Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Both sides back off, for the moment, in California fight over drop boxes

California ballot drop box

California Republicans have agreed to rebrand their ballot collection boxes so they aren't confused with official drop boxes, like the one above.

Mario Tama/Getty Images

An uneasy truce in the ballot drop box war has lasted through the weekend in California.

The state Republican Party has removed some of the vote collection bins wrongly labeled "official" that it had placed in areas with hot congressional contests. Two of the state's top Democratic officials say they are taking a trust-but-verify approach to the move.

There's solid potential for the dispute to flare again, however, reigniting a national dispute about how aggressively party operatives may collect their allies' ballots. President Trump, normally the most prominent among critics who deride this so-called ballot harvesting, now asserts his party is doing exactly the right thing in California.


Republicans said Friday they will continue to maintain dozens of other boxes they've deployed that don't have the deceptive labels. Secretary of State Alax Padilla responded by promising to issue subpoenas to unearth details about the GOP effort and Attorney General Xavier Becerra said he was still deciding whether to press charges of election law violations.

Republicans set up more than 100 of the bins a week ago at churches, political offices, gun shops and other conservative-friendly spots across parts of Los Angeles, Orange and Fresno counties. GOP candidates are in the hunt to take back House seats won by the Democrats in those places two years ago, in part on the strength of that party's finely tuned vote collection operation that year.

Padilla and Becerra ordered the GOP to remove the boxes, arguing they crossed the line of the state's ballot harvesting law, which was significantly loosened in 2018.

Instead, the GOP said it would take three steps the law requires: modify the labels on the grey metal cubes to avoid confusion, assign volunteers to sign the backs of the envelopes when taking custody of them, and turn in the contents of the boxes to county officials every three days. That was good enough for state officials to temporarily stand down.

"We may be told one thing in person or we may hear or receive reports of activities but until we get evidence of it we have to assume everyone is trying to comply with the law," Becerra told reporters.

"If there is any indication of state law being violated we will not hesitate to act on it immediately," Padilla quickly added.

But the Democratic officials said they would not seek to disqualify ballots placed in the GOP bins without the necessary signature, a concession to the sensitivities of being accused of voter suppression.

The subpoenas seek the exact locations of each ballot box and the number of votes collected in each. State GOP spokesman Hector Barajas said the party might expand its operation and would not answer either question, labeling the inquiry "a thuggish voter intimidation and vote suppression tactic by our Democratic attorney general and secretary of state."

The dispute gained national attention because California, the most populous state, is also one that has switched to an almost entirely remote voting process for November because of the coronavirus pandemic. All registered voters have been sent a ballot, which can be returned by mail, in a drop box or at a voting center.

More than 1.5 million ballots have already been returned, 10 times the number two weeks before the 2016 election. Although the state's 55 electoral votes are firmly in the Joe Biden column, four congressional races and penty of downballot contests are too close to call.

For years, Republicans have decried the state's collection rules for fomenting election fraud. A House Republican study this spring raised concerns about "politically weaponized ballot harvesting" in the state but offered no proof of malfeasance in the 2018 midterms, when the GOP saw solid election night leads in several congressional races evaporate when all the ballots collected by third parties were tallied.

The most prominent case of ballot collection fraud is that of a Republican operative in North Carolina, who was indicted on felony charges connected with a scheme to collect so many ballots in a close congressional race two years ago that a do-over election was ordered. It is illegal in North Carolina for anyone other than a close relative or guardian to deliver another voter's absentee ballot. In two dozen states, any such third-party involvement is not allowed.


Read More

California Voters Don’t Like Either Party. Good Thing the Primary Doesn’t Belong to The Parties.

California voters increasingly distrust both major parties. Here's why the state's Top Two primary gives independent voters more power to shape elections.

Image: Duncan Shelby on Alamy.

California Voters Don’t Like Either Party. Good Thing the Primary Doesn’t Belong to The Parties.

SAN DIEGO, Calif. - California voters have already received ballots for the June 2 primary, and the message they have going into these elections may not be what the political class wants to hear: They are not thrilled with either major party.

A recent analysis from the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) found that majorities of likely voters have unfavorable views of both parties—61% unfavorable toward the Democratic Party and 70% unfavorable toward the Republican Party.

Keep ReadingShow less
Demonstrators hold signs during a January 6th memorial march in Washington, DC.

Demonstrators hold signs during a January 6th memorial march marking five years since the attack on January 06, 2026 in Washington, DC

Win McNamee / Getty Images

America at 250: A Nation Drifting from Its Ideals—As Unchecked Power Corrupts

As the nation approaches its 250th Anniversary, Americans should be entering a moment of pride, reckoning, and aspiration — honoring our founding ideals, confronting our injustices, and committing to a shared, inclusive future. But millions cannot reach that place. They are living in a country where the most basic democratic promise — that no one, not even the president, is above the law — is no longer true. And they are asking a question no democracy should ever force its people to ask: How do you confront injustice when leaders erase the history, hide the evidence, excuse the wrongdoing, and protect the perpetrators?

People are watching January 6 perpetrators not only be pardoned, but now discussed as victims deserving compensation — while others who committed far lesser offenses remain in prison. They are watching families who lost loved ones, officers who were attacked, and judges who were threatened receive no acknowledgment, while those who carried out the violence are elevated. They are watching Epstein victims still seeking closure while Maxwell lives comfortably. And they are watching Congress and the courts fail to check a president who intimidates, retaliates, enriches himself, and bends institutions to serve him.

Keep ReadingShow less
Businessman on ladder arranging large, multicolored speech bubbles on blue background

Pluralism has a messaging problem. Explore how body metaphors shape politics, exclusion, diversity, and democratic governance across difference.


Malte Mueller / Getty Images

We Need a New Metaphor of Us

Pluralism has a messaging problem. Part of the reason why is that there is no common emotionally intuitive metaphor for the collaborative co-creation of governance across differences that is a pluralistic democracy.

This matters because humans do not think politically through abstract principles alone — we think through metaphor.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Fragile Coalitions Beneath American Politics
white concrete building during daytime

The Fragile Coalitions Beneath American Politics

Part 1 of “Today’s Governing Gap,” a three-part series on coalition fragility, governing coherence, and the institutional continuity democratic systems require.

American politics looks stable from a distance. Two dominant parties, fiercely competitive elections, a constitutional framework that has held since the Civil War.

Keep ReadingShow less