Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Five reasons to be active this November

Five reasons to be active this November
Getty Images

Gifford is the founder and chief operating officer of ActiVote.

There are nearly 20,000 cities, towns and villages across the United States and many of them have local elections this year. The mayors and councilors and school board members that will be elected this year will do more to impact your daily lives than the folks we send to Washington, D.C. They will influence what our kids are taught in school. They will decide how much money to allocate to safety versus infrastructure versus recreation versus education. We will see these people in our grocery stores, our school plays and concerts, and our local playgrounds.


Many of these candidates running for office are either not paid at all or compensated very little for their time and effort. They run for office because they are public servants and believe in their communities and the benefit that they can bring. Since this is an off year election, many of these elections will be decided by only a handful of votes from the dedicated few who will turn up this election cycle.

This means that you can have a big impact on the outcome for you and your community!

Here are five reasons why you should be civically engaged this November!

  1. I’m not even sure if I have an election? In even years it is much simpler as we all know that every American has an opportunity to vote. In odd years it can be more difficult but we do know that there are elections in over 40 states. It is worth the time to check if you have an election this month. ActiVote is a simple tool where you can check your elections and sign up for reminders for all future elections.
  2. My vote doesn’t matter, why bother?
    Local elections are frequently decided by just a few votes. In 2017, a Virginia House of Delegates race ended in a TIE with more than 23,000 votes cast. In 2019, a Boston city Councilor won after a recount by a single vote. In 2016, a Vermont state house seat was determined by a single vote. That same seat with the same two candidates was also decided by a single vote (the other way) in 2010. So your vote does matter when it comes to these races on the ballot!
  3. I’m not sure what these local officials do?
    There can be dozens of different offices on the ballot and it can be tough to know exactly what each office does. Here’s a quick overview of the most common offices you will see this November: The Mayor is the executive of your municipality and is the end in charge of the budget and key appointments to local government. The Council is the legislative body for your local government and will propose rules and regulations and spending proposals that will govern the city. The School Board is the body that oversees the budget, the policies and the hiring/firing of the superintendent.
  4. I’m not sure who to vote for. I’m worried I might cast the “wrong” vote?
    Often local elections are nonpartisan which takes away the simplest “cheat sheet” many voters use to make their choice - party affiliation. Indeed, a recent study showed that not feeling prepared enough is a barrier to voting in local elections. There are a few quick and simple things you can do to combat this challenge. First, ask around to others in your community who they are voting for and why. That’s a quick (and social!) way to find out more about who others are supporting. There are fun civic tech solutions, such as ActiVote, which help you see what is on your ballot and easily read about the candidates. Another way to filter down the candidates is to look to local organizations you support and see if they have made endorsements in the race. It could be your Congressional representative or your community volunteering organization who has endorsed candidates in the race. Finally, if your community still has a local newspaper they will often have candidate profiles that you can read.
  5. But I don’t have an election this cycle?
    That’s OK, you’re off the hook from voting. But there are a few things you can still do to be engaged. Do you have friends or family in another state or municipality? Give them a call and ask them if they are prepared to vote. The most effective way to get out the vote is for someone to hear from a person they know and trust.

Voting is a habit that you can form. Each opportunity is one where you can take another step in your civic journey. While we would love for everyone to vote in every race on the ballot, that shouldn’t stop one from voting if there is a single candidate or race you feel passionate about. Voting should feel good. Voting should make one feel empowered that this is the moment your voice is heard.

Read More

news app
New platforms help overcome biased news reporting
Tero Vesalainen/Getty Images

The Selective Sanctity of Death: When Empathy Depends on Skin Color

Rampant calls to avoid sharing the video of Charlie Kirk’s death have been swift and emphatic across social media. “We need to keep our souls clean,” journalists plead. “Where are social media’s content moderators?” “How did we get so desensitized?” The moral outrage is palpable; the demands for human dignity urgent and clear.

But as a Black woman who has been forced to witness the constant virality of Black death, I must ask: where was this widespread anger for George Floyd? For Philando Castile? For Daunte Wright? For Tyre Nichols?

Keep ReadingShow less
Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making
Mount Rushmore
Photo by John Bakator on Unsplash

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making

No one can denounce the New York Yankee fan for boasting that her favorite ballclub has won more World Series championships than any other. At 27 titles, the Bronx Bombers claim more than twice their closest competitor.

No one can question admirers of the late, great Chick Corea, or the equally astonishing Alison Krauss, for their virtually unrivaled Grammy victories. At 27 gold statues, only Beyoncé and Quincy Jones have more in the popular categories.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Trump’s mass deportations promise security but deliver economic pain, family separation, and chaos. Here’s why this policy is failing America.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

The Cruel Arithmetic of Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

As summer 2025 winds down, the Trump administration’s deportation machine is operating at full throttle—removing over one million people in six months and fulfilling a campaign promise to launch the “largest deportation operation in American history.” For supporters, this is a victory lap for law and order. For the rest of the lot, it’s a costly illusion—one that trades complexity for spectacle and security for chaos.

