Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Top posts filled at sometimes struggling election agency

Election Assistance Commission

The Election Assistance Commission, from left: Ben Hovland, Christy McCormick, Don Palmer and Thomas Hicks.

Election Assistance Commission

After staying vacant almost a year, the top two jobs have been filled at the Election Assistance Commission, the principal federal agency overseeing how states conduct voting.

The commissioners formally made the hires on Wednesday. The moves could help stabilize the EAC after years of turnover, controversy and inconsistent funding.

The appointments come just five months before the presidential election, and in the middle of a primary season when the coronavirus pandemic has created delays and chaos across the country, most recently this week in Georgia.


The EAC is a small agency that plays a large role in the execution of the democratic process. It is charged with coordinating the government's limited supervision of how states and thousands of localities conduct elections. It certifies the reliability of the voting machines and has been at the center of efforts to protect election systems from being hacked by foreign adversaries.

But it's most prominent job recently has been parceling out $1.2 billion in aid — two-thirds of it to help states secure the 2020 election against hacking and the rest to help them make voting safer and easier during the Covid-19 outbreak. If Congress approves any more money to smooth this year's elections, the EAC will parcel out those grants as well.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

The new leaders will be Executive Director Mona Harrington and General Counsel Kevin Rayburn.

Last September, commissioners deadlocked and so did not reappoint the two people who had been in the top posts for four years, Brian Newby as executive director and Cliff Tatum as top attorney.

It was the latest setback for an agency that has faced budget cutbacks, political gridlock and even efforts to eliminate it.

"This unanimous vote of the commission shows the confidence we have in these great candidates to lead the EAC into its next chapter," said Chairman Ben Hovland.

The four-member commission includes two Democrats and two Republicans.


Mona HarringtonMona HarringtonElection Assistance Commission

Harrington, who had been the agency's chief information and security officer, had been acting executive director since Newby left last fall. She is credited with reorganizing the agency and hiring new staff.

"What she has accomplished over these past months, paired with 18 years of federal government experience and expertise in cybersecurity and IT, made her an ideal candidate," said Vice Chairman Donald Palmer.

Rayburn has spent the past four years as deputy elections director and deputy general counsel in the Georgia secretary of state's office, and before that spent three years with the Tennessee secretary of state.

Read More

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

A roll of "voted" stickers.

Pexels, Element5 Digital

One Lesson from the Elections: Looking At Universal Voting

The analysis and parsing of learned lessons from the 2024 elections will continue for a long time. What did the campaigns do right and wrong? What policies will emerge from the new arrangements of power? What do the parties need to do for the future?

An equally important question is what lessons are there for our democratic structures and processes. One positive lesson is that voting itself was almost universally smooth and effective; we should applaud the election officials who made that happen. But, many elements of the 2024 elections are deeply challenging, from the increasingly outsized role of billionaires in the process to the onslaught of misinformation and disinformation.

Keep ReadingShow less
MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

A check mark and hands.

Photo by Allison Saeng on Unsplash. Unsplash+ License obtained by the author.

MERGER: The Organization that Brought Ranked Choice Voting and Ended SuperPACs in Maine Joins California’s Nonpartisan Primary Pioneers

Originally published by Independent Voter News.

Today, I am proud to share an exciting milestone in my journey as an advocate for democracy and electoral reform.

Keep ReadingShow less
Half-Baked Alaska

A photo of multiple checked boxes.

Getty Images / Thanakorn Lappattaranan

Half-Baked Alaska

This past year’s elections saw a number of state ballot initiatives of great national interest, which proposed the adoption of two “unusual” election systems for state and federal offices. Pairing open nonpartisan primaries with a general election using ranked choice voting, these reforms were rejected by the citizens of Colorado, Idaho, and Nevada. The citizens of Alaska, however, who were the first to adopt this dual system in 2020, narrowly confirmed their choice after an attempt to repeal it in November.

Ranked choice voting, used in Alaska’s general elections, allows voters to rank their candidate choices on their ballot and then has multiple rounds of voting until one candidate emerges with a majority of the final vote and is declared the winner. This more representative result is guaranteed because in each round the weakest candidate is dropped, and the votes of that candidate’s supporters automatically transfer to their next highest choice. Alaska thereby became the second state after Maine to use ranked choice voting for its state and federal elections, and both have had great success in their use.

Keep ReadingShow less
Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

The United States Supreme Court.

Getty Images / Rudy Sulgan

Top-Two Primaries Under the Microscope

Fourteen years ago, after the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the popular blanket primary system, Californians voted to replace the deeply unpopular closed primary that replaced it with a top-two system. Since then, Democratic Party insiders, Republican Party insiders, minor political parties, and many national reform and good government groups, have tried (and failed) to deep-six the system because the public overwhelmingly supports it (over 60% every year it’s polled).

Now, three minor political parties, who opposed the reform from the start and have unsuccessfully sued previously, are once again trying to overturn it. The Peace and Freedom Party, the Green Party, and the Libertarian Party have teamed up to file a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Their brief repeats the same argument that the courts have previously rejected—that the top-two system discriminates against parties and deprives voters of choice by not guaranteeing every party a place on the November ballot.

Keep ReadingShow less