Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The Fahey Q&A With Bonnie Miller of the League of Women Voters, Arkansas

News

League of Women Voters of Arkansas President Bonnie Miller on a hike, standing in front of a landscape view.

Katie Fahey speaks with League of Women Voters of Arkansas President Bonnie Miller on democracy reform across the state and her work in civically educating and engaging residents.

Since organizing the Voters Not Politicians 2018 ballot initiative that put citizens in charge of drawing Michigan's legislative maps, Fahey has been the founding executive director of The People, which is forming statewide networks to promote government accountability. She regularly interviews colleagues in the world of democracy reform for our Opinion section.

Bonnie Miller is known for her activism in democracy reform in Arkansas and is the current president of the League of Women Voters of Arkansas and chair of Save AR Democracy, a campaign to protect ballot initiatives in Arkansas. In 2020, Miller led the Arkansas Voters First campaign, which garnered significant support but was eventually struck down by the Arkansas Supreme Court. She continues to lead the fight for a better democracy in her state while also working in higher education at the University of Arkansas School of Law.


Our conversation has been edited for clarity and brevity.

Fahey: Tell us about your background. What led you to get involved with democracy reform?

Miller: I got involved in democracy reform in 2018 after I attended a local League of Women Voters’ program about gerrymandering and a possible solution—an independent redistricting commission. I was never the same—I was empowered(!!) and ready to get to work. I joined the local LWV chapter, and in 2020, I chaired Arkansas Voters First, a statewide ballot measure campaign to create fair maps through an independent commission. I never looked back!

Fahey: Your state’s ballot initiative process has been under attack from the legislature and the courts. Can you tell us about the history of these attacks, and how are you fighting back?

Miller: Because of recent ballot measures successes (minimum wage, medical cannabis) and near successes (independent redistricting, ranked choice voting), the General Assembly has enacted numerous laws that severely restrict the initiative process to the point where it is nearly impossible to qualify a measure for the ballot. We are fighting back in two ways: First, we have filed two lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of most of the onerous laws, and we have drafted and are currently collecting signatures on a constitutional amendment (the nation’s first!) to save and protect the initiative process in Arkansas.

Fahey: Tell us about the changes you are currently fighting for: What ballot initiatives are you currently working on, and what stage are you at in the process?

Miller: Right now, we’re solely focused on protecting direct democracy in Arkansas. Without the process, the people won’t have the ability to pass policies that our legislature refuses to address. After our redistricting measure was disqualified in 2020 due to a statute subsequently declared unconstitutional, we knew we needed to shift from defense to offense. We developed a two-pronged approach to save and protect the process. We spent years working with local and national stakeholders, experts, and legal counsel to not only protect the process moving forward but to challenge those statutes we believed to be unconstitutional. We’re proud to be the first campaign in the country to launch a proactive, direct democracy amendment—a ballot measure for ballot measures, as we call it. We are currently collecting signatures across the state and have until July 3, 2026, to submit 90,704 signatures from registered voters.

Fahey: Who are the main opponents of your effort, and what are their arguments against it?

Miller: The main opponents are politicians who believe the people should not have the right to participate in direct democracy. They argue that the process needs to be shielded from “special interests,” but what they’re doing is ensuring that ONLY special interests can afford to participate under our current laws. This is not unique to Arkansas—this is a nationwide effort to systemically dismantle the initiative and referendum process in the states that have it.

Fahey: What do you think your campaign needs to do to be successful in November 2026?

Miller: Honestly, the support is there. We just need to qualify for the ballot by submitting the requisite number of signatures. We’re confident our measure will pass by an overwhelming majority if it makes the ballot.

And money, of course! :) We’re running an all-volunteer statewide campaign, and printing and circulating petitions is a costly endeavor—one that gets more and more expensive every cycle as our legislature continues to pass burdensome, unconstitutional laws.

Fahey: Are you finding that your campaign is resonating with AR voters?

Absolutely! Perhaps even more so than we anticipated. We know folks understand the basic premise of the problem, but at the end of the day, this is also a constitutional amendment about a process, and it’s pretty technical and in the weeds. We’ve been blown away by the level of engagement from folks around the policy details—they absolutely get it and are even lining up to sign our petition despite the additional hurdles added by our legislature.

Fahey: What are some of the best practices and lessons you have learned from past successes in ballot initiatives?

Miller: Start early!! Haha, but seriously, start as early as you can. And of course, work with a lawyer. Work with multiple lawyers. Money spent on protecting and insulating your measure from guaranteed challenges is never wasted.

Fahey: What do you currently need the most help with, and how can people get involved?

Miller: We need volunteers, and we have a place for everyone. If you want to help, we can use you! For folks outside of Arkansas looking to help with our effort, you can do a lot by helping to spread the word about our campaign. Find us on social media, subscribe to our newsletter, share our content so it gets in front of as many people as possible. And of course, if you can donate, even $5, that is a TREMENDOUS help. Our campaign is fueled by small donor donations and our volunteers. Head to SaveARDemocracy.org for more information. This is an all-hands-on-deck situation. Our future is at stake.

Fahey: If you were speaking with a high school student or a new immigrant to our country, how would you describe what being an American means to you?

Miller: Being an American to me means being part of one of the most historic and profound coalitions to have ever existed. We always talk about the importance of people-powered coalitions to the success of direct democracy, and that’s true when you zoom out as well. America, our country, IS a coalition—a diverse coalition with many competing interests, and at the end of the day, we are bound together through our commitment to democracy and each other. So while we’re navigating unchartered waters, it’s important to remember how successful we’ve been in holding onto this wonderfully messy and complicated coalition—we NEED to remember that we’ve been down before but never out. We’re still doing the work of democracy, and in America, that includes everyone.

