Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Illinois has badly fumbled AVR, and now it's being sued for voting rights abuse

Voters in Illinois

A lawsuit claims Illinois' handling of the AVR system has hindered voter registration in three elections.

Scott Olson/Getty Images

A coalition of progressive advocacy groups is suing Illinois for allegedly botching the rollout of the state's automatic voter registration system for three years.

When the state enacted AVR in 2017, those groups hoped it would modernize and streamline registration and make the ballot box more readily accessible to members of minority groups and non-English speakers. But the lawsuit, filed Friday, alleges the state has badly fumbled the execution, causing repeated record-keeping errors and voter confusion that violate federal voting rights law.

Things are so bad, the plaintiffs maintain, that federal judges in Chicago should take control of the system until it's put right.


AVR has gained in popularity in recent years precisely because it's supposed to make registration simpler for both voters and bureaucrats. Illinois is the second-most-populous, after Calfifornia, of the 16 states (plus D.C.) where eligible people are automatically added to the voter rolls whenever they do business with the motor vehicle bureau — or, in some places, other state agencies that keep personal information on residents.

The suit alleges multiple failings in the state's system. For instance, last month, 774 convicted felons who had re-registered after their release from prison had their registrations canceled due to a "data-matching error." The state Board of Elections corrected this in time for the start of early voting in the March 17 presidential, congressional and legislative primary.

In January, a glitch in the system mistakenly added nearly 600 noncitizens to the rolls after they applied for a driver's license or identification card. They have since been removed.

Under the 2017 law, when voting-age residents go to the DMV to update or obtain their driver's license, a state employee is supposed to check their voter registration status and ensure their address is up to date. But the lawsuit alleges this often doesn't happen, leaving many residents off the voter rolls.

The state's AVR system also has mistakenly suggested that 16-year-olds are eligible to vote, the suit alleges. Only residents who will be 17 before the next primary and 18 before the next general are eligible to register.

The advocacy groups claim the state's handling of AVR has hindered voter registration in three elections: the 2018 midterm and two local elections last year. It also presents "an imminent threat" of doing so again in the primaries and in November.

"Unfortunately, the promise of voter modernization and inclusivity has not only gone unfulfilled, it now appears that even basic voter registration services are mishandled in disregard of repeated calls for transparency and accountability by non-partisan organizations in the state," says the lawsuit, filed by the Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Chicago, Change Illinois, Chicago Votes Education Fund, Common Cause Illinois, Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights and the Illinois Public Interest Research Group Education Fund.

Read More

An oversized ballot box surrounded by people.

Young people worldwide form new parties to reshape politics—yet America’s two-party system blocks them.

Getty Images, J Studios

No Country for Young Politicians—and How To Fix That

In democracies around the world, young people have started new political parties whenever the establishment has sidelined their views or excluded them from policymaking. These parties have sometimes reinvigorated political competition, compelled established parties to take previously neglected issues seriously, or encouraged incumbent leaders to find better ways to include and reach out to young voters.

In Europe, a trio in their twenties started Volt in 2017 as a pan-European response to Brexit, and the party has managed to win seats in the European Parliament and in some national legislatures. In Germany, young people concerned about climate change created Klimaliste, a party committed to limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, as per the Paris Agreement. Although the party hasn’t won seats at the federal level, they have managed to win some municipal elections. In Chile, leaders of the 2011 student protests, who then won seats as independent candidates, created political parties like Revolución Democrática and Convergencia Social to institutionalize their movements. In 2022, one of these former student leaders, Gabriel Boric, became the president of Chile at 36 years old.

Keep ReadingShow less
How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

Demonstrators gather outside of The United States Supreme Court during an oral arguments in Gill v. Whitford to call for an end to partisan gerrymandering on October 3, 2017 in Washington, DC

Getty Images, Olivier Douliery

How To Fix Gerrymandering: A Fair-Share Rule for Congressional Redistricting

The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield, and government to gain ground. ~ Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Col. Edward Carrington, Paris, 27 May 1788

The Problem We Face

The U.S. House of Representatives was designed as the chamber of Congress most directly tethered to the people. Article I of the Constitution mandates that seats be apportioned among the states according to population and that members face election every two years—design features meant to keep representatives responsive to shifting public sentiment. Unlike the Senate, which prioritizes state sovereignty and representation, the House translates raw population counts into political voice: each House district is to contain roughly the same number of residents, ensuring that every citizen’s vote carries comparable weight. In principle, then, the House serves as the nation’s demographic mirror, channeling the diverse preferences of the electorate into lawmaking and acting as a safeguard against unresponsive or oligarchic governance.

Nationally, the mismatch between the overall popular vote and the partisan split in House seats is small, with less than a 1% tilt. But state-level results tell a different story. Take Connecticut: Democrats hold all five seats despite Republicans winning over 40% of the statewide vote. In Oklahoma, the inverse occurs—Republicans control every seat even though Democrats consistently earn around 40% of the vote.

Keep ReadingShow less
Once Again, Politicians Are Choosing Their Voters. It’s Time for Voters To Choose Back.
A pile of political buttons sitting on top of a table

Once Again, Politicians Are Choosing Their Voters. It’s Time for Voters To Choose Back.

Once again, politicians are trying to choose their voters to guarantee their own victories before the first ballot is cast.

In the latest round of redistricting wars, Texas Republicans are attempting a rare mid-decade redistricting to boost their advantage ahead of the 2026 midterms, and Democratic governors in California and New York are signaling they’re ready to “fight fire with fire” with their own partisan gerrymanders.

Keep ReadingShow less
Stolen Land, Stolen Votes: Native Americans Defending the VRA Protects Us All – and We Should Support Them

Wilson Deschine sits at the "be my voice" voter registration stand at the Navajo Nation annual rodeo, in Window Rock.

Getty Images, David Howells

Stolen Land, Stolen Votes: Native Americans Defending the VRA Protects Us All – and We Should Support Them

On July 24, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked a Circuit Court order in a far-reaching case that could affect the voting rights of all Americans. Native American tribes and individuals filed the case as part of their centuries-old fight for rights in their own land.

The underlying subject of the case confronts racial gerrymandering against America’s first inhabitants, where North Dakota’s 2021 redistricting reduced Native Americans’ chances of electing up to three state representatives to just one. The specific issue that the Supreme Court may consider, if it accepts hearing the case, is whether individuals and associations can seek justice under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). That is because the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, contradicting other courts, said that individuals do not have standing to bring Section 2 cases.

Keep ReadingShow less