Let’s dispense with the fantasy first. The administration insists that mass deportations will save billions, reduce crime, and protect American jobs. But like most political magic tricks, the numbers vanish under scrutiny. The Economic Policy Institute warns that this policy could destroy millions of jobs—not just for immigrants but for U.S.-born workers in sectors like construction, elder care, and child care. That’s not just a fiscal cliff—it is fewer teachers, fewer caregivers, and fewer homes built. It is inflation with a human face. In fact, child care alone could shrink by over 15%, leaving working parents stranded and employers scrambling.

Meanwhile, the Peterson Institute projects a drop in GDP and employment, while the Penn Wharton School’s Budget Model estimates that deporting unauthorized workers over a decade would slash Social Security revenue and inflate deficits by nearly $900 billion. That’s not a typo. It’s a fiscal cliff dressed up as border security.

And then there’s food. Deporting farmworkers doesn’t just leave fields fallow—it drives up prices. Analysts predict a 10% spike in food costs, compounding inflation and squeezing families already living paycheck to paycheck. In California, where immigrant renters are disproportionately affected, eviction rates are climbing. The Urban Institute warns that deportations are deepening the housing crisis by gutting the construction workforce. So much for protecting American livelihoods.

But the real cost isn’t measured in dollars. It’s measured in broken families, empty classrooms, and quiet despair. The administration has deployed 10,000 armed service members to the border and ramped up “self-deportation” tactics—policies so harsh they force people to leave voluntarily. The result: Children skipping meals because their parents fear applying for food assistance; Cancer patients deported mid-treatment; and LGBTQ+ youth losing access to mental health care. The Human Rights Watch calls it a “crueler world for immigrants.” That’s putting it mildly.

This isn’t targeted enforcement. It’s a dragnet. Green card holders, long-term residents, and asylum seekers are swept up alongside undocumented workers. Viral videos show ICE raids at schools, hospitals, and churches. Lawsuits are piling up. And the chilling effect is real: immigrant communities are retreating from public life, afraid to report crimes or seek help. That’s not safety. That’s silence. Legal scholars warn that the administration’s tactics—raids at schools, churches, and hospitals—may violate Fourth Amendment protections and due process norms.

Even the administration’s security claims are shaky. Yes, border crossings are down—by about 60%, thanks to policies like “Remain in Mexico.” But deportation numbers haven’t met the promised scale. The Migration Policy Institute notes that monthly averages hover around 14,500, far below the millions touted. And the root causes of undocumented immigration—like visa overstays, which account for 60% of cases—remain untouched.

Crime reduction? Also murky. FBI data shows declines in some areas, but experts attribute this more to economic trends than immigration enforcement. In fact, fear in immigrant communities may be making things worse. When people won’t talk to the police, crimes go unreported. That’s not justice. That’s dysfunction.

Public opinion is catching up. In February, 59% of Americans supported mass deportations. By July, that number had cratered. Gallup reports a 25-point drop in favor of immigration cuts. The Pew Research Center finds that 75% of Democrats—and a growing number of independents—think the policy goes too far. Even Trump-friendly voices like Joe Rogan are balking, calling raids on “construction workers and gardeners” a betrayal of common sense.

On social media, the backlash is swift. Users on X (formerly Twitter) call the policy “ineffective,” “manipulative,” and “theater.” And they’re not wrong. This isn’t about solving immigration. It’s about staging a show—one where fear plays the villain and facts are the understudy.

The White House insists this is what voters wanted. But a narrow electoral win isn’t a blank check for policies that harm the economy and fray the social fabric. Alternatives exist: Targeted enforcement focused on violent offenders; visa reform to address overstays; and legal pathways to fill labor gaps. These aren’t radical ideas—they’re pragmatic ones. And they don’t require tearing families apart to work.

Trump’s deportation blitz is a mirage. It promises safety but delivers instability. It claims to protect jobs but undermines the very sectors that keep the country running. It speaks the language of law and order but acts with the recklessness of a demolition crew. Alternatives exist—and they work. Cities that focus on community policing and legal pathways report higher public safety and stronger economies. Reform doesn’t require cruelty. It requires courage.

Keep ReadingShow less
Multi-colored speech bubbles overlapping.

Stanford’s Strengthening Democracy Challenge shows a key way to reduce political violence: reveal that most Americans reject it.

Getty Images, MirageC

In the Aftermath of Assassinations, Let’s Show That Americans Overwhelmingly Disapprove of Political Violence

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination—and the assassination of Minnesota state legislator Melissa Hortman only three months ago—questions inevitably arise about how to reduce the likelihood of similar heinous actions.

Results from arguably the most important study focused on the U.S. context, the Strengthening Democracy Challenge run by Stanford University, point to one straightforward answer: show people that very few in the other party support political violence. This approach has been shown to reduce support for political violence.

Keep ReadingShow less