Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Blasts from the past: History isn't always pretty

Opinion

Blasts from the past: History isn't always pretty
Getty Images

Molineaux is co-publisher of The Fulcrum and president/CEO of the Bridge Alliance Education Fund.

History, as is commonly understood, is about the facts of the past. In actuality, history is a story about our roots, our values and our identity. And as I noted previously, winners of wars and conflicts write the historical narrative we later learn in school. In short, our history has oftentimes been a one-sided narrative of those who dominated others and suppressed the voices of many. On occasion, those fighting for freedom, justice and progress prove victorious after decades of coalition building and the narrative is more nuanced. Examples include our stories from the U.S. Civil Rights movement. Or perhaps we lift up overlooked and forgotten stories, as demonstrated by The 1619 Project.


Until the latter half of the twentieth century, domination by “stronger” people over “weaker” people was accepted as “the way it is and will always be.” But 200 years previously, the Declaration of Independence had birthed a new consciousness by stating, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

These self-evident truths would provide hope for those oppressed around the world for much of the 19th and 20th century. With each passing year, the “domination consciousness” would be challenged and experience a thousand cuts. Now we find ourselves in an existential moment when “the way it has always been” is no longer sufficient for most people. The domination consciousness may well be the downfall of our species, as we impact our planet without consideration for our descendants.

Maybe it is time to recover our full history, the good, bad and ugly, by seeking and highlighting stories that are more helpful in developing a new consciousness of collaboration. We often think that “this is the first time we’ve ever experienced something like this.” However, there are always historical cycles and it is more likely that our ancestors experienced a version of what we are experiencing now.

When going into lockdown for the pandemic, I drew strongly on the stories my grandmother shared about the family homestead in Kansas during the Great Depression. Like many of us, I filled up the freezer and saved items I would normally trash, just in case it was useful later. I started a vegetable garden for the first time. The vegetable garden is still helpful, for yummy vegetables and peace of mind, so we keep it going. I/we feel grounded in the cycle of growth a garden provides.

These are the cultural and collective roots we need to be digging for; to inform ourselves of the values and identities that helped our ancestors survive and even thrive. Recently, I’ve come across two historical stories that provide a better context for how we might move forward together.

First is that of the Marbleheaders; the 14th Regiment of the Revolutionary War. This group of White merchants, free Black men and Native Americans fought for independence from Great Britain and are best known for ferrying General Washington across the Delaware, denying the British army his capture. Historically, we’ve forgotten that this mixed group of people joined in a common cause; their economic interests were better served by a new country. Their story reminds us of what we also learned in WWII. When we tie our economic interests together, we can face a common foe, like autocratic tendencies or fascism, and “mutually pledge our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor,” as did the signers of the Declaration of Independence.

The other story highlighted an early labor struggle in West Virginia in 1921. “The red-necks” were coal miners, wearing red bandanas around their necks. The mine owners had employed “private guards” to ensure the miners worked despite inhumane conditions. These red-neck coal miners were not monolithic, but White, Black and immigrant; joining a common cause of safe working conditions by unionizing. A mere three months after the Tulsa Race Massacre, these 10,000 miners took up arms against the mine owners, storming up Blair Mountain and into machine gun fire. The local sheriff used biplanes to drop tear gas, explosive powder and metal bolts. The US government sent troops to stop the miners’ uprising and oppressed the workers of West Virginia to protect “King Coal” and keep discord from spreading to other parts of the nation via worker’s rights. While this early attempt was crushed, their efforts were rewarded in FDR’s New Deal more than a decade later. Yet most people in West Virginia have never heard this part of their history. There are no tourist stops, plaques or reminders.

History is a story about our roots, our values and our identity. What we tell ourselves about our history is important – and all of our roots are part of the story, be it good, bad or ugly. History builds empathy through story telling of the lives and struggles of preceding generations. Once we understand the entirety of our collective past, it is easier for us to embrace it and acknowledge what has worked and what has not worked. We can stop spending energy in denial and shift from domination consciousness based in scarcity to compassion consciousness based in kindness. Only then, will we be ready for a future where we can fulfill our dreams of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness by lifting each other up to thrive, together.


