Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

What is the Building Civic Bridges Act, and why support it?

The following entries were written by supporters of the Building Civic Bridges Act.

What is the Building Civic Bridges Act?

By Kara Jarzynski, executive director of Resolutionaries

In the early 2020s, a YMCA near Seattle was stunned when physical fights began breaking out between members over political disagreements. It became so bad, the YMCA hired consultants to train their staff in conflict resolution and planned a series of events to help bridge differences in the community. They asked their federal Representative for help.

Around the same time, in the same district, religious institutions were attacked. One was vandalized, another was burned to the ground, and at a third community, the faith leaders were assaulted. An interfaith event was held in response, bridging differences in the community and showing the solidarity and strength of a nation in which we have the freedom to live and worship as we choose. These leaders, too, asked their federal Representative for help.


The Representative who received these calls for aid, Representative Derek Kilmer (D-WA), was inspired by these communities working to come together in a culture of toxic polarization. On March 15, 2024, Rep. Kilmer - with bipartisan support from Representative Andy Barr (R-KY) - introduced the Building Civic Bridges Act. This common-sense bill proposes solutions to healing our nation that are both effective and empowering. It's inspired by how the U.S. spends tens of millions of dollars through the National Endowment for Democracy to support civic bridge building and foster social cohesion in other countries. Our government recognizes the critical importance of strengthening democracy abroad. It's time for that work to be done here at home.

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Please find here the thoughts of key national leaders speaking to the importance of the Building Civic Bridges Act as part of the solution to threats impacting national security, business and the economy, education and academia, faith and family, interpersonal relationships, and the institution of democracy itself.

Building civic bridges rebuilds American strength and security

By retired Gen. Michael Hayden, who served as director of the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency

A stable, prosperous democracy is a powerful one. America's democracy has been a tower of strength for all since the mid-20th century.

In recent years, however, this has changed. In 2021, for the first time, the United States was added to the list of "backsliding democracies" by the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, an esteemed intergovernmental evaluator. Americans' faith in our own democracy has faded, as well. According to a December 2023 Gallup poll, only 28% of U.S. adults were satisfied with the way U.S. democracy was working; and according to a 2023 Department of Justice statement, trust in the federal government has reached the lowest measure in its seven decades of polling. To help on this point, I serve as Chairman of Team Democracy's Board of Directors because I believe in their Candidate Principles for Trusted Elections pledge. This is a step, but it is not enough.

Foreign adversaries have taken advantage of cracks in the foundation of American democracy. Russia used social media disinformation to breed discord and divide America prior to the 2016 Presidential election—that is a statement of fact. Now, other adversaries are finding increasingly fertile ground to prey on our country's state of affairs—also a fact. Our enemies detect weakness in our political system and are ready to exploit it. We must come together as a nation.

Our democracy is fundamentally based on debate, dialogue, and the free exchange of ideas. Tragically, misinformation and polarization have made communication difficult and full of mistrust on all sides. We must rebuild our national strength and security by coming together to work out the differences that threaten to destroy our democracy from within and without. We must #DisagreeBetter.

The bipartisan "Building Civic Bridges Act" being introduced this month to the 118th Congress will help solve this challenge by supporting proven ways to get all Americans talking with each other again, a fundamental step to rebuilding America's strength and security. I give it my full support.

We face a crucial moment as Americans. We, as citizens, have the power to choose how we respond. The future of our country, our democracy, our security—and, indeed, that of the free world—depends on our ability to respond to challenges as one nation, indivisible, with freedom and justice for all.

To restore civility, colleges and universities can help build civic bridges

By Charles L. Welch, president of the American Association of State Colleges and Universities

At its best, the college experience creates profound opportunities for students to engage in the sort of civic discourse—and disagreement—that can prepare them for citizenship in a democracy. America’s college campuses play a critical role in supporting civic life in communities across the country that reflect the nation’s diverse and divergent ideas, beliefs, and experiences. They are home to the practice of democracy itself, teaching students how to engage in civil discourse, critical thinking, empathy, and the exchange of knowledge and ideas—hosting civic discussions, voter registration drives, First Amendment demonstrations, and even general election debates during presidential election years.

The American Association of State Colleges and Universities has long been committed to delivering on the civic and democratic promise of higher education for every student who seeks it. AASCU’s nonpartisan American Democracy Project, now in its 21st year, has worked with nearly 300 state colleges and universities to drive opportunities for millions of students to develop awareness and skills for civic engagement. Campuses that participate show steady increases in voting rates and provide a range of opportunities for students to engage in the civic and democratic process.

