Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Learning from Germany

Learning from Germany
Getty Images

Kevin Frazier will join the Crump College of Law at St. Thomas University as an Assistant Professor starting this Fall. He currently is a clerk on the Montana Supreme Court.

Jane Doe taught public school in Texas. She lived in Dallas with her husband, John, and their three kids. They lived a pretty good life but cracks in their collective well-being started to emerge. First, Jane no longer felt supported in her role -- curriculums changed, parents raged, and students disengaged. Second, John tired of debating politics, defending positions, and detailing to his kids why change wasn’t on the horizon. So, the Does traded football for futball and moved to Berlin, Germany. In doing so, they discovered America…only twenty years from now or so they hope.


I grabbed dinner with John in his new home of Berlin. Over veal meatballs he explained why America has so much to learn from Germany and why it ought to learn such lessons sooner than later.

First, John outlined the willingness of Germans to embrace their troubled past. He explained that Germans, though several decades later, have acknowledged that many, if not most, of their forebears were passive or active perpetrators in oppressing religious, social, and political minorities. Additionally, Germany has deliberately and extensively documented and memorialized their persecution and extermination of those populations.

John pointed to the “Stumbling Blocks” throughout Berlin, Germany as a whole, and Europe as an example -- these 4cm by 4cm bronze blocks lie outside of the homes of those who were forcibly taken and murdered throughout the Third Reich - each block identifies the residence and notes how and where they died. In comparison, John noted that his kids grew up with insufficient awareness of America’s own history in the enslavement and elimination of minority groups throughout its history.

Second, he explained the global perspective and lived experience of Germans. John detailed that although Berlin has a housing crisis like many U.S. cities, the community stepped forward in a big way to make sure refugees of the war in Ukraine could find shelter, comfort, and support. He also corrected the assumption of many Americans that Germany is a homogeneous place-- Nearly 20 percent of people living in Germany were not born there. With four kids in tow, John is keenly aware of the importance of introducing them to all the diversity Germany and, of course, Europe as a whole has to offer.

Third, John touted the adoption and respect for human rights demonstrated by the German public, government, and many other parts of the European Union. This point was of particular importance given his daughter’s recent transition from identifying with their assigned gender at birth. According to John, she likely would not have made such a transition or at least with as much support if she had attempted to do so in the United States. My own travels reaffirmed John’s observations - the EU flag flies prominently throughout Berlin and serves as a constant reminder that EU residents have made a commitment to celebrate the freedoms and protections to which every individual is entitled.

After each of us had finished our meatballs and bonded over even meatier topics, I couldn’t help but ask John when he planned to return to the States. He shrugged. Financially, he felt compelled to stay - his four kids could receive a free higher education here. As a parent, he felt a responsibility to expose his kids to Europe’s panoply of cultures, perspectives, and histories as well as to allow them the freedom to grow up in a place more welcoming of their ideas. As an American, he felt torn -- recognizing his desire to help the United States learn what Germany seems to have already picked up, albeit in fits and starts.

According to John, no German would tell you they have fully learned from the nation’s past; no German would pat the nation on its back for the progress it has made; and, no German would claim the people have fully sorted out how to deal with the tension of being a global, multicultural society that still retains a shared set of ideals. But, John makes a compelling case that Americans can and should look across the Atlantic to see how others are responding--often with great poise--to issues already on America’s doorstep.

I hope John returns. But more than anything, I hope those who travel abroad come home with more than Starbucks cups from their favorite city--America does not have a monopoly on good ideas, which means that we can and should engage in an exchange of ways to advance individual and communal well-being.

Read More

news app
New platforms help overcome biased news reporting
Tero Vesalainen/Getty Images

The Selective Sanctity of Death: When Empathy Depends on Skin Color

Rampant calls to avoid sharing the video of Charlie Kirk’s death have been swift and emphatic across social media. “We need to keep our souls clean,” journalists plead. “Where are social media’s content moderators?” “How did we get so desensitized?” The moral outrage is palpable; the demands for human dignity urgent and clear.

But as a Black woman who has been forced to witness the constant virality of Black death, I must ask: where was this widespread anger for George Floyd? For Philando Castile? For Daunte Wright? For Tyre Nichols?

Keep ReadingShow less
Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making
Mount Rushmore
Photo by John Bakator on Unsplash

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making

No one can denounce the New York Yankee fan for boasting that her favorite ballclub has won more World Series championships than any other. At 27 titles, the Bronx Bombers claim more than twice their closest competitor.

No one can question admirers of the late, great Chick Corea, or the equally astonishing Alison Krauss, for their virtually unrivaled Grammy victories. At 27 gold statues, only Beyoncé and Quincy Jones have more in the popular categories.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Trump’s mass deportations promise security but deliver economic pain, family separation, and chaos. Here’s why this policy is failing America.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

The Cruel Arithmetic of Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

As summer 2025 winds down, the Trump administration’s deportation machine is operating at full throttle—removing over one million people in six months and fulfilling a campaign promise to launch the “largest deportation operation in American history.” For supporters, this is a victory lap for law and order. For the rest of the lot, it’s a costly illusion—one that trades complexity for spectacle and security for chaos.

