Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Building a future together based on a common cause

Hands coming together in a circle of people
SDI Productions/Getty Images

Johnson is a United Methodist pastor, the author of "Holding Up Your Corner: Talking About Race in Your Community" and program director for the Bridge Alliance, which houses The Fulcrum.

As the 2024 presidential campaigns speed toward November, we face a transformative moment for our nation. The challenges of recent years have starkly revealed the deep divisions that threaten our societal fabric. Yet, amidst the discord, we are presented with a pivotal choice: Will we yield to the allure of division, or will we summon the courage to transcend our differences and shape a future founded on common cause and mutual respect?


The answer to this question lies in acknowledging a profound truth that has been the wellspring of our nation's resilience since its inception: Our ability to find common cause in the face of adversity is the key to unlocking our true potential as a people. Building together is not merely a matter of grudgingly tolerating diverse viewpoints; it is a powerful affirmation of our shared humanity, a defiant declaration that the inherent dignity residing within every individual shall not diminish due to the differences that superficially divide us.

The cause of building together is not naive idealism, a Pollyannaish belief that we can relinquish the real tensions among us. Our differences are the inevitable result of America's vibrant diversity, the varied threads that weave together to form our nation's rich tapestry. To build together, we must first acknowledge this reality, validating the experiences, fears and concerns that shape the perspectives of our fellow citizens. Only by creating a space where every voice rings out clearly can we address the valid grievances on all sides of the divides that separate us and find common ground in our shared humanity.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

At the heart of our mission is the understanding that those we may differ with are not opponents, but allies in a shared cause — democracy. Driven by the same core desires — a yearning for respect, dignity and a better future for ourselves and our loved ones. It is this collective purpose, this mutual respect, that we must nurture to bridge the gaps that divide us and construct a nation that embodies our highest ideals.

Navigating this electoral season and ongoing work of our democratic republic demands courage to truly listen and understand, even when it challenges our deeply held beliefs. It requires empathy — the ability to see the world through our neighbors' eyes and walk in their shoes. It demands openness — a willingness to share our stories, struggles, and victories — to find common ground in our shared humanity. These are the building blocks of a nation united not by uniformity of thought, but by a shared commitment to the principles of justice, compassion and equality on which our country was built.

The task is daunting, and the journey is long and challenging. Yet it is the only path forward, the sole means by which we can hope to create a world that reflects the very best of who we are and aspire to be. Standing on the precipice of the 2024 presidential election, may we faithfully engage ourselves to this sacred work. Each of us should pledge to listen with open hearts and minds and to seek understanding even in the face of disagreement. Attentive to valid concerns on all sides, ever seeking to find common ground or humanity in one another.

The imperative to unify in the face of adversity is before us. Living up to such a responsibility serves as a testament to the indomitable strength of the human spirit. However, the choice is ours: We can allow the forces of division to pull us asunder, or we, as active participants in this societal transformation, can rise above our differences and construct a future rooted in mutual respect and a shared sense of purpose.

Building together is indeed a challenging charge to keep. It requires patience, perseverance, and faith in ourselves and each other. I understand it's not easy, but it is the only path to a world that mirrors the love and justice at the heart of our highest ideals. Each of us must commit ourselves to this sacred work, my friends. I pray that we find hope and strength in our shared humanity to navigate these trying times, overcome the barriers that divide us and build a nation that reflects the best of us. Doing so will ensure a brighter future for ourselves and those who come after us.

Read More

Flag of Ukraine alongside flag of United States

Flags of Ukraine and the United States

Alex Wong/Getty Images

In swing states, D’s and R’s agree U.S. should continue aid to Ukraine

Amid debates about U.S. international engagement, a new public consultation survey conducted in six swing states by the University of Maryland’s Program for Public Consultation found widespread bipartisan support for the United States continuing to provide military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine.

