Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

Congress Bill Spotlight: Requiring Public Schools Start the Day With the Pledge of Allegiance

News

​Pledge of Allegiance

The Promoting American Patriotism In Our Schools Act would require all public schools nationally to display the American flag and start the day with the Pledge of Allegiance.

Getty Images, Fuse

The Fulcrum introduces Congress Bill Spotlight, a report by Jesse Rifkin, focusing on the noteworthy legislation of the thousands introduced in Congress. Rifkin has written about Congress for years, and now he's dissecting the most interesting bills you need to know about but that often don't get the right news coverage.

A viral TikTok with 23+ million views, depicting what Americans do and don’t know, showcased a woman who could successfully recite the Pledge of Allegiance but didn’t know the solid form of water was ice.


What the bill does

The Promoting American Patriotism In Our Schools Act would require all public schools nationally to display the American flag and start the day with the Pledge of Allegiance.

However, any individual student could still opt out from the pledge for religious or personal reasons. That provision complies with 1943’s Supreme Court decision in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, which ruled 6-3 that Jehovah's Witnesses children could not be forced to salute the flag in school if it violated their religious beliefs.

The bill was introduced in February by Rep. Dale Strong (R-AL5).

Context

The Pledge of Allegiance states: "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

The wording was crafted in 1892 by author Francis Bellamy, who popularized it upon inclusion in the children’s magazine The Youth's Companion. Today, it’s most frequently uttered by schoolchildren in classrooms at the start of the day, though it’s sometimes also recited before sports games or at political campaign events.

Over the years, Congress has enacted legislation about the Pledge at least three times:

What supporters say

Supporters argue that the current bill would increase patriotic sentiment and love of country.

“Unfortunately, many children in today’s society do not know the Pledge of Allegiance. The values and symbols that make America great are being overlooked and ignored. It’s time we change that,” Rep. Strong told Alabama’s Yellowhammer News. “[The bill] ensures that every child grows up understanding and appreciating our great nation, its symbols, and its history.”

What opponents say

Opponents may counter that the bill’s aim already effectively occurs, since almost every public school already starts the day with the Pledge. A full 45 states have laws requiring schools to recite the Pledge, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

The only five states that don’t: Arizona, Hawaii, Nebraska, Wyoming, and Vermont. (Although since 2012, Nebraska has required it through a State School Board policy, even if not by an actual law.)

Other similar proposals

Democrats opposed or expressed concerns about some other recent “mandatory pledge” proposals, though for reasons that don’t precisely line up with the current congressional bill.

In 2023, Democrats expressed concerns about a Republican proposal for House Judiciary Committee meetings to begin with the pledge. But their concerns were largely over what they contended was Republican hypocrisy, with many GOP members saying the pledge yet voting to challenge the Biden-Trump 2020 presidential election results.

Also in 2023, Democrats voted against an Arizona Republican state bill to require the pledge in public schools. But their concerns were largely over the opt-out policy, which was more restrictive than this congressional version, only allowing opt-outs if a student was at least 18 or with parental permission for a minor.

That bill passed the state House by 31-29 but never received a state Senate vote.

A similar bill from 2021

While The Fulcrum was unable to find a version of this exact federal bill previously introduced, 2021’s Love America Act was at least similar.

It would have required public school students nationwide to read four different “foundational” American documents at four different grade levels:

  1. The Pledge of Allegiance in first grade
  2. The Constitution’s preamble in fourth grade
  3. The Declaration of Independence’s preamble in eighth grade
  4. The Bill of Rights in sophomore year of high school

The Republican-led bill never received a vote in the then-Democratic Congress.

Odds of passage

The current congressional bill has attracted 13 Republican cosponsors.

It awaits a potential vote in the House Education and Workforce Committee, controlled by Republicans.

Jesse Rifkin is a freelance journalist with the Fulcrum. Don’t miss his report, Congress Bill Spotlight, on the Fulcrum. Rifkin’s writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.

