Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Top Stories

What is the Building Civic Bridges Act, and why support it?

The following entries were written by supporters of the Building Civic Bridges Act.

What is the Building Civic Bridges Act?

By Kara Jarzynski, executive director of Resolutionaries

In the early 2020s, a YMCA near Seattle was stunned when physical fights began breaking out between members over political disagreements. It became so bad, the YMCA hired consultants to train their staff in conflict resolution and planned a series of events to help bridge differences in the community. They asked their federal Representative for help.

Around the same time, in the same district, religious institutions were attacked. One was vandalized, another was burned to the ground, and at a third community, the faith leaders were assaulted. An interfaith event was held in response, bridging differences in the community and showing the solidarity and strength of a nation in which we have the freedom to live and worship as we choose. These leaders, too, asked their federal Representative for help.


The Representative who received these calls for aid, Representative Derek Kilmer (D-WA), was inspired by these communities working to come together in a culture of toxic polarization. On March 15, 2024, Rep. Kilmer - with bipartisan support from Representative Andy Barr (R-KY) - introduced the Building Civic Bridges Act. This common-sense bill proposes solutions to healing our nation that are both effective and empowering. It's inspired by how the U.S. spends tens of millions of dollars through the National Endowment for Democracy to support civic bridge building and foster social cohesion in other countries. Our government recognizes the critical importance of strengthening democracy abroad. It's time for that work to be done here at home.

Please find here the thoughts of key national leaders speaking to the importance of the Building Civic Bridges Act as part of the solution to threats impacting national security, business and the economy, education and academia, faith and family, interpersonal relationships, and the institution of democracy itself.

Building civic bridges rebuilds American strength and security

By retired Gen. Michael Hayden, who served as director of the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Agency

A stable, prosperous democracy is a powerful one. America's democracy has been a tower of strength for all since the mid-20th century.

In recent years, however, this has changed. In 2021, for the first time, the United States was added to the list of "backsliding democracies" by the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, an esteemed intergovernmental evaluator. Americans' faith in our own democracy has faded, as well. According to a December 2023 Gallup poll, only 28% of U.S. adults were satisfied with the way U.S. democracy was working; and according to a 2023 Department of Justice statement, trust in the federal government has reached the lowest measure in its seven decades of polling. To help on this point, I serve as Chairman of Team Democracy's Board of Directors because I believe in their Candidate Principles for Trusted Elections pledge. This is a step, but it is not enough.

Foreign adversaries have taken advantage of cracks in the foundation of American democracy. Russia used social media disinformation to breed discord and divide America prior to the 2016 Presidential election—that is a statement of fact. Now, other adversaries are finding increasingly fertile ground to prey on our country's state of affairs—also a fact. Our enemies detect weakness in our political system and are ready to exploit it. We must come together as a nation.

Our democracy is fundamentally based on debate, dialogue, and the free exchange of ideas. Tragically, misinformation and polarization have made communication difficult and full of mistrust on all sides. We must rebuild our national strength and security by coming together to work out the differences that threaten to destroy our democracy from within and without. We must #DisagreeBetter.

The bipartisan "Building Civic Bridges Act" being introduced this month to the 118th Congress will help solve this challenge by supporting proven ways to get all Americans talking with each other again, a fundamental step to rebuilding America's strength and security. I give it my full support.

We face a crucial moment as Americans. We, as citizens, have the power to choose how we respond. The future of our country, our democracy, our security—and, indeed, that of the free world—depends on our ability to respond to challenges as one nation, indivisible, with freedom and justice for all.

To restore civility, colleges and universities can help build civic bridges

By Charles L. Welch, president of the American Association of State Colleges and Universities

At its best, the college experience creates profound opportunities for students to engage in the sort of civic discourse—and disagreement—that can prepare them for citizenship in a democracy. America’s college campuses play a critical role in supporting civic life in communities across the country that reflect the nation’s diverse and divergent ideas, beliefs, and experiences. They are home to the practice of democracy itself, teaching students how to engage in civil discourse, critical thinking, empathy, and the exchange of knowledge and ideas—hosting civic discussions, voter registration drives, First Amendment demonstrations, and even general election debates during presidential election years.

The American Association of State Colleges and Universities has long been committed to delivering on the civic and democratic promise of higher education for every student who seeks it. AASCU’s nonpartisan American Democracy Project, now in its 21st year, has worked with nearly 300 state colleges and universities to drive opportunities for millions of students to develop awareness and skills for civic engagement. Campuses that participate show steady increases in voting rates and provide a range of opportunities for students to engage in the civic and democratic process.

AASCU’s American Democracy Project is a powerful example of the impact of civic engagement at the local level. The bipartisan Building Civic Bridges Act, which would create a new Office of Civic Bridge Building within AmeriCorps, will invest in local programming focused on helping communities build relationships across lines of difference. On behalf of the more than 350 regional comprehensive institutions that are members of AASCU, we strongly urge federal policymakers to support the passage of this important legislation.

