LeMieux runs e.pluribus.US, which conceives of, builds and tests interventions to scalably improve public attitudes toward working with political opponents.
A Haitian nurse tends to hurricane victims. A California aid worker steadies still shaken survivors. A Thai volunteer assembles cots, replacing beds lost to the sea. A Jewish meals coordinator nourishes refugeesf air-lifted from the war zone. A Houstonian early-responder comforts those distraught at having lost everything to the flood. A Manhattan good Samaritan assists dust-covered victims, catatonic in that thousand-yard stare.
In this case, these scenes did not happen separately in Haiti, California, Thailand, the Middle East, Texas, nor New York City. These happened collectively, under one roof, this past Sunday afternoon in Ft. Myers.
All of these different “identities” were helping Floridians.
When Hurricane Harvey struck Texas in 2017 I was living in Manhattan. But I had grown up in Houston and still had masses of family and friends there, so I immediately returned to help. Much of my volunteering was at a huge Red Cross shelter downtown. I was struck by how volunteers came from all over the hemisphere, literally from New York to California, all across the Midwest and Mexico.
One guy had driven down alone from north of the Canadian border. Three women flew from Manhattan on a lark for the weekend, just to volunteer. (I initially recognized them due to their all-black attire and Chuck Taylors.) The security checkpoints at Houston’s Bush Intercontinental Airport were staffed that week by officers flown in by the San Francisco Police Department. There were Cruz Roja aid workers from Mexico City who ordinarily train for earthquake response. All helping Texans.
Those Texan people. In that red state.
On social media, yes, the more militantly progressive people in my Facebook feed insinuated Houston deserved this as comeuppance for red-state-driven, laissez-faire zoning failures. (These commenters apparently had never alighted in Houston long enough to learn it actually votes majority blue.) But there in the shelter, it was simply about people coming from everywhere — regardless of borders, tribes, ideologies, parties or income — to help other people in need.
Not long after Harvey, I moved from New York to Miami. And so there I was last month, as Hurricane Ian stormed through southwest Florida. It hit an area I know well and hold dear — Sanibel, Captiva, Boca Grande, Gasparilla. And I have maybe a dozen friends and family scattered across that coast. So again, the situation called out for me to go help. I pulled together my overstocked “kit” (I tend to over-prepare for the possibility zombies might attack while out on these “missions”), rented a big o’l honkin’ pickup truck to ford washes (also overkill) and trundled off to “the war zone.” This time, with my experience from Harvey, I knew exactly where to go and what to do and within minutes of arrival was plugged into the Red Cross effort at South Ft. Myers High School.
Quickly put to work ... (excitement!) ... assembling cots. Shelter work is actually pretty mundane. No zombies.
But — whop! whop! whop! —the Blackhawks repeatedly swooped in with survivors from the barrier islands, mostly Pine, Sanibel and Ft. Myers Beach. And we took care of them.
Very quickly I ran into the Houstonians. A Thai-American and a Jewish-American. The Red Cross had flown them in from Texas to assist with the effort and I was immediately struck by the irony that five years earlier I had flown to Houston to help with their hurricane, and now here was Houston flying to my state to help with our hurricane.
I then met the Haitian-American nurse, actually from Ft. Lauderdale, and couldn’t help but make the connection with all the disasters Haiti has suffered. Additional volunteers hailed from Irvine, Calif. — which someday will call us to come help with their earthquake — and about every other state you can imagine, each with its own unique form of someday-to-come apocalypse.
We humans, we have our tribes. Our opinions. Our interests and differences. Our dislikes. Our antipathies.
But it’s really damn clear, actually: On instinct, we know we need each other.
And despite what might come out of our mouths and emotions at other times, without hesitation we jump when these people that we otherwise view as opponents are in need. It sounds like a quaint, jingoistic concept but when you see a disaster response come together, you understand very clearly that when Americans fall, fellow Americans — from far and wide and irrespective of differences — are instantly there to pick each other up.
