Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Follow Us:
Top Stories

Congress Bill Spotlight: Requiring Public Schools Start the Day With the Pledge of Allegiance

News

​Pledge of Allegiance

The Promoting American Patriotism In Our Schools Act would require all public schools nationally to display the American flag and start the day with the Pledge of Allegiance.

Getty Images, Fuse

The Fulcrum introduces Congress Bill Spotlight, a report by Jesse Rifkin, focusing on the noteworthy legislation of the thousands introduced in Congress. Rifkin has written about Congress for years, and now he's dissecting the most interesting bills you need to know about but that often don't get the right news coverage.

A viral TikTok with 23+ million views, depicting what Americans do and don’t know, showcased a woman who could successfully recite the Pledge of Allegiance but didn’t know the solid form of water was ice.


What the bill does

The Promoting American Patriotism In Our Schools Act would require all public schools nationally to display the American flag and start the day with the Pledge of Allegiance.

However, any individual student could still opt out from the pledge for religious or personal reasons. That provision complies with 1943’s Supreme Court decision in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, which ruled 6-3 that Jehovah's Witnesses children could not be forced to salute the flag in school if it violated their religious beliefs.

The bill was introduced in February by Rep. Dale Strong (R-AL5).

Context

The Pledge of Allegiance states: "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

The wording was crafted in 1892 by author Francis Bellamy, who popularized it upon inclusion in the children’s magazine The Youth's Companion. Today, it’s most frequently uttered by schoolchildren in classrooms at the start of the day, though it’s sometimes also recited before sports games or at political campaign events.

Over the years, Congress has enacted legislation about the Pledge at least three times:

What supporters say

Supporters argue that the current bill would increase patriotic sentiment and love of country.

“Unfortunately, many children in today’s society do not know the Pledge of Allegiance. The values and symbols that make America great are being overlooked and ignored. It’s time we change that,” Rep. Strong told Alabama’s Yellowhammer News. “[The bill] ensures that every child grows up understanding and appreciating our great nation, its symbols, and its history.”

What opponents say

Opponents may counter that the bill’s aim already effectively occurs, since almost every public school already starts the day with the Pledge. A full 45 states have laws requiring schools to recite the Pledge, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

The only five states that don’t: Arizona, Hawaii, Nebraska, Wyoming, and Vermont. (Although since 2012, Nebraska has required it through a State School Board policy, even if not by an actual law.)

Other similar proposals

Democrats opposed or expressed concerns about some other recent “mandatory pledge” proposals, though for reasons that don’t precisely line up with the current congressional bill.

In 2023, Democrats expressed concerns about a Republican proposal for House Judiciary Committee meetings to begin with the pledge. But their concerns were largely over what they contended was Republican hypocrisy, with many GOP members saying the pledge yet voting to challenge the Biden-Trump 2020 presidential election results.

Also in 2023, Democrats voted against an Arizona Republican state bill to require the pledge in public schools. But their concerns were largely over the opt-out policy, which was more restrictive than this congressional version, only allowing opt-outs if a student was at least 18 or with parental permission for a minor.

That bill passed the state House by 31-29 but never received a state Senate vote.

A similar bill from 2021

While The Fulcrum was unable to find a version of this exact federal bill previously introduced, 2021’s Love America Act was at least similar.

It would have required public school students nationwide to read four different “foundational” American documents at four different grade levels:

  1. The Pledge of Allegiance in first grade
  2. The Constitution’s preamble in fourth grade
  3. The Declaration of Independence’s preamble in eighth grade
  4. The Bill of Rights in sophomore year of high school

The Republican-led bill never received a vote in the then-Democratic Congress.

Odds of passage

The current congressional bill has attracted 13 Republican cosponsors.

It awaits a potential vote in the House Education and Workforce Committee, controlled by Republicans.

Jesse Rifkin is a freelance journalist with the Fulcrum. Don’t miss his report, Congress Bill Spotlight, on the Fulcrum. Rifkin’s writings about politics and Congress have been published in the Washington Post, Politico, Roll Call, Los Angeles Times, CNN Opinion, GovTrack, and USA Today.