Building civic bridges supports business

By Richard Eidlin, national policy director for Business for America

As polarization has increasingly brought conflict into the workplace, business leaders recognize the urgent need for civic bridge-building. A 2019 SHRM study found that 42% of American workers experienced political disagreements at work, leading to lower work quality, productivity, toxic work environments, and turnover—at a price of $223 billion. As polarization has increased, so has the cost. A 2021 Harvard study showed conflict resolution pulls employees from their work an average of 3.5 hours per week (markedly up from 2.8 hours in 2008), impacting revenue by hundreds of billions of dollars.

The economic effects do not end in the workplace. Historically, increased polarization has created uncertainty about policy and government stability, delaying hiring and spending; and impeding growth. For example, the rise in polarization between 2007 and 2009 led to a 27 percent decline in corporate investment. In addition, increased polarization and stability often leads economic analysts to downgrade corporate credit ratings and increase interest rates. This played out last year, when Fitch downgraded the United States’ credit rating, citing the erosion of governance and repeated debt limit standoffs.

Fortunately, solutions to polarizations are learnable skills. That’s why Business for America, a national coalition of civic-minded businesses focused on a healthy representative democracy, and a sponsor of Disagree Better at Work (a program offering business-centered solutions to bridge divides), fully supports the bipartisan Building Civic Bridges Act (BCBA).

Congress must act. The ability to #DisagreeBetter is vital to our nation’s social cohesion and economic future.

Building civic bridges empowers deliberative democracy

By Cameron Lange and Alice Siu, Deliberative Democracy Lab at Stanford University

It's no secret that many people in our country have seen, felt, and experienced the effects of polarization in our society. Our elected officials are deeply divided along partisan lines, as evident with the inability to move forward with so many pressing policy issues. The election year has barely begun, and we already see campaign slogans that are aiming to divide, rather than bring our electorate together. But while this polarity has been documented in detail, what is not covered as widely are ways to heal the divide.

Studies show that healing this divide is possible, as seen in Stanford Deliberative Democracy Lab's, "America in One Room," a national deliberative experiment about the major issues facing the country. A nationally representative and random sample of 526 registered voters from around the country were brought together in Dallas, TX, for a long weekend of deliberations on important policy proposals, including the economy, health care, the environment, immigration, and foreign affairs. The group discussed 26 proposals divided across party lines, and by the end, Republicans and Democrats showed signs of lessening division on 22 of them. In just a few days, in one room, the sheer, simple power of conversation began to narrow differences and to bridge the divide. Further, the Lab will continue in summer 2024 with a Young America in One Room, bringing together high school students that are eligible first-time voters for this year's November election.

This work teaches us: we are not suffering from a lack of consensus as much as a lack of conversation. We need to empower and equip our youth, so they can participate and preserve our democracy. We need to empower and equip us all with the skills to do so. We must create a deliberative society that encourages thoughtful discussion across our deep divisions—and we must support initiatives that seek to do this work, such as the Building Civic Bridges Act.

We must do away with partisan conformity, one-sided argumentation, or a mere impression of sound bites and headlines. Only in building these bridges, in civil conversation, can we progress forward as a democracy.

Building civic bridges cultivates empathy and connection

By Tania Israel, professor of counseling psychology at the University of California, Santa Barbara and author of "Beyond Your Bubble: How to Connect Across the Political Divide, Skills and Strategies for Conversations That Work."

Are you stressed about our divided nation? If so, you're not alone. According to the American Psychological Association, over half of Americans say social divisiveness is a significant source of stress, and 29% say the political climate has strained relationships with family members. What's responsible for these ruptures? The culprit is affective polarization.

Republicans and Democrats question each other's intelligence, morality, and open-mindedness. Increasingly disgruntled by the idea of working with, living near, or having family members marry someone from a different political party, we sort ourselves into social bubbles. The desire to be with like-minded people, drives many to avoid holiday gatherings, change houses of worship,or consider a job change.

News, social media, and cognitive biases further cement our skewed perceptions of political adversaries and widen the divide. Given these forceful influences shaping our views, it's no surprise Americans are pessimistic and stressed.

Yet, I remain optimistic. Because I know of a power that's stronger than political parties, more enduring than social media posts, and more compelling than cable news: human connection.

When we communicate face-to-face, not Facebook-to-Facebook, our skewed perceptions can be corrected. When we share our stories rather than stats and slogans, we foster empathy. When we engage seeking to understand, we forgo stereotypes for common humanity. When we work together toward a common goal, we build trust. It is called bridge-building.

These interactions don't happen automatically. They need to be cultivated and supported. Fortunately, there's something brewing in Congress that can do just that. The Building Civic Bridges Act (BCBA) will support research, training, and grants to support bridge-building exactly what we need to heal our ruptures and fortify the human fabric of our country.