AASCU’s American Democracy Project is a powerful example of the impact of civic engagement at the local level. The bipartisan Building Civic Bridges Act, which would create a new Office of Civic Bridge Building within AmeriCorps, will invest in local programming focused on helping communities build relationships across lines of difference. On behalf of the more than 350 regional comprehensive institutions that are members of AASCU, we strongly urge federal policymakers to support the passage of this important legislation.

Building civic bridges supports business

By Richard Eidlin, national policy director for Business for America

As polarization has increasingly brought conflict into the workplace, business leaders recognize the urgent need for civic bridge-building. A 2019 SHRM study found that 42% of American workers experienced political disagreements at work, leading to lower work quality, productivity, toxic work environments, and turnover—at a price of $223 billion. As polarization has increased, so has the cost. A 2021 Harvard study showed conflict resolution pulls employees from their work an average of 3.5 hours per week (markedly up from 2.8 hours in 2008), impacting revenue by hundreds of billions of dollars.

The economic effects do not end in the workplace. Historically, increased polarization has created uncertainty about policy and government stability, delaying hiring and spending; and impeding growth. For example, the rise in polarization between 2007 and 2009 led to a 27 percent decline in corporate investment. In addition, increased polarization and stability often leads economic analysts to downgrade corporate credit ratings and increase interest rates. This played out last year, when Fitch downgraded the United States’ credit rating, citing the erosion of governance and repeated debt limit standoffs.

Fortunately, solutions to polarizations are learnable skills. That’s why Business for America, a national coalition of civic-minded businesses focused on a healthy representative democracy, and a sponsor of Disagree Better at Work (a program offering business-centered solutions to bridge divides), fully supports the bipartisan Building Civic Bridges Act (BCBA).

Congress must act. The ability to #DisagreeBetter is vital to our nation’s social cohesion and economic future.

Building civic bridges empowers deliberative democracy

By Cameron Lange and Alice Siu, Deliberative Democracy Lab at Stanford University

It's no secret that many people in our country have seen, felt, and experienced the effects of polarization in our society. Our elected officials are deeply divided along partisan lines, as evident with the inability to move forward with so many pressing policy issues. The election year has barely begun, and we already see campaign slogans that are aiming to divide, rather than bring our electorate together. But while this polarity has been documented in detail, what is not covered as widely are ways to heal the divide.

Studies show that healing this divide is possible, as seen in Stanford Deliberative Democracy Lab's, "America in One Room," a national deliberative experiment about the major issues facing the country. A nationally representative and random sample of 526 registered voters from around the country were brought together in Dallas, TX, for a long weekend of deliberations on important policy proposals, including the economy, health care, the environment, immigration, and foreign affairs. The group discussed 26 proposals divided across party lines, and by the end, Republicans and Democrats showed signs of lessening division on 22 of them. In just a few days, in one room, the sheer, simple power of conversation began to narrow differences and to bridge the divide. Further, the Lab will continue in summer 2024 with a Young America in One Room, bringing together high school students that are eligible first-time voters for this year's November election.

This work teaches us: we are not suffering from a lack of consensus as much as a lack of conversation. We need to empower and equip our youth, so they can participate and preserve our democracy. We need to empower and equip us all with the skills to do so. We must create a deliberative society that encourages thoughtful discussion across our deep divisions—and we must support initiatives that seek to do this work, such as the Building Civic Bridges Act.

We must do away with partisan conformity, one-sided argumentation, or a mere impression of sound bites and headlines. Only in building these bridges, in civil conversation, can we progress forward as a democracy.

Building civic bridges cultivates empathy and connection

By Tania Israel, professor of counseling psychology at the University of California, Santa Barbara and author of "Beyond Your Bubble: How to Connect Across the Political Divide, Skills and Strategies for Conversations That Work."

Are you stressed about our divided nation? If so, you're not alone. According to the American Psychological Association, over half of Americans say social divisiveness is a significant source of stress, and 29% say the political climate has strained relationships with family members. What's responsible for these ruptures? The culprit is affective polarization.

Republicans and Democrats question each other's intelligence, morality, and open-mindedness. Increasingly disgruntled by the idea of working with, living near, or having family members marry someone from a different political party, we sort ourselves into social bubbles. The desire to be with like-minded people, drives many to avoid holiday gatherings, change houses of worship,or consider a job change.

News, social media, and cognitive biases further cement our skewed perceptions of political adversaries and widen the divide. Given these forceful influences shaping our views, it's no surprise Americans are pessimistic and stressed.

Yet, I remain optimistic. Because I know of a power that's stronger than political parties, more enduring than social media posts, and more compelling than cable news: human connection.

When we communicate face-to-face, not Facebook-to-Facebook, our skewed perceptions can be corrected. When we share our stories rather than stats and slogans, we foster empathy. When we engage seeking to understand, we forgo stereotypes for common humanity. When we work together toward a common goal, we build trust. It is called bridge-building.

