Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Americans think the country's on the brink of a civil war. And they blame incivility.

The average American voter believes the country is two-thirds of the way to the "edge of a civil war," according to yet another survey showing divisions in the country are bad and getting worse.

The survey, by Georgetown University's Institute of Politics and Public Service, also found voters held seemingly contradictory positions. They agreed that people had become too uncivil and that a focus on solutions and common ground and compromise should be the goal of political leaders. At the same time, similar numbers of respondents said they want leaders who stand up to the other side and stand up to powerful interests.


When respondents to the survey were asked to rate the level of civility in the country on a scale of 0-100, with the top end identified as being the "edge of a civil war," the mean response was 67.

Respondents disagreed on whom to blame for incivility in the survey, run by one noted pollster of each party. Republicans blame Democratic political leaders, social media, large newspapers, CNN and MSNBC. Democrats blame Republican political leaders, social media, Fox News, wealthy special interests and President Trump.

Other key findings in the poll include:

  • The greatest concern about uncivil and rude behavior by politicians came from women voters, Democrats and black voters.
  • More than eight in 10 believe "compromise and common ground should be the goal for political leaders."

The Democratic pollster, Celinda Lake with Lake Research Partners, said the highest level of intense agreement from independents is that politicians in Washington are spending too much time working with special interests. The GOP pollster, Ed Goeas with the Tarrance Group, said restoring a higher level of civility will "take a dedicated and courageous group of Republicans, Democrats and members of the media to reject the easy tactics of uncivil rhetoric that paints opponents as enemies."

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less