Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Ranked-choice voting is heading for its biggest year ever

This November, RCV will be on the ballot in four states – Oregon, Idaho, Nevada and Colorado – as well as the nation’s capital

people voting
Getty Images

Hill was policy director for the Center for Humane Technology, co-founder of FairVote and political reform director at New America. You can reach him on X @StevenHill1776.

The Spirit of 2024 may soon manifest as “the best of times and the worst of times.”

This could end up being the year that Donald Trump returns to the Oval Office and rules with a vengeful wrath, further eroding America’s democratic institutions and our standing in the world. And 2024 could end up being the breakout year for ranked-choice voting, the most popular political reform in the United States.


RCV is on the cusp of becoming a new norm for representative democracy in the United States. It has won 27 city and four statewide ballot measures in a row.

Ranked-choice voting has become so popular because it liberates voters to support their favorite candidates, knowing that if your top choice can’t win then your “runoff vote” will count for your second choice, then your third choice and so on. Voters can pick their favorite candidates instead of settling for the “lesser of two evils” or wasting votes on a candidate with no chance of winning.

RCV is establishing an impressive track record across the country, having been used in hundreds of elections by over 16 million voters in over 50 cities, counties and states. And now RCV is poised for its biggest year ever.

Across the nation, RCV will be on the ballot in four states ( Oregon, Idaho, Nevada and Colorado) as well as the nation’s capital, Washington DC. Here is a rundown of the different RCV campaigns this November.

Oregon

The Oregon effort, Measure 117, is exciting, as it was put on the November 2024 ballot by the Democratic-controlled Legislature. This is the first time in modern U.S. history that a state legislature has allowed voters to decide whether to use an alternative electoral method for its federal and statewide elections (including president and governor).

Nevada

Voters in Nevada will vote on Question 3, a ballot measure that combines RCV with a “top five” open primary. Voters already approved the original Question 3 in November 2022, but the political class, both Democrats and Republicans, have not made reform easy — reformers have to win twice at the ballot box. And unlike in Oregon, where the Democratic Party leadership led the effort to put RCV on the ballot, in the Silver State both the Democratic and Republican parties have the knives out for it.

If Question 3 passes, all candidates regardless of party would run on a single primary ballot and the top five vote-getters would advance to the general election, which then would be decided by RCV. Driving support for reform is the fact that Nevada is one of a number of states that has seen a sharp increase in the number of independent voters – about 41 percent are registered as either nonpartisan or with a minor party, which combined is greater than either registered Democrats (31 percent) or Republicans (28 percent).

Colorado

Like Nevada and Alaska, nearly half (47 percent) of Colorado’s active voters are registered as “unaffiliated,” and so their ability to participate in major party primaries — when most elections are decided — is restricted. RCV proponents have gathered enough signatures to place on the ballot Proposition 131, which resembles the Alaska model in that it would create a single primary for all parties, with the top four finishers going to a November runoff decided by RCV. Prop 131 is sweeping, applying to races for the Senate, the House of Representatives, governor, attorney general, state legislature, secretary of state and more.

Like in Nevada, Prop 131 is opposed by both the Democratic and Republican parties, as well as MAGA gun-toting Rep. Lauren Boebert (R). It also has drawn opposition from the progressive Working Families Party, which apparently views RCV as a threat to its efforts to get fusion voting in Colorado. RCV is already used in Boulder and other Colorado cities, so voters will decide on whether to use it at the state level.

Idaho

In the Gem State, Proposition 1 is also a top-four-RCV combo measure. While it’s a heavily conservative state, like in Alaska many of those conservatives are not registered as Republicans but as independents — over a third (35 percent) of Idaho voters are registered as “unaffiliated,” by far the second-largest affiliation in Idaho, nearly three times more numerous than Democratic Party registration. Yet these voters are not allowed to participate in the GOP’s closed primary, where virtually all elections are decided. A coalition of independents and moderate Republicans, including Republicans for Open Primaries and Reclaim Idaho, collected enough signatures to qualify a voter initiative.

