Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Loneliness, Gun Violence, and the American Abdication

Opinion

Loneliness, Gun Violence, and the American Abdication

Loneliness and gun violence are twin crises eroding America’s social fabric. Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson explores how isolation, easy access to firearms, and political paralysis threaten life, liberty, and belonging.

Getty Images, Tetra Images

We are a nation unmoored from itself, where loneliness spreads faster than any virus and gun violence stalks our communities with metronomic certainty. The numbers, at this point, are almost numbing. But the ache they represent is not.

Loneliness is an epidemic. Once considered a private crisis, loneliness has metastasized into a public health catastrophe. Former U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy believed loneliness "as dangerous as smoking fifteen cigarettes a day." We keep scrolling, liking, streaming, and yet so many of us are left feeling profoundly alone. Aloneness is not simply a byproduct of excessive technology or social media engagement, though these play their part. Unfortunately, Americans worship individualism, giving way to the fraying of communal threads. To paraphrase my friend, Eric Liu, executive leader of Citizen University, we are witnessing the fading of shared spaces and the thinning of civic ties and bonds of mutual affection. Thus, as we drift apart, violence fills the space more and more.


Gun violence in America is no longer an aberration—it's an ambient fact of life. Mass shootings title headlines, but they are only the tip of the iceberg. Every day, guns claim the lives of nearly 130 people in the U.S., many by their own hand. Suicides account for a significant number of all deaths by firearms. These same instruments, revered as a symbol of liberty, are for thousands the tool of self-harm.

Loneliness and gun violence are twin symptoms of a deeper malaise. When people feel unseen, unheard, and undervalued, the risk of self-harm and violence against others grows. What's more, the easy access to firearms transforms fleeting moments of pain into permanent tragedy.

So, where, in our so-called democracy, is the response? Here is where the American project falters most conspicuously. We like to believe that ours is a government "of the people, by the people, for the people." Yet, on issues that cut closest to the bone—mental health, gun safety, the basic architecture of belonging—our representatives seem frozen in amber. Poll after poll shows broad popular support for reasonable gun laws, for expanded mental health care, for robust investment in community life. And yet, the legislative gears grind to a halt, jammed by monetary debates, polarization, and a kind of learned helplessness.

The result is a country that professes inalienable rights—life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—but fails to secure them for millions. If suicide is the tenth leading cause of death in the U.S., if gun violence is the leading cause of death for children and teens, if loneliness is eroding our lifespans, what does it mean to say we are free? What is the value of liberty in a society where so many are left unprotected from despair and violence?

There's a word for this kind of impotence: abdication. It is not, as some would like to pretend, merely a matter of "gridlock" or "partisan bickering." It is a choice—a refusal to wield the tools of democracy to secure “the good life” for all. The failure of policy does not just evidence abdication; it reveals a lack of imagination and a diminished sense of what is possible and promised. We should not allow ourselves to become hostage to this reality. The American story, at its best, is one of collective resolve and willingness to look honestly at our brokenness, while daring to build.

First, we must refuse to accept loneliness as a private problem. It is a civic emergency, and it demands civic solutions. That means rebuilding the public square—not just metaphorically but literally. Invest in libraries, parks, community centers, and transit. Support organizations that foster connection, not just consumption. Reclaim the idea that the government can be an engine of belonging, not just an administrator of transactions.

Second, we must treat gun violence as a public health crisis, not a partisan wedge. That means universal background checks, safe storage laws, red flag policies, and restrictions on weapons of war—the basics, supported by the vast majority of Americans. However, it also means investing in upstream solutions, such as accessible mental health care, trauma-informed education, and economic policies that reduce desperation and isolation.

Third, we must demand more of our representatives—and of ourselves. Democracy is not a spectator sport. If those in power refuse to act, we must make it impossible for them to do otherwise. That means organizing, voting, protesting, and running for office. But it also means practicing democracy in our daily lives: showing up for neighbors, joining local boards, and breaking bread with those unlike ourselves.

Above all, we must reclaim a sense of agency—not just as individuals but as a nation. The sovereignty of civil society is not a given; it is something we must continually assert, defend, and renew. It requires that we see one another, not as threats or strangers, but as fellow travelers, bound together by fate and choice.

