Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Georgia's new voting machines may violate privacy laws

Georgia voting touchscreen

Voting rights advocates claim the new touchscreens being used in Georgia are so big and bright that they can be read from 30 feet away.

Office of the Georgia Secretary of State

There's now a second front in the battle over Georgia's new electronic voting machines. Already under fire for its version of a paper audit trail, the system is now wrapped up in a lawsuit for its use of voting touchscreens that are so big and so bright that some may be able to see how others are voting.

The plaintiffs, including the Colorado-based Coalition for Good Governance, say the screens violate Georgia's ballot secrecy provisions because they can be read as far as 30 feet away.

They are asking a state court to act immediately by requiring the use of paper ballots in the runoff election for a state Senate seat. Early in-person voting for that race began Monday and March 3 is election day.

The plaintiffs argue it is not simply a matter of changing the brightness of the computers, the angle of the screens or the type size. And the state cannot solve the problem by simply hanging curtains because Georgia law bans anything like a booth or curtain around the voting devices that would prevent election officials from overseeing the voting process.


Last March, Gov. Brian Kemp signed a law requiring new voting machines for the entire state, a project that cost more than $100 million.

The new machines came under earlier criticism because the paper ballot they produce includes a barcode that is used to cast the ballot and could be used to double check results. But voters cannot read the codes to know whether the printouts match their choices.

The Coalition for Good Governance filed a separate lawsuit on that issue. It is still pending in federal court.

The defendants in the new case are the members of the Sumter County Board of Elections.

Sumter County, a mostly rural portion of south-central Georgia, is home to Plains, the hometown and current residence of former President Jimmy Carter and his wife, Rosalynn.

Read More

Stolen Land, Stolen Votes: Native Americans Defending the VRA Protects Us All – and We Should Support Them

Wilson Deschine sits at the "be my voice" voter registration stand at the Navajo Nation annual rodeo, in Window Rock.

Getty Images, David Howells

Stolen Land, Stolen Votes: Native Americans Defending the VRA Protects Us All – and We Should Support Them

On July 24, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked a Circuit Court order in a far-reaching case that could affect the voting rights of all Americans. Native American tribes and individuals filed the case as part of their centuries-old fight for rights in their own land.

The underlying subject of the case confronts racial gerrymandering against America’s first inhabitants, where North Dakota’s 2021 redistricting reduced Native Americans’ chances of electing up to three state representatives to just one. The specific issue that the Supreme Court may consider, if it accepts hearing the case, is whether individuals and associations can seek justice under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). That is because the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, contradicting other courts, said that individuals do not have standing to bring Section 2 cases.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person voting

New York City’s election has gotten a lot of attention over the last few weeks, and ranked choice voting is a big part of the reason why.

Hill Street Studios/Getty Images

New York City’s Ranked Choice Voting: Democracy That’s Accountable to Voters

New York City’s election has gotten a lot of attention over the last few weeks, and ranked choice voting is a big part of the reason why.

Heads turned when 33-year-old state legislator Zohran Mamdani knocked off Andrew Cuomo, a former governor from one of the Democratic Party’s most prominent families. The earliest polls for the mayoral primary this winter found Mamdani struggling to reach even 1 percent.

Keep ReadingShow less
Defend Democracy Against Bombardments on the Elections Front –A Three-Part Series
polling station poster on clear glass door

Defend Democracy Against Bombardments on the Elections Front –A Three-Part Series

In Part One, Pat Merloe explored the impact of the political environment, the need for constitutional defense against power-grabbing, and the malign effects of proof of citizenship on voting.

In the second part of the three-part series, Merloe explores the harmful effects of Executive Orders, the reversal of the Justice Department on voting rights, and the effects of political retribution.

Keep ReadingShow less
Defend Democracy Against Bombardments on the Elections Front –A Three-Part Series
Voted printed papers on white surface

Defend Democracy Against Bombardments on the Elections Front –A Three-Part Series

In Part 1, Pat Merloe examines the impact of the political environment, the necessity of constitutional defense against power-grabbing, and the detrimental effects of proof of citizenship on voting.

Part One: Bellicose Environment, Constitutional Infringements, and Disenfranchisement by Proof of Citizenship

The intense MAGA barrage against genuine elections, leading up to 2024’s voting, paused briefly after Election Day - not because there was diminished MAGA hostility towards typically trustworthy processes and results, but mainly because Donald Trump won. Much valuable work took place to protect last year’s polls, and much more will be needed as we head toward 2026, 2028, and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less