Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Half the country buying Trump's unfounded case against mail voting

President Donald Trump
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

There remains essentially no evidence for President Trump's constant claims that expanded voting by mail will allow the November election to be stolen from him. But a new poll shows his dark warnings are nonetheless resonating with the public.

Mail-in voting is vulnerable to significant levels of fraud, in the view of almost half of respondents to the latest ABC-Washington Post poll, released Tuesday. The share who said so, 49 percent, matches the number from a similar poll by Gallup this spring.

The new finding is important for several reasons: It shows Trump's constant allegations penetrated the national belief system this spring and have stayed there. It offers a political rationale for Republicans, in Congress and the states, to resist spending more or relaxing rules to promote absentee balloting as a healthy and reliable alternative during the coronavirus pandemic.

And it suggests half the country is prepared to listen if Trump refuses to accept the November election results on the grounds they were tainted — which he signaled he might do in an interview that aired Sunday.


The Post-ABC poll found that 38 percent of Americans said they'd prefer to vote by mail with 59 percent preferring to vote in person.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

One in four votes have been cast by mail in the past few elections. But the percentages have doubled, tripled or gone even higher during the 2020 primaries as election officials promote mail-in voting as the way for people to avoid exposure to Covid-19.

Not surprisingly, only 28 percent of the supporters of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden see mail-in voting as vulnerable to substantial fraud. Among backers of Trump, 78 percent say there's a significant risk.

When questioned about the risk versus reward of mail-in ballots, 43 percent said they were confident of adequate safeguards in place to thwart fraud.

Trump's opposition could ultimately stifle participation among Republicans, many in the party worry, because absentee ballots are used disproportionately by older people, who skew reliably conserfative. Beyond the tactical risks of Trump's position, though, is the widely held view of good-government advocates that the president's rhetoric is threatening to do lasting harm to the nation's already beleaguered confidence in the democratic process.

The ABC-Post pollsters interviewed 1,006 adults, including 845 registered voters, July 12-15. The margin of error was 3.5 percentage points for the full sample.

The Gallup poll in April found that, while 49 percent believe that more mail voting will mean more fraud, the number rises to a combined 61 percent when people are asked if there would be "a great deal " or "fair amount" of fraud.

Trump most recently repeated his unsubstantiated attacks on mail-in voting in a tweet Tuesday: "Mail-In Voting, unless changed by the courts, will lead to the most CORRUPT ELECTION in our Nation's History! #RIGGEDELECTION."

Besides the rhetoric by Trump and other Republicans, another factor that is likely causing greater suspicion are the examples during the primaries where mail-in ballots have been mishandled.

Read More

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Podcast: How do police feel about gun control?

Jesus "Eddie" Campa, former Chief Deputy of the El Paso County Sheriff's Department and former Chief of Police for Marshall Texas, discusses the recent school shooting in Uvalde and how loose restrictions on gun ownership complicate the lives of law enforcement on this episode of YDHTY.

Listen now

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

Podcast: Why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies

There's something natural and organic about perceiving that the people in power are out to advance their own interests. It's in part because it’s often true. Governments actually do keep secrets from the public. Politicians engage in scandals. There often is corruption at high levels. So, we don't want citizens in a democracy to be too trusting of their politicians. It's healthy to be skeptical of the state and its real abuses and tendencies towards secrecy. The danger is when this distrust gets redirected, not toward the state, but targets innocent people who are not actually responsible for people's problems.

On this episode of "Democracy Paradox" Scott Radnitz explains why conspiracy theories thrive in both democracies and autocracies.

Your Take:  The Price of Freedom

Your Take: The Price of Freedom

Our question about the price of freedom received a light response. We asked:

What price have you, your friends or your family paid for the freedom we enjoy? And what price would you willingly pay?

It was a question born out of the horror of images from Ukraine. We hope that the news about the Jan. 6 commission and Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court nomination was so riveting that this question was overlooked. We considered another possibility that the images were so traumatic, that our readers didn’t want to consider the question for themselves. We saw the price Ukrainians paid.

One response came from a veteran who noted that being willing to pay the ultimate price for one’s country and surviving was a gift that was repaid over and over throughout his life. “I know exactly what it is like to accept that you are a dead man,” he said. What most closely mirrored my own experience was a respondent who noted her lack of payment in blood, sweat or tears, yet chose to volunteer in helping others exercise their freedom.

Personally, my price includes service to our nation, too. The price I paid was the loss of my former life, which included a husband, a home and a seemingly secure job to enter the political fray with a message of partisan healing and hope for the future. This work isn’t risking my life, but it’s the price I’ve paid.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Given the earnest question we asked, and the meager responses, I am also left wondering if we think at all about the price of freedom? Or have we all become so entitled to our freedom that we fail to defend freedom for others? Or was the question poorly timed?

I read another respondent’s words as an indicator of his pacifism. And another veteran who simply stated his years of service. And that was it. Four responses to a question that lives in my heart every day. We look forward to hearing Your Take on other topics. Feel free to share questions to which you’d like to respond.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, autocracies don't make economies great

libre de droit/Getty Images

No, autocracies don't make economies great

Tom G. Palmer has been involved in the advance of democratic free-market policies and reforms around the globe for more than three decades. He is executive vice president for international programs at Atlas Network and a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.

One argument frequently advanced for abandoning the messy business of democratic deliberation is that all those checks and balances, hearings and debates, judicial review and individual rights get in the way of development. What’s needed is action, not more empty debate or selfish individualism!

In the words of European autocrat Viktor Orbán, “No policy-specific debates are needed now, the alternatives in front of us are obvious…[W]e need to understand that for rebuilding the economy it is not theories that are needed but rather thirty robust lads who start working to implement what we all know needs to be done.” See! Just thirty robust lads and one far-sighted overseer and you’re on the way to a great economy!

Keep ReadingShow less
Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Podcast: A right-wing perspective on Jan. 6th and the 2020 election

Peter Wood is an anthropologist and president of the National Association of Scholars. He believes—like many Americans on the right—that the 2020 election was stolen from Donald Trump and the January 6th riots were incited by the left in collusion with the FBI. He’s also the author of a new book called Wrath: America Enraged, which wrestles with our politics of anger and counsels conservatives on how to respond to perceived aggression.

Where does America go from here? In this episode, Peter joins Ciaran O’Connor for a frank conversation about the role of anger in our politics as well as the nature of truth, trust, and conspiracy theories.

Keep ReadingShow less