Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Hurricanes destroy bridges, but unify shores

Opinion

Volunteers help Florida recover from Hurricane Ian

Volunteers distribute food in Lehigh Acres, Fla.,, the aftermath of Hurricane Ian.

Joseph Agcaoli/AFP via Getty Images

LeMieux runs e.pluribus.US, which conceives of, builds and tests interventions to scalably improve public attitudes toward working with political opponents.

A Haitian nurse tends to hurricane victims. A California aid worker steadies still shaken survivors. A Thai volunteer assembles cots, replacing beds lost to the sea. A Jewish meals coordinator nourishes refugeesf air-lifted from the war zone. A Houstonian early-responder comforts those distraught at having lost everything to the flood. A Manhattan good Samaritan assists dust-covered victims, catatonic in that thousand-yard stare.

In this case, these scenes did not happen separately in Haiti, California, Thailand, the Middle East, Texas, nor New York City. These happened collectively, under one roof, this past Sunday afternoon in Ft. Myers.

All of these different “identities” were helping Floridians.


When Hurricane Harvey struck Texas in 2017 I was living in Manhattan. But I had grown up in Houston and still had masses of family and friends there, so I immediately returned to help. Much of my volunteering was at a huge Red Cross shelter downtown. I was struck by how volunteers came from all over the hemisphere, literally from New York to California, all across the Midwest and Mexico.

One guy had driven down alone from north of the Canadian border. Three women flew from Manhattan on a lark for the weekend, just to volunteer. (I initially recognized them due to their all-black attire and Chuck Taylors.) The security checkpoints at Houston’s Bush Intercontinental Airport were staffed that week by officers flown in by the San Francisco Police Department. There were Cruz Roja aid workers from Mexico City who ordinarily train for earthquake response. All helping Texans.

Those Texan people. In that red state.

On social media, yes, the more militantly progressive people in my Facebook feed insinuated Houston deserved this as comeuppance for red-state-driven, laissez-faire zoning failures. (These commenters apparently had never alighted in Houston long enough to learn it actually votes majority blue.) But there in the shelter, it was simply about people coming from everywhere — regardless of borders, tribes, ideologies, parties or income — to help other people in need.

Not long after Harvey, I moved from New York to Miami. And so there I was last month, as Hurricane Ian stormed through southwest Florida. It hit an area I know well and hold dear — Sanibel, Captiva, Boca Grande, Gasparilla. And I have maybe a dozen friends and family scattered across that coast. So again, the situation called out for me to go help. I pulled together my overstocked “kit” (I tend to over-prepare for the possibility zombies might attack while out on these “missions”), rented a big o’l honkin’ pickup truck to ford washes (also overkill) and trundled off to “the war zone.” This time, with my experience from Harvey, I knew exactly where to go and what to do and within minutes of arrival was plugged into the Red Cross effort at South Ft. Myers High School.

Quickly put to work ... (excitement!) ... assembling cots. Shelter work is actually pretty mundane. No zombies.

But — whop! whop! whop! —the Blackhawks repeatedly swooped in with survivors from the barrier islands, mostly Pine, Sanibel and Ft. Myers Beach. And we took care of them.

Very quickly I ran into the Houstonians. A Thai-American and a Jewish-American. The Red Cross had flown them in from Texas to assist with the effort and I was immediately struck by the irony that five years earlier I had flown to Houston to help with their hurricane, and now here was Houston flying to my state to help with our hurricane.

I then met the Haitian-American nurse, actually from Ft. Lauderdale, and couldn’t help but make the connection with all the disasters Haiti has suffered. Additional volunteers hailed from Irvine, Calif. — which someday will call us to come help with their earthquake — and about every other state you can imagine, each with its own unique form of someday-to-come apocalypse.

We humans, we have our tribes. Our opinions. Our interests and differences. Our dislikes. Our antipathies.

But it’s really damn clear, actually: On instinct, we know we need each other.

And despite what might come out of our mouths and emotions at other times, without hesitation we jump when these people that we otherwise view as opponents are in need. It sounds like a quaint, jingoistic concept but when you see a disaster response come together, you understand very clearly that when Americans fall, fellow Americans — from far and wide and irrespective of differences — are instantly there to pick each other up.

Why is that?

I think it’s because we know we need each other. For the same reason they need us, we know we will someday need them. Stubbornly secure inside us, though sometimes repressed, is our perhaps begrudging wisdom that we can’t do this thing alone, this thing called civilization (which is to say, anything worth arguing over).

People tell Americans we have become too divided, have antipathy toward one another, lack empathy for opponents’ situations and cannot solve problems with them.

I think we do know how to problem-solve across boundaries. I’ve seen it first-hand.

We just need to ask: Who is it that convinced us we can’t do it in politics?


Read More

Man wearing Trump hat watches Trump on TV

Trump’s 10-to-1 rule aims to cut red tape, but fewer regulations can mean weaker food safety, Head Start services, and checks on presidential power.

Wu Xiaoling/Xinhua via Getty Images

Trump’s 10-to-1 Rule Gives the Presidency Too Much Power

We only think about the plumbing in our homes when something goes wrong. The same is true for government bureaucracy. Rules, procedures, and bureaucrats operate largely out of sight, making sure food is safe, Social Security checks arrive, workplaces are safe, and children with disabilities receive the services promised to them by law. Yes, there is plenty of red tape in government, just as an old house can accumulate pipes that no longer serve much purpose. But ripping out pipes simply because there are too many of them is not much of a plumbing strategy. Yet the Trump administration has made the number of federal regulations it eliminates a measure of success. That raises a more important question: When does cutting bureaucracy stop making government more efficient and start making it less capable?

1. The Case for Cutting Red Tape

Keep ReadingShow less
​Herbert Hoover  listening to a one valve radio set.

Herbert Hoover (1874 - 1964), Republican Party candidate for the Presidency of the United States of America, listening to a one valve radio set.

Topical Press Agency/Getty Images

A Second Axial Age Demands Global Leadership Rooted in Hoover’s Ideals

The time has come when we must take an enlarged vision of the future. (Herbert Hoover)

Our 31st President, Herbert Hoover, said this in 1926. Although one hundred years have passed since — and it is always time to take a larger view of the future — his proclamation rings truer now than ever.

Keep ReadingShow less
​U.S. President Donald Trump

U.S. President Donald Trump on October 16, 2026 in Palm Beach, Florida.

(Photo by Eric Lee/Getty Images)

Trump — President by Law, Not by Constitutional Duty

A president can win an election and still fail the test of leadership. The presidency is a public trust, not a personal platform, family enterprise, or license to demean people and disregard the law. Donald Trump holds the office legally. Yet his conduct raises a fundamental question: is he fulfilling the constitutional duties that give the presidency its meaning? The answer, visible in his behavior, is no. He performs the role of president the way a showman performs a part — loudly, aggressively, and without the substance the office requires.

Leadership is not conferred by a title; it is demonstrated through conduct. Ethical leadership requires integrity, honesty, sound judgment, and accountability. Moral leadership demands empathy, fairness, humility, and the courage to do what is right even when doing so carries a personal or political cost. When a president repeatedly demeans people, disregards established norms, and places personal interests above public duty, citizens have every reason to question his leadership — or whether he is leading at all.

Keep ReadingShow less