These interactions don't happen automatically. They need to be cultivated and supported. Fortunately, there's something brewing in Congress that can do just that. The Building Civic Bridges Act (BCBA) will support research, training, and grants to support bridge-building exactly what we need to heal our ruptures and fortify the human fabric of our country.

Building civic bridges serves faith communities

By Megan Rawlins Woods, director of nonpartisanship at Mormon Women for Ethical Government

A few years ago, my close friend chose to step back from his involvement with his church community. Oh, he still believed. He was still willing to serve and worship. However, he felt he was no longer welcome in his congregation because some of his political views were different from his coreligionists. Although their religious views aligned, politics were driving a wedge in their ability to worship together.

Faith communities have long been places where people form close associations of love and care, regardless of life circumstances. Religion provides a sense of belonging, purpose, and an organized way to serve the larger community. Unfortunately, societal divisions are changing that.

In 2018, The Deseret News reported that "political concerns can affect which church we attend, how faithful we are and whether we drop out of organized religion altogether." A 2022 survey by Religion and Politics showed that among those who have considered changing churches, a quarter of respondents said they have left or considered leaving their church because of political differences. These situations can damage social cohesion in a neighborhood or town.

People sincerely want to overcome division, but often lack the skills to engage in civil discussion. The Building Civic Bridges Act (BCBA) would provide ways to teach bridge-building skills, helping to repair the breaches in our social institutions. Although some church organizations will not accept federal grant money, these programs can be accessed through other civic organizations. The skills learned can then be transferred to faith communities.

Civic bridge-building activities foster respect, strengthen relationships, and forge a sense of common civic purpose, diminishing polarization. Our faith communities are hurting as Americans are increasingly emotionally alienated from one another. For the sake of our communities, MWEG urges Congress to pass the Building Civic Bridges Act.

Conclusion

By Kara Jarzynski

Our nation was founded on the freedom to dialogue, debate, and exchange ideas: integral to a thriving democracy. Therefore, building bridges and talking across lines of difference are vital, patriotic acts. Without them, our nation falters, with dire consequences to our economy, our national security, our communities, our schools, and our places of worship. The Building Civic Bridges Act is much needed legislation. It is a key component in a wave of local and national programs, responding to the need and desire of Americans to stop fighting over our problems, and start working together to solve them. Person-to-person, American to fellow American, the Building Civic Bridges Act is a powerful step toward revitalizing the civic fabric of our great nation.

These articles were originally published on AllSides and being republished with permission from the authors.

Read More

Treasury Secretary Bessent Foreshadows Trade Deals With Major Economic Partners

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent talks with Rep. Chuck Edwards, R-NC, after testifying in front of the House Appropriations Committee May 6, 2025.

Athan Yanos/MNS.

Treasury Secretary Bessent Foreshadows Trade Deals With Major Economic Partners

WASHINGTON – Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent attempted to reassure Americans about the state of the U.S. economy, despite President Donald Trump’s major economic changes and the instability they have brought to the stock market.

“In the first 100 days of the new administration, we have set the table for a robust economy that allows Main Street to grow with Congress and the White House working hand in hand. We expect to see even more positive results over the next few months,” Bessent told the House Appropriations Committee last week.

Keep ReadingShow less
Cancer Research in the U.S. Is World Class Because of Its Broad Base of Funding − With the Government Pulling Out, Its Future Is Uncertain

Without federal support, the lights will turn off in many labs across the country.

Getty Images, Thomas Barwick

Cancer Research in the U.S. Is World Class Because of Its Broad Base of Funding − With the Government Pulling Out, Its Future Is Uncertain

Cancer research in the U.S. doesn’t rely on a single institution or funding stream − it’s a complex ecosystem made up of interdependent parts: academia, pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology startups, federal agencies and private foundations. As a cancer biologist who has worked in each of these sectors over the past three decades, I’ve seen firsthand how each piece supports the others.

When one falters, the whole system becomes vulnerable.

Keep ReadingShow less
Surviving the Cold: How Private Hypothermia Shelters Are Stepping In for the Community in Washington, D.C.
Shifting the narrative on homelessness in America
Getty Images

Surviving the Cold: How Private Hypothermia Shelters Are Stepping In for the Community in Washington, D.C.

Walking up and down the metro escalators was the only way David Jackson could stay warm during the winter nights of 2021.

While Jackson knew he could call District officials to come pick him up in a van and drive him to a hypothermia shelter, he kept hearing negative experiences from others. According to the 2024 annual Point in Time study, which reports homelessness in the Washington metropolitan area, there are 3,960 people experiencing homelessness. However, findings show 1,778 beds available for homeless people looking for hypothermia shelters, which only offer overnight emergency housing without additional support.

