Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Defining the Democracy Reform Movement: Julia Roig

Opinion

Defining the Democracy Reform Movement: Julia Roig

USA flag on pole during daytime

Photo by Zetong Li on Unsplash

The Fulcrum presents The Path Forward: Defining the Democracy Reform Movement. Scott Warren's weekly interviews engage diverse thought leaders to elevate the conversation about building a thriving and healthy democratic republic that fulfills its potential as a national social and political game-changer. This series is the start of focused collaborations and dialogue led by The Bridge Alliance and The Fulcrum teams to help the movement find a path forward.

I’m excited to start this series by highlighting an interview with Julia Roig, the Chief Network Weaver for the Horizons Project. Julia brings extensive experience working for democratic change around the world, and her work at the Horizons Project focuses on supporting and building the broader pro-democracy ecosystem.


Julia provided her candid thoughts on what is needed at this moment in the field, expressing an urgent need for actors to both deliberately work together and change their approaches- which she is nervous is not happening enough. Some of her main ideas (which you can watch in the video below):

  • Exploring the tension between peacebuilding vs resistance: Horizon’s original purpose was squarely to combat polarization and promote peacebuilding. Currently, they are working with actors engaged in resistance work. These approaches can sometimes seem in tension with each other.

    Julia noted the balance between lowering the heat (combatting polarization) and raising the heat (resistance)- but ideally ensuring that actors are in lockstep rather than in tension. Julia noted that she has a sticky on her desk from a conversation she had in which someone told her, “I don’t care about the ecosystem,” to remind her of the magnitude of the challenge;

  • The ecosystem can be seen as a jazz band: Julia talked about the pro-democracy movement as a jazz band in which everyone plays different instruments, there’s not a song sheet, there’s no conductor, but everyone is generally moving in the same direction.

    “Not everybody has to do everything. I’m actually not even asking people to change their lanes. And yet we do need to figure out how we fit together.”

  • The field needs to change: Julia was concerned that actors in the movement were not thinking or acting differently amid the changing contexts. She noted, "We are living in a different country today than we were a month ago, and I'm not sure that I see enough people pivoting or even having the conversations about what's needed to be pivoting.”

    Julia warned that an organizational retrenchment is happening right now, potentially precisely because there’s so much uncertainty. She noted, “Honestly, what I'm experiencing right now is more entrenchment within these different kinds of theories of change, these different fields…Everybody's freaking out of their minds right now. No one is their best self. And if you're not your best self, and you're totally operating on Lizard Brain.”

    She went on to note, “We are making the same mistakes. I mean, that's the issue. When do we pause to have a bigger conversation? When is that going to happen?”

- YouTubeyoutu.be

The broader points that Julia continues to hammer home are that the field needs to work together, think differently, and both push back against immediate threats while taking a step back to think about the long term. Challenging but vital requests at this moment.

As I proceed in this research, I realize that many of us are potentially falling into the trap of feeling shocked and awed, which keeps us confused, overwhelmed, and divided in our efforts. Yes, there’s a need to act in the immediate, but I think Julia is onto something with the field’s inability to think and act differently in the moment.

Please listen to Julia’s powerful interview and share your thoughts or ideas on “A Path Forward for the Pro-Democracy Community." Please get in touch.

We must pivot if we are to be successful.

Executive Editor's Notes: We invite you to subscribe to the Fulcrum's YouTube channel, where you will find thought-provoking and engaging conversations about what matters most in protecting and nurturing democracy.

Scott's next interview with Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson, a spiritual entrepreneur, author, and scholar-practitioner , will be published on Thursday, March 13.

Scott Warren is a fellow at the SNF Agora Institute at Johns Hopkins University. He is co-leading a trans-partisan effort to protect the basic parameters, rules, and institutions of the American republic. He is the co-founder of Generation Citizen, a national civics education organization.

SUGGESTIONS:

A Path Forward for the Pro-Democracy Community

A Democracy Reform Movement- If we can define it

Read More

Where is the Holiday Spirit When It Comes to Solving Our Nation’s Problems?

Amid division and distrust, collaborative problem-solving shows how Americans can work across differences to rebuild trust and solve shared problems.

Getty Images, andreswd

Where is the Holiday Spirit When It Comes to Solving Our Nation’s Problems?

Along with schmaltzy movies and unbounded commercialism, the holiday season brings something deeply meaningful: the holiday spirit. Central to this spirit is being charitable and kinder toward others. It is putting the Golden Rule—treating others as we ourselves wish to be treated—into practice.

Unfortunately, mounting evidence shows that while people believe the Golden Rule may apply in our private lives, they are pessimistic that it can have a positive impact in the “real” world filled with serious and divisive issues, political or otherwise. The vast majority of Americans believe that our political system cannot overcome current divisions to solve national problems. They seem to believe that we are doomed to fight rather than find ways to work together. Among young people, the pessimism is even more dire.

Keep ReadingShow less
Varying speech bubbles.​ Dialogue. Conversations.
Varying speech bubbles.
Getty Images, DrAfter123

Political Division Is Fixable. Psychology Shows a Better Way Forward.

A friend recently told me she dreads going home for the holidays. It’s not the turkey or the travel, but rather the simmering political anger that has turned once-easy conversations with her father into potential landmines. He talks about people with her political views with such disdain that she worries he now sees her through the same lens. The person she once talked to for hours now feels emotionally out of reach.

This quiet heartbreak is becoming an American tradition no one asked for.

Keep ReadingShow less
People waving US flags
A deep look at what “American values” truly mean, contrasting liberal, conservative, and MAGA interpretations through the lens of the Declaration and Constitution.
LeoPatrizi/Getty Images

The Season to Remember We’re Still One Nation

Every year around this time, the noise starts to drop. The pace eases a bit. Families gather, neighbors reconnect, and people who disagree on just about everything still manage to pass plates across the same table. Something about late November into December nudges us toward reflection. Whatever you call it — holiday spirit, cultural memory, or just a pause in the chaos — it’s real. And in a country this divided, it might be the reminder we need most.

Because the truth is simple: America has never thrived by choosing one ideology over another. It has thrived because our competing visions push, restrain, and refine each other. We forget that at our own risk.

Keep ReadingShow less
Governors Cox and Shapiro Urge Nation to “Lower the Temperature” Amid Rising Political Violence

Utah Republican Spencer Cox and Pennsylvania Democrat Josh Shapiro appear on CNN

Governors Cox and Shapiro Urge Nation to “Lower the Temperature” Amid Rising Political Violence

In the days following the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, I wrote Governor Cox’s Prayer Wasn’t Just Misguided—It Was Dangerous, an article sharply criticizing Utah Gov. Spencer Cox for his initial public response. Rather than centering his remarks on the victim, the community’s grief, or the broader national crisis of political violence, Cox told reporters that he had prayed the shooter would be from “another state” or “another country.” That comment, I argued at the time, was more than a moment of emotional imprecision—it reflected a deeper and more troubling instinct in American politics to externalize blame. By suggesting that the perpetrator might ideally be an outsider, Cox reinforced long‑standing xenophobic narratives that cast immigrants and non‑locals as the primary sources of danger, despite extensive evidence that political violence in the United States is overwhelmingly homegrown.

Recently, Cox joined Pennsylvania Governor, Democrat Josh Shapiro, issuing a rare bipartisan warning about the escalating threat of political violence in the United States, calling on national leaders and citizens alike to “tone it down” during a joint interview at the Washington National Cathedral.

Keep ReadingShow less