Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

From Vision to Action: Remaking the World Through Social Entrepreneurship

Principles 1 through 4

Opinion

From Vision to Action: 
Remaking the World Through Social Entrepreneurship
blue and brown globe on persons hand
Photo by Greg Rosenke on Unsplash

Social entrepreneurs are people who launch ventures aimed at promoting positive change in their community and in the world. I am such a person. In 1982, I founded a nonprofit organization called Search for Common Ground (informally known as “Search”). My bottom line was not financial gain but making the world a better place.

My credentials as a social entrepreneur grew out of my hands-on involvement in building Search from zero into the world’s largest nonprofit group involved in peacebuilding. My partner and closest collaborator wasand ismy wife, Susan Collin Marks. By the time we stepped down from Search’s leadership in 2014, we had a deeply committed staff of 600 employees working out of offices in 35 countries. In 2018, Search was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.


There are two kinds of social entrepreneurs: those, like us, who work in the nonprofit sector, and those who start social enterprises whose goal is both to promote the public good while supporting their work by making a modest profit.

As a social entrepreneur, I was self-taught, neither a theoretician nor a scholar. Over the years, I developed a set of eleven working principles that have become my modus operandi and provide the basic framework for my new book, “From Vision to Action: Remaking the World Through Social Entrepreneurship," from which this series of three articles is adapted. While I applied these principles in nonprofit work, they are also applicable to social enterprisesand to life, in general.

PART ONE

PRINCIPLE #1: START FROM VISION. Social entrepreneurs need to have a clear vision, and everything they do should be consistent with that vision—or at least not inconsistent with it. A vision may appear in a flash or evolve over many years. My vision was to shift how the world deals with conflict—away from adversarial, win-lose approaches toward non-adversarial, win-win problem-solving.

During the Cold War, my vision included ending the adversarial relationship between the United States and the Soviet Union. Like so many people, I was terrified by the prospect of nuclear war. If something profound were not done, I feared the superpowers would blow up the planet. Preventing nuclear war—in essence, saving the world—provided me with huge motivation. It still does.

I believed the best way to reduce the threat was to move the superpowers from a state of confrontation to one of cooperation. Consequently, my colleagues and I played a key role in facilitating cooperation between the U.S. and the Soviet Union in countering terrorism. To that end, we even facilitated collaboration between the CIA and the KGB.

A group of people sitting around a table AI-generated content may be incorrect.

This photo appeared on the back cover of the book I edited with Igor Beliaev, called Common Ground on Terrorism and published by W.W. Norton. From left: Igor Beliaev, Political Observer, Literaturnaya Gazeta; Feodor Sherbak. former First Deputy Director, Internal Security Directorate, KGB; William Colby, former Director, CIA; Ray Cline, former Deputy Director, CIA; Natalie Latter, interpreter; John Marks, President, Search for Common Ground; Valentin Zvezdenkov, former Director of Counterterrorism, KGB; Oleg Proudkov, Foreign Editor, Literaturnaya Gazeta

PRINCIPLE #2: BE AN APPLIED VISIONARY. Social entrepreneurs should not be pure visionaries unless they intend to start a new religion or write a philosophy textbook. Rather, they need to be visionary leaders who produce tangible results in the real world. Although they may have lofty intentions, they have no choice but to move ahead one step at a time and be incrementally transformational. If they go for overwhelming, unified solutions, they are likely to fail. However, if some part of their overall goal is reachable, they should probably start there. I call this a salami-slicing approach. A small victory is almost always more useful than a large failure. And their timing needs to be right. If they move too quickly or are too far ahead of the curve, they will be viewed as hopeless dreamers. However, if they are too slow in reacting, there may be little reason for them to proceed. I have found that being six months to a year ahead of conventional wisdom is a good position to be in.

For example, in 1993-1994, before official peace talks had begun between Jordan and Israel, we at Search sponsored back-channel meetings between former generals from the two countries. Together, they worked out unofficial understandings on key issues. After each session, the results were promptly sent to the Prime Minister of Israel and the King of Jordan. Our unofficial talks demonstrated that agreements could serve the interests of both parties, and many of the formulations made by our generals became part of the eventual Israeli-Jordanian peace treaty.

PRINCIPLE #3: “ON S’ENGAGE ET PUIS ON VOIT.” This is a quote from Napoleon Bonaparte – someone not generally considered a peacemaker. A non-literal translation is: “One becomes engaged in an activity, and then one sees new possibilities.” Napoleon was a soldier, and he believed that the best way to understand enemy defenses was to attack and then observe the reaction. As a peace-loving civilian, I only apply this Napoleonic logic metaphorically. I don’t go around beating up opponents to see how they defend themselves. However, the lesson for social entrepreneurs is that once engaged in an activity, they will likely detect opportunities they would not have seen otherwise.

I found that excessive planning was often a barrier to moving forward. As boxing champion Mike Tyson once said, “Everyone has a plan until they’ve been punched in the mouth.” The Soviets learned this the hard way with their five-year plans.

Allen Grossman, my oldest friend and a former chair of Search’s board, topped off a successful career in both the nonprofit and for-profit sectors with twenty years as a professor at Harvard Business School. According to Allen, there are two principal management styles. The first is management by rule. It requires employees of an organization to follow well-defined procedures. The second is adaptive management. It requires problem-solving and decision-making in response to exceptions, new information, and changing circumstances.

All organizations must have rules, but I found that social entrepreneurs are usually much more interested in being adaptive than in following regulations. The path forward most often emerges, not from long-term, deliberative processes, but from unfolding events.

The remaining eight principles of social entrepreneurship will be described in two additional excerpts from the book, “From Vision to Action: Remaking the World Through Social Entrepreneurship.”

