Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

After two election security documentaries, a firm belief in old-school paper

Documenting attempts to hack election systems

The documentary "Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America's Elections" features a gathering of hackers easily cracking election systems.

Sarah Teale

Golden is the author of "Unlock Congress" and a senior fellow at the Adlai Stevenson Center on Democracy. He is also a member of The Fulcrum's editorial advisory board. Teale is a film and television producer and director.


We recently spoke about "Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America's Elections," the most recent documentary that Sarah, Simon Ardizzone and Russell Michaels have made for HBO. The film, which is also streaming on Hulu, paints a harrowing picture of how America's election systems are stunningly vulnerable and under attack in real time, and our talk illuminated the problems laid out in the film as well as what every voter can do to help secure our elections.

The conversation has been edited for clarity and length. It may be heard in its entirety on The Golden Mean Podcast.

Golden: Let's start with an overview. What's the film about and what did you discover?

Teale: Our first film, in 2006, was "Hacking Democracy." Harri Hursti, a hacker genius from Finland, managed to show how easy it is to flip the vote. He flipped the vote in Leon County, Fla., with the permission of an election official. This was on real voting machines in a real circumstance, in a real election office.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The documentary caused a big stir, and we somehow thought maybe people would fix this. But, no. We are still voting on the exact same machines in 20 states and nothing's been fixed. And in fact, in some ways, it's gotten a lot worse because hackers now know how to do this really easily. In 2006, it took maybe somebody more professional. Now, anyone can do it.

Golden: In the new film you show us this gathering where these hackers — as young as 11 — are gleeful they're getting into these machines so easily. And without paper ballots, there's no paper trail in an election to do a risk-limiting audit, right?

Teale: Right. And there are still five states that do not have paper ballots at all. So there is no way to do a recount if there's a problem. And in many there have in fact been problems, but they can't recount.

But if you have paper you can see what a person's intention is. With a hand-marked paper ballot, you can put them through the machines. In order to be sure the first count is accurate, you start recounting a percentage of ballots. And you keep counting until you're really sure the result is correct. Sometimes, that's going to take all of them. But usually, you can count a percentage and then you'll know.

As voters, we all should all be writing to our elected officials and demanding a paper ballot and demanding risk-limiting audits.

Golden: You guys covered the 2018 election for governor of Georgia, where the secretary of state, Brian Kemp, was overseeing the elections while he was running for governor. And these machines were having problems. In fact, there's a scene where he has to go revote. It's almost like a fictional film where someone set this scene up!

Teale: And if you create chaos like that, you prevent people from voting. People have got an hour for lunch where they come to vote, and they're not able to vote.

We went to the second largest county in Georgia, a majority black county and these machines are from 20 years ago, when you used to have to start your Apple with a memory card. They're so ancient.

And none of the little cards used to start the machines would work. If there'd been one, randomly, maybe. But none would work. And so we had a discussion with Harri and Rich DeMillo, who was head of Georgia Tech for a while, where I asked how this can happen. And Rich says, "Well, you know, you can put them in the microwave and cook it."

But this happened in three majority-black counties, which led to delays between five and six hours. And people stood in line for five hours to vote, which breaks your heart.

Golden: So let's fast forward. Talk about the outlook for this year's elections. I hate to say "hopeless," but where are we?

Teale: Well, there have now been six Senate bills with Republicans and Democrats coming together. And we covered four of them. They've been trying and trying. But on each bipartisan bill, Mitch McConnell refuses to bring them up. He just kills it every time, with instructions from the White House.

And this I still don't understand, why we are not prepared to secure our vote. When we started making this film, Harri said, "Look, I refuse to believe it's the Russians until we see it for ourselves." I know 17 different intelligence services in Washington all agreed it was the Russians. And that never happens. They never agree. But he said, "No, we should keep our minds open and not assume."

And by the end of the film — after three years of making this thing — it was obvious. Everywhere we looked, it was Russians.

Golden: Right now we're trying to deal with the coronavirus. In spite of what President Trump says, is it still possible we could have a breakthrough and allow ballots by mail for everybody who wants them?

Teale: In California they have already instituted this. Secretary of State Alex Padilla has said: "You can either come and vote in person. You can bring your mail-in ballot to a location we have directed you to, or you can mail it back. Whatever you want to do." And that seems to me to be the only way to go. To give people the options and to also have early voting.

Golden: A final question, which may sound rather obvious: Why do you care so much about this?

Teale: Because if we care about our schools, if we care about mental health, about the water we drink, about our taxes and our money — if we care about anything at all that touches our lives — it's incumbent upon us to vote. People believe the same we do, whether you're a Republican or a Democrat.

So in order to have your voice heard, which is the difference between us and authoritarian governments, we have to fix this. We have to insist on paper ballots and audits in order to do it.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less