Building civic bridges serves faith communities

By Megan Rawlins Woods, director of nonpartisanship at Mormon Women for Ethical Government

A few years ago, my close friend chose to step back from his involvement with his church community. Oh, he still believed. He was still willing to serve and worship. However, he felt he was no longer welcome in his congregation because some of his political views were different from his coreligionists. Although their religious views aligned, politics were driving a wedge in their ability to worship together.

Faith communities have long been places where people form close associations of love and care, regardless of life circumstances. Religion provides a sense of belonging, purpose, and an organized way to serve the larger community. Unfortunately, societal divisions are changing that.

In 2018, The Deseret News reported that "political concerns can affect which church we attend, how faithful we are and whether we drop out of organized religion altogether." A 2022 survey by Religion and Politics showed that among those who have considered changing churches, a quarter of respondents said they have left or considered leaving their church because of political differences. These situations can damage social cohesion in a neighborhood or town.

People sincerely want to overcome division, but often lack the skills to engage in civil discussion. The Building Civic Bridges Act (BCBA) would provide ways to teach bridge-building skills, helping to repair the breaches in our social institutions. Although some church organizations will not accept federal grant money, these programs can be accessed through other civic organizations. The skills learned can then be transferred to faith communities.

Civic bridge-building activities foster respect, strengthen relationships, and forge a sense of common civic purpose, diminishing polarization. Our faith communities are hurting as Americans are increasingly emotionally alienated from one another. For the sake of our communities, MWEG urges Congress to pass the Building Civic Bridges Act.

Conclusion

By Kara Jarzynski

Our nation was founded on the freedom to dialogue, debate, and exchange ideas: integral to a thriving democracy. Therefore, building bridges and talking across lines of difference are vital, patriotic acts. Without them, our nation falters, with dire consequences to our economy, our national security, our communities, our schools, and our places of worship. The Building Civic Bridges Act is much needed legislation. It is a key component in a wave of local and national programs, responding to the need and desire of Americans to stop fighting over our problems, and start working together to solve them. Person-to-person, American to fellow American, the Building Civic Bridges Act is a powerful step toward revitalizing the civic fabric of our great nation.

These articles were originally published on AllSides and being republished with permission from the authors.

Read More

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making
Mount Rushmore
Photo by John Bakator on Unsplash

Following Jefferson: Promoting Inter-Generational Understanding Through Constitution-Making

No one can denounce the New York Yankee fan for boasting that her favorite ballclub has won more World Series championships than any other. At 27 titles, the Bronx Bombers claim more than twice their closest competitor.

No one can question admirers of the late, great Chick Corea, or the equally astonishing Alison Krauss, for their virtually unrivaled Grammy victories. At 27 gold statues, only Beyoncé and Quincy Jones have more in the popular categories.

Keep ReadingShow less
A close up of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement badge.

Trump’s mass deportations promise security but deliver economic pain, family separation, and chaos. Here’s why this policy is failing America.

Getty Images, Tennessee Witney

The Cruel Arithmetic of Trump’s Immigration Crackdown

As summer 2025 winds down, the Trump administration’s deportation machine is operating at full throttle—removing over one million people in six months and fulfilling a campaign promise to launch the “largest deportation operation in American history.” For supporters, this is a victory lap for law and order. For the rest of the lot, it’s a costly illusion—one that trades complexity for spectacle and security for chaos.

Let’s dispense with the fantasy first. The administration insists that mass deportations will save billions, reduce crime, and protect American jobs. But like most political magic tricks, the numbers vanish under scrutiny. The Economic Policy Institute warns that this policy could destroy millions of jobs—not just for immigrants but for U.S.-born workers in sectors like construction, elder care, and child care. That’s not just a fiscal cliff—it is fewer teachers, fewer caregivers, and fewer homes built. It is inflation with a human face. In fact, child care alone could shrink by over 15%, leaving working parents stranded and employers scrambling.

Meanwhile, the Peterson Institute projects a drop in GDP and employment, while the Penn Wharton School’s Budget Model estimates that deporting unauthorized workers over a decade would slash Social Security revenue and inflate deficits by nearly $900 billion. That’s not a typo. It’s a fiscal cliff dressed up as border security.

And then there’s food. Deporting farmworkers doesn’t just leave fields fallow—it drives up prices. Analysts predict a 10% spike in food costs, compounding inflation and squeezing families already living paycheck to paycheck. In California, where immigrant renters are disproportionately affected, eviction rates are climbing. The Urban Institute warns that deportations are deepening the housing crisis by gutting the construction workforce. So much for protecting American livelihoods.

