Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

What voters need to know about the presidential election

House chamber

Rep. Scott Perry objects to Pennsylvania's certification of its Electoral College vote during a joint session of Congress on Jan. 7, 2021.

Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Becvar is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and executive director of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund. Nevins is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and co-founder and board chairman of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

It is quite clear that the presidential election is going to be incredibly close. In each of the seven swing states, the margin of error is less than 2 percent.

As citizens, this is not something to fear and it is critically important that we all trust the election results.

As part of our ongoing series for the Election Overtime Project, today we present a guide explaining in detail what you, as a voter, need to know about the role of state legislatures and Congress in a presidential election. The guide was prepared by the Election Reformers Network, a nonprofit organization championing impartial elections and concrete policy solutions that strengthen American democracy.


Once Election Day has come, state legislators have no role in determining presidential results

  1. They can pass laws before the election deciding how the state will select its electors (winner-take-all, by congressional district, etc.).
  2. They cannot change how the state selects its electors after the elections.
  3. They cannot select a different set of electors than those chosen based on the certified results.
  4. They do not certify the presidential results in their state.

Candidates and parties

Candidates and/or parties have many opportunities to ensure the accuracy of the count. They have no legitimate grounds to claim they legally won once results showing they did not are final, and all court cases are resolved.

  1. Candidates and/or parties can designate observers to watch important election processes, in accordance with state law.
  2. Candidates in close elections can observe and/or request recounts in most states.
  3. Candidates and parties can contest results in court.

Courts

Elections are conducted according to procedures set by law; courts are the backstop candidates and officials use to ensure the law is followed.

  1. Courts can order election boards, canvas boards and similar bodies to certify results if they refuse to do so.
  2. Courts cannot hear (and must dismiss) challenges if the court lacks the authority to hear the case, if the plaintiff lacks the right to bring the case, or if there is insufficient evidence or legal basis to continue the case.
  3. Courts can hear and decide challenges to the election results if there is sufficient evidence that the votes were not cast or counted according to law.

Results: Election laws alone determine when results are final

  1. Media projections have no bearing on the results.
  2. Whether a candidate concedes has no bearing on the results (though failing to do so can create risks of political violence).
  3. The election result and selection of electors in a state becomes final when the governor (or other executive per state law) issues the Certificate of Ascertainment within 36 days of Election Day (by Dec. 11).
  4. The Certificate of Ascertainment is subject to change by court order if there is a successful legal challenge before the meeting of electors (Dec. 17).

Congress

The role of Congress is extremely limited, and Congress does not actually “certify” presidential results.

  1. Congress can witness the vice president counting — without discretion — each state’s official certificate of electoral votes.
  2. Members of Congress can object to counting electoral votes on a very limited set of grounds that are extremely unlikely to occur. (For example: Did the elector vote for a president who is over 35, as required by the Constitution?)
  3. Members of Congress cannot object to the results in any state so long as those results have been certified according to law.
  4. In the very unlikely event that no candidate wins a majority of electoral votes, the House of Representatives picks the president (with each state's delegation having one vote) and the Senate picks the vice president.

Read More

Independent Voters Just Got Power in Nevada – if the Governor Lets It Happen

"On Las Vegas Boulevard" sign.

Photo by Wesley Tingey on Unsplash. Unplash+ license obtained by IVN Editor Shawn Griffiths.

Independent Voters Just Got Power in Nevada – if the Governor Lets It Happen

CARSON CITY, NEV. - A surprise last-minute bill to open primary elections to Nevada’s largest voting bloc, registered unaffiliated voters, moved quickly through the state legislature and was approved by a majority of lawmakers on the last day of the legislative session Monday.

The bill, AB597, allows voters not registered with a political party to pick between a Republican and Democratic primary ballot in future election cycles. It does not apply to the state’s presidential preference elections, which would remain closed to registered party members.

Keep ReadingShow less
Voter registration

In April 2025, the SAVE Act has been reintroduced in the 119th Congress and passed the House, with a much stronger chance of becoming law given the current political landscape.

SDI Productions

The SAVE Act: Addressing a Non-Existent Problem at the Cost of Voter Access?

In July 2024, I wrote about the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act when it was first introduced in Congress. And Sarah and I discussed it in an episode of Beyond the Bill Number which you can still listen to. Now, in April 2025, the SAVE Act has been reintroduced in the 119th Congress and passed the House, with a much stronger chance of becoming law given the current political landscape. It's time to revisit this legislation and examine its implications for American voters.

Read the IssueVoter analysis of the bill here for further insight and commentary.

Keep ReadingShow less
Independent Voters Gain Ground As New Mexico Opens Primaries
person in blue denim jeans and white sneakers standing on gray concrete floor
Photo by Phil Scroggs on Unsplash

Independent Voters Gain Ground As New Mexico Opens Primaries

With the stroke of a pen, New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham enfranchised almost 350,000 independent voters recently by signing a bill for open primaries. Just a few years ago, bills to open the primaries were languishing in the state legislature, as they have historically across the country. But as more and more voters leave both parties and declare their independence, the political system is buckling. And as independents begin to organize and speak out, it’s going to continue to buckle in their direction.

In 2004, there were 120,000 independent voters in New Mexico. A little over 10 years later, when the first open primary bill was introduced, that number had more than doubled. That bill never even got a hearing. But today the number of independents in New Mexico and across the country is too big to ignore. Independents are the largest group of voters in ten states and the second-largest in most others. That’s putting tremendous pressure on a system that wasn’t designed with them in mind.

Keep ReadingShow less
"Voter Here" sign outside of a polling location.

"Voter Here" sign outside of a polling location.

Getty Images, Grace Cary

Stopping the Descent Toward Banana Republic Elections

President Trump’s election-related executive order begins by pointing out practices in Canada, Sweden, Brazil, and elsewhere that outperform the U.S. But it is Trump’s order itself that really demonstrates how far we’ve fallen behind. In none of the countries mentioned, or any other major democracy in the world, would the head of government change election rules by decree, as Trump has tried to do.

Trump is the leader of a political party that will fight for control of Congress in 2026, an election sure to be close, and important to his presidency. The leader of one side in such a competition has no business unilaterally changing its rules—that’s why executive decrees changing elections only happen in tinpot dictatorships, not democracies.

Keep ReadingShow less