Read More

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Close-up of sign reading 'Immigrants Make America Great' at a Baltimore rally.

Trump’s Anti-Latino Racism is a Major Liability for Democracy

Donald Trump’s second administration has fully clarified Latinos’ racial position in America: our ethnic group’s labor, culture, and aspirations are too much for his supporters to stomach. The Latino presence in America triggers too many uneasy questions (are they White?), too many doubts (are they really American?), and too much resentment (why are they doing better than me?).

Trump’s targeted deportations of undocumented Latinos, unwarranted arrests of Latino citizens, and heightened ICE presence in Latino neighborhoods address these worries by lumping Latinos with Black people. Simply put, we have become yet another visible population that America socially stigmatizes, economically exploits, and politically terrorizes because aggrieved White adults want to preserve their rank as our nation’s premier racial group. The cumulative impacts are serious: just yesterday, an international panel of investigators on human rights and racism, backed by the U.N., found that such actions have resulted in “grave human rights violations.”

Keep ReadingShow less
People waving US flags

People waving US flags

LeoPatrizi/Getty Images

Democracy Fellowship Spotlight: Joel Gurin on Trustworthy Data

Earlier this year, the Bridge Alliance and the National Academy of Public Administration launched the Fellows for Democracy and Public Service Initiative to strengthen the country's civic foundations. This fellowship unites the Academy’s distinguished experts with the Bridge Alliance’s cross‑sector ecosystem to elevate distributed leadership throughout the democracy reform landscape. Instead of relying on traditional, top‑down models, the program builds leadership ecosystems: spaces where people share expertise, prioritize collaboration, and use public‑facing storytelling to renew trust in democratic institutions. Each fellow grounds their work in one of six core sectors essential to a thriving democratic republic.

Recently, I interviewed Joel Gurin, who founded and now leads the Center for Open Data Enterprise (CODE) and wrote Open Data Now. Before launching CODE in 2015, he chaired the White House Task Force on Smart Disclosure, which studied how open government data can improve consumer markets. He also led as Chief of the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at the Federal Communications Commission and spent over a decade at Consumer Reports.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kristi Noem facing away with her hand up to be sworn in as she testifies.

U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem is sworn in as she testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on March 03, 2026 in Washington, DC. The Department of Homeland Security has faced criticism over it's handling of immigration enforcement leaving the department unfunded.

Getty Images, Andrew Harnik

Kristi Noem is a Criminal. They Fired Her Because She’s a Woman

Kristi Noem deserved to get axed. After ignoring thousands of stories of officers detaining American citizens in violent, indiscriminate, unconstitutional roundups, posing for a gleeful photo-op at a hellacious El Salvadoran prison, labeling American protesters as domestic terrorists, and lying under oath multiple times, Democrats and even many Republicans lauded her exodus. Still, in what was a brief, volatile tenure as Secretary of Homeland Security, Noem transformed the agency charged with the protection of the American people into a theater for performative cruelty. Now, as the door hits Noem on the way out, it is important to note that her ouster was not a triumph of ethics or the law or even a sudden recollection of what competence looks like. Despite no lack of legitimate grounds for dismissal, most sources say the final straw was a $220 million ad blitz, possibly complicated by an alleged affair with her adviser. But who among Trump’s inner circle doesn’t come with a laundry list of wasteful spending and personal embarrassments? The rest of the Cabinet is chock full of unqualified Trump-loyalists demonstrating incompetence so regularly that in any other era they would have all resigned or been canned long ago. Given the purported reasons Noem was ultimately fired, and where the conversation has lingered since, to the untrained eye, it seems like Noem may have been the first to get the boot, at least in part because she’s not a man.

There’s nothing Noem did that another member of the cabinet or Trump himself couldn’t top. Consider the shameful tenure of our Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick, who engaged in intimate business deals with Epstein years after Epstein’s first conviction, and even planned family vacations to his private island. While Noem is fired for a $220 million ad buy, Lutnick remains the face of American business, despite once being in business with a convicted sex trafficker and lying about it. And our wannabe-fraternity-pledgemaster Secretary of War Pete Hegseth is, if possible, an even greater liability. Hegseth breached security protocol in his second month on the job and oversaw a record $93 billion of spending in a single month, $9 million going to king crab and lobster tails, and $15 million to ribeye steaks. More gravely, in his zeal to project “lethality," Hegseth gutted civilian harm mitigation programs by 90 percent; shortly thereafter, on his watch, in what is the most devastating single military error in modern history, the U.S. fired a Tomahawk missile into a school full of children, killing at least 168 children and 14 teachers. Noem may have turned federal agents against American civilians (which is not why she was fired), but Hegseth is committing war crimes around the globe.

Keep ReadingShow less
A balance.

A retired New York judge criticizes President Trump’s actions on tariffs, judicial defiance, alleged corruption, and executive overreach, warning of threats to constitutional order and the rule of law in the United States.

Getty Images

A Pay‑to‑Play Presidency Testing the Limits of Our Institutions

Another day, another outrage, and another attack on the Constitution that this President has twice taken a vow to uphold. Instead of accepting the Supreme Court decision striking down his imposition of tariffs, the President is now imposing them by executive order and excoriating the Justices who ruled against him. His disrespect for the Constitution and the judiciary is boundless.

To this retired New York State judge, all hell seems to have broken loose in our federal government. Congress lies dormant when it is not enabling the chief executive’s misuse and personal acquisition of federal funds, and, notwithstanding its recent tariffs ruling, a majority of the Supreme Court generally rubber-stamps the administration’s actions through opaque “shadow docket” rulings. In doing so, SCOTUS abdicates its role as an independent check.

Keep ReadingShow less