SUGGESTIONS:

Congress Bill Spotlight: Trump Derangement Syndrome Research Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: Congress Meeting in Philadelphia on Declaration of Independence 250th Anniversary

Congress Bill Spotlight: National Garden of American Heroes, As Trump Proposed

Congress Bill Spotlight: Preventing Presidential Inaugurations on MLK Day, Like Trump’s

Read More

Ingrassia Exit Highlights Rare GOP Pushback to Trump’s Personnel Picks

President Donald Trump speaks at a White House press briefing on Jan. 30, 2025.

Credit: Jonah Elkowitz/Medill News Service

Ingrassia Exit Highlights Rare GOP Pushback to Trump’s Personnel Picks

WASHINGTON — Paul Ingrassia withdrew his nomination to lead the Office of Special Counsel on Tuesday night after facing Republican pushback over past controversial statements.

While Ingrassia joins a growing list of President Donald Trump’s nominees who have withdrawn from consideration, many who have aired controversial beliefs or lack requisite qualifications have still been appointed or are still in the nomination process.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Revolution in Congressional Decision-Making
low light photography of armchairs in front of desk

A Revolution in Congressional Decision-Making

The dysfunction of today’s federal government is not simply the product of political division or individual leaders; it is rooted in the internal rules of Congress itself. The Founders, in one of their few major oversights, granted Congress the authority to make its own procedural rules (Article I, Section 5) without establishing any framework for how it should operate. Over time, this blank check has produced a legislative process built to serve partisan power, not public representation.

The result is a Congress that often rewards obstruction and gridlock over compromise and action. The Founders imagined representatives closely tied to their constituents—one member for every 30,000 to 50,000 citizens. Today, that ratio has ballooned to one for every 765,000 in the House, and in the Senate, each member can represent tens of millions (e.g., California). As the population has grown, representation has become distant and impersonal, while procedural rules have tightened the grip of party leadership. Major issues can no longer reach the floor unless the majority party permits it. The link between citizens and decisions has nearly vanished.

Keep ReadingShow less
Lasting peace requires accepting Israel’s right to exist

US President Donald Trump hailed a "tremendous day for the Middle East" as he and regional leaders signed a declaration on Oct. 13, 2025, meant to cement a ceasefire in Gaza, hours after Israel and Hamas exchanged hostages and prisoners. (TNS)

Lasting peace requires accepting Israel’s right to exist

President Trump took a rhetorical victory lap in front of the Israeli parliament Monday. Ignoring his patented departures from the teleprompter, which violated all sorts of valuable norms, it was a speech Trump deserved to give. The ending of the war — even if it’s just a ceasefire — and the release of Israel’s last living hostages is, by itself, a monumental diplomatic accomplishment, and Trump deserves to take a bow.

Much of Trump’s prepared text was forward-looking, calling for a new “golden age” for the Middle East to mirror the one allegedly unfolding here in America. I’m generally skeptical about “golden ages,” here or abroad, and especially leery about any talk about “everlasting peace” in a region that has known “peace” for only a handful of years since the fall of the Ottoman Empire.

Keep ReadingShow less
A child looks into an empty fridge-freezer in a domestic kitchen.

The Trump administration’s suspension of the USDA’s Household Food Security Report halts decades of hunger data tracking.

Getty Images, Catherine Falls Commercial

Trump Gives Up the Fight Against Hunger

A Vanishing Measure of Hunger

Consider a hunger policy director at a state Department of Social Services studying food insecurity data across the state. For years, she has relied on the USDA’s annual Household Food Security Report to identify where hunger is rising, how many families are skipping meals, and how many children go to bed hungry. Those numbers help her target resources and advocate for stronger programs.

Now there is no new data. The survey has been “suspended for review,” officially to allow for a “methodological reassessment” and cost analysis. Critics say the timing and language suggest political motives. It is one of many federal data programs quietly dropped under a Trump executive order on so-called “nonessential statistics,” a phrase that almost parodies itself. Labeling hunger data “nonessential” is like turning off a fire alarm because it makes too much noise; it implies that acknowledging food insecurity is optional and reveals more about the administration’s priorities than reality.

Keep ReadingShow less