Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Upon further review, election agency budget proposal a wash

Election Assistance Commission budget

The 2021 budget proposal by President Trump calls for a slight increase in the operating budget for the Election Assistance Commission, according to details of the budget plan.

Samuel Corum/Getty Images

The news about the Election Assistance Commission in President Trump's new budget isn't so bad after all.

On first blush, it appeared the EAC was not going to get any help in trying to rebuild itself from a series of budget cutbacks and staff turnover. After all, the bottom line in the budget proposal released last week was a proposed cut of $2.1 million, or 14 percent, from this year's $15.2 million in spending.

But, the agency points out, if you look at the fine print, the operating budget being proposed is actually slightly higher than the current year's operating budget.


All of this is important because, while tiny compared to most other parts of the government, the EAC's job is huge: It is the lead federal agency overseeing the process and security of all the elections for the president and Congress, which are actually conducted by the states and several thousand of counties and municipalities. The job has become even more critical with the 2016 hacking attempts by Russian operatives and predictions of even more sophisticated and extensive election security challenges this time.

Here is how the math works: The $15.2 million budget for the current year includes $2.4 million for relocating the EAC offices, which are now in the Washington suburb of Silver Spring, Md. In addition, another $1.5 million must be transferred to the National Institute of Standards and Technology for the work it's doing on setting voluntary new guidelines for voting machines.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The budget proposal for next year assumes another transfer to NIST but not any special real estate costs, leaving $11.6 million to operate the agency — which would represent a slightly-better-than-inflationary boost of 2.6 percent above the current operating budget.

The detailed budget calls for spending $5.2 million for salaries and benefits, an 11 percent increase, which would allow the creation of two new positions for a total staff of 32. Other expenses, including travel, would be cut by 3 percent to $7.9 million.

Of course, Congress will have the final say on all aspects of the federal budget, including that of the EAC. The House Appropriations Committee will begin reviewing Trump's proposal early next month.

Read More

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ranked Choice Voting May Be a Stepping Stone to Proportional Representation

Someone filling out a ballot.

Getty Images / Hill Street Studios

Ranked Choice Voting May Be a Stepping Stone to Proportional Representation

In the 2024 U.S. election, several states did not pass ballot initiatives to implement Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) despite strong majority support from voters under 65. Still, RCV was defended in Alaska, passed by a landslide in Washington, D.C., and has earned majority support in 31 straight pro-RCV city ballot measures. Still, some critics of RCV argue that it does not enhance and promote democratic principles as much as forms of proportional representation (PR), as commonly used throughout Europe and Latin America.

However, in the U.S. many people have not heard of PR. The question under consideration is whether implementing RCV serves as a stepping stone to PR by building public understanding and support for reforms that move away from winner-take-all systems. Utilizing a nationally representative sample of respondents (N=1000) on the 2022 Cooperative Election Survey (CES), results show that individuals who favor RCV often also know about and back PR. When comparing other types of electoral reforms, RCV uniquely transfers into support for PR, in ways that support for nonpartisan redistricting and the national popular vote do not. These findings can inspire efforts that demonstrate how RCV may facilitate the adoption of PR in the U.S.

Keep ReadingShow less