Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

The $2 Billion a Day Problem of Polarization

Opinion

The $2 Billion a Day Problem of Polarization
A person holding a stack of dollar bills that are flying away.
Getty Images, PM Images

What do a sausage maker and an insurance giant have in common? A growing concern about the divisions fracturing American society — and a willingness to do something about it.

At Johnsonville, recent research with The Harris Poll found that 82% of Americans agree there’s too much outrage in the country and wish we could “turn down the temperature.” The company’s “Keep It Juicy” campaign, voiced by actor Vince Vaughn, encourages Americans to reclaim everyday joy and civility. Meanwhile, Allstate, one of the nation’s largest insurers, has launched a three-year initiative with the Aspen Institute to strengthen trust in communities. Their message is clear: “Strong communities, businesses, and relationships are built on trust.”


These efforts reflect a broader trend: companies are no longer sitting on the sidelines while the social fabric unravels. From brand campaigns to cross-sector partnerships, more business leaders are investing in solutions — in their workplaces as well as communities — to rebuild trust, civility, and social cohesion.

And there’s good reason to act. In a 2024 study, SHRM found that U.S. employers collectively lose more than $2 billion each day due to lost productivity and absenteeism caused by toxic workplace behavior. These numbers reflect a larger national crisis: Americans are exhausted by division, and it’s showing up at the office, in customer interactions, and on company balance sheets.

While individual company initiatives are an important start, broader public solutions are also needed. One business-friendly response is the federal Building Civic Bridges Act (BCBA), which would support local initiatives that help Americans connect across differences and heal our social and political divides.

This bipartisan bill, recently reintroduced in the 119th Congress, has been endorsed by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Business Roundtable, Indiana Chamber of Commerce, and U.S. Hispanic Business Council. Business for America has rallied support from well-known brands like Cummins, ECOS, REI Co-op, Salesforce, and Sierra Nevada Brewing Co. The legislation would fund research-backed, community-based programs that strengthen civic connections and teach skills like active listening, respectful dialogue, and conflict resolution.

When it comes to ROI for business, the BCBA would generate a ripple effect far beyond civic nonprofits. It could help address three growing challenges:

First, frontline workers are increasingly subjected to the emotional fallout of polarization. According to the Harvard Business Review in 2022, 78% of frontline employees and managers say abusive behavior from customers has increased in recent years. SHRM reports that U.S. workers collectively experience 171 million acts of incivility every day — leading to burnout, low morale, and turnover. Reducing societal hostility helps protect employees and customer-facing operations alike.

Second, workplace culture itself is at risk. The political climate has seeped into our breakrooms and Slack channels. A 2024 SHRM survey found that 71% of U.S. workers report having polarizing, political, or controversial conversations at work and 87% of employers are concerned about managing divisive political beliefs. Left unaddressed, these rifts lead to toxicity, disengagement, and lost talent.

Third, division is not just bad for workplace dynamics — it’s a barrier to policy progress and economic growth. In a 2024 Gartner report, U.S. business leaders ranked political polarization as the second-highest emerging risk after generative AI. When Congress is gridlocked, the issues that matter to business — from workforce development to supply chains to climate resilience — stagnate. Bridging divides is not just a cultural issue; it’s a competitiveness issue.

Fortunately, Americans are ready for change. Nearly 80% say that, given the opportunity, they would help reduce divisions in the country. What they need are the tools and spaces to do so. The Building Civic Bridges Act would provide just that.

Whether through ad campaigns, community partnerships, or public policy, business leaders have a role to play in restoring civility and trust. As Johnsonville suggests, it’s time to turn down the temperature. As Allstate reminds us, where there’s optimism, there’s opportunity. And as Congress considers the BCBA, we urge more business leaders to raise their voice in support. Because the future of business — and American prosperity — depends on it.

Sarah Bonk is a civic entrepreneur and the founder/CEO of Business for America. She spent over 20 years leading strategy, design, and organizational change at Apple and American Electric Power. Today, she works with business leaders to help fix what’s broken in American politics.

Kara Revel Jarzynski is the Executive Director of Resolutionaries.


Read More

The Iran war could shape American policy for decades

U.S. forces patrol the Arabian Sea near M/V Touska on April 20, 2026, after firing upon the Iranian-flagged vessel that the U.S. accused of attempting to violate the U.S. naval blockade of Iranian ports near the Strait of Hormuz.

(U.S. Navy/Getty Images/TNS)

The Iran war could shape American policy for decades

The war with Iran that never really ended is back on. Like everybody else, including the Trump administration and the Iranian regime, I have no idea how it will end. But it eventually will, and how it will be remembered will matter enormously.

Politics is about many things, but whether you call it “spin,” “framing” or “narrative competition,” storytelling is never far from the heart of it. As the philosopher Richard Rorty observed, “Competition for political leadership is in part a competition between differing stories about a nation’s self-identity, and between differing symbols of its greatness.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Presidential powers: Corporate abuses big concern after SCOTUS move

An oil production operation is shown in North Dakota. With the U.S. Supreme Court granting more presidential powers to the executive branch, environmental groups warned key agencies will have a harder time going after polluters.

(Adobe Stock)

Presidential powers: Corporate abuses big concern after SCOTUS move

A U.S. Supreme Court opinion issued last month expands presidential power over independent federal agencies, prompting warnings from environmental advocates about potential implications for states such as North Dakota.

The court’s conservative majority said President Donald Trump had the authority to fire a former Federal Trade Commission member without cause. Legal observers countered the opinion nullifies longstanding precedent involving the role of Congress in insulating certain federal agency officials from direct presidential control.

Keep ReadingShow less
Federal Register Reports being printed out of a large machine.

Congress should strengthen the administrative state by writing clearer laws, limiting delegated authority, and requiring periodic reauthorization of agency powers.

Photo courtesy of Luka Jacobi-Krohn

Putting the Guardrails Back on Delegations of Power

Congress needs to write better laws instead of dismantling the administrative state.

Debates over the administrative state focus on whether these agencies have accrued too much power. Some argue that the solution is to severely weaken or, in extreme scenarios, dismantle these federal agencies. However, the issue is not the existence of these agencies but actually how Congress writes its laws. When statutes are drafted with vague language, agencies are left to interpret the scope, and courts are forced to set the boundaries. This results in constant litigation and generally regulatory instability. If Congress actually wants a more durable and accountable regulatory system, they need to start with themselves by writing clearer laws.

Keep ReadingShow less
Businesspeople walking in line across world map, painted on asphalt

America's immigration debate reflects a deeper question: Does America still believe in itself? A historical look at immigration, assimilation, and American identity.

Klaus Vedfelt / Getty Images

What Immigration Debates Reveal About National Confidence

America has spent 250 years arguing about immigrants.

But beneath the arguments about visas, walls, asylum claims, deportations, and border security lies a more uncomfortable question:

Keep ReadingShow less