We are a country where the right to life, liberty, and happiness is more than a slogan. Where loneliness is not a death sentence, and where our democracy is measured not by its promises but by its practices. A nation that is honest about its failures. Audacious in our hopes. A society learning and yearning to belong to one another. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.


Read More

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

Waiting for the Door to Open: Advocates and older workers are left in limbo as the administration’s decision to abandon a harsh disability rule exists only in private assurances, not public record.

AI-created animation

Silence, Signals, and the Unfinished Story of the Abandoned Disability Rule

We reported in the Fulcrum on November 30th that in early November, disability advocates walked out of the West Wing, believing they had secured a rare reversal from the Trump administration of an order that stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers.

The public record has remained conspicuously quiet on the matter. No press release, no Federal Register notice, no formal statement from the White House or the Social Security Administration has confirmed what senior officials told Jason Turkish and his colleagues behind closed doors in November: that the administration would not move forward with a regulation that could have stripped disability benefits from more than 800,000 older manual laborers. According to a memo shared by an agency official and verified by multiple sources with knowledge of the discussions, an internal meeting in early November involved key SSA decision-makers outlining the administration's intent to halt the proposal. This memo, though not publicly released, is said to detail the political and social ramifications of proceeding with the regulation, highlighting its unpopularity among constituents who would be affected by the changes.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

A memorial for Ashli Babbitt sits near the US Capitol during a Day of Remembrance and Action on the one year anniversary of the January 6, 2021 insurrection.

(John Lamparski/NurPhoto/AP)

How Trump turned a January 6 death into the politics of ‘protecting women’

In the wake of the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, President Donald Trump quickly took up the cause of a 35-year-old veteran named Ashli Babbitt.

“Who killed Ashli Babbitt?” he asked in a one-sentence statement on July 1, 2021.

Keep ReadingShow less
Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

Supreme Court, Allen v. Milligan Illegal Congressional Voting Map

Gerrymandering Test the Boundaries of Fair Representation in 2026

A wave of redistricting battles in early 2026 is reshaping the political map ahead of the midterm elections and intensifying long‑running fights over gerrymandering and democratic representation.

In California, a three‑judge federal panel on January 15 upheld the state’s new congressional districts created under Proposition 50, ruling 2–1 that the map—expected to strengthen Democratic advantages in several competitive seats—could be used in the 2026 elections. The following day, a separate federal court dismissed a Republican lawsuit arguing that the maps were unconstitutional, clearing the way for the state’s redistricting overhaul to stand. In Virginia, Democratic lawmakers have advanced a constitutional amendment that would allow mid‑decade redistricting, a move they describe as a response to aggressive Republican map‑drawing in other states; some legislators have openly discussed the possibility of a congressional map that could yield 10 Democratic‑leaning seats out of 11. In Missouri, the secretary of state has acknowledged in court that ballot language for a referendum on the state’s congressional map could mislead voters, a key development in ongoing litigation over the fairness of the state’s redistricting process. And in Utah, a state judge has ordered a new congressional map that includes one Democratic‑leaning district after years of litigation over the legislature’s earlier plan, prompting strong objections from Republican lawmakers who argue the court exceeded its authority.

Keep ReadingShow less
New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) (L) and Rep. August Pfluger (R-TX) lead a group of fellow Republicans through Statuary Hall on the way to a news conference on the 28th day of the federal government shutdown at the U.S. Capitol on October 28, 2025 in Washington, DC.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

New Year’s Resolutions for Congress – and the Country

Every January 1st, many Americans face their failings and resolve to do better by making New Year’s Resolutions. Wouldn’t it be delightful if Congress would do the same? According to Gallup, half of all Americans currently have very little confidence in Congress. And while confidence in our government institutions is shrinking across the board, Congress is near rock bottom. With that in mind, here is a list of resolutions Congress could make and keep, which would help to rebuild public trust in Congress and our government institutions. Let’s start with:

1 – Working for the American people. We elect our senators and representatives to work on our behalf – not on their behalf or on behalf of the wealthiest donors, but on our behalf. There are many issues on which a large majority of Americans agree but Congress can’t. Congress should resolve to address those issues.

Keep ReadingShow less