Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

California Needs More Homeless Shelters, Especially in the Face of Climate-Driven Disasters

Opinion

California Needs More Homeless Shelters, Especially in the Face of Climate-Driven Disasters

Firefighters hosing down a structure during a local wildfire in Southern California.

Getty Images//Studio One-One

As a native Californian and a passionate homeless advocate, my heart shattered when I witnessed the devasting wildfires that ravaged the state I call home. For those already vulnerable, facing homelessness or housing insecurity, the wildfires are a cruel reminder of how fragile stability can be. The Los Angeles fires have forced evacuations of more than 200,000 people, displacing families and individuals from the only place they consider home. Shelters quickly filled to capacity, and resources that were already strained became nearly nonexistent. The lack of a solid foundation can turn a natural disaster into an inescapable cycle of hardship and despair.

California's homelessness crisis is multifaceted and severely impacts individuals and families across the state. With 181,399 unhoused individuals, of whom 68% are unsheltered, it is clear that the current resources available are grossly inadequate. This situation not only showcases a systemic failure to provide necessary support but also amplifies the vulnerability of these individuals, especially in the face of natural disasters such as the wildfires.


The nearly 71,131 emergency and transitional beds fall significantly short of meeting the needs of those experiencing homelessness. These facilities are often overwhelmed, lacking the capacity to accommodate the surge of individuals who may seek refuge during emergencies. Additionally, many of these shelters may not be equipped with the resources, infrastructure, or care needed for individuals with unique requirements, such as those dealing with mental health issues, substance use disorders, or families with children. This shortfall can lead to dire outcomes for those affected, as they have nowhere safe to go during times of crisis.

Moreover, the availability of beds in jails— 83,000 across 125 facilities —further emphasizes a troubling trend in California's approach to homelessness. Instead of providing supportive housing and resources that could help stabilize individuals, the state often resorts to criminalizing those in vulnerable situations. This approach not only fails to address the root causes of homelessness but also exacerbates the problem, pushing individuals deeper into a cycle of poverty, trauma, and incarceration.

The focus on punitive measures instead of preventive solutions not only strains the judicial system but also neglects the comprehensive care that the unhoused need. Investing in mental health services, addiction recovery programs, job training, and accessible housing solutions is imperative for reversing these harmful trends.

Furthermore, the interplay between homelessness and natural disasters cannot be overlooked. As climate change continues contributing to increasing frequency and intensity of wildfires, floods, and other disasters, the unhoused population is disproportionately affected. Many do not have access to transportation and may be unable to evacuate in a timely manner, putting their lives at greater risk.

In a state as affluent and innovative as California, it is unacceptable that so many of our residents live without a secure roof over their heads, especially during times of crisis. We owe it to ourselves and each other to foster resilience not just in our communities but within the very systems that must protect the most vulnerable among us. One where safety, stability, and dignity are not privileges, but rights for every individual, regardless of their circumstances.

During the worst of the fires, the sight of crows flying to safety served as a poignant metaphor, highlighting a community yearning for a way out. While political rivalry creates inaction, the outpouring of support and compassion from neighbors demonstrates an unwavering resolve to reclaim their streets from despair. Community groups, volunteers, and local organizations are stepping in where the city falls short, providing food, shelter, and a listening ear to those in need.

In this moment of crisis, the people of California are becoming the forerunners of change by putting community first. As crows take flight to escape danger, so too do community members rise to the challenge, pushing for solutions that foster dignity and hope. The way Californians put each other first was a breathtaking scene and a beautiful reminder that when government fails to protect its most vulnerable, it is the love for our community that can pave the way toward lasting change.

Asha Wasuge is a fierce professional advocate for the unhoused population and a Public Voices Fellow in Domestic Violence and Economic Security with the OpEd Project.

Read More

Communication concept with multi colored abstract people icons.

Research shows that emotional, cognitive, and social mechanisms drive both direct and indirect contact, offering scalable ways to reduce political polarization.

Getty Images, Eoneren

“Direct” and “Indirect” Contact Methods Likely Work in Similar Ways, so They Should Both Be Effective

In a previous article, we argued that efforts to improve the political environment should reach Americans as media consumers, in addition to seeking public participation. Reaching Americans as media consumers uses media like film, TV, and social media to change what Americans see and hear about fellow Americans across the political spectrum. Participant-based efforts include dialogues and community-based activities that require active involvement.

In this article, we show that the mechanisms underlying each type of approach are quite similar. The categories of mechanisms we cover are emotional, cognitive, relational, and repetitive. We use the terms from the academic literature, “direct” and “indirect” contact, which are fairly similar to participant and media consumer approaches, respectively.

Keep ReadingShow less
The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

As political violence threatens democracy, defending free speech, limiting government overreach, and embracing pluralism matters is critical right now.

Getty Images, Javier Zayas Photography

The American Experiment Requires Robust Debate, Not Government Crackdowns

The assassinations of conservative leader Charlie Kirk and Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota have triggered endorsements of violence and even calls for literal war on both the far right and far left. Fortunately, an overwhelming majority of Americans reject political violence, but all of us are in a fight to keep our diverse and boisterous brand of democracy alive. Doing so requires a renewed commitment to pluralism and a clear-headed recognition of the limits of government, especially when proposals entail using the criminal justice system to punish speech.

Pluralism has been called the lifeblood of a democracy like ours, in which being an American is not defined by race or religion. It requires learning about and accepting our differences, and embracing the principle that, regardless of them, every person is entitled to be protected by our Constitution and have a voice in how we’re governed. In contrast, many perpetrators of political violence rationalize their acts by denying the basic humanity of those with whom they disagree. They are willing to face the death penalty or life in prison in an attempt to force everyone to conform to their views.

Keep ReadingShow less
A woman sitting down and speaking with a group of people.

The SVL (Stories, Values, Listen) framework—which aims to bridge political divides with simple, memorable steps for productive cross-partisan conversations—is an easy-to-use tool for making an impact at scale.

Getty Images, Luis Alvarez

Make Talking Politics Easier and More Scalable: Be SVL (Stories, Values, Listen)

How can one have a productive conversation across the political spectrum?

We offer simple, memorable guidance: Be SVL (pronounced like “civil”). SVL stands for sharing Stories, relating to a conversation partner’s Values, and closely Listening.

Keep ReadingShow less
St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

People attend a mass and ceremony for a new mural dedicated to New York City’s immigrant communities and honoring the city’s first responders at St. Patrick’s Cathedral on September 21, 2025 in New York City.

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

St. Patrick’s Cathedral’s Mural: Art, Immigration, and the American Spirit

In a bold fusion of sacred tradition and contemporary relevance, artist Adam Cvijanovic has unveiled a sweeping new mural at St. Patrick’s Cathedral in New York City—one that reimagines the historic narthex as a vibrant ode to peace, migration, and spiritual continuity.

In an age of polarization and performative politics, it’s rare to find a work of art that speaks with both spiritual clarity and civic urgency. Yet that’s exactly what “What’s So Funny About Peace, Love and Understanding” accomplishes. The piece is more than a visual upgrade to a “dreary” entranceway—it’s a theological and cultural intervention, one that invites every visitor to confront the moral stakes of our immigration discourse.

Keep ReadingShow less