In addition to founding and heading Search for Common Ground, John Marks is a NY Times best-selling and award-winning author, who most recently started the Pro Bono Litigation Corps in partnership with Gary DiBianco under the auspices of Lawyers for Good Government.

Read More

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​
Photo illustration by Yunuen Bonaparte for palabra

Iguanas on the Tombstones: A Poet's Metaphor for Colonialism​

Iguanas may seem like an unconventional subject for verse. Yet their ubiquitous presence caught the attention of Puerto Rican poet Martín Espada when he visited a historic cemetery in Old San Juan, the burial place of pro-independence voices from political leader Pedro Albizu Campos to poet and political activist José de Diego.

“It was quite a sight to witness these iguanas sunning themselves on a wall of that cemetery, or slithering from one tomb to the next, or squatting on the tomb of Albizu Campos, or staring up at the bust of José de Diego, with a total lack of comprehension, being iguanas,” Espada told palabra from his home in the western Massachusetts town of Shelburne Falls.

Keep ReadingShow less
Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

Leonardo DiCaprio, Benicio del Toro, Chase Infiniti, and Paul Thomas Anderson pose during the fan event for the movie 'One Battle After Another' at Plaza Toreo Parque Central on September 18, 2025 in Naucalpan de Juarez, Mexico.

(Photo by Eloisa Sanchez/Getty Images)

Does One Battle After Another Speak to Latino Resistance?

After decades of work, Angeleno director P.T. Anderson has scored his highest-grossing film with his recent One Battle After Another. Having opened on the weekend of September 26, the film follows the fanatical, even surrealistic, journey of washed-up revolutionary Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio), who lives in hiding with his teenage daughter, Willa (Chase Infiniti), some fifteen years after his militant group, French 75, went underground. When their nemesis Colonel Lockjaw (Sean Penn) resurfaces, Bob and Wila again find themselves running from the law. When Wila goes AWOL, her karate teacher, Sensei Sergio St. Carlos (Benicio del Toro), is enlisted to help Bob find his daughter. Although ambitious, edgy, and fun, the political message of the hit film is generally muddled. The immensely talented director did not make a film matching the Leftist rigor of, say, Battleship Potemkin. Nor can the film be grouped among a veritable cavalcade of fictional and non-fictional films produced during the last twenty years that deal with immigrant issues along the U.S.-Mexico Border. Sleep Dealer, El Norte, and Who is Dayani Cristal? are but a few of the stronger offerings of a genre of filmmaking that, for both good and bad, may constitute a true cinematic cottage industry.

Nevertheless, the film leans heavily into Latino culture in terms of themes, setting, and characters. Filmed largely in the U.S.’s Bordertown par excellence—El Paso, Texas—we meet the martial arts teacher Sergio, who describes his work helping migrants cross the border as a “Latino Harriet Tubman situation.” We learn that the fugitive revolutionary, Bob, is known by several aliases, including “The Gringo Coyote.” His savior, Sensei Sergio, explains to him outrightly that he’s “a bad hombre”—cheekily invoking the hurtful bon mots used by then-candidate Donald Trump in a 2016 debate with Hilary Clinton. The epithet is repeated later on in the film when Bob, under police surveillance in the hospital, is tipped off to an exit route by a member of the French 75 disguised as a nurse: “Are you diabetic? You’re a bad hombre, Bob. You know, if you’re a bad hombre, you make sure you take your insulin on a daily basis, right?” All this, plus the fact that the film’s denouement begins with a raid on a Mexican Restaurant in Northern California.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards

Jimmy Kimmel onstage during the 67th GRAMMY Awards on February 01, 2025, in Los Angeles, California

Getty Images, Johnny Nunez

Why the Fight Over Jimmy Kimmel Matters for Us All

There are moments in a nation’s cultural life that feel, at first, like passing storms—brief, noisy, and soon forgotten. But every so often, what begins as a squall reveals itself as a warning: a sign that something far bigger is at stake. The initial cancellation of Jimmy Kimmel by Disney, along with the coordinated blackout from network affiliates like Nexstar and Sinclair, is one of those moments. It’s not merely another skirmish in the endless culture wars. Actually, it is a test of whether we, as a society, can distinguish between the discomfort of being challenged and the danger of being silenced.

The irony is rich, almost to the point of being absurd. Here is a late-night comedian, a man whose job is to puncture the pompous and needle the powerful, finding himself at the center of a controversy. A controversy bigger than anything he’d ever lampooned. Satire that, depending on your perspective, was either too pointed or simply pointed in the wrong direction. Yet, that was not the ostensible reason.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bad Bunny preforming on stage alongside two other people.

Bad Bunny performs live during "No Me Quiero Ir De Aquí; Una Más" Residencia at Coliseo de Puerto Rico José Miguel Agrelot on September 20, 2025 in San Juan, Puerto Rico

Getty Images, Gladys Vega

From Woodstock to Super Bowl: Bad Bunny and the Legacy of Musical Protest

As Bad Bunny prepares to take the Super Bowl stage in February 2026—and grassroots rallies in his honor unfold across U.S. cities this October—we are witnessing a cultural moment that echoes the artist-led protests of the 1960s and 70s. His decision to exclude U.S. tour dates over fears of ICE raids is generating considerable anger amongst his following, as well as support from MAGA supporters. The Trump administration views his lyrics and his fashion as threats. As the story unfolds, it is increasingly becoming a political narrative rather than just entertainment news.

Music has long been a part of the American political scene. In 1969, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young released “Ohio,” a response to the Kent State shootings that galvanized antiwar sentiment.

Keep ReadingShow less