Read More

The Future of DEI in Higher Education: Unpacking Recent Federal Restrictions
A group of people standing in a circle with their hands together

The Future of DEI in Higher Education: Unpacking Recent Federal Restrictions

This nonpartisan policy brief, written by an ACE fellow, is republished by The Fulcrum as part of our partnership with the Alliance for Civic Engagement and our NextGen initiative — elevating student voices, strengthening civic education, and helping readers better understand democracy and public policy.

Key Takeaways

  • Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs serve diverse student populations at colleges and universities across the nation. DEI programs in higher education have traditionally supported first-generation college students, students with disabilities, veterans, low-income students, and racial and ethnic minorities through offices, scholarships, cultural centers, and accessibility services.
  • Federal initiatives, such as TRIO or the Full-Service Community Schools program, are facing cuts to funding due to DEI-related federal policy, affecting students across the nation.

Defining DEI

From debates surrounding race-conscious admission policies to questions about the role and funding of identity-based student centers, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) has become a widely debated topic in higher education policy. DEI refers to institutional policies and programs–such as mentorship opportunities, cultural centers, and support programs–which improve campus climate and student access for underrepresented groups. Though many colleges and universities across the United States have developed DEI initiatives aimed at shaping student access and institutional priorities, recent legal and policy developments have raised questions about how these efforts align with federal law.

Keep ReadingShow less
Rear view of teenage boy walking with arm around friends

Why many young men feel politically and socially adrift, how changing gender roles affect masculinity, self-esteem, relationships, and the future of society.

Maskot / Getty Images

Lost Boys - What Is the Role of a Man in Today's Society?

A recent New York Times article stated that young males who provided an important swing vote for Trump in 2024 are discouraged by what Trump has done and not done while in office. But they are nevertheless not particularly inclined to vote Democratic because they don't see the Party as welcoming their view of masculinity and they don't know where they fit in this society.

These young men assume that because the Party supports equality for women in the workplace and because many young women no longer have marriage and having children at the top of their agenda, the Party would not be a welcoming home for them. They see themselves as striving for the masculinity of their fathers' or grandfathers' day, where the man was the breadwinner in the family and had respect and authority. Not the weaker half in relationships with women.

Keep ReadingShow less
Showing Up and Staying: Disaster Relief in an Age of Distrust

NECHAMA volunteers in Western North Carolina after Hurricane Helene.

Showing Up and Staying: Disaster Relief in an Age of Distrust

As the Atlantic hurricane season officially began on June 1, disaster response organizations across the country are preparing for the next storm. That preparation includes coordinating logistics, purchasing supplies, training volunteers, and strengthening partnerships. It now also requires planning for an environment shaped by misinformation, distrust, and competing narratives.

A recent 60 Minutes segment examining extremist groups in disaster zones highlighted how quickly public perceptions can form after a disaster. Recovery efforts are now followed by outside groups and online networks attempting to influence how events are understood while communities are still in crisis.

Keep ReadingShow less
How State Courts Can Help Deflect the Supreme Court’s Latest Blow to Multiracial Democracy

Black and white illustration of voters

State Court Report

How State Courts Can Help Deflect the Supreme Court’s Latest Blow to Multiracial Democracy

With its April ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, the Supreme Court delivered yet another blow to the Voting Rights Act, specifically Section 2, which governs race in redistricting. The decision was sad and utterly predictable, but still nothing short of astonishing. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the Court’s conservative supermajority, stealthily setting aside 40 years of legal precedent under Section 2 largely on the belief that racism is a thing of the past and extreme partisan gerrymandering is, in effect, a fundamental right of state lawmakers. Callais had a tortured path to the Court, a feature of the case that has undoubtedly been eclipsed by the lawless nature of the ruling itself, all of which reveals that the Supreme Court represents the gravest threat to multiracial democracy in the United States. (I argued as much in a law review article, predicting the outcome and analyzing the ways a Court gone rogue might get to that ruling.)

What’s more? In recent years, the Court has played fast and loose with a “principle” purportedly meant to limit chaos around elections, known as Purcell. But instead of limiting chaos, the Court’s Purcell jurisprudence will hasten and aggrandize the already-problematic impact of the Callais ruling. As the nation’s redistricting wars inevitably continue — in this election season, the 2028 presidential campaign, and even the next decade — state courts can help stave off democratic erosion by resisting the urge to invoke Purcell.

Keep ReadingShow less