But the real cost isn’t measured in dollars. It’s measured in broken families, empty classrooms, and quiet despair. The administration has deployed 10,000 armed service members to the border and ramped up “self-deportation” tactics—policies so harsh they force people to leave voluntarily. The result: Children skipping meals because their parents fear applying for food assistance; Cancer patients deported mid-treatment; and LGBTQ+ youth losing access to mental health care. The Human Rights Watch calls it a “crueler world for immigrants.” That’s putting it mildly.

This isn’t targeted enforcement. It’s a dragnet. Green card holders, long-term residents, and asylum seekers are swept up alongside undocumented workers. Viral videos show ICE raids at schools, hospitals, and churches. Lawsuits are piling up. And the chilling effect is real: immigrant communities are retreating from public life, afraid to report crimes or seek help. That’s not safety. That’s silence. Legal scholars warn that the administration’s tactics—raids at schools, churches, and hospitals—may violate Fourth Amendment protections and due process norms.

Even the administration’s security claims are shaky. Yes, border crossings are down—by about 60%, thanks to policies like “Remain in Mexico.” But deportation numbers haven’t met the promised scale. The Migration Policy Institute notes that monthly averages hover around 14,500, far below the millions touted. And the root causes of undocumented immigration—like visa overstays, which account for 60% of cases—remain untouched.

Crime reduction? Also murky. FBI data shows declines in some areas, but experts attribute this more to economic trends than immigration enforcement. In fact, fear in immigrant communities may be making things worse. When people won’t talk to the police, crimes go unreported. That’s not justice. That’s dysfunction.

Public opinion is catching up. In February, 59% of Americans supported mass deportations. By July, that number had cratered. Gallup reports a 25-point drop in favor of immigration cuts. The Pew Research Center finds that 75% of Democrats—and a growing number of independents—think the policy goes too far. Even Trump-friendly voices like Joe Rogan are balking, calling raids on “construction workers and gardeners” a betrayal of common sense.

On social media, the backlash is swift. Users on X (formerly Twitter) call the policy “ineffective,” “manipulative,” and “theater.” And they’re not wrong. This isn’t about solving immigration. It’s about staging a show—one where fear plays the villain and facts are the understudy.

The White House insists this is what voters wanted. But a narrow electoral win isn’t a blank check for policies that harm the economy and fray the social fabric. Alternatives exist: Targeted enforcement focused on violent offenders; visa reform to address overstays; and legal pathways to fill labor gaps. These aren’t radical ideas—they’re pragmatic ones. And they don’t require tearing families apart to work.

Trump’s deportation blitz is a mirage. It promises safety but delivers instability. It claims to protect jobs but undermines the very sectors that keep the country running. It speaks the language of law and order but acts with the recklessness of a demolition crew. Alternatives exist—and they work. Cities that focus on community policing and legal pathways report higher public safety and stronger economies. Reform doesn’t require cruelty. It requires courage.

Keep ReadingShow less
Just the Facts: Impact of the Big Beautiful Bill on Health Care

U.S. President Donald Trump takes the stage during a reception for Republican members of the House of Representatives in the East Room of the White House on July 22, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump thanked GOP lawmakers for passing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.

Getty Images, Chip Somodevilla

Just the Facts: Impact of the Big Beautiful Bill on Health Care

The Fulcrum strives to approach news stories with an open mind and skepticism, striving to present our readers with a broad spectrum of viewpoints through diligent research and critical thinking. As best we can, we remove personal bias from our reporting and seek a variety of perspectives in both our news gathering and selection of opinion pieces. However, before our readers can analyze varying viewpoints, they must have the facts.

What are the new Medicaid work requirements, and are they more lenient or more restrictive than what previously existed?

Keep ReadingShow less
U.S. Constitution
Imagining constitutions
Douglas Sacha/Getty Images

A Bold Civic Renaissance for America’s 250th

Every September 17, Americans mark Constitution Day—the anniversary of the signing of our nation’s foundational charter in 1787. The day is often commemorated with classroom lessons and speaking events, but it is more than a ceremonial anniversary. It is an invitation to ask: What does it mean to live under a constitution that was designed as a charge for each generation to study, debate, and uphold its principles? This year, as we look toward the semiquincentennial of our nation in 2026, the question feels especially urgent.

The decade between 1776 and 1787 was defined by a period of bold and intentional nation and national identity building. In that time, the United States declared independence, crafted its first national government, won a war to make their independence a reality, threw out the first government when it failed, and forged a new federal government to lead the nation. We stand at a similar inflection point. The coming decade, from the nation’s semiquincentennial in 2026 to the Constitution’s in 2037, offers a parallel opportunity to reimagine and reinvigorate our American civic culture. Amid the challenges we face today, there’s an opportunity to study, reflect, and prepare to write the next chapters in our American story—it is as much about the past 250 years, as it is about the next 250 years. It will require the same kind of audacious commitment to building for the future that was present at the nation’s outset.

Keep ReadingShow less