a role in this shift by attending local government meetings, getting involved in campaigns, observing policy hearings to better understand governance's realities or hosting a dinner that brings together neighbors with different political views. Democracy happens one conversation, one relationship at a time.
The stakes couldn't be higher. Every time a talented moderate chooses private life over public service, we lose not just their leadership but also the next generation of potential leaders. The simple act of sharing a meal and watching children play together across party lines now seems quaint.
We face complex challenges that require nuanced solutions and leaders capable of building broad coalitions. It's time to make public service appealing again to those who see governance as a calling rather than a combat sport.
Ulcca Joshi Hansen, PhD, JD is a Paul & Daisy Soros Fellow and a Public Voices Fellow of The OpEd Project. Dr. Hansen is a futurist and the author of the award-winning book The Future of Smart. Her research and writing focus on bridging cultural and ideological divides during periods of rapid social change.
Keep ReadingShow less
Photo by Element5 Digital on Unsplash
After 2024, Republicans Ought to Want to Abolish the Electoral College Too
Jan 07, 2025
January 6th this year marked not just the anniversary of the violent assault on the U.S. Capitol four years ago, but the actual counting of the electoral votes in Congress (by the loser of the presidential race, Vice President Kamala Harris). Last month, three Senate Democrats presented a bill to abolish the Electoral College. It’s a pity they couldn’t secure a couple of Republican cosponsors. Because it’s quite conceivable this time around that Donald Trump might have decisively won the nationwide popular vote – but nevertheless lost in the Electoral College. The same thing that happened to Democrats in 2000 and 2016 might well have happened to the GOP in 2024.
Let’s take a look at the math. If candidate Harris had held the line in her three “Blue Wall” states, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, she would have captured the presidency. Instead, she lost all three. But by how much?
In Wisconsin, about 30,000 votes. In Michigan, about 80,000 votes. In Pennsylvania, about 120,000 votes. Grand total? About 230,000 votes.
That’s not as close as the 78,000 votes which, if flipped, would have given Hillary Clinton an Electoral College victory to accompany her 2.9 million popular vote triumph in 2016. That’s not as close as the 43,000 votes which, if flipped, would have stolen from Joe Biden his Electoral College victory after his whopping 7 million popular vote triumph in 2020. But this time, around 230,000 votes, if flipped – less than 0.15% of 155 million cast nationwide – would have stolen from Donald Trump the Electoral College victory he legitimately earned with his popular vote triumph of nearly 2.3 million votes in 2024.
Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter
That’s three elections in a row now where the clear winner of the popular vote easily could have lost or did lose the presidency!
Republicans should recall, too, that the 2000 Bush v. Gore race obviously might have gone the opposite way. Gore could have lost the nationwide popular vote by 543,895 votes yet won Florida by 537 votes – and consequently the presidency – rather than, as it actually happened, the other way around.
So how about it, GOP? How about we work together to get rid of the thing once and for all? Because the Electoral College effectively disenfranchises all, repeat all, of the residents of all 43 of the non-swing states. I vote for the Democratic presidential candidate every four years from my home in California. My misguided brother votes for the Republican presidential candidate every four years from his home in California. But both of us know that our presidential votes really don’t count. Really don’t matter. Really cannot possibly affect the outcome.
Yet voters in the seven swing states – red and blue alike – know their votes matter extraordinarily. Think how much this distorts the actual final national vote count. Who knows how many potential voters in those 43 states, because they understand this reality, don’t bother to show up? Why should they, when the presidential candidates campaign there approximately never? The Electoral College isn’t just awful because it has burned Democrats twice in the past quarter century. The Electoral College is awful because it burns our democracy every four years without fail.
Fortunately, getting rid of this civic atrocity does not, repeat not, require amending the U.S. Constitution. Article II, Section 1 says that each State shall appoint its allocated Electors “in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct.” State legislatures do not have to award all of their electors to the winner of the popular vote inside their state. They could instead assign them in proportion to how the vote was split in that state. That’s one of the imaginative plans pushed by the group Make Every Vote Count. (Nebraska and Maine do just that already.) Or they could award all their electoral votes (in an “interstate compact” with other states) to the winner of the popular vote not inside their own state, but inside the United States. That’s the brilliant plan pushed by the group National Popular Vote.
“A republic, Madame, if you can keep it.” So said Benjamin Franklin to a Philadelphia matron who asked what had emerged from the deliberations inside Independence Hall in 1787. The 250th anniversary of the birth of our country, July 4, 2026, is only 18 months away. What better moment to seize this opportunity to correct this monstrous flaw in our American democracy? Let’s compete on a level playing field for hearts and minds and votes across all the fruited plain. Let’s choose our national leader in roughly the same way they do in most other countries and exactly the same way we choose every other elected official in our country. One person. One vote. And one United States of America.
Tad Daley is President of the Americans for Democratic Action Foundation of Southern California, founded nationally in 1947 by Bayard Rustin, Hubert Humphrey, and Eleanor Roosevelt. Daley has served as a policy advisor, speechwriter, and/or coauthor with three members of the U.S. House and two U.S. Senators. He is the author of the book APOCALYPSE NEVER: Forging the Path to a Nuclear Weapon-Free World from Rutgers University Press. @TheTadDaley
Keep ReadingShow less
Load More