Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Defining the Democracy Reform Movement: Julia Roig

Opinion

Defining the Democracy Reform Movement: Julia Roig

USA flag on pole during daytime

Photo by Zetong Li on Unsplash

The Fulcrum presents The Path Forward: Defining the Democracy Reform Movement. Scott Warren's weekly interviews engage diverse thought leaders to elevate the conversation about building a thriving and healthy democratic republic that fulfills its potential as a national social and political game-changer. This series is the start of focused collaborations and dialogue led by The Bridge Alliance and The Fulcrum teams to help the movement find a path forward.

I’m excited to start this series by highlighting an interview with Julia Roig, the Chief Network Weaver for the Horizons Project. Julia brings extensive experience working for democratic change around the world, and her work at the Horizons Project focuses on supporting and building the broader pro-democracy ecosystem.


Julia provided her candid thoughts on what is needed at this moment in the field, expressing an urgent need for actors to both deliberately work together and change their approaches- which she is nervous is not happening enough. Some of her main ideas (which you can watch in the video below):

  • Exploring the tension between peacebuilding vs resistance: Horizon’s original purpose was squarely to combat polarization and promote peacebuilding. Currently, they are working with actors engaged in resistance work. These approaches can sometimes seem in tension with each other.

    Julia noted the balance between lowering the heat (combatting polarization) and raising the heat (resistance)- but ideally ensuring that actors are in lockstep rather than in tension. Julia noted that she has a sticky on her desk from a conversation she had in which someone told her, “I don’t care about the ecosystem,” to remind her of the magnitude of the challenge;

  • The ecosystem can be seen as a jazz band: Julia talked about the pro-democracy movement as a jazz band in which everyone plays different instruments, there’s not a song sheet, there’s no conductor, but everyone is generally moving in the same direction.

    “Not everybody has to do everything. I’m actually not even asking people to change their lanes. And yet we do need to figure out how we fit together.”

  • The field needs to change: Julia was concerned that actors in the movement were not thinking or acting differently amid the changing contexts. She noted, "We are living in a different country today than we were a month ago, and I'm not sure that I see enough people pivoting or even having the conversations about what's needed to be pivoting.”

    Julia warned that an organizational retrenchment is happening right now, potentially precisely because there’s so much uncertainty. She noted, “Honestly, what I'm experiencing right now is more entrenchment within these different kinds of theories of change, these different fields…Everybody's freaking out of their minds right now. No one is their best self. And if you're not your best self, and you're totally operating on Lizard Brain.”

    She went on to note, “We are making the same mistakes. I mean, that's the issue. When do we pause to have a bigger conversation? When is that going to happen?”

- YouTubeyoutu.be

The broader points that Julia continues to hammer home are that the field needs to work together, think differently, and both push back against immediate threats while taking a step back to think about the long term. Challenging but vital requests at this moment.

As I proceed in this research, I realize that many of us are potentially falling into the trap of feeling shocked and awed, which keeps us confused, overwhelmed, and divided in our efforts. Yes, there’s a need to act in the immediate, but I think Julia is onto something with the field’s inability to think and act differently in the moment.

Please listen to Julia’s powerful interview and share your thoughts or ideas on “A Path Forward for the Pro-Democracy Community." Please get in touch.

We must pivot if we are to be successful.

Executive Editor's Notes: We invite you to subscribe to the Fulcrum's YouTube channel, where you will find thought-provoking and engaging conversations about what matters most in protecting and nurturing democracy.

Scott's next interview with Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson, a spiritual entrepreneur, author, and scholar-practitioner , will be published on Thursday, March 13.

Scott Warren is a fellow at the SNF Agora Institute at Johns Hopkins University. He is co-leading a trans-partisan effort to protect the basic parameters, rules, and institutions of the American republic. He is the co-founder of Generation Citizen, a national civics education organization.

SUGGESTIONS:

A Path Forward for the Pro-Democracy Community

A Democracy Reform Movement- If we can define it


Read More

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

People gather over a giant Declaration of Independence

Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images.

Reclaiming Patriotism: Between Nationalism and Pessimism

As America approaches the 250th anniversary of its independence, I am more in the mood to protest than to celebrate. Does that make me unpatriotic? The answer depends on how we understand “patriotism.” For a nation that is founded in revolution, let’s affirm a deeper and more profound love of country, a civic patriotism celebrative of our larger ideals including pluralism, dissent, and a commitment to social change.

Two Types of Patriotism

Keep ReadingShow less
A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together
Political polarization
Polarization and the politics of love

A New Path to Depolarization: Media That Brings Us Together

As we face ever-growing partisan polarization in American society, the need for large-scale action becomes increasingly urgent. As James Coan and I have written about in the Fulcrum during my time at More Like US, there are approaches grounded in a significant body of social psychological research that can help address this rapidly growing problem, namely different variations of social contact theory, especially vicarious contact. Until recently, much of the research and thus much of the basis for our articles has been focused on applying social contact theory to other problems facing society: prejudice against members of the LGBTQ community, individuals with autism, and immigrant schoolchildren, among other examples.

It was therefore exciting when last fall I saw the publication of an article in Political Science Research and Methods titled "Content That's as Good as Contact?: Vicarious Intergroup Contact and the Promise of Depolarization at Scale." The study, conducted in 2022 in conjunction with YouGov, finally attempted to measure the effectiveness of indirect contact as a path to depolarization, primarily through the vicarious experience of productive political conversation. Encompassing over 2,000 participants gathered from a nationally representative sample recruited by YouGov’s online panel, the study looked to test affective polarization, measured attitudinally, and interest and investment in depolarization, measured behaviorally. To this end, the study tested multiple media interventions, namely a 50-minute Braver Angels documentary featuring a “Red-Blue” depolarization workshop; a 50-minute placebo nature documentary about wildebeest migration; a 5-minute version of the Braver Angels documentary; a second 5-minute version that emphasized partisan misperception correction; and a pure control group, with no treatment.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

United States Marine Corps Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II STOVL stealth multirole fighters belonging to the VMFA-121 "Green Knights" taxiing at the MCAS Iwakuni in Yamaguchi, Japan, on March 23, 2017.

(viper-zero / Getty Images)

How Red and Blue America Can Stay Together by Pulling Apart

In earlier essays, I argued that America’s political division has grown so deep that a peaceful “American Union” of two sovereign nations — one broadly red, one broadly blue — is worth considering. I also argued that relocation fears are overstated, that cooperation could increase economic prosperity, and that separation could help heal the lingering wounds of the Civil War.

But how would this all actually work? What happens to the national debt? Who gets the military bases, federal lands, and nuclear weapons? Will Social Security be protected? Could two nations share the dollar, defend themselves together, and resolve their disagreements?

Keep ReadingShow less
Rear view of teenage boy walking with arm around friends

Why many young men feel politically and socially adrift, how changing gender roles affect masculinity, self-esteem, relationships, and the future of society.

Maskot / Getty Images

Lost Boys - What Is the Role of a Man in Today's Society?

A recent New York Times article stated that young males who provided an important swing vote for Trump in 2024 are discouraged by what Trump has done and not done while in office. But they are nevertheless not particularly inclined to vote Democratic because they don't see the Party as welcoming their view of masculinity and they don't know where they fit in this society.

These young men assume that because the Party supports equality for women in the workplace and because many young women no longer have marriage and having children at the top of their agenda, the Party would not be a welcoming home for them. They see themselves as striving for the masculinity of their fathers' or grandfathers' day, where the man was the breadwinner in the family and had respect and authority. Not the weaker half in relationships with women.

Keep ReadingShow less