Keep ReadingShow less
Policy Changes Could Derail Michigan’s Clean Energy Goals

New clean energy manufacturing plants, including for EV batteries, solar panels, and wind turbines, are being built across states like Michigan, Georgia, and Ohio.

Steve/Adobe Stock

Policy Changes Could Derail Michigan’s Clean Energy Goals

In recent years, Michigan has been aggressive in its approach to clean energy: It’s invested millions of dollars in renewable energy infrastructure, created training programs for jobs in the electric vehicle industry, and set a goal of moving the state to 100% carbon neutrality by 2050.

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and other state officials aim to make the Great Lakes State a leader in clean energy manufacturing by bringing jobs and investments to local communities while also tackling pollution, which continues to wreak havoc on the environment.

Now Michigan’s clean energy efforts have seemingly hit a wall of uncertainty as President Donald Trump’s administration takes ongoing actions to roll back federal climate regulations.

“We’ve seen nothing less than an unprecedented, all-out assault on our environment and our democracy,” said Bentley Johnson, the Michigan League of Conservation Voters’ federal government affairs director.

The clean energy sector has grown rapidly in the United States since President Joe Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022. Congress appropriated $370 billion under the IRA, and White House officials at the time touted it as the country’s largest investment in clean energy.

According to Climate Power, a national public relations and advocacy organization dedicated to climate justice, Michigan was the No. 1 state in the nation in 2024 in its number of clean energy projects; from 2022-2024, the state announced 74 projects totalling over 26,000 jobs and roughly $27 billion in federal funding.

Trump has long been critical of the country’s climate initiatives and development of clean energy technology. He’s previously made false claims that climate change is a hoax and wind turbines cause cancer. Since taking office again in January, Trump has tried to pause IRA funding and signed an executive order to boost coal production.

Additionally, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin announced in March that the agency had canceled more than 400 environmental justice grants to be used to improve air and water quality in disadvantaged communities. Senate Democrats, who released a full list of the canceled grants, accused the EPA of illegally terminating the contracts, through which funds were appropriated by Congress under the IRA. Of those 400 grants, 15 were allocated for projects in Michigan, including one to restore housing units in Kalamazoo and another to transform Detroit area food pantries and soup kitchens into emergency shelters for those in need.

Johnson said the federal government reversing course on the allotted funding has left community groups who were set to receive it in the lurch.

“That just seems wrong, to take away these public benefits that there was already an agreement — Congress has already appropriated or committed to spending this, to handing this money out, and the rug is being pulled out from under them,” Johnson said.

Climate Power has tracked clean energy projects across the country totaling $56.3 billion in projected funding and over 50,000 potential jobs that have been stalled or canceled since Trump was elected in November. Michigan accounts for seven of those projects, including Nel Hydrogen’s plans to build an electrolyzer manufacturing facility in Plymouth.

Nel Hydrogen announced an indefinite delay in the construction of its Plymouth factory in February 2025. Wilhelm Flinder, the company’s head of investor relations, communications, and marketing, cited uncertainty regarding the IRA’s tax credits for clean hydrogen production as a factor in the company’s decision, according to reporting by Hometownlife.com. The facility was expected to invest $400 million in the local community and to create over 500 people when it started production.

“America is losing nearly a thousand jobs a day because of Trump’s war against cheaper, faster, and cleaner energy. Congressional Republicans have a choice: get in line with Trump’s job-killing energy agenda or take a stand to protect jobs and lower costs for American families,” Climate Power executive director Lori Lodes said in a March statement.

Opposition groups make misleading claims about the benefits of renewable energy, such as the reliability of wind or solar energy and the land used for clean energy projects, in order to stir up public distrust, Johnson said.

In support of its clean energy goals, the state fronted some of its own taxpayer dollars for several projects to complement the federal IRA money. Johnson said the strategy was initially successful, but with sudden shifts in federal policies, it’s potentially become a risk, because the state would be unable to foot the bill entirely on its own.

The state still has its self-imposed clean energy goals to reach in 25 years, but whether it will meet that deadline is hard to predict, Johnson said. Michigan’s clean energy laws are still in place and, despite Trump’s efforts, the IRA remains intact for now.

“Thanks to the combination — I like to call it a one-two punch of the state-passed Clean Energy and Jobs Act … and the Inflation Reduction Act, with the two of those intact — as long as we don’t weaken it — and then the combination of the private sector and technological advancement, we can absolutely still make it,” Johnson said. “It is still going to be tough, even if there wasn’t a single rollback.”

Sign up for The Fulcrum newsletter

Keep ReadingShow less