Majorities of both Republicans and Democrats support the U.S. upholding the principle of collective security by helping to protect nations that are under attack; continuing to be a member of NATO; and continuing to abide by the longstanding international ban on nuclear testing.

Keep ReadingShow less
Red and blue fingers pointing at each other
PM Images/Getty Images

Maybe America needs a mom to call a time out

Klug served in the House of Representatives from 1991 to 1999. He hosts the political podcast “Lost in the Middle: America’s Political Orphans.”

All of us have had that moment. An innocent comment over coffee with a friend, at a family dinner or while riding an elevator with a coworker. Everyone is at edge over politics. Nerves are rubbed raw. Civility has seemingly vanished.

When asked to rate the level of political division in the country on a scale of 0-100, where 0 is no division and 100 is the edge of a civil war, the mean response is 71, according to the Georgetown University Institute of Public Service. A similar share of Americans tell Pew they worry about political disagreements triggering more violence.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ben Klutsey

Our views on the issues haven't changed that much over the past several decades. If anything, we’ve moved a little bit closer to each other. But the way we feel about each other has changed over time," said Ben Klutsey, director of the program on pluralism and civil exchange at the Mercatus Center.

Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation

‘A truly pluralistic society has both inclusion and dissent’: A conversation with Ben Klutsey

Berman is a distinguished fellow of practice at The Harry Frank Guggenheim Foundation, co-editor of Vital City, and co-author of "Gradual: The Case for Incremental Change in a Radical Age." This is the sixth in a series of interviews titled "The Polarization Project."

The documentary film “Undivide Us” brings together Americans from across the political spectrum for conversations about abortion, immigration, guns and other controversial issues. According to Ben Klutsey, who helped facilitate the conversations, “Participants came in expecting shouting matches, but they ended up exchanging phone numbers and wanting to stay connected because they found each other to be incredibly interesting. People are not as polarized as we think they are when we look at our screens and social media.”

This could also serve as a mission statement for Klutsey, who directs the program on pluralism and civil exchange at the Mercatus Center, a libertarian research center housed at George Mason University. At Mercatus, Klutsey is attempting to build a community of students and scholars who can exchange ideas and coexist with one another peacefully despite their political differences. Klutsey also regularly interviews leading thinkers about liberalism for the online journal Discourse.

Keep ReadingShow less
Homeless encampment

Views on how to deal with the homeless encampments that have cropped up across California in recent years, such as this one in Los Angeles in July, don’t fall neatly along party lines.

Qian Weizhong/VCG via Getty Images

Local elections are less partisan because voters will cross party lines when issues hit close to home

Lascher is a professor of public policy and administration at California State University, Sacramento. Adams is a professor of political science at San Diego State University. Martin is an associate professor of political science at California State University, Sacramento.

Hand-wringing over American politics commonly focuses on the sharp and growing divisions between Democrats and Republicans.

Accumulating evidence indicates that voters are less likely than ever to split their ticket or vote for candidates from different parties in presidential or congressional races. Polarization over hot-button issues has spiked, as has animosity toward members of the opposite party.

Research also shows that state-level political contests have become more partisan. Results for state-level electoral contests more closely mirror presidential election results than they once did.

Keep ReadingShow less
Andrew Yang

The Forward Party, founded by Andrew Yang, "will greatly increase the overall health of our democracy while helping to put the power back into the hands of voters," writes Copenhaver.

Marco Bello/Getty Images

Identifying division is easy; finding points of agreement is difficult

Copenhaver, a former mayor of Augusta, Ga., hosts “The Changemaker Podcast and is a founding partner of Starts With Us.

Negative campaigning is increasing in volume and nastiness every election cycle. Campaigns are based on a “divide and conquer” strategy, pitting citizens against each other. If you ask most political operatives why this is the case, they’ll tell you it’s because it works. It drives donations, volunteer engagement and turnout. And while I won’t debate that it works, it’s not the only approach that works.

Keep ReadingShow less