Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

California Needs More Homeless Shelters, Especially in the Face of Climate-Driven Disasters

Opinion

California Needs More Homeless Shelters, Especially in the Face of Climate-Driven Disasters

Firefighters hosing down a structure during a local wildfire in Southern California.

Getty Images//Studio One-One

As a native Californian and a passionate homeless advocate, my heart shattered when I witnessed the devasting wildfires that ravaged the state I call home. For those already vulnerable, facing homelessness or housing insecurity, the wildfires are a cruel reminder of how fragile stability can be. The Los Angeles fires have forced evacuations of more than 200,000 people, displacing families and individuals from the only place they consider home. Shelters quickly filled to capacity, and resources that were already strained became nearly nonexistent. The lack of a solid foundation can turn a natural disaster into an inescapable cycle of hardship and despair.

California's homelessness crisis is multifaceted and severely impacts individuals and families across the state. With 181,399 unhoused individuals, of whom 68% are unsheltered, it is clear that the current resources available are grossly inadequate. This situation not only showcases a systemic failure to provide necessary support but also amplifies the vulnerability of these individuals, especially in the face of natural disasters such as the wildfires.


The nearly 71,131 emergency and transitional beds fall significantly short of meeting the needs of those experiencing homelessness. These facilities are often overwhelmed, lacking the capacity to accommodate the surge of individuals who may seek refuge during emergencies. Additionally, many of these shelters may not be equipped with the resources, infrastructure, or care needed for individuals with unique requirements, such as those dealing with mental health issues, substance use disorders, or families with children. This shortfall can lead to dire outcomes for those affected, as they have nowhere safe to go during times of crisis.

Moreover, the availability of beds in jails— 83,000 across 125 facilities —further emphasizes a troubling trend in California's approach to homelessness. Instead of providing supportive housing and resources that could help stabilize individuals, the state often resorts to criminalizing those in vulnerable situations. This approach not only fails to address the root causes of homelessness but also exacerbates the problem, pushing individuals deeper into a cycle of poverty, trauma, and incarceration.

The focus on punitive measures instead of preventive solutions not only strains the judicial system but also neglects the comprehensive care that the unhoused need. Investing in mental health services, addiction recovery programs, job training, and accessible housing solutions is imperative for reversing these harmful trends.

Furthermore, the interplay between homelessness and natural disasters cannot be overlooked. As climate change continues contributing to increasing frequency and intensity of wildfires, floods, and other disasters, the unhoused population is disproportionately affected. Many do not have access to transportation and may be unable to evacuate in a timely manner, putting their lives at greater risk.

In a state as affluent and innovative as California, it is unacceptable that so many of our residents live without a secure roof over their heads, especially during times of crisis. We owe it to ourselves and each other to foster resilience not just in our communities but within the very systems that must protect the most vulnerable among us. One where safety, stability, and dignity are not privileges, but rights for every individual, regardless of their circumstances.

During the worst of the fires, the sight of crows flying to safety served as a poignant metaphor, highlighting a community yearning for a way out. While political rivalry creates inaction, the outpouring of support and compassion from neighbors demonstrates an unwavering resolve to reclaim their streets from despair. Community groups, volunteers, and local organizations are stepping in where the city falls short, providing food, shelter, and a listening ear to those in need.

In this moment of crisis, the people of California are becoming the forerunners of change by putting community first. As crows take flight to escape danger, so too do community members rise to the challenge, pushing for solutions that foster dignity and hope. The way Californians put each other first was a breathtaking scene and a beautiful reminder that when government fails to protect its most vulnerable, it is the love for our community that can pave the way toward lasting change.

Asha Wasuge is a fierce professional advocate for the unhoused population and a Public Voices Fellow in Domestic Violence and Economic Security with the OpEd Project.


Read More

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

Jalen Brunson #11 of the New York Knicks celebrates with the Larry O'Brien Championship Trophy during the New York Knicks Championship ticker tape parade and victory rally celebrating winning the 2026 NBA Finals on June 18, 2026 in New York City.

(Photo by Angelina Katsanis/Getty Images)

The Knicks and the Practice of Us

I didn’t grow up anywhere near Madison Square Garden. My childhood unfolded in the Midwest, far from New York’s tangled boroughs and yellow cabs. My father brought the city with him, tucked in the vowels of his accent and the teams he rooted for. He was a Jersey boy at first. Then, a reluctant Midwesterner. Geography, though, never truly loosened its grip. In our house, sports allegiance wasn’t a choice. It was inherited—an expectation passed like a family recipe. Or a story retold until it blurs into fact.

For my father, and then for me, the Knicks were never just a team. They were a test of endurance. Before I could distinguish a pick-and-roll from a triangle offense, I understood Knicks loyalty: you waited. You hoped in public, persisted when heartbreak was routine. Knicks fandom was boot camp for disappointment. The main skill was getting up after being knocked down.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

United States Marine Corps Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II STOVL stealth multirole fighters belonging to the VMFA-121 "Green Knights" taxiing at the MCAS Iwakuni in Yamaguchi, Japan, on March 23, 2017.

(viper-zero / Getty Images)

How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

In earlier essays, I argued that America’s political division has grown so deep that a peaceful “American Union” of two sovereign nations — one broadly red, one broadly blue — is worth considering. I also argued that relocation fears are overstated, that cooperation could increase economic prosperity, and that separation could help heal the lingering wounds of the Civil War.

But how would this all actually work? What happens to the national debt? Who gets the military bases, federal lands, and nuclear weapons? Will Social Security be protected? Could two nations share the dollar, defend themselves together, and resolve their disagreements?

Keep ReadingShow less