Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

From Silicon Valley to Capitol Hill: The Ascendancy of Indian Americans

From Silicon Valley to Capitol Hill: The Ascendancy of Indian Americans

The flag of India.

Canva Images

In the intricate landscape of global geopolitics, the ascendancy of Indian Americans stands as a quiet yet transformative force—a phenomenon that demands serious consideration. While traditional paradigms of power focus on military might or economic clout, the strategic leverage wielded by this diaspora is rewriting the rules of global influence. India’s economic trajectory reflects its ambitions on the global stage. Contributing 4% to global GDP today, the nation is poised to become the world’s third $10 trillion economy within two decades. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicts India will account for 18% of total global growth by decade’s end, a rise that challenges established economic hierarchies.

Trade data between India and the United States reflects the growing interdependence: In 2020, U.S. imports to India stood at $51.3 billion. This figure grew to $80.1 billion in 2024, alongside a trade deficit swelling from $24.2 billion to $41.5 billion. This trade expansion is mirrored by Indian-American professionals dominating key sectors of the U.S. economy. With a median household income of $119,000, Indian Americans outperform national averages and hold influential roles across corporate and governmental institutions. CEOs of global giants like Microsoft, Google, and Citibank exemplify this trend, along with leadership roles in companies like Apple, Intel, and Dell.


The H-1B visa regime has become a cornerstone of India’s knowledge-driven strategy. In 2023, Indian professionals accounted for over 72% of the 386,000 H-1B visas issued or renewed, reshaping workforce dynamics and fostering a seamless flow of talent and expertise. This system serves not only as a conduit for individual aspirations but as a sophisticated mechanism of geopolitical influence, embedding Indian professionals in critical sectors globally. Despite comprising less than 2% of the U.S. electorate, Indian Americans have rapidly emerged as a politically significant bloc. By 2024, the community boasted over 260,000 eligible voters, compared to 180,000 in 2020. This growth coincides with a surge in political representation: several Indian-Americans have been appointed to key positions in President Donald Trump’s second-term Cabinet, highlighting the growing influence of Indian-American professionals in shaping U.S. policy across various sectors, from artificial intelligence (AI) to public health. Such achievements reflect more than representation; they signify calculated efforts to influence policy-making at the highest levels.

Organizations like the Hindu American Foundation exemplify this strategic approach, advancing India’s interests through lobbying and legislative advocacy. The Indian-American diaspora represents a paradigm shift in how nations project power. Unlike traditional models reliant on direct state action, India’s strategy leverages transnational networks. Diaspora-led lobbying efforts, such as the 2024 Technology Immigration Summit on Capitol Hill, which was held by the Foundation for India and Indian Diaspora (FIIDS), illustrate the community’s ability to shape discourse around immigration policies and bilateral relations. This decentralized model extends to the export of intellectual capital. Stanford’s Asia-Pacific Research Center highlights India’s unique role as a global talent exporter, with CEOs and executives forming the backbone of its soft power strategy. Each Indian-American leader becomes a potential conduit for fostering economic and cultural ties, creating complex interdependencies between India and host nations.

As Washington grapples with containing China’s rise, the Indian-American phenomenon presents a more nuanced challenge. This is not traditional immigration but a strategic, networked approach to influence that blends economic, political, and cultural dimensions. By embedding its talent within global institutions, India is decentralizing its power projection, creating a web of interconnections that defies conventional geopolitical analysis. For U.S. policymakers, the message is clear: India’s ambitions require fresh lenses to comprehend and address. The diaspora’s ascendancy signifies more than a demographic shift; it heralds a new model of global engagement—subtle, persistent, and increasingly consequential. The rise of Indian Americans underscores the emergence of a 21st-century framework for global power.

Khalid is a physician, geostrategic analyst and freelance writer.

Read More

Trump’s Erosion of America’s “Soft Power” Will Have Economic Impacts
A person holding a stack of dollar bills that are flying away.
Getty Images, PM Images

Trump’s Erosion of America’s “Soft Power” Will Have Economic Impacts

President Donald Trump has championed a strong, often confrontational posture toward many nations, defining his foreign policy as “America First.” This is a new U.S. that the world is dealing with, no longer the chief architect of the multilateral world of markets, democracy, and human rights that the U.S. has been, albeit imperfectly, since World War II.

But since Trump has been in office for only five months, it’s too early to tell the ultimate impacts. However, one thing is becoming increasingly clear. The Trump administration’s posturing is causing an erosion of what is known as “soft power.” And that is starting to result in some negative economic impacts.

Keep ReadingShow less
Insider trading in Washington, DC

U.S. senators and representatives with access to non-public information are permitted to buy and sell individual stocks. It’s not just unethical; it sends the message that the game is rigged.

Getty Images, Greggory DiSalvo

Insider Trading: If CEOs Can’t Do It, Why Can Congress?

Ivan Boesky. Martha Stewart. Jeffrey Skilling.

Each became infamous for using privileged, non-public information to profit unfairly from the stock market. They were prosecuted. They served time. Because insider trading is a crime that threatens public trust and distorts free markets.

Keep ReadingShow less
Could Splits Within the GOP Over Economic Policy Hurt the Trump Administration?

With Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) by his side President Donald Trump speaks to the press following a House Republican meeting at the U.S. Capitol on May 20, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Tasos Katopodis

Could Splits Within the GOP Over Economic Policy Hurt the Trump Administration?

Republican U.S. Senator Josh Hawley from Missouri is an unusual combo of right and left politics—kind of like an elephant combined with a donkey combined with a polar bear. And, yet, his views may augur the future of the Republican Party.

Many people view the Republican and Democratic parties as ideological monoliths, run by hardcore partisans and implacably positioned against each other. But, in fact, both parties have their internal divisions, influenced by various outside organizations. In the GOP, an intra-party battle is brewing between an economic populist wing with its more pro-labor positions and a traditional libertarian wing with its pro-free market stances.

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: Trump’s Middle East Trip

U.S. President Donald J. Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman a signing ceremony at the Saudi Royal Court on May 13, 2025, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Getty Images, Win McNamee

Just the Facts: Trump’s Middle East Trip

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

Are pro-Israel supporters of Donald Trump concerned about his recent trip to the Middle East?

Keep ReadingShow less