Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Mindfulness and elected leaders

Mindfulness and elected leaders

SEAN GLADWELL/Getty Images

It has been suggested by some that there is a little-visited intersection of mindfulness and healthy self-governance. While a seemingly new thought for those who feel we must be pragmatic, let's explore the concept with a "risk and reward" lens.

Mindfulness is a mental state achieved by focusing one's awareness on the present moment, while acknowledging and accepting (but not being captured by) one's feelings, thoughts and bodily sensations. Through various techniques such as meditation, or just regular exercise one can learn to be more present in the moment, i.e. more mindful.


With the seemingly endless new problems that the world faces at an accelerating rate, perhaps contemplation can meet action in a positive way.

Is it possible that through deep reflection — stepping back from the rhetoric, from the "I'm right, you're wrong" mentality — our leaders might legislate and govern more effectively?

Albert Einstein famously said we cannot solve problems with the mindset that created them.

"We shall require a substantially new manner of thinking if humanity is to survive." He went on to say that freeing ourselves from the "optical delusion" can "widen our circle of compassion."

As stated by the Garrison Institute, which is dedicated to inspired thinking and thoughtful action, "Contemplation — the practice of reflecting deeply — opens fresh possibilities for new thinking, and can be an indispensable part of the solution to today's real-world, human-created problems, from an epidemic of psychological trauma to global climate change."

The risk is negligible — a little time and ego invested in contemplation and reflection. The reward is quite substantial. Better thinking, innovative ideas and real-world solutions.

In the coming months The Fulcrum will explore spirituality and mindfulness within our Pop Culture section. Pop culture is not just trendy music, theatre or art. Pop culture is everything that impacts the culture of our society, and certainly religion, spirituality and mindfulness are immensely important to millions of Americans and thus critically important in determining how our society functions.

Enjoy this short, humorous video about mindfulness as former British Prime Minister Theresa May answers questions — and good-natured heckling — regarding the use of mindfulness as a tool for solving social issues. It is revealed that several members of Parliament and their staff attended a mindfulness workshop to increase their effectiveness.

https://vimeo.com/333330057

As always we encourage your engagement so please offer any ideas you may have as to the connection between spirituality and mindfulness on healthy self-governance and our democracy. You may email us at pop-culture@fulcrum.us.

Read More

Nicolas Maduro’s Capture: Sovereignty Only Matters When It’s Convenient

US Capitol and South America. Nicolas Maduro’s capture is not the end of an era. It marks the opening act of a turbulent transition

AI generated

Nicolas Maduro’s Capture: Sovereignty Only Matters When It’s Convenient

The U.S. capture of Nicolás Maduro will be remembered as one of the most dramatic American interventions in Latin America in a generation. But the real story isn’t the raid itself. It’s what the raid reveals about the political imagination of the hemisphere—how quickly governments abandon the language of sovereignty when it becomes inconvenient, and how easily Washington slips back into the posture of regional enforcer.

The operation was months in the making, driven by a mix of narcotrafficking allegations, geopolitical anxiety, and the belief that Maduro’s security perimeter had finally cracked. The Justice Department’s $50 million bounty—an extraordinary price tag for a sitting head of state—signaled that the U.S. no longer viewed Maduro as a political problem to be negotiated with, but as a criminal target to be hunted.

Keep ReadingShow less
Red elephants and blue donkeys

The ACA subsidy deadline reveals how Republican paralysis and loyalty-driven leadership are hollowing out Congress’s ability to govern.

Carol Yepes

Governing by Breakdown: The Cost of Congressional Paralysis

Picture a bridge with a clearly posted warning: without a routine maintenance fix, it will close. Engineers agree on the repair, but the construction crew in charge refuses to act. The problem is not that the fix is controversial or complex, but that making the repair might be seen as endorsing the bridge itself.

So, traffic keeps moving, the deadline approaches, and those responsible promise to revisit the issue “next year,” even as the risk of failure grows. The danger is that the bridge fails anyway, leaving everyone who depends on it to bear the cost of inaction.

Keep ReadingShow less
White House
A third party candidate has never won the White House, but there are two ways to examine the current political situation, writes Anderson.
DEA/M. BORCHI/Getty Images

250 Years of Presidential Scandals: From Harding’s Oil Bribes to Trump’s Criminal Conviction

During the 250 years of America’s existence, whenever a scandal involving the U.S. President occurred, the public was shocked and dismayed. When presidential scandals erupt, faith and trust in America – by its citizens as well as allies throughout the world – is lost and takes decades to redeem.

Below are several of the more prominent presidential scandals, followed by a suggestion as to how "We the People" can make America truly America again like our founding fathers so eloquently established in the constitution.

Keep ReadingShow less
Money and the American flag
Half of Americans want participatory budgeting at the local level. What's standing in the way?
SimpleImages/Getty Images

For the People, By the People — Or By the Wealthy?

When did America replace “for the people, by the people” with “for the wealthy, by the wealthy”? Wealthy donors are increasingly shaping our policies, institutions, and even the balance of power, while the American people are left as spectators, watching democracy erode before their eyes. The question is not why billionaires need wealth — they already have it. The question is why they insist on owning and controlling government — and the people.

Back in 1968, my Government teacher never spoke of powerful think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, now funded by billionaires determined to avoid paying their fair share of taxes. Yet here in 2025, these forces openly work to control the Presidency, Congress, and the Supreme Court through Project 2025. The corruption is visible everywhere. Quid pro quo and pay for play are not abstractions — they are evident in the gifts showered on Supreme Court justices.

Keep ReadingShow less