Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

South Dakotans to vote on instituting top-two primary system

Welcome to South Dakota sign
Joe Sohm/Visions of America/Getty Images

Downey is an intern for The Fulcrum and a graduate student at Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism.

This fall, voters in deeply red South Dakota will decide if they want to replace their closed primaries by joining a handful of other states that run open, nonpartisan systems.

The ballot measure, approved by the secretary of state last month, would establish a top-two primary system for gubernatorial, legislative, county and congressional races. If approved all candidates, regardless of party affiliation, would compete on a single primary ballot with the two receiving the most votes moving on to the general election. In addition, all registered voters would be able to cast ballots.


In the current, closed primary system, voters must register with a political party if they wish to cast a ballot in a primary, meaning South Dakota’s second largest voting group — unaffiliated and independent voters — cannot vote in a primary.

“All the states around us have more accessibility for independents in their elections. We are uniquely closed with our approach to the primary here on the Northern Plains, so we just want to catch up with what our neighbors are doing and allow our independents to have a voice in selecting the leaders and representatives,” said Joe Kirby, a member of the South Dakota Open Primaries board of directors.

South Dakota is one of 15 states that currently hold fully closed primaries, according to Unite America. Neighboring states Montana, North Dakota and Minnesota have open primaries while Wyoming and Iowa hold semi-open primaries, in which independents can choose to vote in one partisan primary, while registered Democrats and Republicans can only vote in their own party’s primary. The state’s southern neighbor, Nebraska, holds a different kind of open-primary system where independent voters can choose which partisan primary to vote in for congressional and statewide offices, but top-two open primaries are held for the unicameral, nonpartisan Legislature.

Independent voters are traditionally the ones who benefit the most from primary reform.

“If they’re focused on any particular form [of democracy reform], it’s primary reform because that’s about their right to vote,” said Jeremy Gruber, senior vice president of Open Primaries, which advocates for open and nonpartisan primary systems. “And it’s an issue of whether or not they can participate in a system they pay for and be on equal footing with every other voter.”

And while the number of independent voters is growing in South Dakota “because people are getting sick of politics as usual,” there is also support for open primaries amongst Republicans in the state, said Kirby.

“The mainstream Republicans that I would consider myself a part of are seeing growing numbers of election deniers and MAGA people that are getting very aggressive within the party and splitting the party into two factions,” Kirby said. “We see open primaries as a vehicle toward normalizing politics once again.”

The South Dakota Republican Party chair, John Wiik, felt that the ballot measure was unnecessary and independent or unaffiliated voters in the state should consider joining a party if they want to cast a ballot in primary elections.

“Find a party you agree with. Find a party that 80 percent of your values [you] identify with and join that party. You can’t stay independent and tell the parties how to do their jobs. That would be the words I would say for an independent voter right now,” Wiik told a local South Dakota news outlet.

Kirby and South Dakota Open Primaries, the group sponsoring the ballot question, collected 36,350 signatures from South Dakotans in support of the measure. South Dakota requires 35,017 valid signatures be collected for an initiated constitutional amendment to be approved for the ballot.

This is not the first attempt at establishing open primaries in the Republican-dominated state. “We actually started in 2016 with a slightly different measure which failed because we went for two things at once. We were going to open the primaries and also remove party labels from the ballot,” Kirby said. “We learned that when you combine two issues into a single initiative, you combine the negatives of both.”

Four states currently hold nonpartisan primaries. California and Washington operate top-two open primaries while Louisiana did away with primaries altogether but holds a runoff in races where no candidate wins a majority. In 2022, Alaska debuted a system that combines a top-four primary with ranked-choice voting in the general election, but a new ballot initiative is looking to do away with RCV this November.

Nevada is the only other state whose primary reform initiative has been approved to appear on the ballot this fall. Unlike South Dakota, Nevada’s ballot measure has combined two issues into one: open primaries and ranked-choice voting.

Nevada’s initiative first appeared on the ballot in 2022. The state requires approval in two consecutive general elections before an initiated constitutional amendment can go into effect. If approved in November, Nevada will become the sixth state to hold nonpartisan primaries and the first to establish a top-five ranked-choice voting system.

Kirby is an advocate for RCV, but thinks that gaining support for election reform measures is easier when the change is less complicated. “We think our chances are better than most because we’re keeping it simple with the top-two primary, as opposed to trying to also sell ranked-choice voting,” he said.

South Dakotans will have two other ballot measures to consider this November: a measure to protect abortion rights and a measure to repeal the state grocery tax. A measure to legalize recreational marijuana is awaiting certification to appear on the ballot.

Read More

Voter registration

In April 2025, the SAVE Act has been reintroduced in the 119th Congress and passed the House, with a much stronger chance of becoming law given the current political landscape.

SDI Productions

The SAVE Act: Addressing a Non-Existent Problem at the Cost of Voter Access?

In July 2024, I wrote about the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act when it was first introduced in Congress. And Sarah and I discussed it in an episode of Beyond the Bill Number which you can still listen to. Now, in April 2025, the SAVE Act has been reintroduced in the 119th Congress and passed the House, with a much stronger chance of becoming law given the current political landscape. It's time to revisit this legislation and examine its implications for American voters.

Read the IssueVoter analysis of the bill here for further insight and commentary.

Keep ReadingShow less
Independent Voters Gain Ground As New Mexico Opens Primaries
person in blue denim jeans and white sneakers standing on gray concrete floor
Photo by Phil Scroggs on Unsplash

Independent Voters Gain Ground As New Mexico Opens Primaries

With the stroke of a pen, New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham enfranchised almost 350,000 independent voters recently by signing a bill for open primaries. Just a few years ago, bills to open the primaries were languishing in the state legislature, as they have historically across the country. But as more and more voters leave both parties and declare their independence, the political system is buckling. And as independents begin to organize and speak out, it’s going to continue to buckle in their direction.

In 2004, there were 120,000 independent voters in New Mexico. A little over 10 years later, when the first open primary bill was introduced, that number had more than doubled. That bill never even got a hearing. But today the number of independents in New Mexico and across the country is too big to ignore. Independents are the largest group of voters in ten states and the second-largest in most others. That’s putting tremendous pressure on a system that wasn’t designed with them in mind.

Keep ReadingShow less
"Voter Here" sign outside of a polling location.

"Voter Here" sign outside of a polling location.

Getty Images, Grace Cary

Stopping the Descent Toward Banana Republic Elections

President Trump’s election-related executive order begins by pointing out practices in Canada, Sweden, Brazil, and elsewhere that outperform the U.S. But it is Trump’s order itself that really demonstrates how far we’ve fallen behind. In none of the countries mentioned, or any other major democracy in the world, would the head of government change election rules by decree, as Trump has tried to do.

Trump is the leader of a political party that will fight for control of Congress in 2026, an election sure to be close, and important to his presidency. The leader of one side in such a competition has no business unilaterally changing its rules—that’s why executive decrees changing elections only happen in tinpot dictatorships, not democracies.

Keep ReadingShow less
"Vote" pin.
Getty Images, William Whitehurst

Most Americans’ Votes Don’t Matter in Deciding Elections

New research from the Unite America Institute confirms a stark reality: Most ballots cast in American elections don’t matter in deciding the outcome. In 2024, just 14% of eligible voters cast a meaningful vote that actually influenced the outcome of a U.S. House race. For state house races, on average across all 50 states, just 13% cast meaningful votes.

“Too many Americans have no real say in their democracy,” said Unite America Executive Director Nick Troiano. “Every voter deserves a ballot that not only counts, but that truly matters. We should demand better than ‘elections in name only.’”

Keep ReadingShow less