Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Both sides back off, for the moment, in California fight over drop boxes

California ballot drop box

California Republicans have agreed to rebrand their ballot collection boxes so they aren't confused with official drop boxes, like the one above.

Mario Tama/Getty Images

An uneasy truce in the ballot drop box war has lasted through the weekend in California.

The state Republican Party has removed some of the vote collection bins wrongly labeled "official" that it had placed in areas with hot congressional contests. Two of the state's top Democratic officials say they are taking a trust-but-verify approach to the move.

There's solid potential for the dispute to flare again, however, reigniting a national dispute about how aggressively party operatives may collect their allies' ballots. President Trump, normally the most prominent among critics who deride this so-called ballot harvesting, now asserts his party is doing exactly the right thing in California.


Republicans said Friday they will continue to maintain dozens of other boxes they've deployed that don't have the deceptive labels. Secretary of State Alax Padilla responded by promising to issue subpoenas to unearth details about the GOP effort and Attorney General Xavier Becerra said he was still deciding whether to press charges of election law violations.

Republicans set up more than 100 of the bins a week ago at churches, political offices, gun shops and other conservative-friendly spots across parts of Los Angeles, Orange and Fresno counties. GOP candidates are in the hunt to take back House seats won by the Democrats in those places two years ago, in part on the strength of that party's finely tuned vote collection operation that year.

Padilla and Becerra ordered the GOP to remove the boxes, arguing they crossed the line of the state's ballot harvesting law, which was significantly loosened in 2018.

Instead, the GOP said it would take three steps the law requires: modify the labels on the grey metal cubes to avoid confusion, assign volunteers to sign the backs of the envelopes when taking custody of them, and turn in the contents of the boxes to county officials every three days. That was good enough for state officials to temporarily stand down.

"We may be told one thing in person or we may hear or receive reports of activities but until we get evidence of it we have to assume everyone is trying to comply with the law," Becerra told reporters.

"If there is any indication of state law being violated we will not hesitate to act on it immediately," Padilla quickly added.

But the Democratic officials said they would not seek to disqualify ballots placed in the GOP bins without the necessary signature, a concession to the sensitivities of being accused of voter suppression.

The subpoenas seek the exact locations of each ballot box and the number of votes collected in each. State GOP spokesman Hector Barajas said the party might expand its operation and would not answer either question, labeling the inquiry "a thuggish voter intimidation and vote suppression tactic by our Democratic attorney general and secretary of state."

The dispute gained national attention because California, the most populous state, is also one that has switched to an almost entirely remote voting process for November because of the coronavirus pandemic. All registered voters have been sent a ballot, which can be returned by mail, in a drop box or at a voting center.

More than 1.5 million ballots have already been returned, 10 times the number two weeks before the 2016 election. Although the state's 55 electoral votes are firmly in the Joe Biden column, four congressional races and penty of downballot contests are too close to call.

For years, Republicans have decried the state's collection rules for fomenting election fraud. A House Republican study this spring raised concerns about "politically weaponized ballot harvesting" in the state but offered no proof of malfeasance in the 2018 midterms, when the GOP saw solid election night leads in several congressional races evaporate when all the ballots collected by third parties were tallied.

The most prominent case of ballot collection fraud is that of a Republican operative in North Carolina, who was indicted on felony charges connected with a scheme to collect so many ballots in a close congressional race two years ago that a do-over election was ordered. It is illegal in North Carolina for anyone other than a close relative or guardian to deliver another voter's absentee ballot. In two dozen states, any such third-party involvement is not allowed.


Read More

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Close-up of sign reading 'Immigrants Make America Great' at a Baltimore rally.

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Donald Trump’s second administration has fully clarified Latinos’ racial position in America: our ethnic group’s labor, culture, and aspirations are too much for his supporters to stomach. The Latino presence in America triggers too many uneasy questions (are they White?), too many doubts (are they really American?), and too much resentment (why are they doing better than me?).

Trump’s targeted deportations of undocumented Latinos, unwarranted arrests of Latino citizens, and heightened ICE presence in Latino neighborhoods address these worries by lumping Latinos with Black people. Simply put, we have become yet another visible population that America socially stigmatizes, economically exploits, and politically terrorizes because aggrieved White adults want to preserve their rank as our nation’s premier racial group. The cumulative impacts are serious: just yesterday, an international panel of investigators on human rights and racism, backed by the U.N., found that such actions have resulted in “grave human rights violations.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: The SAVE Act and the Future of Voter ID Rules
A close up of a window with a sticker on it
Photo by Zach Wear on Unsplash

Just the Facts: The SAVE Act and the Future of Voter ID Rules

Last week, I wrote a column in the Fulcrum entitled “Just the Facts: Voter ID, States’ Powers, and Federal Limits.” The facts presented in that writing made it clear that the U.S. Constitution does not require voter ID and left almost all election administration—including voter qualifications—to the states. However, over time, constitutional amendments and federal statutes have restricted states’ ability to impose discriminatory voting rules, but they have never mandated voter ID.

The SAVE America Act

The national debate over voter ID has entered a new phase with the introduction of the SAVE America Act, the most sweeping federal voter‑identification and citizenship‑documentation proposal in modern history. For more than two centuries, voter eligibility rules—ID included—have been primarily a matter of state authority, bounded by constitutional protections against discrimination. The SAVE America Act would shift that balance by imposing federal requirements for both photo identification and documentary proof of citizenship in federal elections.

Keep ReadingShow less
Posters are displayed next to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) as he speaks at a news conference to unveil the Take It Down Act to protect victims against non-consensual intimate image abuse, on Capitol Hill on June 18, 2024 in Washington, DC.

A lawsuit against xAI over AI-generated deepfakes targeting teenage girls exposes a growing crisis in schools. As laws struggle to keep up, this story explores AI accountability, teen safety, and what educators and parents must do now.

Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

Deepfakes: The New Face of Cyberbullying and Why Parents, Schools, and Lawmakers Must Act

As a former teacher who worked in a high school when Snapchat was born, I witnessed the birth of sexting and its impact on teens. I recall asking a parent whether he was checking his daughter’s phone for inappropriate messages. His response was, “sometimes you just don’t want to know.” But the federal lawsuit filed last week against Elon Musk's xAI has put a national spotlight on AI-generated deepfakes and the teenage girls they target. Parents and teachers can’t ignore the crisis inside our schools.

AI Companies Built the Tool. The Grok Lawsuit Says They Own the Damage.

Whether the theory of French prosecutors–that Elon Musk deliberately allowed the sexualized image controversy to grow so that it would drive up activity on the platform and boost the company’s valuation–is true or not, when a company makes the decision to build a tool and knows that it can be weaponized but chooses to release it anyway, they are making a risk-based decision believing that they can act without consequence. The Grok lawsuit could make these types of business decisions much more costly.

Keep ReadingShow less