Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

From Silicon Valley to Capitol Hill: The Ascendancy of Indian Americans

From Silicon Valley to Capitol Hill: The Ascendancy of Indian Americans

The flag of India.

Canva Images

In the intricate landscape of global geopolitics, the ascendancy of Indian Americans stands as a quiet yet transformative force—a phenomenon that demands serious consideration. While traditional paradigms of power focus on military might or economic clout, the strategic leverage wielded by this diaspora is rewriting the rules of global influence. India’s economic trajectory reflects its ambitions on the global stage. Contributing 4% to global GDP today, the nation is poised to become the world’s third $10 trillion economy within two decades. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicts India will account for 18% of total global growth by decade’s end, a rise that challenges established economic hierarchies.

Trade data between India and the United States reflects the growing interdependence: In 2020, U.S. imports to India stood at $51.3 billion. This figure grew to $80.1 billion in 2024, alongside a trade deficit swelling from $24.2 billion to $41.5 billion. This trade expansion is mirrored by Indian-American professionals dominating key sectors of the U.S. economy. With a median household income of $119,000, Indian Americans outperform national averages and hold influential roles across corporate and governmental institutions. CEOs of global giants like Microsoft, Google, and Citibank exemplify this trend, along with leadership roles in companies like Apple, Intel, and Dell.


Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The H-1B visa regime has become a cornerstone of India’s knowledge-driven strategy. In 2023, Indian professionals accounted for over 72% of the 386,000 H-1B visas issued or renewed, reshaping workforce dynamics and fostering a seamless flow of talent and expertise. This system serves not only as a conduit for individual aspirations but as a sophisticated mechanism of geopolitical influence, embedding Indian professionals in critical sectors globally. Despite comprising less than 2% of the U.S. electorate, Indian Americans have rapidly emerged as a politically significant bloc. By 2024, the community boasted over 260,000 eligible voters, compared to 180,000 in 2020. This growth coincides with a surge in political representation: several Indian-Americans have been appointed to key positions in President Donald Trump’s second-term Cabinet, highlighting the growing influence of Indian-American professionals in shaping U.S. policy across various sectors, from artificial intelligence (AI) to public health. Such achievements reflect more than representation; they signify calculated efforts to influence policy-making at the highest levels.

Organizations like the Hindu American Foundation exemplify this strategic approach, advancing India’s interests through lobbying and legislative advocacy. The Indian-American diaspora represents a paradigm shift in how nations project power. Unlike traditional models reliant on direct state action, India’s strategy leverages transnational networks. Diaspora-led lobbying efforts, such as the 2024 Technology Immigration Summit on Capitol Hill, which was held by the Foundation for India and Indian Diaspora (FIIDS), illustrate the community’s ability to shape discourse around immigration policies and bilateral relations. This decentralized model extends to the export of intellectual capital. Stanford’s Asia-Pacific Research Center highlights India’s unique role as a global talent exporter, with CEOs and executives forming the backbone of its soft power strategy. Each Indian-American leader becomes a potential conduit for fostering economic and cultural ties, creating complex interdependencies between India and host nations.

As Washington grapples with containing China’s rise, the Indian-American phenomenon presents a more nuanced challenge. This is not traditional immigration but a strategic, networked approach to influence that blends economic, political, and cultural dimensions. By embedding its talent within global institutions, India is decentralizing its power projection, creating a web of interconnections that defies conventional geopolitical analysis. For U.S. policymakers, the message is clear: India’s ambitions require fresh lenses to comprehend and address. The diaspora’s ascendancy signifies more than a demographic shift; it heralds a new model of global engagement—subtle, persistent, and increasingly consequential. The rise of Indian Americans underscores the emergence of a 21st-century framework for global power.

Khalid is a physician, geostrategic analyst and freelance writer.

Read More

Trump’s Tariffs: a burden on workers, a boon for the wealthy

An illustration of a deconstructed dollar bill.

Getty Images, rob dobi

Trump’s Tariffs: a burden on workers, a boon for the wealthy

Earlier this year, President Trump imposed tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China, claiming they would fix trade imbalances and protect jobs. However, instead of helping American workers, these tariffs act as hidden taxes; they drive up costs and feed inflation. While average Americans bear the brunt of higher prices and lost jobs, the wealthy are insulated from the worst effects.

Many economists assert that tariffs are stealth taxes, that is, the burden is not distributed equally—while corporations may adjust by diversifying suppliers or passing costs along, working households cannot escape higher prices on essential goods like groceries and electronics. Analysts estimate these tariffs could add $1,250 to the annual cost of living for the average American household—a substantial burden for families already struggling with inflation. Additionally, according to the well-regarded Tax Foundation, the tariffs are projected to reduce GDP by 0.5% and result in the loss of approximately 292,000 jobs.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ending De Minimis Trade Hurts Average Americans

Figurines of manual workers with stacks of coins

Getty Images/Glow Images

Ending De Minimis Trade Hurts Average Americans

Among the international trade issues making headlines is President Trump’s recent announcement to abandon current U.S. law regarding small, low-value packages containing products purchased by Americans from overseas. The initial Executive Order was paused just days later. But the threat remains, making damaging economic repercussions imminent.

The process for such small-dollar shipments is de minimis entry. The term means “pertaining to tiny or trivial things,” emphasizing why its usage only applies to goods under a lower-priced threshold.

Keep ReadingShow less
Latino Freeze Movement: Do Economic Boycotts Create Real Change?
white and black printer paper

Latino Freeze Movement: Do Economic Boycotts Create Real Change?

President Donald Trump has implemented executive orders that some have perceived as targeting Hispanic, Latino communities, particularly in relation to immigration policies, which they argue have contributed to increased tensions and uncertainty among individuals and their families in the United States.

Historically, the Hispanic, Latino community has significant shaped the U.S. economy and culture. As political tensions have escalated in recent weeks, it has led to organized economic activism. One such effort, the Latino Freeze Movement (LFM), has directly responded to Trump’s policies and rhetoric toward the community.

Keep ReadingShow less
Dictionary definition of tariff
Would replacing the income tax with higher tariffs help ‘struggling Americans’?
Devonyu/Getty Images

Could Trump’s tariffs have unintended consequences that hurt America?

The first few weeks of the Trump administration have been head-spinning. President Trump and his team were well-prepared to launch their policy agenda, signing over 50 executive orders, the most in a president's first month in more than 40 years. A major focus has been economic policy, first with immigration raids, which were quickly followed by announcements of tariffs on imports from America’s biggest trade partners.

The tariff announcements have followed a meandering and confusing course. President Trump announced the first tariffs on February 1, but within 24 hours, he suspended the tariffs on Mexico and Canada in favor of “negotiations.” Mexico and Canada agreed to enforce their borders better to stop migrants and fentanyl imports, which the Trump administration called a victory. Despite the triumphalist rhetoric, the enforcement measures were substantially the same as what both countries were already planning to do.

Keep ReadingShow less