Not news to many: Our polarized view of media brands is only intensifying
Nike has Colin Kaepernick. Smith & Wesson has guns. Trump Hotels has, well, President Trump.
Not surprisingly, each of these companies is among the most politically polarizing brands of the moment. But the best way to make such a list, it turns out, is to be in the news business.
Of the 15 most polarizing brands of 2019, the dozen not mentioned above are from a single industry — the mainstream media — according to a recent survey by Morning Consult, a brand development and news company. The rankings were determined by measuring the difference in favorability of more than 3,700 brands among self-identified Republicans and Democrats.
If a healthy democracy hinges on the electorate's ability to debate policy from a shared set of facts, the most recent survey suggests a troubling reality, as the news bubbles that have increasingly segregated Americans along ideological lines is only getting worse.
Some of the findings aren't at all surprising: Republicans are by far the biggest fans of Fox, Fox News, Fox Business and Fox Nation — the only news brands that hold a positive net favorability score among surveyed Republicans — while Democrats have favorable views of the other eight news outlets: The New York Times and The Washington Post, plus the three major broadcast networks and the three big cable news channels without a "fox" in the name.
Morning Consult conducted the same survey last year with much the same result: 12 of the top 15 polarizing brands were news outlets. The big difference in the intervening time is that the polarization of media brands has only gotten more emphatic.
Compared to 2018, Democrats had less positive views of the news outlets favored by Republicans, such as Fox News and Fox Business, while Republicans held far more negative opinions of the major news organizations preferred by Democrats.
Trust in the media as a whole also appears to be largely partisan, as a Gallup Poll released last month found that 69 percent of Democrats but only 15 percent of Republicans had a "great deal" or "fair amount" of trust in news organizations.
The Gallup Poll was backed by a separate Morning Consult report in April that found trust in national news organizations had steadily declined since 2016, a phenomenon "largely driven by Republicans."
- Polarization and the politics of love - The Fulcrum ›
- Political polarization is about feelings, not facts - The Fulcrum ›
Marginal improvements have been made to help voters understand the questions posed to them on the ballot this November, a new study concludes, but such ballot measures still favor the college-educated — who represent a minority of the U.S. population.
This year voters in eight states will decide the fate of a collective 36 such propositions. In a study released Thursday, Ballotpedia assessed how easy it is to comprehend what each proposal would accomplish, concluding that the difficulty level had decreased compared with the referendums decided in the last off-year election of 2017 — but not by much.
In fact, according to a pair of well-established tests, 21 of the 36 ballot measures cannot be understood by the 40 percent of the voting-age population who never attended college.
Colorado has become the second state to ask the Supreme Court to decide if states may legally bind their presidential electors to vote for the candidate who carried their state.
The issue of so-called faithless electors is the latest aspect of an increasingly heated debate about the virtues and flaws of the Electoral College that has blossomed, especially among progressive democracy reform advocates, now that two of the past five presidential winners (Donald Trump in 2016 and George W. Bush in 2000) got to the Oval Office despite losing the national popular vote.