Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Loneliness, Gun Violence, and the American Abdication

Opinion

Loneliness, Gun Violence, and the American Abdication

Loneliness and gun violence are twin crises eroding America’s social fabric. Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson explores how isolation, easy access to firearms, and political paralysis threaten life, liberty, and belonging.

Getty Images, Tetra Images

We are a nation unmoored from itself, where loneliness spreads faster than any virus and gun violence stalks our communities with metronomic certainty. The numbers, at this point, are almost numbing. But the ache they represent is not.

Loneliness is an epidemic. Once considered a private crisis, loneliness has metastasized into a public health catastrophe. Former U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy believed loneliness "as dangerous as smoking fifteen cigarettes a day." We keep scrolling, liking, streaming, and yet so many of us are left feeling profoundly alone. Aloneness is not simply a byproduct of excessive technology or social media engagement, though these play their part. Unfortunately, Americans worship individualism, giving way to the fraying of communal threads. To paraphrase my friend, Eric Liu, executive leader of Citizen University, we are witnessing the fading of shared spaces and the thinning of civic ties and bonds of mutual affection. Thus, as we drift apart, violence fills the space more and more.


Gun violence in America is no longer an aberration—it's an ambient fact of life. Mass shootings title headlines, but they are only the tip of the iceberg. Every day, guns claim the lives of nearly 130 people in the U.S., many by their own hand. Suicides account for a significant number of all deaths by firearms. These same instruments, revered as a symbol of liberty, are for thousands the tool of self-harm.

Loneliness and gun violence are twin symptoms of a deeper malaise. When people feel unseen, unheard, and undervalued, the risk of self-harm and violence against others grows. What's more, the easy access to firearms transforms fleeting moments of pain into permanent tragedy.

So, where, in our so-called democracy, is the response? Here is where the American project falters most conspicuously. We like to believe that ours is a government "of the people, by the people, for the people." Yet, on issues that cut closest to the bone—mental health, gun safety, the basic architecture of belonging—our representatives seem frozen in amber. Poll after poll shows broad popular support for reasonable gun laws, for expanded mental health care, for robust investment in community life. And yet, the legislative gears grind to a halt, jammed by monetary debates, polarization, and a kind of learned helplessness.

The result is a country that professes inalienable rights—life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness—but fails to secure them for millions. If suicide is the tenth leading cause of death in the U.S., if gun violence is the leading cause of death for children and teens, if loneliness is eroding our lifespans, what does it mean to say we are free? What is the value of liberty in a society where so many are left unprotected from despair and violence?

There's a word for this kind of impotence: abdication. It is not, as some would like to pretend, merely a matter of "gridlock" or "partisan bickering." It is a choice—a refusal to wield the tools of democracy to secure “the good life” for all. The failure of policy does not just evidence abdication; it reveals a lack of imagination and a diminished sense of what is possible and promised. We should not allow ourselves to become hostage to this reality. The American story, at its best, is one of collective resolve and willingness to look honestly at our brokenness, while daring to build.

First, we must refuse to accept loneliness as a private problem. It is a civic emergency, and it demands civic solutions. That means rebuilding the public square—not just metaphorically but literally. Invest in libraries, parks, community centers, and transit. Support organizations that foster connection, not just consumption. Reclaim the idea that the government can be an engine of belonging, not just an administrator of transactions.

Second, we must treat gun violence as a public health crisis, not a partisan wedge. That means universal background checks, safe storage laws, red flag policies, and restrictions on weapons of war—the basics, supported by the vast majority of Americans. However, it also means investing in upstream solutions, such as accessible mental health care, trauma-informed education, and economic policies that reduce desperation and isolation.

Third, we must demand more of our representatives—and of ourselves. Democracy is not a spectator sport. If those in power refuse to act, we must make it impossible for them to do otherwise. That means organizing, voting, protesting, and running for office. But it also means practicing democracy in our daily lives: showing up for neighbors, joining local boards, and breaking bread with those unlike ourselves.

Above all, we must reclaim a sense of agency—not just as individuals but as a nation. The sovereignty of civil society is not a given; it is something we must continually assert, defend, and renew. It requires that we see one another, not as threats or strangers, but as fellow travelers, bound together by fate and choice.