High-profile GOP leaders are directing this effort, including former Gov. Butch Otter and dozens of past state lawmakers and officials. These leaders believe a top four primary combined with RCV would help defeat extreme MAGA candidates who have successfully ousted more moderate GOP legislators in low-turnout “plurality wins all” primaries. This campaign, along with the top-four-RCV repeal effort in Alaska this November, is an important battle for the heart and soul of the Republican Party, and it will create a model for other conservative states.

Washington, D.C.

This is an exciting campaign in our nation’s capital, where if successful federal leaders will be able to observe up close the benefits of ranked ballots. Independent voters — about 16 percent of the electorate — have long been shut out of the partisan primaries in D.C. This year, in one city council district the winner of the Democratic primary, which had 10 candidates, garnered less than 24 percent of the vote. Spoiler candidates split the vote and the winner saw 76 percent of their constituents vote for other candidates.

Initiative 83 would allow independent voters to participate in the party primary of their choice, using RCV to rank up to five candidates. The Washington Post has endorsed RCV as a way to improve local elections, citing the reform’s success in other cities.

Reform efforts for better representative democracy using ranked-choice voting elections have been ongoing for over three decades. In November, we will see whether 2024 is the year that representative democracy in the United States takes a giant step forward toward a brighter future, or a troubling step backward toward authoritarianism.

The stakes couldn’t be higher.


Read More

 Side view of young African American male voter filling in ballot

An opinion piece argues that America must revisit Reconstruction after the Trump era, starting with the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.

Pressmaster/Getty Images

Radical Reconstruction: Looking to the Past To Move Forward

The last 11 years of electoral politics have plunged our nation into new lows: withdrawal and reentry into Middle Eastern conflicts, a politicized public health response during a pandemic, an attempted coup of the American government, and continual police brutality against people of color. Donald Trump’s existence on the political stage, in office or out, has held our nation hostage through repeated crises, leading us to the most divided time in our nation since the Civil War. The path forward for our young country doesn’t just require new ideas: we need to finally follow through on Reconstruction.

A blip in American history, Abraham Lincoln’s post-Civil War vision, called Reconstruction, was the proposed path forward for Southern reentry into American life. In exchange for loyalty to the Union and some guarantees of black civil protection, Lincoln prepared to readmit secessionist states into the Union, albeit with political restraints on numerous Confederate leaders.

Keep ReadingShow less
Ballot with "None of the Above" selected

Frustrated with the two-party system? An argument for a tripartisan alternative: an Independent Caucus of 5-6 senators with leverage over major legislation.

donald_gruener/Getty Images

The Two-Party System or What?

The evidence continues to come in -- lately from USA Facts and the Unpopulist-- that the majority of American voters don't like our two-party political system. Yet there is no consensus on what we want to replace it with.

There does seem to be an assumption that if you don't like the two-party system, then you want a political system which supports more than two parties, namely a multi-party system.

Keep ReadingShow less
Person looking at computer screen at work.

Brenda Núñez, voter registration supervisor for Nueces County, shows the home screen of the state's voter registration system in 2024. Election officials say they're still struggling to use the system, known as TEAM, to complete essential tasks.

(==Gabriel Cárdenas for Votebeat

Election Officials Are Scrambling To Process Voter Registration Backlog Using a System They Say Does Not Work

At 6 p.m. a few days after the state sent Randall County election administrator Shannon Lackey a backlog of 3,388 of voter registration records, she was still at her desk, processing them after a full day of work.

She planned to stay late and get as much done as she could, then keep working from home. Lackey, whose department has five employees, isn’t expecting overtime pay or compensatory time off to make up for the extra work caused by the state error.

Keep ReadingShow less
multiethnic American voters participating in the US election, showcasing the concept of choice in a democracy

Presidents who lost the popular vote often faced economic turmoil. See the pattern from Harrison to Trump and how a 50-state strategy could change it.

Alan Mazzocco/Getty Images

Path Forward from Economic Consequences of Non-Popular Vote Presidents

While losing the popular vote does not inherently cause economic ruin, the structural political weakness of entering office without a democratic majority mandate often compounded the economic challenges their administrations faced. These terms were marked by distinct economic hardships, structural imbalances, or severe financial crises.

Destabilizing Partisan Protectionism

Keep ReadingShow less