SUGGESTIONS:

Congress Bill Spotlight: Trump Derangement Syndrome Research Act

Congress Bill Spotlight: Congress Meeting in Philadelphia on Declaration of Independence 250th Anniversary

Congress Bill Spotlight: National Garden of American Heroes, As Trump Proposed

Congress Bill Spotlight: Preventing Presidential Inaugurations on MLK Day, Like Trump’s


Read More

Presidential powers: Corporate abuses big concern after SCOTUS move

An oil production operation is shown in North Dakota. With the U.S. Supreme Court granting more presidential powers to the executive branch, environmental groups warned key agencies will have a harder time going after polluters.

(Adobe Stock)

Presidential powers: Corporate abuses big concern after SCOTUS move

A U.S. Supreme Court opinion issued last month expands presidential power over independent federal agencies, prompting warnings from environmental advocates about potential implications for states such as North Dakota.

The court’s conservative majority said President Donald Trump had the authority to fire a former Federal Trade Commission member without cause. Legal observers countered the opinion nullifies longstanding precedent involving the role of Congress in insulating certain federal agency officials from direct presidential control.

Keep ReadingShow less
Private Prisons and ICE Exploit Loopholes, Harm Communities

Delaney Hall Detention Facility, Newark, New Jersey.

(Photo by Andrew Lichtenstein/Corbis via Getty Images)

Private Prisons and ICE Exploit Loopholes, Harm Communities

While Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) terrorizes Black and brown communities with racial profiling, kidnappings, inhumane treatment, fatal abuse, and killings, private prison investors are asking how ICE can detain more people to increase their profits. Private prison corporations have long profited from immigration enforcement, but they are expecting a financial windfall under the current administration. These corporations are politically and financially situated to rapidly increase detention capacity and cash in on the president’s goal of deporting one million people per year. Stopping these corporations from lining politicians’ campaign coffers is a necessary first step in ensuring that our government is accountable to the people it serves, rather than the corporations it contracts with.

ICE and private prison corporations have long had a symbiotic relationship. Ninety percent of ICE's detainees were already being held in facilities owned or operated by private prison corporations before President Trump began his second term. CoreCivic and GEO Group, two of the largest private prison corporations that lead the multi-billion dollar industry, have been contracting with immigration enforcement for decades. By 2023, ICE contracts accounted for 43 percent of CoreCivic’s revenue and 30 percent of GEO Group’s revenue. The majority of each corporation’s lobbyists have held government positions, and GEO Group’s board of directors “has extensive links with ICE.” The relationship between private prisons and ICE is the embodiment of the “'revolving door’ between the federal government and the private sector.”

Keep ReadingShow less
Federal Register Reports being printed out of a large machine.

Congress should strengthen the administrative state by writing clearer laws, limiting delegated authority, and requiring periodic reauthorization of agency powers.

Photo courtesy of Luka Jacobi-Krohn

Putting the Guardrails Back on Delegations of Power

Congress needs to write better laws instead of dismantling the administrative state.

Debates over the administrative state focus on whether these agencies have accrued too much power. Some argue that the solution is to severely weaken or, in extreme scenarios, dismantle these federal agencies. However, the issue is not the existence of these agencies but actually how Congress writes its laws. When statutes are drafted with vague language, agencies are left to interpret the scope, and courts are forced to set the boundaries. This results in constant litigation and generally regulatory instability. If Congress actually wants a more durable and accountable regulatory system, they need to start with themselves by writing clearer laws.

Keep ReadingShow less
Businesspeople walking in line across world map, painted on asphalt

America's immigration debate reflects a deeper question: Does America still believe in itself? A historical look at immigration, assimilation, and American identity.

Klaus Vedfelt / Getty Images

What Immigration Debates Reveal About National Confidence

America has spent 250 years arguing about immigrants.

But beneath the arguments about visas, walls, asylum claims, deportations, and border security lies a more uncomfortable question:

Keep ReadingShow less