We are a country where the right to life, liberty, and happiness is more than a slogan. Where loneliness is not a death sentence, and where our democracy is measured not by its promises but by its practices. A nation that is honest about its failures. Audacious in our hopes. A society learning and yearning to belong to one another. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

Rev. Dr. F. Willis Johnson is a spiritual entrepreneur, author, scholar-practioner whose leadership and strategies around social and racial justice issues are nationally recognized and applied.


Read More

Tensions were High as Representatives Debated Allegations Against the Southern Poverty Law Center

Members of the House Judiciary Committee during the hearing on the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Credit: Olivia Ardito

Tensions were High as Representatives Debated Allegations Against the Southern Poverty Law Center

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The House Judiciary Committee held a hearing last Wednesday examining claims that the Southern Poverty Law Center had funded the very hate groups the center aims to dismantle. Tensions were high as Republicans and Democrats fired back at each other. Noticeably absent was a representative from the center, a non-profit that since 1971 has fought for racial justice and against white supremacy.

The hearing came after the Texas Attorney General Ken Pax­ton announced last Monday that he was investigating the center. The U.S. Justice Department indicted the Southern Poverty Law Center in April for allegedly funneling money to people associated with violent extremist groups. The group has flatly rejected the accusations. While Republicans backed these claims, Democrats viewed the allegations as part of the Trump-backed efforts to hinder “DEI” and other racial justice initiatives.

Keep ReadingShow less
Trump Is Protecting Insurrectionists But Not Your Kids

An analysis of gun violence, political extremism, Islamophobia, and community resilience in America after the San Diego Islamic Center shooting.

GemaIbarra / Getty Images

Trump Is Protecting Insurrectionists But Not Your Kids

Last Monday, two teenage gunmen opened fire outside the Islamic Center of San Diego, murdering three Muslim men. Unfortunately, this is the type of horror Americans have been conditioned to expect. After years of political stagnation on gun safety and ongoing hateful acts of violence, our president has signaled once again to children, to the Muslim community, and to everyone else: he does not care if you get shot.

Gun violence has been on the rise in the United States for too long. Perhaps the most harrowing consequence is that gun violence is now the leading cause of death among children. Whether from school shootings, homicides, suicides, or accidents, the gun-death rate for children is nearly five in every 100,000. In fact, the number of domestic deaths due to gun violence is about as many as U.S. military deaths in every war since World War I combined. More children have been lost to gun violence since 2020 than troops lost since 9/11. Yet even with such a striking death toll—and one affecting children no less—happening on our own soil, Vice President J.D. Vance calls it a “fact of life.

Keep ReadingShow less
The dome of the United States Capitol Building in Washington, D.C., stands tall against a blue sky with the American flag waving proudly

Congress faces growing pressure to pass redistricting reform as lawmakers debate banning gerrymandering, independent commissions, and mid-decade map changes amid renewed national controversy over fair elections.

Getty Images, aire images

Congress's Missed Opportunities on Redistricting Reform

On April 29, Issue One posted an image on Facebook and Instagram: CONGRESS CAN FIX THIS WITH THREE SIMPLE STEPS:

  1. Establish Clear National Criteria for Fair Maps
  2. Require Independent Redistricting Commissions in Every State
  3. Ban Mid-Decade Redistricting.

Issue One added below: “… but it needs 60 Senate votes to do it.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional
beige concrete building under blue sky during daytime

Open Letter to Justice Roberts: Partisan Gerrymandering Is Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court, in holding that partisan gerrymandering is permissible—unless it "goes too far"—stated that the argument made against this practice based on the Court's "one person, one vote" doctrine didn't work because the cases that developed that doctrine were about ensuring that each vote had an equal weight. The Court reasoned that after redistricting, each vote still has equal weight.

I would respectfully disagree. After admittedly partisan redistricting, each vote does not have an equal weight. The purpose of partisan gerrymandering is typically to create a "safe" seat—to group citizens so that the dominant political party has a clear majority of the voters. It's the transformation of a contested seat or even a seat safe for the other party into a safe seat for the party doing the redistricting.

Keep ReadingShow less