Let’s dispense with the fantasy first. The administration insists that mass deportations will save billions, reduce crime, and protect American jobs. But like most political magic tricks, the numbers vanish under scrutiny. The Economic Policy Institute warns that this policy could destroy millions of jobs—not just for immigrants but for U.S.-born workers in sectors like construction, elder care, and child care. That’s not just a fiscal cliff—it is fewer teachers, fewer caregivers, and fewer homes built. It is inflation with a human face. In fact, child care alone could shrink by over 15%, leaving working parents stranded and employers scrambling.

Meanwhile, the Peterson Institute projects a drop in GDP and employment, while the Penn Wharton School’s Budget Model estimates that deporting unauthorized workers over a decade would slash Social Security revenue and inflate deficits by nearly $900 billion. That’s not a typo. It’s a fiscal cliff dressed up as border security.

And then there’s food. Deporting farmworkers doesn’t just leave fields fallow—it drives up prices. Analysts predict a 10% spike in food costs, compounding inflation and squeezing families already living paycheck to paycheck. In California, where immigrant renters are disproportionately affected, eviction rates are climbing. The Urban Institute warns that deportations are deepening the housing crisis by gutting the construction workforce. So much for protecting American livelihoods.

But the real cost isn’t measured in dollars. It’s measured in broken families, empty classrooms, and quiet despair. The administration has deployed 10,000 armed service members to the border and ramped up “self-deportation” tactics—policies so harsh they force people to leave voluntarily. The result: Children skipping meals because their parents fear applying for food assistance; Cancer patients deported mid-treatment; and LGBTQ+ youth losing access to mental health care. The Human Rights Watch calls it a “crueler world for immigrants.” That’s putting it mildly.

This isn’t targeted enforcement. It’s a dragnet. Green card holders, long-term residents, and asylum seekers are swept up alongside undocumented workers. Viral videos show ICE raids at schools, hospitals, and churches. Lawsuits are piling up. And the chilling effect is real: immigrant communities are retreating from public life, afraid to report crimes or seek help. That’s not safety. That’s silence. Legal scholars warn that the administration’s tactics—raids at schools, churches, and hospitals—may violate Fourth Amendment protections and due process norms.

Even the administration’s security claims are shaky. Yes, border crossings are down—by about 60%, thanks to policies like “Remain in Mexico.” But deportation numbers haven’t met the promised scale. The Migration Policy Institute notes that monthly averages hover around 14,500, far below the millions touted. And the root causes of undocumented immigration—like visa overstays, which account for 60% of cases—remain untouched.

Crime reduction? Also murky. FBI data shows declines in some areas, but experts attribute this more to economic trends than immigration enforcement. In fact, fear in immigrant communities may be making things worse. When people won’t talk to the police, crimes go unreported. That’s not justice. That’s dysfunction.

Public opinion is catching up. In February, 59% of Americans supported mass deportations. By July, that number had cratered. Gallup reports a 25-point drop in favor of immigration cuts. The Pew Research Center finds that 75% of Democrats—and a growing number of independents—think the policy goes too far. Even Trump-friendly voices like Joe Rogan are balking, calling raids on “construction workers and gardeners” a betrayal of common sense.

On social media, the backlash is swift. Users on X (formerly Twitter) call the policy “ineffective,” “manipulative,” and “theater.” And they’re not wrong. This isn’t about solving immigration. It’s about staging a show—one where fear plays the villain and facts are the understudy.

The White House insists this is what voters wanted. But a narrow electoral win isn’t a blank check for policies that harm the economy and fray the social fabric. Alternatives exist: Targeted enforcement focused on violent offenders; visa reform to address overstays; and legal pathways to fill labor gaps. These aren’t radical ideas—they’re pragmatic ones. And they don’t require tearing families apart to work.

Trump’s deportation blitz is a mirage. It promises safety but delivers instability. It claims to protect jobs but undermines the very sectors that keep the country running. It speaks the language of law and order but acts with the recklessness of a demolition crew. Alternatives exist—and they work. Cities that focus on community policing and legal pathways report higher public safety and stronger economies. Reform doesn’t require cruelty. It requires courage.

Keep ReadingShow less
Multi-colored speech bubbles overlapping.

Stanford’s Strengthening Democracy Challenge shows a key way to reduce political violence: reveal that most Americans reject it.

Getty Images, MirageC

In the Aftermath of Assassinations, Let’s Show That Americans Overwhelmingly Disapprove of Political Violence

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination—and the assassination of Minnesota state legislator Melissa Hortman only three months ago—questions inevitably arise about how to reduce the likelihood of similar heinous actions.

Results from arguably the most important study focused on the U.S. context, the Strengthening Democracy Challenge run by Stanford University, point to one straightforward answer: show people that very few in the other party support political violence. This approach has been shown to reduce support for political violence.

Keep ReadingShow less