Why is that?
I think it’s because we know we need each other. For the same reason they need us, we know we will someday need them. Stubbornly secure inside us, though sometimes repressed, is our perhaps begrudging wisdom that we can’t do this thing alone, this thing called civilization (which is to say, anything worth arguing over).
People tell Americans we have become too divided, have antipathy toward one another, lack empathy for opponents’ situations and cannot solve problems with them.
I think we do know how to problem-solve across boundaries. I’ve seen it first-hand.
We just need to ask: Who is it that convinced us we can’t do it in politics?



















A view of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on June 25, 2026. President Donald Trump jolted Republicans during a fiery appearance at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday, scrapping a housing bill signing ceremony and clashing behind closed doors with a party rebel who challenged him over the Iran war. Trump had been expected to sign the bipartisan housing.
Only Trump doesn’t care about housing
It was August 15, 2024. Then candidate Donald Trump stepped out of his Bedminster, New Jersey, golf club’s columned clubhouse to a gaggle of reporters. He was flanked by tables of groceries and signs showing the rising cost of food. Also on one of the tables was a dollhouse, meant to represent the equally alarming rise in housing prices.
It was a speech about the economy, the single most important issue of the 2024 election cycle, full of promises that went right to the heart of Americans’ anxieties. While former President Joe Biden and then Vice President Kamala Harris were contorting themselves to posture a good economy that just needed more time to recover from the pandemic, Trump was preying on voters’ very real fears of unaffordable gas, groceries, and homes. It was obviously a winning message.
In that speech, Trump promised, “We’re going to open up tracts of federal land for housing construction. We desperately need housing for people who can’t afford what’s going on now.”
As of mid-2023, there had been a housing shortage of nearly four million homes, according to the National Association of Realtors. Americans all over the country were either priced out of buying new homes due to low inventory, trapped in their existing homes by sky-high mortgage rates, or facing exorbitant rent hikes thanks to corporate investors buying up rental properties. Americans needed help, and Trump promised it.
Cut to March of 2026, when Trump reportedly told House Speaker Mike Johnson, “No one gives a sh*t about housing.”
That kind of thinking may explain why Trump this week suddenly announced he was canceling a signing ceremony for the bipartisan “21st Century ROAD to Housing Act,” a housing bill co-sponsored by Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Tim Scott that passed the House 358-32 and was approved in the Senate on Monday.
Trump instead demanded Congress pass the SAVE America Act, his controversial election grievance bill that doesn’t have enough Republican support to get passed in the Senate.
It’s just the latest in a line of policy self-owns where Trump has seemingly intentionally made life more difficult for Republicans hoping to keep their majority. Despite midterm elections occurring in the midst of a blistering economy and an unpopular war, they were surely hoping the housing bill would give them something — anything — to brag about when they returned home to their districts.
And very much to the contrary, Americans do give a sh*t about housing. According to a recent survey by the Bipartisan Policy Center, a whopping 79% say the cost of housing is extremely or very important to them. Eighty-three percent say Congress should take action on the issue — like it just did. Eighty-nine percent say the House and Senate need to work together to pass affordable housing legislation — like they just did. And 63% say they would be more likely to vote for a lawmaker if they helped pass legislation to build more affordable homes and lower housing costs — like they just did.
There aren’t many issues that unite Americans like housing does, and very few bipartisan policy wins Congress can point to, and yet, Trump is holding that bill hostage in order to get his pet project — which doesn’t even have the support of his own party — pushed through.
If you’re trying to make sense of something so nonsensical, as I’m sure many Republican lawmakers are, it’s certainly sad but not actually all that complicated. Trump said what he needed to get reelected and then promptly abandoned his promises in order to pursue his own self-interests, even if those interests are bad for Republicans and bad for voters.
That’s just the kind of guy he is.
S.E. Cupp is the host of "S.E. Cupp Unfiltered" on CNN.